ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Physics beyond the standard model, FUF080

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-04-01 - 2010-06-01
Antal svar: 5
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Gabriele Ferretti»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

5 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 2 40%

Around 20 hours/week» 2 40%

Around 25 hours/week» 1 20%

Around 30 hours/week» 0 0%

At least 35 hours/week» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.8

- The time spent on the course the first few weeks was very low though and the toughness of the course grew exponentially.» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

5 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 0 0%

75%» 2 40%

100%» 3 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

- I was sick during the last part of the course» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

5 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 1 20%

The goals are difficult to understand» 0 0%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 0 0%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 4 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

4 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 4 100%

No, the goals are set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

4 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 1 25%

Yes, definitely» 2 50%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3

- "Make predictions for scattering experiments in simple supersymmetric models." Well, this we did not discuss much.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 2 40%

Large extent» 1 20%

Great extent» 2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Personally I had seen a lot of the material before, but I believe the teaching was very good.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 5 100%

Large extent» 0 0%

Great extent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

5 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 0 0%

Rather well» 4 80%

Very well» 1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

5 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 2 40%

Very good» 3 60%

I did not seek help» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

5 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 1 20%

Rather well» 1 20%

Very well» 2 40%

I did not seek cooperation» 1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

11. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 2 40%

Adequate» 2 40%

High» 1 20%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- Too low the first weeks. Too high the last week (home exam 2).» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

5 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 1 20%

Adequate» 2 40%

High» 2 40%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 1 20%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 2 40%

Excellent» 2 40%

Genomsnitt: 4

- The first course to (finally) examine the standard model and explain what is meant by "gauge theories", something alluded to by almost 2 years of previous courses.» (Excellent)

14. What should be preserved to next year?

- homework and nice of lectuer»
- The teacher.»
- The standard model introduction.»
- The lecturer!»

15. What should be changed to next year?

- maybe more detail and development of standard model»
- Give better questions on the SUSY part of the course. Higher workload the first weeks.»
- Less accelerator physics.»
- more focus on SUSY, maybe make it over 2 periodes!»

16. Additional comments

- not that easy to grasp all the details»
- Awesome!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från