Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Nonlinear and adaptive control, ESS076, VT2010

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-05-07 - 2010-05-18
Antal svar: 23
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 38%
Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

23 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 21%
Around 20 hours/week»9 39%
Around 25 hours/week»5 21%
Around 30 hours/week»3 13%
At least 35 hours/week»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.39

- due to sickness a part of the period» (At most 15 hours/week)
- my estimate is a bit on the upper side as i was a bit in consistent with my own schedule, due to assignments of the other course.» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

23 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 4%
50%»0 0%
75%»13 56%
100%»9 39%

Genomsnitt: 4.3

- i had to skip few lectures» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

23 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 17%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 4%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»8 34%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 43%

Genomsnitt: 3.04

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

21 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»19 90%
No, the goals are set too high»2 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.09

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

23 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 4%
Yes, definitely»3 13%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»19 82%

Genomsnitt: 3.78

- Please stop sending course evaluation sheets before the exam has passed.» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

23 svarande

Small extent»1 4%
Some extent»7 30%
Large extent»10 43%
Great extent»5 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.82

- The excercises were good, explained the use of the theory in practice» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

23 svarande

Small extent»2 8%
Some extent»9 39%
Large extent»11 47%
Great extent»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.47

- More relevant course literature!» (Small extent)
- The book doesn"t give much more than the lecturers» (Some extent)
- would have been nice if we had an e-book of the main book!!» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

23 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 8%
Rather well»15 65%
Very well»6 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.17

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

23 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»9 39%
Very good»12 52%
I did not seek help»2 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.69

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

23 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 4%
Rather well»10 43%
Very well»11 47%
I did not seek cooperation»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.52

11. How was the course workload?

23 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 8%
Adequate»12 52%
High»7 30%
Too high»2 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.39

12. How was the total workload this study period?

23 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 4%
Adequate»12 52%
High»6 26%
Too high»4 17%

Genomsnitt: 3.56

- Can"t say, I study 50%.» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

23 svarande

Poor»1 4%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»5 21%
Good»10 43%
Excellent»7 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.95

- Väldigt bra föreläsare!» (Excellent)
- Very good. Bo Egardt is one of the best teachers, if not the best, so far at the master program. And Mikael Thor is the best course assistant so far.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- guided excercise sessions»
- Matlab examples»
- the study visit on preemraff, or elsewhere»
- Bo and Michael...»
- computer exercises were good.»
- The study trip to Preem»
- The company visit.»
- class demonstrations, and industrial visit.»
- Bo Egardt and Mikael Thor»
- The visit to a company»
- Visiting preem»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Perhaps leave out some of theory covered in the first weeks»
- Reduce the number of topics in the course»
- some extra exercises during pss wont hurt...»
- I think it is better to change the course book, to all supplementary or lecture notes, because he concentrates only a little on the course book.»
- It would be nice to do the pendulum lab on a real pendulum instead of simulating.»
- I know its hard but sill there is a need of some way to explain certain concepts instead of equations on the board.»
- Make the inverted pendulum task into a real laboration.. not a computer simulation.»
- more problem sessions»

16. Additional comments

- By far one of the best courses I have taken so far!»
- some interactive environment in the class that makes students feel free to ask questions. currently teacher keeps on asking for questions, but hardly any one questions, this indicates that either every one understands every thing or nothing.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från