Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

GIS2010, vvt105

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-03-25 - 2010-04-15
Antal svar: 20
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 33%
Kontaktperson: Gunnar Lanner»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Klass: Övriga
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Övriga studenter

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

20 svarande

<15 hours/week»5 25%
Around 20 hours/week»10 50%
Around 30 hours/week»4 20%
Around 40 hours/week»1 5%
>50 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.05

2. Attendance on lectures

How many per cent of the lectures did you attend?

20 svarande

<25%»2 10%
25-50%»2 10%
50-75%»6 30%
>75%»10 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- We studied the chapter in small groups instead. The lectures was to slow.» (<25%)

Teaching and course administration

3. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»5 25%
Some extent»6 30%
Large extent»4 20%
Great extent»5 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.45

4. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»1 5%
Some extent»3 15%
Large extent»10 50%
Great extent»6 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

- Didn"t open the book until I started studying for the exam. » (Small extent)
- The book was very good and quite easy to understand.» (Large extent)

5. Was the course literature worth its price?

Do you consider that the course literature was worth its price? As a guideline the student union at Chalmers has set is at 70 sKr/hp.

20 svarande

1 (not worth it)»1 6%
0 0%
7 43%
4 25%
5 (well worth it)»4 25%
Did not buy the litterature»4

Genomsnitt: 3.62

- Very expensive for so little use. I regret even buying it.» (1 (not worth it))
- E-book» (5 (well worth it))

6. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

20 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 5%
Rather well»11 55%
Very well»8 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- Every handout should be put on the homepage. Also, it would be good to have all slides at the course homepage in advance for the lecture, so that they can be used for keeping notes.» (Rather well)
- No bigger problems.» (Rather well)

Study climate

7. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

19 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 15%
Very good»15 78%
I did not seek help»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.89

8. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

20 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 5%
Rather well»5 25%
Very well»14 70%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.65

- It was very bad to let us choose groups and then have to change them because of the language problem. It is not so hard to change the namnes on the maps and files to the computer exercise.. It is not fair to all students. It is hard to understand the program when you don"t understand what the columns and files means. » (Rather poorly)
- Too large assignments groups. It would be better to do them alone, or maybe in groups of two.» (Rather well)
- A good group.» (Very well)

9. How was the course workload?

19 svarande

1 (Too low)»0 0%
2 10%
16 84%
1 5%
5 (Too high)»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.94

- Too low during the course, and to high in the end of the course» (?)
- The assignments wasn"t very difficult to perform and I didn"t study anything until the exam was coming up.» (2)

Summarizing questions

10. How well did the course fullfill your expectations?

19 svarande

1 (not at all)»0 0%
3 15%
5 26%
6 31%
5 (very well)»5 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.68 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- This is a software learning course more focus should be on computer rather than book» (?)
- Exercises were very good. Lectures didn"t seem to have a clear aim and structure, diffcult to understand. » (3)
- This course would have been perfect for a big project work with a presentation as an exam. » (3)
- More computer exercises would have been good.» (4)

11. What is your general impression of the course?

20 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»3 15%
Adequate»7 35%
Good»5 25%
Excellent»5 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- Good in the sense of the information learned about the subject. Maby not so much ass to how that information was gathered.» (Good)

12. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Exercises»
- Computer exercises»
- The course book and ArcGIS lectures.»
- The computer exercises »
- computer work»
- assignment and lab work»
- The computer exercises are very important!»

13. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Lectures»
- Fewer students in computer sessions. The first lecture with Map-Info we wated 3 hours to recieve help. I also did not find the lectures meaningfull at all. Just to show the pictures from the book is not meaningful. Also the study visit, to have that in swedish was a real low water mark.»
- Some of the 70 questions can"t be found in our literature at all so they should be removed.»
- Larger project work with MapInfo, ArcGis etc.»
- more examples for calculation exercises in class»
- more operatial instruction for the assaingment»
- More books on library»
- not think about yet»
- More information about what exercises to do in the book and the handouts. The questions that was handed out need to be updated. A lot of these was the same and not relevant this year. »

14. Additional comments

- The greatest help for the exam was to do the questions in the book after each chapter together with the 70 sample questions given.»
- no more comments»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.68

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.68
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.67

Kursutvärderingssystem från