ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

0910-3 Human - computer interaction, TDA288

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-03-23 - 2010-04-18
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 20%
Kontaktperson: Börje Johansson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

1. Which programme are you on?

8 svarande

Chalmers, Computer Science and Engineering (D)»3 37%
Chalmers, Master»5 62%
University of Gothenburg»0 0%
Other»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.62

Your own effort

2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

8 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»8 100%
Around 20 hours/week»0 0%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

- Less than 10 hours... (1 lecture = 2h, 1 excercise = 3h, weekly report writing = 3h, final report writing = 1h/week)» (At most 15 hours/week)

3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

8 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»4 50%
75%»4 50%
100%»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Crashes in the schedule» (50%)
- Could not attent any tuesday lectures.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

4. How understandable are the course goals?

8 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 50%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 12%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 12%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.12

- I didn"t attend the introduction lecture.» (I have not seen/read the goals)

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 16%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 83%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.83

6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

7 svarande

No, not at all»1 14%
To some extent»4 57%
Yes, definitely»0 0%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- The mandatory exercises seemed to be passed/rejected mostly based on formatting and length of hand-in.» (No, not at all)
- There were no examination. Very strange!» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»2 25%
Some extent»4 50%
Large extent»2 25%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Some of the exercises had good comment sections in the end where the assistant gave good feedback and concluding remarks. Besides that i regret going to so many lectures.» (Small extent)
- I did not have to read much from the litterature» (Large extent)

8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»6 75%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»2 25%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

- I don"t even know what the book looks like.» (Small extent)

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

8 svarande

Very badly»3 37%
Rather badly»1 12%
Rather well»3 37%
Very well»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- Information was very hard to find on the website. There were information on the website which was no longer valid. The teacher did not know what was on the website.» (Very badly)
- A lot of the information on the webpage is from last year and wasen"t updateded for this year. Also a lot of the infromation was wrong and lead to a lot of confusions. For example the infromation about exam was not right. Also the infromation wasen"t the same as what the lecturer said during class. » (Very badly)
- All information om the web page was old. Dates were wrong, information about examination was wrong etc.» (Very badly)

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 62%
Very good»1 12%
I did not seek help»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

8 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 37%
Very well»5 62%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

12. How was the course workload?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»6 75%
Adequate»2 25%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

13. How was the total workload this study period?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 75%
High»1 12%
Too high»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- I took 3 courses.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

8 svarande

Poor»2 25%
Fair»4 50%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»2 25%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- Interesting subject though.» (Poor)
- It should not be worth 7.5 hp at Chalmers...» (Poor)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Inlämningsuppgiften, det känns som att jag lärde mig mer på den än om vi hade haft tenta. Det var trevlig stämning på lektionerna också :)»
- Guest lectures, text book»
- Guest lectures.»
- The excersises»
- The exercises»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- no»
- More feedback on exercises. Better feedback on half-way report hand-in. This time there were virtually none.»
- The webpage and course administration»
- There should be an exam»

17. Additional comments

Kursutvärderingssystem från