ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Advanced software architecting, Lp4 VT-10, DAT220/DIT542

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-05-17 - 2010-06-03
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Victoria Ewers»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 28%
Around 20 hours/week»4 57%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»1 14%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Too many articles for reading.» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 14%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 28%
100%»4 57%

Genomsnitt: 4.28

- other is missed because i was sick» (75%)
- There were very few lectures overall, the planned » (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

7 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 14%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 71%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3

- the course was clearly tough and hard to understand..» (The goals are difficult to understand)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 14%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»3 42%
No, the goals are set too high»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 2.28

Teaching and course administration

5. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»2 28%
Some extent»4 57%
Large extent»1 14%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

6. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»3 42%
Some extent»3 42%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

- Difficult slides and articles.» (Small extent)

7. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

7 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 28%
Rather well»4 57%
Very well»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- but lecture slides and helping research papers should be uploaded in advance on course home page.» (Very well)

Study climate

8. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor»1 14%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 14%
Very good»4 57%
I did not seek help»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

9. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»4 57%
Very well»2 28%
I did not seek cooperation»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

10. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 42%
Adequate»0 0%
High»4 57%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

11. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 28%
Adequate»2 28%
High»3 42%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

Summarizing questions

12. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»2 28%
Fair»1 14%
Adequate»2 28%
Good»2 28%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

- This course was not as per my expectation. It was probably the worst course I have attended in Chalmers so far.» (Poor)
- » (Fair)

13. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- I cannot say»
- the teacher should be chosen carefully»
- question answering way of teacher that is fantastic»

14. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- For starters, offer a course with full complement. The time slots which were not used could have been filled with guest lecturers and TAs»
- it should be more practical rather then theoratical if it will be divided in to two parts and 3 cr out of 7 will be given on practical project that will be the best solution rather then only theoray becasue now this course is just a theory incluting writing a paper.One can not learn most of it if you actually dont implement architecture in real project.»
- The structure. It"s too difficult.»
- There should be some practical labs etc..»

15. Additional comments

- Teacher is good but it is advance course so it should be more practical rather then just exam or paper writng because theractical exam on writing a paper does give you practical experience.»
- The course is too advance. We don"t have such background. Make it easier. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från