Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Environmental Risk Assessment in Engineering, MPEMA, VT10, BOM060

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-05-11 - 2010-05-28
Antal svar: 17
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 36%
Kontaktperson: Kathrine Jahnberg»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

17 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 23%
Around 20 hours/week»5 29%
Around 25 hours/week»2 11%
Around 30 hours/week»5 29%
At least 35 hours/week»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.64

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

17 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»2 11%
50%»1 5%
75%»8 47%
100%»6 35%

Genomsnitt: 4.05

- Conflicting classes» (50%)

3. much of the suggested course literature did you read?

17 svarande

0-10%»2 11%
About 25%»1 5%
About 50%»3 17%
About 75%»8 47%
90 - 100%»3 17%

Genomsnitt: 3.52

- no need to read the literature» (0-10%)
- Burgman seems often too detailed for me» (About 75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

4. What have been your main learning/accomplishments during the course

- the contents are too extensive,not sure which one is main learning outcome.»
- To do a risk assessment»
- A general understanding of the concepts, I dont belive that memorizing things is a good way to learn a subject but to understand "the system", "the concept" so I think that is my main accomplishment during this course.»
- more sensitivity to this topic, to see how to use different methods, party to much details about examples, hard to follow if you don"t have the specific background, »
- Assessing the risk to human and environment specially about soil and water.»
- How to do a Risk Assessment for Human and Ecological species.»
- software sada»
- I had the same course in the previous quarter. I wanted to improve that, but it was mainly repeating. »
- A practical approach to environmental problems. Group work and presentation practice. Application of statistics and logic.»
- SADA, risk analysis,hydraulic, soil remediation actions, fault tree and event tree,etc. »
- Risk assessment in detail,»
- it was some what interesting»

5. How understandable are the course goals?

17 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 11%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 29%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 58%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- I didn"t expect to face so much ecology!!! You cannot read this out of the course goals. It would be fine to have a braoder focus on engineering» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- But some of the goals was hard to learn during the course.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

6. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

16 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 6%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»15 93%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.93

- --> see above» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

7. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

15 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»4 26%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»11 73%

Genomsnitt: 3.73

Teaching and course administration

8. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»2 12%
Some extent»5 31%
Large extent»7 43%
Great extent»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.56

- To much fokus on the project.» (Some extent)
- Some lectures are hard to follow, depending on low voice and presentaions with dark background» (Some extent)

9. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»4 23%
Some extent»5 29%
Large extent»7 41%
Great extent»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.29

- The book is completely useless and the litteraure on the course page is in couple cases outdated.» (Small extent)
- The main part of the learning comes from the PW» (Some extent)

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

17 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 5%
Rather well»9 52%
Very well»7 41%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- Would be fine if the slides are availabel before the lecture» (Rather well)

11. What do you think about the lectures?

- it is good but too extensive and a little bit hard»
- It is to long to sit for lecture in 4 hours I think. It also feels like much is repetition from previous lectures or quite obvious. Otherwise good!»
- Handsome people»
- Good, sometimes to much focus on practical work, more theory would be nice, not such a strong focus on ecology»
- In general they were good, sometimes lot of information at the same time.»
- Good»
- Did not attend in most of them»
- Andreas lectures were too slow.»
- they are quite helpful»
- Some improvements are needed for guest lecturer"s lectures mainly!»
- they are good and helpfull with good knowldge»

Study climate

12. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

17 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 5%
Rather good»6 35%
Very good»9 52%
I did not seek help»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

13. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

17 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»7 41%
Very well»10 58%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

- It seems impossible to get everyone in the group to work, but I am quite used to it by now.» (Rather well)

14. How was the course workload?

17 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 11%
Adequate»8 47%
High»6 35%
Too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- It"s partly hard to know what is expected» (High)

15. How was the total workload this study period?

17 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»8 47%
High»6 35%
Too high»3 17%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

- I am also working on my master thesis » (High)
- Mamma mia!» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

16. What is your general impression of the course?

17 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»5 29%
Good»7 41%
Excellent»5 29%

Genomsnitt: 4

- A good course for undestanding Environmental issues on an Engineering basis» (Excellent)

17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- study visit»
- Project work»
- The course content and approach.»
- openness good presentation and slides (except one lecturer)»
- The friendly atmosphere of the course.»
- Doing a project»
- teachers »
- The Project!»
- the project work»
- Project work, course main goals,»
- there must be some more lucture note and the teacher have to give some time to the software untill the student undersad it very well»

18. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- the project content, not so clear what to do from begining»
- The long lectures.»
- slides before lecture, printout friendly slides, no dark background more generality towards engineering»
- Less workload and lecture»
- In general, if possible try to simplify the approach to learn the main concepts and then go into details»
- No change in project at last minute»
- probably omitting the parts that has been gone through in the course called risk in engineering»
- Andreas lectures. Clearer how the exam will be.»
- not yet»
- Guest lecturer"s lectures!»
- there must be some more lucture note and the teacher have to give some time to the software untill the student undersad it very well»
- Don"t let Tommy lecture 4 hours in a row!!»

19. Additional comments

- try to shrink the project,it is too big»
- I dont think i like this course that much. Risk control in engineering was much better course.»
- :-)»
- N/A»
- it was so nice i had with the course but one thing was confuse me always .. the course include every part for example some time it enviromental some time it come to geotechnical and some time even water therefor it better to pull it up in one direction i think , ofcourse it give alot of d/f knowldge but it confuse at the same time.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från