|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Environmental Risk Assessment in Engineering, MPEMA, VT10, BOM060Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2010-05-11 - 2010-05-28 Antal svar: 17 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 36% Kontaktperson: Kathrine Jahnberg»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.64 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.05 - Conflicting classes» (50%) 3. much of the suggested course literature did you read?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.52 - no need to read the literature» (0-10%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.4. What have been your main learning/accomplishments during the course- the contents are too extensive,not sure which one is main learning outcome.»- To do a risk assessment» - A general understanding of the concepts, I dont belive that memorizing things is a good way to learn a subject but to understand "the system", "the concept" so I think that is my main accomplishment during this course.» - more sensitivity to this topic, to see how to use different methods, party to much details about examples, hard to follow if you don"t have the specific background, » - Assessing the risk to human and environment specially about soil and water.» - How to do a Risk Assessment for Human and Ecological species.» - software sada» - I had the same course in the previous quarter. I wanted to improve that, but it was mainly repeating. » - A practical approach to environmental problems. Group work and presentation practice. Application of statistics and logic.» - SADA, risk analysis,hydraulic, soil remediation actions, fault tree and event tree,etc. » - Risk assessment in detail,» - it was some what interesting» 5. How understandable are the course goals?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.35 - I didn"t expect to face so much ecology!!! You cannot read this out of the course goals. It would be fine to have a braoder focus on engineering» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer) 6. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.93 - --> see above» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable) 7. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?15 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.73 Teaching and course administration8. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.56 - To much fokus on the project.» (Some extent) 9. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.29 - The book is completely useless and the litteraure on the course page is in couple cases outdated.» (Small extent) 10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.35 - Would be fine if the slides are availabel before the lecture» (Rather well) 11. What do you think about the lectures?- it is good but too extensive and a little bit hard»- It is to long to sit for lecture in 4 hours I think. It also feels like much is repetition from previous lectures or quite obvious. Otherwise good!» - Handsome people» - Good, sometimes to much focus on practical work, more theory would be nice, not such a strong focus on ecology» - In general they were good, sometimes lot of information at the same time.» - Good» - Did not attend in most of them» - Andreas lectures were too slow.» - they are quite helpful» - Some improvements are needed for guest lecturer"s lectures mainly!» - they are good and helpfull with good knowldge» Study climate12. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.58 13. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.58 - It seems impossible to get everyone in the group to work, but I am quite used to it by now.» (Rather well) 14. How was the course workload?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.35 - It"s partly hard to know what is expected» (High) 15. How was the total workload this study period?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.7 - I am also working on my master thesis » (High) Summarizing questions16. What is your general impression of the course?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 - A good course for undestanding Environmental issues on an Engineering basis» (Excellent) 17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- study visit»- Project work» - The course content and approach.» - openness good presentation and slides (except one lecturer)» - The friendly atmosphere of the course.» - Doing a project» - teachers » - The Project!» - the project work» - Project work, course main goals,» - there must be some more lucture note and the teacher have to give some time to the software untill the student undersad it very well» 18. What should definitely be changed to next year?- the project content, not so clear what to do from begining»- The long lectures.» - slides before lecture, printout friendly slides, no dark background more generality towards engineering» - Less workload and lecture» - In general, if possible try to simplify the approach to learn the main concepts and then go into details» - No change in project at last minute» - probably omitting the parts that has been gone through in the course called risk in engineering» - Andreas lectures. Clearer how the exam will be.» - not yet» - Guest lecturer"s lectures!» - there must be some more lucture note and the teacher have to give some time to the software untill the student undersad it very well» - Don"t let Tommy lecture 4 hours in a row!!» 19. Additional comments- try to shrink the project,it is too big»- I dont think i like this course that much. Risk control in engineering was much better course.» - :-)» - N/A» - it was so nice i had with the course but one thing was confuse me always .. the course include every part for example some time it enviromental some time it come to geotechnical and some time even water therefor it better to pull it up in one direction i think , ofcourse it give alot of d/f knowldge but it confuse at the same time.»
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23%