Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

TUP2010, BOM040

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-03-25 - 2010-04-20
Antal svar: 19
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 38%
Kontaktperson: Gunnar Lanner»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Klass: Övriga
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Övriga studenter

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

19 svarande

<15 hours/week»7 36%
Around 20 hours/week»9 47%
Around 30 hours/week»2 10%
Around 40 hours/week»1 5%
>50 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.84

2. Attendance on lectures

How many per cent of the lectures did you attend?

19 svarande

<25%»1 5%
25-50%»2 10%
50-75%»4 21%
>75%»12 63%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- Difficult to understand aim and structure of lectures. Difficult to follow notes on black board, sometimes a bit messy.» (<25%)

Teaching and course administration

3. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent»3 15%
Some extent»2 10%
Large extent»9 47%
Great extent»5 26%

Genomsnitt: 2.84

4. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent»5 26%
Some extent»7 36%
Large extent»7 36%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.1

- It was just chapter five that was good in that book.» (Small extent)
- Didn"t open the book until studying for the exam. Boring layout of the book which makes it difficult to read.» (Small extent)
- The coursebook was not so good, I did not read so much in it» (Small extent)

5. Was the course literature worth its price?

Do you consider that the course literature was worth its price? As a guideline the student union at Chalmers has set is at 70 sKr/hp.

19 svarande

1 (not worth it)»0 0%
6 42%
5 35%
3 21%
5 (well worth it)»0 0%
Did not buy the litterature»5

Genomsnitt: 2.78

- Had some use of it when studying for the exam but too expensive.» (2)

6. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

19 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 10%
Rather well»10 52%
Very well»7 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.26

- Poor information of what to present when doing the the assignment presentations. » (Rather badly)
- All the assignments should be on the course homepage.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

7. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

19 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»17 89%
I did not seek help»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 4.1

8. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

19 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 5%
Rather well»4 21%
Very well»14 73%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

9. How was the course workload?

19 svarande

1 (Too low)»2 10%
0 0%
14 73%
3 15%
5 (Too high)»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.94

- Many assignments.» (3)

Summarizing questions

10. How well did the course fullfill your expectations?

19 svarande

1 (not at all)»0 0%
2 10%
5 26%
7 36%
5 (very well)»5 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.78 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The assignments were very interesting, but it was unclear what was required to get bonus points from them to the exam.» (3)

11. What is your general impression of the course?

19 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 10%
Adequate»2 10%
Good»8 42%
Excellent»7 36%

Genomsnitt: 4.05

12. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Assignments, but it should be clear how to get bonus points.»
- The assigments and the trip to Denmark, also the Vägvärket study visit.»
- The trip to Copenhagen :)»
- It was good to do several smaller projects in different areas, I think I learn a lot from doing assignments like that.»
- course handut should have to add more »
- trip to Copenhaguen and road administration»
- Definitely be the Copenhagen Trip»
- The trip the Copenhagen was a very fun and nice way to experience traffic planning! Thanks a lot for making that possible!!»

13. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- More clear aim and structure of lectures.»
- It takes too long time when every group presents their assigments and it"s not fun listen to 10 presentations that are almost the same. But in some of the assigments the groups had different tasks, and the it is okey to listen to all groups. »
- Maybe it is not neccessary for everybody to listen to all of the other groups projects presentations?»
- course handut should have to add more »
- Giving more explainations about average and marginal costs when analysing the graph»
- none »
- Some information about the course need to be more clear!! Like HOW and WHEN to hand in the assignments and what exercises in the book we should do.. Answers to the 100 questions should be avalible. »

14. Additional comments

- The trip to copenhagen was great!»
- Very good and enriching course»
- I really like this course.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.78

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.78
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.69

Kursutvärderingssystem från