ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Bioelectromagnetics, SSY110, VT2010

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-05-07 - 2010-05-18
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 23%
Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

13 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»9 69%
Around 20 hours/week»2 15%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 1.76

- really low tempo» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

13 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 15%
75%»7 53%
100%»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 4.15

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

13 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 23%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 30%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»6 46%

Genomsnitt: 3

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

13 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»3 23%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»10 76%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.76

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

12 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»3 25%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»9 75%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 30%
Large extent»6 46%
Great extent»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»1 7%
Some extent»3 23%
Large extent»8 61%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.69

- I have not read any of them yet» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

13 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»6 46%
Very well»7 53%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- there are a lot of separated pdf files that is better to join together as a one or less than 3 files» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 30%
Very good»7 53%
I did not seek help»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

- i asked many questions and got the answers perfectly thanks» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

13 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 7%
Rather well»7 53%
Very well»5 38%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

11. How was the course workload?

13 svarande

Too low»1 7%
Low»2 15%
Adequate»8 61%
High»2 15%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.84

- almost all the time » (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 15%
Adequate»9 69%
High»2 15%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 15%
Adequate»5 38%
Good»4 30%
Excellent»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

- It is a way to high focus on guidlines. It is intersting and important but just to much of it. I was hoping for much more biologi. Much more science. It is a lot of quick views of studys made that generally conclude nothing and guidlines established. It seems to lack a little bit of substance. The laboration (nr 2) which is the only one I have done was really really boring. It could have been a demonstration. Suggestion: A lab where we looked at cells exposed to high intensity magnetic fields and studyed how they reacted. Or something where we looked at how much heat certain radiation generates in different types of media. The lab now is to much just writing down the result and to little making the conclusions. Really repetitive. » (Fair)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Labs»
- no idea»
- The guest lecture by I think she was called Anna who talked about tumour fighting with Microwave antennas. That was really interesting. Everything on biological effects due to fields and biological explanations to large studies. »
- The lab»
- The lab experiment.»
- Laboratory»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- nothing »
- Laboration nr two. Maybe something about laser therapy could be added? It is a type of therapy used in rehabilitation where you send laser beams into you muscles for example. Maybe a look at sonic rehabiliation could also be done altough its technically not included in electromagnetic. »
- Give more information on the texts that we need to read»
- The exercise part. More student participation is needed.»
- no»

16. Additional comments

- I have to say Prof. Yngve Hamnerius is really perfect and answer the questions perfect and patiently. some time he mix the solid subject with fun and this method help us to learn so fast. anyway Best regards....»
- I think deeper lab experiment and more student participation in exercise courses are needed.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från