|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Agile development processes, Lp4 VT-10, EDA397/DIT191Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2010-05-17 - 2010-10-25 Antal svar: 28 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 33% Kontaktperson: Victoria Ewers»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.82 - I should have read the study book earlier in the course...» (At most 15 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.57 - Had collisions with another course during many lectures...» (25%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How was the course load?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.96 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - lite vad man gjorde det till fanns altid att göra» (High) 4. How understandable are the course goals?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.85 - I think the course goals have changed because lot of lessons were dropped.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer) 5. Were the facilities and equipment available for the project work sufficient?28 svarande(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
- Annoying with other people in the labs.» (Yes, No) 6. To what extend did the project work contribute towards learning?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.78 - In the 4-5 weeks the supervision was lacking so much that I learned close to nothing about XP. It got better at the end thought.» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.57 - The book and the slides(plus the project) were my main input» (Small extent) 8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.46 - Did not buy it, and in retrospect that was a wise choice, did not seem like hte book offered much.» (Small extent) 9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.14 - Some improvements could be done» (Rather well) Study climate10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.25 - As I have mentioned before. The first parts of the course was really lousy, but it got better towards the end.» (Very poor) 11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.42 - Group memebers were not interested in contributing to the project cause the end result did not matter anyway.» (Rather poorly) Summarizing questions12. What is your general impression of the course?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.82 - Not the exams last question, see 15..» (Good) 13. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- project work»- The structure of the project.» - the project!» - Project » - Overview of different agile methods, and their differences and similarities. Those were interesting.» - Project work» - N/A» - Project work.» - Having a project in a course such as this is a good idea, I think. It requires better/more supervision thought.» - Teachers. And the feedbacks of the last lecture day. It"s a very nice tool to improve.» - Yes» - I think Ruben did a great job teaching» - The material» - Project» - Project work in the lab» - Labs.» - Föreläsaren+programerings övningarna» - lab must be preserved. it gives a gud insight of the Aglie method of working» - The project, definitely. Perhaps give bonus points that reflect the project progress.» 14. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Less GUI in the project and longer iterations»- Less laboratory sessions. » - Moor teachers, better rooms..» - examination way, it should be project based rather then theory as this course is about practical agile development exposure» - Smaller rooms. More encouragement to make a really good product in the project and to really follow the practices. More reminders to keep following the practices.» - Type of project. This year the project contained more UI stuffs so it became really hard to follow TDD. so instead of heavy UI project if the project where easily TDD usable then we would have learned better.» - Project should have different, more easily testable topic.» - More interesting projects. Maybe offer an external forum to share questions between all the students. Explain the whole planning game before start any work session.» - Maybe even more foucs on different processes apart from XP» - The project must be organized better.» - Lectures, Testing lecture especially.» - Labs too. I mean, there should be more guidance or passive control from the teachers in order to help students adopt quicker to a new development process.» - Kör kursen i läsperiod 1 den är gjord för det» 15. Additional comments- The exam was good for all but the last question (which was ca 23% of the exam), which was about something really irrelevant for the course.. Were we supposed to be experts on Lean or Agile for this course? I know that it was part of the course, but not at the extent of 23%? Very disappointed..»- Exam questions marks were very badly divided. For example, There was one question of 14 marks and one was 5 marks and 5 marks question was 2 times more bigger then the 14 marks question...secondly 5 marks question was from the part extreme programming that we acctually learn during project (we spent 4 weeks on project and the main topic was extreme programming) and 14 marks question was from a topic "lean development" that was only disscussed in less then one lecture... it should not happen again becasue it affected every student of the class... and becasue of that hardly any body will get 5 grade, after putting a lots of effort during project,reading and remembering course material... this type of exams demotivate student and this is not fair.» - over all course was good, though the 14 marks for a single question was rather surprising in final exam.» - It might be interesting to try some other Agile process in the project. XP is , as was stated in the course, best used with experienced developers.» - I liked the environment among students. » Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.65
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
42%