ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Autonomous agents, (theory part), FFR125

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-03-29 - 2010-04-14
Antal svar: 12
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 37%
Kontaktperson: Mattias Wahde»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Teaching

1. How do you rate the lectures?

Please write a comment.

12 svarande

Not good at all» 0 0%

Not so good» 0 0%

Neither good nor bad» 0 0%

Good» 9 75%

Very good» 3 25%

Genomsnitt: 4.25 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The lecturer really knows what is he teaching» (Good)
- the use of both blackboard and slides was perfect» (Very good)

2. To what extent have the lectures been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Not at all» 1 8%

Some extent» 4 33%

Large extent» 4 33%

Very large extent» 3 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.75 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The lectures don"t add much to the lecture notes.» (Some extent)
- Since the litteraure covers mostly all of the course the lectures was mostly a support.» (Some extent)
- Since the litteraure covers mostly all of the course the lectures was mostly a support.» (Some extent)
- The lectures had pretty much the same content as the book, but it is sometimes easier to understand when the stuff is explained face to face.» (Large extent)

3. To what extent have the home problems been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 2 16%

Large extent» 3 25%

Very large extent» 7 58%

Genomsnitt: 3.41 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The GPRSim problems are just silly. Understanding and using the simulator takes more time than solving the problems. » (Some extent)
- Home problems gives a better and more lasting understanding of the course contents.» (Large extent)
- Good mix of high and low complexity problems.» (Very large extent)
- Good mix of high and low complexity of problems.» (Very large extent)

4. What is your impression of the course literature?

Course literature: Lecture notes, slides, and scientific papers

12 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Poor» 0 0%

Average» 3 25%

Good» 4 33%

Very good» 5 41%

Genomsnitt: 4.16 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Very focused towards this specific course with few deepening possabilities. » (Average)
- Very focused towards this specific course with few deepening possabilities. » (Average)
- A bit too much text, but good in general.» (Good)
- The lectutenotes were very good and easy to read.» (Very good)
- Sometimes incomplete compared to the material discussed in class, but overall very good» (Very good)

5. How well did the course administration, web page, communication etc. work?

12 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 0 0%

Rather well» 8 66%

Very well» 4 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The lecture notes could be uploaded before the lecture, as well as the litterature could be given in advance.» (Rather well)
- The lecture notes could be uploaded before the lecture, as well as the litterature could be given in advance.» (Rather well)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.58

Your own efforts

6. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

Hours per week include time in lectures, reading the course literature, working with home problems etc.

12 svarande

At most 15 hours» 2 16%

About 20 hours» 7 58%

About 25 hours» 2 16%

At least 30 hours» 1 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.16 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

7. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

12 svarande

Less than 20%» 1 8%

20-40%» 0 0%

41-60%» 1 8%

61-80%» 4 33%

More than 80%» 6 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.16 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.16

Study climate

8. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help during the course?

12 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 3 25%

Very good» 7 58%

I did not seek help» 2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.91 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

9. How was the course workload?

12 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 5 41%

High» 5 41%

Too high» 2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.75 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Since the course is split over two periods it"s no problem to cope the workload.» (Adequate)
- Since the course is split over two periods it"s no problem to cope the workload.» (Adequate)
- Homeproblems and exam and project is a bit much. Just homeproblems and project would be enough.» (Too high)
- the course is divided in two parts, so the expected workload was less. With that workload the course should be worthed at least 10.5 cr» (Too high)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.83

Course goals, level of difficulty, exam

10. How understandable are the course goals?

Note that a description of the course contents was given in the first lecture. You may wish to revisit the slides from that lecture.

12 svarande

Not at all understandable» 0 0%

Somewhat understandable» 2 16%

Completely understandable» 10 83%

Genomsnitt: 2.83 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- in many questions we were asked for too detailed answers, it is very unlikely that in real-life we will have to use this knowledge without double check with a book, so it is a waste of effort to memorize all the formulas, the outcome from the course should be to learn how to use them. » (Somewhat understandable)

11. Is the level of difficulty of the course reasonable, considering your background and the number of credits?

12 svarande

No, the level is too low» 1 8%

Yes, the level is reasonable» 10 83%

No, the level is too high» 1 8%

Genomsnitt: 2

- I consider some things easier and some harder. Hard to have a course with such wide range of topics and keep all of them on a good level for all students.» (Yes, the level is reasonable)
- It is a bit to high considering the credits, but not my background (chemical engineering with physics)» (No, the level is too high)

12. Did the exam reflect the contents of the course?

12 svarande

Not at all» 0 0%

No» 0 0%

To some extent» 1 8%

Yes» 11 91%

Yes, completely» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.91 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

13. Did the examination as a whole assess whether you have reached the goals?

The course was examined in two parts:

Home problems (25p)
Exam (25p)

12 svarande

No, not at all» 1 8%

Yes, to some extent» 4 33%

Yes, definitely» 7 58%

Genomsnitt: 2.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The combination of home problems and exam + robotic project is perfect!» (Yes, definitely)
- The combination of home problems and exam + robotic project is perfect!» (Yes, definitely)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.08

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

12 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Poor» 0 0%

Average» 2 16%

Good» 7 58%

Very Good» 3 25%

Genomsnitt: 4.08 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It is fun, but the level is just too low.» (Average)
- A verry nice cource but the exam was harder than expected.» (Very Good)

15. Is there anything you think should be changed until next year?

- Personally I would have liked to learn how neural networks are used in robotics and skip the image processing (though the IP was fun). »
- Afternoon lectures.»
- Remove GPRSim, it is a horrible program even if it is reprogrammed to use xml files as input. Who wants to program a robot with xml???»
- Publish the all of the course litterature from start. Upload lecture notes before every lecture.»
- Publish the all of the course litterature from start. Upload lecture notes before every lecture.»
- not realy»
- Given the workload and the fact that the course runs over two quarters the 7.5 hp might be abit low. But i still like my courses to be hard and extensive so i guess it is ok»
- The course seems to give an overview of a lot of topics but no deep insight. The home problems sometimes focused on the mathematical details of simple concepts, and while that was helpful I felt that it wasn"t enough to make this course live up to what I thought it would be»
- the project should be part of the grading»
- moderate the workload. onle less set of HP. Give more importance to the 2nd part of the course»

16. Would you recommend this course to other students? Why?

- Yes. It is fun and interesting»
- Yes, it was interesting and spanned a number of areas that are also applicable to other subjects.»
- Yes because it is fun, but please remove the GPRSim program!»
- Yes, intresting field of research. Also fun home problems and practical part of the course. »
- Yes, interesting field of research. Also fun home problems and practical part of the course. »
- yes, because the content of the course is very good»
- Yes, it covers lots of different and useful topics»
- it is very interesting to use real/simulated robots»

17. Which areas do you think should be covered in more (or less) depth?

Topics covered: Autonomous robots, kinematics and dynamics, animal behavior, robotic behaviors (exploration, navigation and localization),
human-robot interaction, utility, decision-making

- As I said, maybe the human robot-interaction could have been skipped, it is very shallow anyway. Though fun and interesting.»
- Less kinematics and dynamics. More of the rest.»
- The course could be more focused towards animal behaviors contra robotic behaviors with decision making and the concept of utility. The image processing part could be removed since it is such a huge topic and there are separate course in this field. Personally I could have seen that the kinematics and dynamics part could be put as prerequests for the course.»
- The course could be more focused towards animal behaviors contra robotic behaviors with decision making and the concept of utility. The image processing part could be removed since it is such a huge topic and there are separate course in this field. Personally I could have seen that the kinematics and dynamics part could be put as prerequest for the course.»
- More decision making and robot brain stuff (robotic behaviours) Less kinematics and dynamics.»
- I think kinematics and dynamics was given much more attention that it deserved, while real issues related to the design of robotic brains were somewhat skimmed through with no or little detail (animal behavior, HRI). I would"ve preferred a more exploratory approach to these last topics, even if that meant replacing the exam with a project or more assignments, but at least something that lets us learn and get creative in these areas. All we did was somewhat direct applications»
- more animal behavior and robotic behaviors and less of kinematics and dynamics»

18. Additional comments

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.08

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.48
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.73

Kursutvärderingssystem från