Visa resultat

Chalmers Masters Programme Evaluation 2010

Masters Programme

1. Architecture and Civil Engineering

Architecture»		41		19%
Architecture and Engineering»		7		3%
Design and Construction Project Management»		34		16%
Design for Sustainable Development»		24		11%
Geo and Water Engineering»		46		21%
Interior Architecture»		1		0%
Sound and Vibration»		17		8%
Structural Engineering and Building Performance Design»		42		19%

Genomsnitt: 4.45

2. Bioscience, Molecular science and Chemical Engineering

Bioinformatics and System Biology»		15		12%
Biotechnology»		44		36%
Chemistry and Bioscience»		26		21%
Innovative and Sustainable Chemical Engineering»		37		30%

Genomsnitt: 2.69

3. Computer Science, Information Technology and Electrical Engineering

Biomedical Engineering»		26		7%
Communication Engineering»		80		24%
Computer Science: Algorithms, Languages and Logic»		35		10%
Integrated Electronic System Design»		43		13%
Interaction Design»		35		10%
Networks and Distributed Systems»		49		14%
Secure and Dependable Computer systems»		13		3%
Software Engineering and Technology»		45		13%
Intelligent Systems Design»		2		0%

Genomsnitt: 4.27

4. Engineering for Sustainable Development

Electric Power Engineering»		49		41%
Environmental Measurements and Assessments»		9		7%
Industrial Ecology - For a Sustainable Society»		24		20%
Sustainable Energy Systems»		37		31%

Genomsnitt: 2.41

5. Management of Innovation and Technology

Business Design»		29		15%
International Project Management»		15		7%
Management of Economis and Innovation»		53		28%
Nordic Master in Maritime Management»		5		2%
Quality and Operations Management»		38		20%
Supply Chain Management»		48		25%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

6. Mechanical, Automation, and Industrial Design Engineering

Advanced Engineering Materials»		38		12%
Automotive Engineering»		39		13%
Industrial Design Engineering»		34		11%
Naval Architecture»		20		6%
Product Development»		52		17%
Production Engineering»		32		10%
Solid and Fluid Mechanics»		36		12%
Systems, Control and Mechatronics»		45		15%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

7. Microtechnology and Nano Science

Materials and Nanotechnology»		24		34%
Microtechnology»		18		25%
Nanoscale Science and Technology»		8		11%
Wireless and Photonic Engineering»		20		28%

Genomsnitt: 2.34

8. Physics, Space Science and Mathematics

Applied Physics»		26		23%
Complex Adaptive Systems»		27		24%
Engineering Mathematics and Computational Sciences»		15		13%
Fundamental Physics»		11		10%
Nuclear Engineering»		14		12%
Radio and Space Science»		16		14%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

Background and Introduction

9. How satisfied are you with the Masters programme so far?

Not at all»		19		1%
Not so satisfied»		103		7%
Neither/Nor»		120		8%
Satisfied»		730		51%
Very satisfied»		441		30%
No opinion»		11		0%

Genomsnitt: 4.05

10. What year did you start the programme?

2007»		65		4%
2008»		590		41%
2009»		766		53%

Genomsnitt: 2.49

11. Where did you study for your Bachelor degree?

Sweden - Chalmers»		728		51%
Sweden - another university»		31		2%
University outside Sweden - Europe»		105		7%
University outside Sweden - NOT Europe»		524		36%
Other»		35		2%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

12. Are you

Female»		394		27%
Male»		1021		72%

Genomsnitt: 1.72

13. How satisfied are you with the information (before applying) about the Masters programme (MP)?

1417 svarande

Not at all»		36		2%
Not so satisfied»		167		11%
Neither/Nor»		243		17%
Satisfied»		743		52%
Very satisfied»		197		13%
No opinion»		35		2%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

14. From where did you get the most important information about the programme?

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

The web»		942		66%
Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers»		392		27%
Presentation/Information within Chalmers»		277		19%
Presentations/information outside Chalmers»		31		2%
Written information (not web)»		106		7%
Friends»		435		30%
Former students from Chalmers»		260		18%
Other sources»		68		4%

Your own effort

15. How many hours per week have you spent studying at this programme?

1420 svarande

Less than 30 hours/week»		128		8%
Between 30-40 hours/week»		468		32%
Between 40-50 hours/week»		497		34%
Between 50-60 hours/week»		242		16%
More than 60 hours/week»		89		6%

Genomsnitt: 2.79 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.79

Goals and goal fulfilment

16. Have you seen the goals of the Masters programme (before now)?

Yes (more than 5 times)»		111		7%
Yes (between 2 and 5 times)»		457		32%
Yes (once)»		421		29%
No»		346		24%
No opinion»		86		6%

Genomsnitt: 2.89

17. How understandable are the programme goals?

The goals are difficult to understand»		16		1%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		386		27%
The goals are clear enough»		676		47%
The goals are very clear»		137		9%
No opinion»		194		13%

Genomsnitt: 3.08

18. Do you think the goals are reasonable for a master degree?

No, the goals are set too low»		22		1%
No, the goals are a bit too low»		139		9%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»		993		70%
No, the goals are a bit high»		27		1%
No, the goals are set far too high»		5		0%
No opinion»		224		15%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

19. Do you think the goals are fulfilled within the programme?

No, not at all»		24		1%
To some extent»		288		20%
Almost»		511		36%
Yes, definitely»		367		26%
No opinion»		221		15%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

Programme layout/structure/design

20. How satisfied are you with the programme curriculum?

Not at all»		30		2%
Not so satisfied»		163		11%
Neither/Nor»		191		13%
Satisfied»		793		56%
Very satisfied»		172		12%
No opinion»		63		4%

Genomsnitt: 3.79

21. Is there any subject/course that you would like to add into the programme?

Yes»		570		40%
No»		345		24%
No opinion»		483		34%

Genomsnitt: 1.94

- More on plant science» (?)
- nano/micro fluidic» (?)
- The subjects are fine but I would likto ask you people that there should be a subject that will link the program with the industry.What I mean is, there should be a project course of one quarter for all the students of MPCOM that have to be done in close collaboration with Ericsson.It will give a real practical experiance. Another thing I like to add here and This is my own experience, I have been applying for Master thesis in companies and where ever I apply their main requirements were C++ or java or VHDL or SystemC or Python or combination of these. Becuase industries dont work on MATLAB.It is only used by universities to model a system but when it comes to real implementation these languages are used. So please do add some of these languages in your courses.Because of these languages I was not selected because I didnt work on these languages and this happened to me 3 times. » (?)
- The choice you made to keep tution fees, I totaly against it. Well, you charged no fees to EU students who are from rich countries, but students from my country are poor, can"t even dream to study in Sweden any more. I am very unhappy for your dicission and sorry to say that we cannot come to Sweden for study any more. You might have few students who are really rich, but even they will not consider to come in Sweden. Because, I know, those rich students in my country they prefer to study in USA, UK, Canada or AUS. Rest of the poor students like me, preffered choice was Sweden. Now our hope and dream to receive some well higher education is stopped. This tution fee is just like a SLAP from Sweden to us who are poor. Wish you good luck you rich people.» (?)
- manufacture the at least simple satellite» (?)
- The course of "Phase Transformation" may be included in first year, perhaps in first quarter.It will make life more easier for students in the courses of Engineering Metals and Joining Technology» (?)
- Something more mathematical. I would have liked to read simulatioin of complex system. But since it is at the same period as sustainable energy futures its hard to prioritate it in. Would hav ebeen better if you could read it either in lp4 for as one of the electable courses or as an alternative to course to either applied industriable ecology of environmental management which are courses that both suck. » (?)
- strategy creation, sustainability development, » (?)
- Distributed Systems Programming, Networking Programming.» (?)
- Maybe, to have more options in the optative courses.» (?)
- Adding the number of elective courses to increase the chance to select the interested courses.» (Yes)
- Rotor dynamics» (Yes)
- I would like to add a course concerning Economy and Finance in an early stage of the programme» (Yes)
- Applied courses with a more hands-on approach» (Yes)
- Pharmacology, vaccinology, immunology» (Yes)
- More structural dynamics» (Yes)
- It"s good to make Environmental Management course compulsory» (Yes)
- I dont know, people more skilled then me should identify potential areas and hence add them as mandatory courses to the program. But i seariously feel ill-equipped to goi either in the industry or in reseach.» (Yes)
- The name of My program is almost tricky, the name should be relatied for digital domian not Integrated Electronics System on chip» (Yes)
- Practical marketing courses. The current marketing and nerworking courses are on a too high theoretical level. The majority of the students will NOT continue in the university world and thus need another type of marketing courses. Also the program boasts to involve marketing and therfore this is needed.» (Yes)
- More brand management» (Yes)
- Mer tekniska kurser! Som det är nu blir vi snarare miljöaktivister än ingenjörer.» (Yes)
- I would like to have more focus on lean which I believe many people associate operations with. The lean parts that was covered in Mats course where not sufficient and well taught. » (Yes)
- The Biomedical Engineering in Chalmers is served as a bachelor degree and gives no further details. It is just a summery of six tracks and nothing more!» (Yes)
- En kurs i ledarskap.» (Yes)
- kurser som är anpassade för den sektor vi kommer att arbeta i.» (Yes)
- A real finance course.» (Yes)
- Marketing (as a part of strategy).» (Yes)
- Negotiation skills» (Yes)
- multicore programming» (Yes)
- Better classes about wind power/solar cells» (Yes)
- More courses on compiler related subjects.» (Yes)
- Project Management» (Yes)
- I would like to have more courses given on Chalmers dedicated specifically to electronic system design. In the end of the programme, I had run out of truly relevant courses and had to choose more computer science oriented courses.» (Yes)
- A course about power and energy market thet is connected to our other courses. » (Yes)
- More courses about sustainable energy technology (how does solar cells, wind power work...?)» (Yes)
- Some project or something with PLC-programming.» (Yes)
- More experimental work is always appreciated.» (Yes)
- Strategic management and project planning & management» (Yes)
- Another control course in lp1 year2!» (Yes)
- Composites» (Yes)
- A financial course would be beneficiary.» (Yes)
- Finance » (Yes)
- design course » (Yes)
- more management courses and a course/subcourse within maintenance since it is "in the loop" around now» (Yes)
- The Nuclear Engineering programme (since it is focused around nuclear reactors and power plants) should contain a basic course dealing with (electric) power production and transportation, in my opinion.» (Yes)
- More up-to-date courses or aim the course contents more to todays technologies.» (Yes)
- global enviornmental issues» (Yes)
- Advanced courses on Vibrations» (Yes)
- Resource planning and management. (More hands on and applied to reality.)» (Yes)
- some more advanced and practical courses about networking» (Yes)
- Something relating to economical issues within product development. Cost estimation, target costing or something similar.» (Yes)
- Some focus course in network programming. There are the distributed systems courses, of course, but one with focus on programming and designing high performance network applications with focus on reliability, security and performance. Maybe as an optional course. » (Yes)
- all information about other courses in other faculties could be clear. a student free discussion web base room can help students to understand the content of courses and also know professors before they take courses.» (Yes)
- More business understanding. Remove the course environmental management and replace it with a coourse in sustainable management taught by another department.» (Yes)
- More geotechnical engineering, Project management (we had opportunity but the number of students are to high, couldn´,t read the course)» (Yes)
- Verification and Validation» (Yes)
- Accelerator physics would be a good topic for fundamental physics program. » (Yes)
- Ultrasonics» (Yes)
- Kurser i byggproduktion inom anläggning/grundläggning. Mer geoteknik och geologi, bla innehållande modellering med beräknigsprogram typ PLAXIS. Egen kurs i bergmekanik, tunnelbyggande sprängning osv. » (Yes)
- Topics concerning the international aspects of SCM. Topics regarding the network perspective and introducing the Industrial Networks Approach (INA) to SCM students.» (Yes)
- Economics, Finance, Accounting, Business negotiation» (Yes)
- I think access to Swedish courses have to be provided to exchange students.» (Yes)
- A better option of technical courses.» (Yes)
- more analog circuit course» (Yes)
- More management courses, maybe one within production. » (Yes)
- Routing and Swithching, » (Yes)
- C/C++, Java» (Yes)
- Design Patterns» (Yes)
- A course/courses that go deeper in the following two areas, which are two of the master programs goals: 18. relate the technical specifications of a communication system to its role in society, including economical, environmental, and ethical considerations, as well as to regulation and standardization 19. reflect upon how communication technology interacts with the physiology of the human being, including aspects of health and perception, and which responsibilities this places on the engineer » (Yes)
- Some relevant technologies for prototyping and specifically evaluating designs, involving end users more.» (Yes)
- There is almost no course in the filed of neuroscience, which is one the major, wellknown branches of biomedical engineering. » (Yes)
- Radio electronic» (Yes)
- Quantum Mechanics, Hålfasthetslära» (Yes)
- Intellectual property» (Yes)
- Many but some of the new improvements are towards that direction.» (Yes)
- There are several subjects in the programme, road, geotecnic, water, environment and risk so it is hard to specalize in one subject. And that is not what the employers are looking for!!» (Yes)
- More emphasis on the synthesis phase, including idea generation , concept development and aesthetical issues. As it is now, there is too much emphasis on the analytical phases, resulting in an unsecurity about the more creative parts of product development. More shorter assignemnts where the creativity is trained, without the aim that the result shall be 100% water proof in every aspect.» (Yes)
- During the forst quarter, there should be a MATLAB course aimed for students who doesn"t have this knowledge at all. I"ve my freinds who don"t know MATLAb even now. It"s an integral pat of our curriculum. The current basic course in MATLAB runs for 2 weeks and during that time, students need time to get adjusted in this new place. Also that course, as I came to know was about 3D in MATLAB. So, some people faced difficulties learning that.» (Yes)
- I think that the PhD courses that are already available at the department should be available to advanced students if the lecturer agrees that the student in question can attend. Then such courses should be easy to include in the master"s degree and not as it is today with the "Topics in engineering mathematics" course listing.» (Yes)
- More courses on research topics» (Yes)
- maybe courses regarding PLC"s.» (Yes)
- environmental policy and economy» (Yes)
- Compiler construction» (Yes)
- some elective like advance system design or embedded systems design for students with background in electronics engineering...» (Yes)
- YES! more hands on courses where you learn tools such as Energy System Modelling and Planning» (Yes)
- IT Business Design, if there"s anything like that.» (Yes)
- An environmental transports course» (Yes)
- The existing "Matrix Analysis" should be the start before the course commences. Even though, this is a PhD course, this definitely sets the tone in better understanding communications, especially, subspaces, projecting vectors to null space, MIMO. The course does expect the students to know linear algebra but not everyone has read or encountered Eigen values and Eigen vectors. The course and its students will benefit a lot if the MATRIX ANALYSIS course SSY205 or something similar is at the start of the course. Otherwise, the first year of the MSc in CommEngg is well structured, going over every stage of the communication block. Apart from the Random processes course, most of the other Comm Engg courses did not deal much with stochastic processes ! :( The 2nd year MSC Comm Engg is dry ! with nothing other than the PhD courses. Most of the students are here to specialize and dig deep into communication engg but instead the 2nd year is mostly pushed to other departments. Hence, if there were courses that could talk about the latest things in research or even developments in MIMO would be wonderful. At times, I feel the MSc course is a waste of time, as nothing significant is learnt apart from what is already studied in the Bachelors ! 2nd Year needs improvement.» (Yes)
- There should be a separate course on MIMO and OFDM either mandatory or elective.» (Yes)
- Some finance as a complement, so a course in corporate finance for instance.» (Yes)
- - acoustic simulation course only using FEM/SEA/BEM/Abaqus/Ansys/CAE etc. - vehicle acoustic course - non linear acoustics - still more of the good structure borne sound which is so good done already by Wolfgang Kropp - project work in acoustic, for example that one or two people can work on a project/topic for a quarter to learn things and investigate them so that they practice more working on their own and get also ECTS for that! » (Yes)
- Juridical things like laws and regulations for biulgings and how to draw up a contract.» (Yes)
- A practical course that runs over the whole year where some more complex problem than the ones in the standard laborations has to be solved.» (Yes)
- more quality and operations management for the Management-track. As process management, course in purchasing, production economy» (Yes)
- Medical Physics. Every year.» (Yes)
- Quality methods More mixed applications between engineering and industrial design» (Yes)
- More network courses. Internet technology is so hectic, maybe you can divide it into two courses or something.» (Yes)
- More (system) modelling and mathematically oriented courses» (Yes)
- not in particular, but I think the elective courses in general don"t cover the whole area of the programme. the variety of them is too low.» (Yes)
- In-depth courses in software like CATIA, Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign, etc., Maya, SolidWorks, etc.» (Yes)
- Construction Planning and Control, Resource Management, Project Cost Estimating, Information Technology Applications in Construction, Business Practices in Construction, Construction Equipment Management, Construction Site planning and Management» (Yes)
- I think there is a lack of courses related to Digital ASIC or implementation technologies or related to more tools.» (Yes)
- maybe a more deep or a more practical network security course, would also be nice if it enabled you to take cisco certifications. » (Yes)
- More ecomony and market thinking. Maybe something about electrical power» (Yes)
- Basic Communication Courses like Digital Signal Processing and Error Control Coding» (Yes)
- Programming courses (Java, C/C++, C#/.NET) » (Yes)
- Skeppsbyggnadsteknik» (Yes)
- I think it"s a shame that there isn"t more cooperation with the math department and Chalmers and GU and with the logic and philosophy department at GU. I find that many courses offered at those departments are relevant to us at CSALL. Abstract algebra for example, given by the math department. The logic department at GU used to have courses in recursion theory, model theory, set theory, proof theory, etc (http://www.utbildning.gu.se/ViewPage.action?siteNodeId=541835&languageId=100000&contentId=-1&subjectParam=Logik&languageId=100000&subjectPageSiteNodeId=541835) but because of decline and money those courses are no longer given. I think that"s a huge shame, because we even have a logic track at the CSALL master and surely there would be atleast a handful of students who would like to take those courses if they knew they existed and the same goes for relevant courses at the math department...» (Yes)
- A course solely in VHDL coding, how to write good code and how to make a good system.» (Yes)
- What I miss in some of the courses are dynamic behaviour of different systems. Most of the time we looked at the ideal cases and simplifications, this is also needed but then some of the dynamic stuffs also has to be added since this is the problem in reality.» (Yes)
- More on methods to program in VHDL instead of just VHDL programming.. Dos and donts.. basically an industry oriented approach to VHDL.» (Yes)
- I suggest that the program should be split into two programs 1 Msc networks and Communicatiions 2 Msc Distributed Systems » (Yes)
- Course in patents, histology, biology terminology/advanced genetics» (Yes)
- The microscopy course in lp4 is not really a option when your taking the biomaterial track..maybe move the course to lp1 so that you can take it the second year» (Yes)
- courses in nanochemistry» (Yes)
- Management» (Yes)
- Keep the IT systems as optional. Make a production path and one more management path throughout the program. Include more focus on the demand side, not just 1 course.» (Yes)
- Since the program is in a multidisciplinary field, i would like to have a broader selection of courses, today we have 9 courses to choose from, and that is too low!» (Yes)
- Mandatory FEM» (Yes)
- Lean Production» (Yes)
- Human genetics can be added» (Yes)
- Some courses from the international project management that in some cases are difficult to get in due to capacity issues» (Yes)
- More courses in economy and legal affairs» (Yes)
- courses with a more technical/engineering perspective, advanced finance course, marketing, general strategy course » (Yes)
- a course dealing with the programming aspects of data aquisition and analysis, being able to write small programs/routines is expected from almost all physicists but but we are required to learn it just as we get along our studies, it would be good to have some physics focused programming course.( i also spoke with students with bachelor degree from chalmers and they agree)» (Yes)
- maybe a little more engineering is better» (Yes)
- Human Genetics» (Yes)
- Mangement and leader courses.» (Yes)
- The whole programme needs to be revised.» (Yes)
- a laboratory of circuit design for communication engineering. (we see a lot of matlab things that stay theoretical, but we never materialize them into a pcb)» (Yes)
- Project management, Leadership(real one), Resource management, Quote from a exchange-student at this master programme: "if I wanted to be a good programmer, I would be done after my bachelor, I came for something else"» (Yes)
- Quantum optics project course in photonics» (Yes)
- More courses involving indoor climate and building physics. Less compulsory courses.» (Yes)
- ecology and sustainability in design» (Yes)
- Econometrics» (Yes)
- More management» (Yes)
- Power System Protection and Wind power system» (Yes)
- some basic finance course, Strategy course» (Yes)
- - courses which make use of your knowledge in maths - more elective courses to choose between» (Yes)
- More suggestions for the second autumn so that the students will know what is appropriate for the degree» (Yes)
- course on mobile application development designing and validation of architecture with tools.» (Yes)
- From what I understand, many who work with computer security in the industry find it difficult to motivate to their bosses why the company should spend money on security. It might be nice with a course that bring up that topic, that might also give an introduction on how to analyze cost-effectiveness of implementing certain security-related measures. The master programme "Software engineering" (and IT-programmet on the bachelor level) has some interesting courses on high-quality programming, which is a skill that I think is very useful for making secure systems. I have chosen several of them myself, but making them recommended or mandatory might not be a bad idea. It would also be fun with advanced security courses, since the ones available now (except Language-based security) give little more than playing with Linux-servers on ones spare time. One example is to make them more research-oriented.» (Yes)
- A course about the power market and how one manage it. And a basic course about cooling.» (Yes)
- "Advanced courses" (courses that continuous where bachelor courses in the same subject left off) in general. In particular a course I"d really like to take if is existed would be Advanced Databases (focused on performance and optimization)» (Yes)
- It was a lot of probability theory in Modelling and simulation and Digital control. I saw that the master programme MPCOM has a course in Random processes with applications. That might be helpful for us too. We can choose it in the second year. However, it might be better to read it before the other courses.» (Yes)
- shell analysis, earthquake engineering, bridge engineering» (Yes)
- I think this program has a serious lack of Hydraulic courses or the courses related to.» (Yes)
- MANAGEMENT COURSES!» (Yes)
- Would like to have software architecture with revised course outline and more interactive session with the course members. Another course that i would like to have is "Design Pattern" that would focus on the learnig of various design patters in the software industries such as the GOF(gang of four) design patterns (Builder, Factory etc.)» (Yes)
- Let Master Students start their thesis earlier, even at the start of their education. They have passed bachelor, so they are capable of handle basics.» (Yes)
- For instance Phsycology for Engineers, Project Management and some kind of course that concerns starting your own business. » (Yes)
- CAD courses taught in English.» (Yes)
- Some architecture classes with a clear focus, led by competent teachers with knowledge of the course subject who give guidance, assistance, lectures on the subject and provide relevant literature would be nice.» (Yes)
- more renewable energy (i mean just few lectures on it, it should have specific courses on wind turbines, marine energy or solar photovoltaic...)» (Yes)
- Structural Optimization» (Yes)
- More propulsion courses» (Yes)
- courses about energy» (Yes)
- A seperate course for Power system protection and generation.» (Yes)
- A course with greater focus on different tools and processes used at construction sites. How does environmental work, safety work, time planning, budgeting, labor union relationships etc function for a site manager? I especially lack the part about labour unions. At least in Sweden they very much influence the daily construction work.» (Yes)
- Color shceme(management)» (Yes)
- Quantum mechanics nanophotonics» (Yes)
- Business Law» (Yes)
- Finance, practical cash flow studies.» (Yes)
- A course connected to the master thesis, helping the students with running their project and writing their report etc. Seminars with other students during the work with the master thesis could be helpful, by for example discuss general issues with how to enhance the quality of the master thesis.» (Yes)
- A course in patents should be obligatory in an innovations programme!» (Yes)
- More early project management and team dynamics, since working in teams are quite enforced and frequent, then it would be very beneficial to have a early minimum framework so that all group members have some basic knowledge how to behave in teams and project groups.» (Yes)
- earthquake engineering» (Yes)
- High Voltage- / Electric- Power, that is nog only meant for vehicles.» (Yes)
- Networks in control systems» (Yes)
- Geophysics, statistics/geostatistics, geo and water engineering courses related to energy (ie water power, wave power, geothermal power etc), mineral resources (oil/gas/mining etc)» (Yes)
- some courses from mechanical department and maybe a few courses about earth quack design. » (Yes)
- Need to insert additional courses.Because current courses are either have been chosen from physics depertment or from micro technology » (Yes)
- I"d like to see a basic network course connected with Internet Technology. Then instead of voluntarily a mandatory Switches and routers course as it is extremely useful. » (Yes)
- Project Management, Basic Finance» (Yes)
- Optimization» (Yes)
- The hard courses are so crowded in the beginning 6 quarters in my major, and the rest time of this program are not fully used. Because the following coursed are a bit simple.» (Yes)
- psychological aspects of work in teams. something like organizational behaviour.» (Yes)
- More traffic and geotechnics!» (Yes)
- More geo-courses, for example one geotechnics course with FEM. » (Yes)
- IP» (Yes)
- Managment» (Yes)
- Total quality management, Economics» (Yes)
- a list of optional courses that fulfill the MTS/ general competence requirement for the old swedish degree(civilingenjör). It would be nice in a masters program with so few mandatory courses to be informed on this matter before all optional courses have already been used up on sience courses» (Yes)
- Software Testing should be a included in the programme. » (Yes)
- A continuation on the chaos theory would be nice as well as making the game theory course permanent.» (Yes)
- some supportive course go together with studio, like structure and building technique » (Yes)
- TIF165 Nanotechnology for sustainable energy » (Yes)
- CAD and more about compressors pumps and turbines. Säkerhetsventiler behöver också behandlas.» (Yes)
- more automation courses and project management» (Yes)
- Advanced Algorithms» (Yes)
- A course on the dangers of new technologies. » (Yes)
- Change management, Whole Risk management course, TQM» (Yes)
- More courses to choose from, more in to detail courses and more artistic corses.» (Yes)
- Sustainable Architecture in other climates than the Nordic one» (Yes)
- Psychologi & groupdynamics that empasize practical skills for the student (trial and error) - communication and action. Some kind of general technical skills that empasize how to plan and combine different proffesional skills within the construction industri. » (Yes)
- Interior architecture» (Yes)
- not a specific course that I know exist but something more that connects the programme to society and reality» (Yes)
- More courses on proteins, with a lot of lab work, similar to the course protein engineering 1. Protein engineering 2 is only a literature course, and we already now how to find literature and write essays.» (Yes)
- More applied mechanics in the development process» (Yes)
- optimization models in operations management. f.i mathematical programming» (Yes)
- more dynamic courses» (Yes)
- Practical experience in companies» (Yes)
- more urban planning studio» (Yes)
- a little more detailed study in road vehicle aerodynamics» (Yes)
- 1. A course that brings up how to visualise in a 3D environment, we have the sketching and 3D modelling (Alias) but not a updated course on how to make that product a photo realistic image. Alias isn"t enough! Look at for example Vray, definitely cheaper than Alias and makes extremely good images! 2. A course in subdivision modelling to be able to model in a faster way, from sketch to image to final product. T-Splines is the best and actually the cheapest one on the market right now, just a tip.» (Yes)
- A continuation/extension of the "Simulation of complex systems" course.» (Yes)
- Advanced concurrent programming» (Yes)
- Managerial Economics Total Quality Management» (Yes)
- A course to learn a specific FEM-software. Now we are just supposed to use a software without having seen it before.» (Yes)
- it would be better if more networking courses are added for those who want to follow network and communication track.» (Yes)
- basic mechanics for students other then mechanical background.» (Yes)
- project managmant..... i believe every engineer have to know about it» (Yes)
- Level Design, Advanced Game Design, Advanced gameplay design, Advanced game engines» (Yes)
- More ellective courses maybe...» (Yes)
- Project management (i see you have included "Software leadership and quality management" in the curriculum, maybe it adresses this), software & system usability (though IT students probably have this one already), more focus on software requirements elicitation and user need analysis & interviews» (Yes)
- Nanotechnology for Sustainable Energies Bionanotechnology for Chemical Engineers» (Yes)
- More sketching classes for Industrial design students.» (Yes)
- Some kind of prototype building course where we get to spend time in the prototype workshop.» (Yes)
- Optimization,» (Yes)
- multi-criteria decision making» (Yes)
- There are no such course at Chalmers currently, but it would be great to have it: Semantics of hardware description languages (DAT110 and TDA956 cover these issues only briefly)» (Yes)
- 1. An additional course in dynamics 2. A course treating the actual design process including administrative assignments that occur in real life designs together with an overview of the different areas that a structural engineer has to chose from after examination. (Lika bridge design and industri) Different areas have very different ways to work.. 3. A course treating the basics in modern drawing tools. (AutoCAD, Tekla..) 4. A course treating only how different loads are modelled. (Snow, Wind, Self-weight, Traffic, Earthquaks..)» (Yes)
- I think that whole subject of sustainability in architecture should be critically reviewed and some strong relations to climate change at least questioned. Strong attention but obscure understanding of sustainability issues and definitions in university"s standpoint, in my opinion, is misleading.» (Yes)
- More courses on wireless communication and signal processing. » (Yes)
- There is a general lack of technical drawing and construction knowledge that is acquired in the courses. I also wish the computer courses were more available for masters students, when I tried to take a course they told me it was primarily for bachelor students. As for other courses: Sustainable design in climates other than the swedish one should be included. » (Yes)
- economics and laws in the building sector. Presentation technic (written, illustrative and oral), more workshops with focus on analying/research. Cooperation between the different studios in the program, that woud increase the learning and get more of a whole picture of the architecture.» (Yes)
- cost-awareness, presentation techniques, and sustainable construction types (I think the info/courses from gave us a very basic knowledge, and as the projects become larger, there is need for a deeper knowledge in these fields. » (Yes)
- Presentation techniques, e.g. how to make layouts, format posters and so on. We aim to be managers and thus need to be able to communicate in an attractive way. Not many workers on any site like to read a report comprising of 20 pages if it can be presented clearly on a colorful poster with easy-to-read graphs and images.» (Yes)
- Structures/engineering (minimum one semester) with mathematics/calculations, not just conceptual knowledge. I believe this is a standard requirement in many universities. » (Yes)
- Software Constraints» (Yes)
- Service Design(?),skills(photoshop/flash)» (Yes)
- For the product development programme, some more courses about more methods etc. would have been nice.» (Yes)
- More strategy and marketing » (Yes)
- I would like to take more courses that deal with the firm level and the strategic business perspective of sustainable development. » (Yes)
- Economics» (Yes)
- more photonic courses classical optics» (Yes)
- Maybe some courses in nuclear engineering.» (Yes)
- control systems» (Yes)
- more technical subjects» (Yes)
- Heat pumps, air conditioning and refrigeration would be a good course to add to the building physics part.» (Yes)
- bio-physics Drug Design and Discovery» (Yes)
- A course dedicated to regulations. CCR is quite interesting and need to be developed in a regulation course. » (Yes)
- some basic technology, like graphic» (Yes)
- If someone wants specialization in wireless communication or signal processing then there should be more courses in this area. » (Yes)
- Deformation of metals, advanced level» (Yes)
- Better courses in production systems. The present courses are too much repetition from the Automation & Mechatronics bachelor» (Yes)
- Metal forming, Casting, » (Yes)
- Courses on Digital Signal Processing, Wireless Communication specific courses, Radar System Engineering» (Yes)
- Purchasing course instead and combine freight/physical distribution courses» (Yes)
- surface chemistry» (Yes)
- Some classes about logistics.» (Yes)
- Global Supply Chain Finance» (Yes)
- Algorithms» (Yes)
- a course about electric motors in vehicles» (Yes)
- total quality management, product development and some course focusing on innovation. it would also be nice to have the opportunity to get a deeper knowledge of the working patterns in a specific industry» (Yes)
- Computer programming, such as C or C++ Basic electronic"s course» (Yes)
- More geotechnical courses aswell as rock mechanics, less water courses.» (Yes)
- Webbdesign» (Yes)
- More Quantum Field Theory, including renormalization and non-abelian stuff. They program coordinator knows this, it"s just that it would take about a year of additional courses to make it happen and it isn"t possible. But it would be fun!» (Yes)
- A bit more industry related parts, where you get a better feeling of what you can work with afterwards» (Yes)
- Composit and should be included in Msc advanced Engineering materials(obligatory)» (Yes)
- Computational Neuroscience. More signal Processing courses. Artificial Inteligence» (Yes)
- pharmaceutical sciences , and Natural product chemistry could be compulsory instead of elective. » (Yes)
- Watermarking optimization » (Yes)
- A course in economics, adapted to industrial design» (Yes)
- Basic electrical engineering course» (Yes)
- Make Biomedical Instrumentation a 15 hp course» (Yes)
- design theory» (Yes)
- . advanced mathematical logic, "more advanced topics than logic in computer science, incompleteness theorem for example"» (Yes)
- Advanced analog courses, analog circuits for communication, RF analog, power management in VLSI, System C/verilog. » (Yes)
- Seismec performance of structures» (Yes)
- A course covering the basic microscopy techniques should be included. » (Yes)
- design history design and innovation strategy deign process more of ergonomics for human factors major » (Yes)
- Some courses about the managerment and business» (Yes)
- Communication, oral and written» (Yes)
- I really miss information about packet-switching and routing, which was what I was looking for when choosing hte master"s programme.» (Yes)
- the compulsory course should change some » (Yes)
- A course that deal with construction logistics and purshasing together.» (Yes)
- there should be some basic lab based courses especially for international students who have limited practical skills» (Yes)
- More "hands on" simulation courses in the production systems track.» (Yes)
- Courses related to nanochemisrty and nanotechnolohy can be added» (Yes)
- Courses on OFDM and multicarier schemes, Cellular Communication Networks, Courses on Channel estimation techniques. I would like to say that, the courses were not designed particularly for wireless communications, rather students were forced to opt other courses to fill the credits. I have seen 4 different flavours in the same master program, like courses on source coding, multimdeia and video communication, Image processing, Image analysis etc etc give you totally new fields. One who has opted chalmers for doing specialization in wireless communications cannot find any further good courses right after the study period 3. He or she has to opt multi flavour courses to fulfil the degree requiremetns.» (Yes)
- Experimental fluid dynamics course» (Yes)
- In my Program I suggest to more courses in the field of Power system anlysis such as protection, Transient anlysis...etc.» (Yes)
- More building physics.» (Yes)
- show that we can pick any electable courses. It is important! » (Yes)
- more hardware course like communication circuits. » (Yes)
- Corporate Finance» (Yes)
- Corporate Finance» (Yes)
- elective in finance. however, I am aware that this year is being stressed a cooperation with goteborg university. I think this is ok.» (Yes)
- specific course on vehicle structure (chassis/body). Design and manufacturing aspects.» (Yes)
- compulsory internship for at least 3 month,» (Yes)
- More courses with technical alignment, like the FEM course. Would like to have more computational courses.» (Yes)
- A course regarding deformation mechanisms» (Yes)
- courses with more hands-on experiences and practical labs» (Yes)
- Shipyard Organization Methods of Ship Production» (Yes)
- Probability and Statistics» (Yes)
- biological engineering courses» (Yes)
- Power generation. Wind power, solar power etc...» (Yes)
- Ecology for engineers. It is important to have basic understanding about ecology and ecosystem services.» (Yes)
- Cancer Biology, Chromatography methods.» (Yes)
- More options for the compulsory courses» (Yes)
- More satellite communication, positioning and their systems related courses should be added » (Yes)
- System on chip» (Yes)
- Open Innovation» (Yes)
- Some economic aspects» (Yes)
- OpenFOAM» (Yes)
- Advanced Engineering Mathematics. Analysis of shell structures. Bridge Engineering. Continuum Mechanics. Dynamic Soil Mechanics. Analysis of slender structures. In most parts of the world, these courses are elective for structural engineers, but not here at Chalmers.» (Yes)
- The curriculum is out of touch. However, I have noticed that this has been adressed already for next year, and those changes seem well thought and are in line with my own opinion.» (Yes)
- Det är väldigt få rekommenderade kurser för oss medan andra har mycket fler.» (Yes)
- Integrated water resource management,water governance,Advanced GIS for water systems, research methodology,Environmental measuring and monitoring» (Yes)
- Social Interfaces» (Yes)
- There should be better information about courses relevant for the program given by other departments. courses on patents and courses on leadership. not included at all in the education and difficult to find relevant courses on that subject from other departments as well fitting with the biotechnology master. Good drug carrier courses. Took a course in nanostructured drugdelivery courses but this course was not so good and I did not learn as much and those things I would have wanted. Development of better cell laboratory skills when it comes to animal cells which should already be included in the education during the bachelor. We are almost only trained in working with bacteria and yeast during the bachelor. » (Yes)
- Course in project management, a better course in cognitive ergonomics or equal (psychology)» (Yes)
- Statistical process control» (Yes)
- Detailed study about wire bonding...» (Yes)
- Power System Protection» (Yes)
- Yes, there is - but don"t want them to be compulsory» (Yes)
- adding more geology courses could be better,» (Yes)
- More courses about simulation and modeling tools for energy systems.» (Yes)
- The Artifical Neural Network-course given in the CAS-programme should be added into the programme. An Machine Learning or AI-branch could be added to the programme if this course and AI2 from Lindholmen were added or Stochastic Optimzation Algorithms from CAS-programme» (Yes)
- organisational behavior and lean production» (Yes)
- Sound Recognition» (Yes)
- One of the first courses taught in this program should relate to human cognition. Having an entire master"s program around designing interactive things for people without providing an introduction into how people understand the world seems like building a house without a foundation. Further, in the game design track of Interaction Design, there is only one course about game design.» (Yes)
- Introduction to bioinformatics algorithms(the book by PEVZENER will be good giude) Introduction to Mathematical Application in Bioinformatics » (Yes)
- environmental engineering» (Yes)
- Satellite Modeling and Design Satellite projects More Practical and lab based courses » (Yes)
- More courses related to Networking......where more practical work is required to be done on router, switches etc.» (Yes)
- Some courses like BIW, Vehicle Technologies, Projects related industries would be more interesting» (Yes)
- Ingen specifik kurs men jag tycker att det borde finnas fler praktiska möjligheter att välja kurser utanför programmet. Vi har visserligen många valbara poäng men när det kommer till kritan är det väldigt svårt att välja andra kurser: antingen blir det schemakrockar eller så är vi inte behöriga av outgrundliga anledningar, och många av de intressanta kurserna som hör till I kommer vi inte in på för att de har idiotiska regler om att bara I-studenter får läsa deras kurser. Det borde gå att samordna bättre med andra masterprogram.» (Yes)
- More about real scenario calculations.» (Yes)
- Power Generation course» (Yes)
- system control applied to hybrid vehicle» (Yes)
- Radio Access Networks/Mobile communication» (Yes)
- More Experimental Biology course.» (Yes)
- Some signals and system Engineering- Automation and Matlab courses for international students » (Yes)
- some fabrication courses should me added in our core courses......» (Yes)
- As the name indicates networks and distributed system but so far i didn"t still get any networking knowledge and the goal of the programme says that the student can be a network consultant but i really don"t know how without giving enough networking courses which are applicable to the real world.» (Yes)
- An extension of the course Structural Systems in order to get better perspectives on the practical engineering work.» (Yes)
- Wireless Networks. The couse which already exits is not helpful. I can not learn much but can still easy get 7.5 credits. The communication engineering subject are all based on basic physical layer, no course is about the view of the wireless networks. While searching the job, I find a lot of the jobs require student have the background of computer science and communication engineering. However, the courses provided in Chalmers both in computer and communicaiton area are not enough to cover what I need.» (Yes)
- Marketing» (Yes)
- earlier mechanics course. One which gives more basic understanding in structural/material dynamics» (Yes)
- I think international students need a preparatory course of MATLAB which is critically required for bioreactor course. Also, more courses related to the field of bionanotechnology.» (Yes)
- Service Contract Mangagement (in the track of Prod Mangement). It is common today that production manager has to outsources activities that arent core activities..» (Yes)
- More course about the state of the art, such as LTE related courses» (Yes)
- Power System protection course» (Yes)
- Software Project Management» (Yes)
- Network design» (Yes)
- finance/accountancy course » (Yes)
- model facture» (Yes)
- More business economics» (Yes)
- course about Building Information Modeling(BIM). » (Yes)
- Design for Testability (DFT), Design Verification » (Yes)
- Drawings» (Yes)
- placed courses by keeping international(worldwide) requirement means introduced some courses whose requirement are common in most part of the world. » (Yes)
- Reconstruction (project)» (Yes)
- Constraint Programming» (Yes)
- more course related to software developing process» (Yes)
- high energy astrophysics radiative transfer» (Yes)
- there should be more specialization options, excluding studios. for example there should be at least a mandatory course about cost calculations and construction laws, for future architects to learn what is constructible» (Yes)
- Courses of specific characterisation methods» (Yes)
- More marketing and sales» (Yes)
- Composite Mechanics» (Yes)
- More Matlab preporation for new students. more about battary and Electric motors and Controlsystems. » (Yes)
- distribution of electricity/energy» (Yes)
- My program is mostly aimed at instrumentation stuff. There is lots of work on modeling different biological systems, which have no place in the program,i.e. not in the courses nor in the master thesis projects usually offered. I think also it would be a very good idea to add a course on statistical data analysis and information theory, covering titles like entropy,tests of significance, classification methods and signal detection theory as they are vastly used in research.» (Yes)
- A more open kind of project, where it isn"t necessary to work in cooperation with a company.» (Yes)
- Optimization in Supply Chain. Compulsory course on sustainability of supply chain and business development - something like that- Corporate finance or finance impplications over the suuply chain» (Yes)
- More courses on real estate management, and more practically oriented courses in project management, e.g. by doing workshops, force us to form teams and take individual responsibility to fill a decided role in the group etc.» (Yes)
- nonlinear control» (Yes)
- More mechatronics (at least as optional courses)» (Yes)
- Some Economic / Purchase related / Management courses can add more value» (Yes)
- The image analysis course I took from Biomedical engineering was very interesting and seems relevant even for us at EM» (Yes)
- I think one pure mathematics cource that covers all the relevent topics to the field of Microwave engineering and one more cource on the radar, satellite and RFID etc applications relevent to microwave engineering.» (Yes)
- Advance Course in Internet Technology and some courses more related to Data networks etc...» (Yes)
- Fluid materials, they can be viewed from a material point of view as well» (Yes)
- Design Of Experiment, for use in for example engine calibration (due to increasing nr of variables in ICEs)» (Yes)
- Internship with management in a company min 6 months» (Yes)
- I think the various areas must be treated into details for a student to know which area he/she want to specialized.It now looks more like a bit in each field of civil engineering.» (Yes)
- More civil engineering courses and management courses» (Yes)
- sustainable power production course could be divided in two» (Yes)
- Stochastic Optimization, more programming (for those so inclined), more hands-on applying techniques. Where are all courses combining the knowledge into something useful? » (Yes)
- Course in Game Theory» (Yes)
- modeling, materials» (Yes)
- Basic Economics» (Yes)
- More applied engineering geology and geotechnics (much more)» (Yes)
- advanced analog circuit design, more subjects on advanced fpga design, the subjects related to asic were thorough and very satisfying» (Yes)
- Most courses value group working which is good, but I think it is better to have some courses to train the individual ability, like individual project.» (Yes)
- Some courses in the following topics: Optical communication Sound processing Optimization » (Yes)
- Corporate Finance» (Yes)
- Research Methodology Biofuels Tribology » (Yes)
- More road and traffic planning » (Yes)
- cosmetics» (Yes)
- More Clean room exercises, More interdisciplinary subjects!» (Yes)
- More extensive cooperation with other professional fields, separate course and/or integrated with existing. More attention to verifiable science part, students know know too little construction/physics/system techonology/..» (Yes)
- TQM should be required for all students. This is such an important subject and needed when students come out to their first job. » (Yes)
- 1, Kursen med järnvägsfokus, ex järnvägsplanering och uppförande av järnväg. Öppna upp för distanskurser! (Personligt önskemål) 2, Kurser med fokus på projektledning och projekteringsledning många av oss kommer jobba inom projetkeringsområdet och behöver den kunskapen också! (Detta saknas verkligen!) 3, Mer projekt applicerade på verkliga projekt såsom stora komplexa byggnationer och hur det fungerar på olika företag idag. Ex. samarbete med företag som jobbar med stora järnvägs-, väg-, vatten eller andra infrastruktur eller anläggningsprojekt. Självklart med studiebesök ute i produktion. (Skulle ge oss en bättra förberedelse inför arbetslivet!)» (Yes)
- semiconductor physics» (Yes)
- Environmental impacts on transportation, Strategic Impact Assesment.» (Yes)
- More geotechnics» (Yes)
- -new related softwares. -new technologys/methods of construction, details... -something like an internship, because I think like medicine students who learn their skillsin a real atmosphere like a hospital or so, it"s really useful if architecture schools have connections with construction sites, or architectural offices to be experienced by students.» (Yes)
- Some courses about WCDMA, LTE» (Yes)
- More real research work» (Yes)
- Groundwater flows and test well pumping» (Yes)
- software development for smart phones.» (Yes)
- More handson education on how financlia reporting should be handeled in the projects» (Yes)
- Social aspects, politics, democracy etc. The three sustainability dimensions are environmental, economic and social, so there should be a course about a sustainable society including such things as democracy etc. The name of the programme is Industrial ecology - for a sustainable society, which implies that that dimension would be raised, but it is clearly lacking!» (Yes)
- More traffic courses and geotechnical courses» (Yes)
- some more courses on antenna design and simulation as it is communication engineering program and antenna is one of the very important part of communication.» (Yes)
- Någon mer kurs inom hydrogeologi och geoteknik.» (Yes)
- Some arts courses for the designing» (Yes)
- Maybe some courses about project management» (Yes)
- More project courses.» (Yes)
- quality management» (Yes)
- more of sociology » (Yes)
- Intelectual Property» (Yes)
- Courses giving basic idea related to Finance Courses on numerical research design» (Yes)
- more detail knowledge about the distributed system and how to use it» (Yes)
- Possibility to read more cryptography courses. As far as i know there is only possible to read one introduction course but it would be nice to have more advanced courses following the introduction.» (Yes)
- Environmental courses!» (Yes)
- A course aimed at realising your concept ideas in some form. The student should be able to chose a strategy (licensing to company, selling the concept, starting a company) and go through the different steps necessary to realise it.» (Yes)
- AI for games » (Yes)
- Most of 2009 students have no idea about the Master"s degree they are taking. A general overview about electronics circuits should help.» (Yes)
- This is kind of vehicle related program, so that would be good to have more CAD softwares and body design (even in the case of art design).» (Yes)
- Business Information Systems Entrepreneurship and Creativity Sustainable Decisions and Organisations» (Yes)
- More realistic technology courses for the game design track, especially when it comes to the development/programming part. Object orientation is not enough and the students need to know when not to use it.» (Yes)
- Intercultural business communication.» (Yes)
- genetics» (Yes)
- More courses about road planning!» (Yes)
- Power courses» (Yes)
- Cognitive Sciences, an Industry Project(coupling groups of students with companies and coming up with a new design for them), a Service Design Project, Data Visualization, Tangible UI, Computational Design.» (Yes)
- Rock Mechanics, Foundation Engineering, Soil Mechanics» (Yes)
- A course in interaction design (as introduction/birds eye view). In general more courses to choose from.» (Yes)
- Environmental evaluation tools» (Yes)
- Some introduction course in technical terms before starting the program that you could learn during the summer. It was hard in the beginning with English.» (Yes)
- A bit more electrical engineering, though I read the course Power Market Management which filled that gap for me.» (Yes)
- Water management, more water courses! » (Yes)
- Grid & Cloud computing, peer-to-peer systems» (Yes)
- The program is more heading toward more chemical and environmental aspects and less technical stuff» (Yes)
- We were supposed to have more subjects on the "soft" side of management and so far, the only course that was really worth it was Project Psychology with Max Rapp Ricciardi» (Yes)
- A few practical courses for developing skills: Interaction using emerging web technologies (HTML+JS+CSS), Interaction for mobile devices (Android particularly, not just iPhone)» (Yes)
- Software Design Patterns» (Yes)
- a course in advanced FPGA implementation (with signal processing etc)» (Yes)
- A course that gives a brief understanding of building economy, since one as an architect will always have to deal with that and that is quite a difficult task to do if not knowing anything.» (Yes)
- Risk Management» (Yes)
- Musical Acoustics, Marine Acoustics, Signal Processing, » (Yes)
- I would like to add some courses that more focus on the companies work becuase most of the courses today are very wide and is on a global scale.» (Yes)
- Economics, project management etc. You are going to work at a company when you"re finished, but you won"t have any skills in any fields except maths. Specially project management would be great to have in the programme since all of us are going to work in projects later. Other programms have much more of this courses. Why are they learning "how to behave" but we"re not?!?» (Yes)
- Sales orientation.» (Yes)
- The already existing Artificial Intelligence 2 course should be taken over by this masters program» (Yes)
- More company visiting, focus more on practice.» (Yes)
- A more detailed course in FEM (Finite Element Method)» (Yes)
- Ersätt physical distribution med en inköpskurs för att mer motsvara de grundläggande pelarna i masterprogrammet men främst för att det endast var repetition av freight transport kursen.» (Yes)
- På svenska mer om byggprocessen och juridik i bygg och anläggningsbranschen.» (Yes)
- Some programming course (optional or semi-mandatory course). It would be very relevant with an optional course in object-oriented programming (C++ or Java), since the program has a modelling and design track. The course Digital Control is very difficult to handle. I would like to have a recommended system control course before that (optional).» (Yes)
- Programming of parallel computers and High Performance Computing.» (Yes)
- applied signal processing» (Yes)
- MKM130 Project work in microtechnology» (Yes)
- Transportation, logistics, railway-engineering, operation and maintenance of road/rail, management » (Yes)
- More practical projects, applied tasks where more than one subject are implemented.» (Yes)
- scientific visits» (Yes)
- Training in writing reports.» (Yes)
- Management type courses» (Yes)
- Hybrid technology» (Yes)
- In the imaging track, there are few courses, I hope there could be more courses and not conflict with compulsory courses.» (Yes)
- -something relating to human psychology -more interaction design class options during 2nd year -art/design based course teaching graphic design - colour/typography etc» (Yes)
- Project management is needed, since most courses are project based. » (Yes)
- As part of a course or two, gain some exposure to experimentation and energy equipment in use at Chalmers.» (Yes)
- Mix signal subjects.» (Yes)
- The game track is kind of lacking, another game design course or the option of some 3d-modeling/animation course in year 2 would be welcome.» (Yes)
- more projects to prepare for real working life» (Yes)
- Sustainable Building for Different Climates( Not only considering Sweden)» (Yes)
- Connect together more of the knowledge that was learnt during the bachelor.» (Yes)
- basic economic in building construction and architecture, but maybe it should be earlier... » (Yes)
- To bad information about prerequirement courses!!!» (Yes)
- More surface courses» (Yes)
- Strategic sourcing» (Yes)
- Please offer some basic courses related to Communication Engineering in english. There are some courses related to my field which are very important but they are offered in swedish language. Also there should be a course of swedish language.» (Yes)
- instead of global chemical sustainability should be replace by another engineering course, the status of mandatory is not suitable for global chemical sustainability, and digital control as well because many students do not have the background of electronics so it means we have 7 mandatory courses and among them we have to select 6, so digital control should not have in the mandatory list and chemical global sustainability as well. thanks.» (Yes)
- Subjects on RF Design and advanced Analog Design» (Yes)
- Not in particular, just that information about other courses should be more aware, and can be chosen e.g courses from GU» (Yes)
- It would be nice if some different areas of specialization are highlighted in the software engineering program and courses are grouped targeting that specific program» (Yes)
- Digital communications, Wireless communications, Wireless Networks» (Yes)
- there is lack of course options. more courses can be added related to application like Bridge Design, Plates and Shell, Tall Structure, etc» (Yes)
- Would be nice to connect it more to EcoMarathon since its a nice control project.» (Yes)
- Yes, the program needs more courses in Power Systems, like Power Quality, Stability and Protection at least. Also, more detailed courses in Wind Power and a second course of FACTS devices where things are seen in more depth. Most of the courses need of a second part where things are seen in more depth.» (Yes)
- courses from fundalmental physics. they are helpful.» (Yes)
- more courses about chemistry» (Yes)
- We must have more programming cources in order not to be unemployed after graduation» (Yes)
- More energy technology courses combined with chemical engineering. » (Yes)
- More courses about DSP in FPGA, System level Design, etc.» (Yes)
- More courses in theoretical computer science. For example a course in denotational semantics and domain theory would be interesting. More courses in logic, it would be good to have a course in set theory for instance. A course in abstract algebra empasizing on the connection between algebra and programming. Maybe with connections to type theory. Some category theory could also be part of such a course, alternatively have an advanced advanced functional programming course.» (Yes)
- Perhaps a project course where the knowledge from this program could be applied more in a programming context, i.e. development of network-related applications, as the master"s thesis isn"t necessarily about that. Coming from the Software Engineering BSc on Chalmers, this would connect the BSc and MSc in a better way.» (Yes)
- Power Quality Power System Stability Control of FACTS and HVDC» (Yes)
- High speed noise issues » (Yes)
- More analogue courses. I believe programme needs more courses realted to integrated electronics. » (Yes)
- More like th HPC course. This course should be promoted more aswell. It is really good.» (Yes)
- More courses within food and health to get a broader perspective.» (Yes)
- Digital Signal Processing Neural Networks Speech Signal Processing Adaptive Signal Processing» (Yes)
- Railways Engineering» (Yes)
- More passive house calculations.» (Yes)
- Sustainable Energy Futures» (Yes)
- 3D course (3Ds Max)» (Yes)
- More courses related to water technology.» (Yes)
- More fluid dynamics and applied mechanics» (Yes)
- I think there were too many water-related courses and too few courses in geotechnics, geology and traffic.» (Yes)
- Sustainable energy systems» (Yes)
- After "Introduction to microtechnology and nanotechnology" One general course about creating and engineering new Micro-Nano devices, » (Yes)
- Group theory» (Yes)
- HVDC ,WINDPOWER COURSES » (Yes)
- a course knowledge about how chemicals effect the nature and the human body» (Yes)
- automotive acoustics, thermo acoustics, project work.» (Yes)
- The master is called Sustainable Energy Systems. Yes we have courses about Sustainable Development and Sustainable Energies. Yes we have courses about Energy Systems. But I don"t see any course in the program making the link between those two subjects. Indeed, we don"t learn that much about making energy systems energy-efficient (except by the use of heat exchangers). For instance, how to design correctly motors and pumps (size adapted to demand), what kind of devices can be added to reduce the energy demand (such as variable frequency drives), what kind of maintenance should be done to avoid losses, etc. I"m available for any other suggestion regarding an "Energy Efficiency for Industry" course (allet@student.chalmers.se). I think it is really important to have one for this master.» (Yes)
- Actually, MPCOM is too general, people who want to study wireless communication path have wireless courses only in the first year, the second year course offer is very poor. I think this is not good. You can choose a bunch of courses, get to know a bit about everything, but essentially you will end up knowing nothing really deep.» (Yes)
- Maybe some selective course related to economics in company context combining supply chain. » (Yes)
- TQM organizational behavior» (Yes)
- more Quality e.g. TQM and Lean something more suitable for mechanical engineering. Today there is still much focus on Construction engineering» (Yes)
- Digital Signal Processing in VLSI System Level Design » (Yes)
- Fundamental business and finance course for people with bsc other than industrial engineering.» (Yes)
- Human aspects in the construction sector and bidding processes» (Yes)
- some kind of applied physics i combination with cad» (Yes)
- I would like to raise the quality of each course» (No)
- There could be some more technical courses. Fundamental structural engineering for example.» (No)
- Update the courses. They are way too easy.» (No)
- But make sure elective courses are being done..Ended up with a third choice this year, and hence elective became mandatory courses to only get enough credit points in the ECTS system.» (No)
- I think there should be a Swedish language course so that we can understand Swedish language and culture.» (No)
- Current plan with many elective free courses are good. Gives the student much freedom to make it"s own specialization/generalization» (No)
- I would like a clearer separation between the different areas. My primary interest is in Human Factors for instance and especially Grafical Interfaces. To be able to read all courses I feel is relevant in this field i must study at more than a 100 % pace, since a number of mandatory courses exist which do not contribute towards my understanding in the area.» (No)
- Om vi bara pratar med koordinatorn först får vi välja in i stort sett vilken kurs som helst från andra mastersprogram» (No)
- should perhaps have chosen another programme» (No)
- We are free to add courses from other areas ourselves.» (No)
- rather, the courses should have higher standard, and then I only refer to all of the courses after christmas. They were all a disaster!» (No)
- More connection to real working tasks and probable future tasks. » (No)
- Business administration» (No opinion)
- A course in parallel programming would be a good preparation for some of the courses contained in the programme (distributed systems, real time systems etc). So maybe it would be a good idea to recommend students applying to the programme to read such a course before the master.» (No opinion)
- Image analysis course is not very satisfactory,,teach it diffrently..» (No opinion)
- Suggest better elective courses during the spring of the 1st year of the masters» (No opinion)
- I dont know, more practial things perhaps.» (No opinion)
- im on an exchange within the master program, and its the exchange that im unsatisfied with.» (No opinion)
- From my point of view its better to define the master thesis at first stages of study and make course selection based on thesis specific concept.» (No opinion)
- I prefered to study the courses same as the Electric Power Engineering program in other top universities such as American or Canadian universities.» (No opinion)
- I think wireless sensors course would be helpful» (No opinion)

22. Are there any courses that you think should be heavily revised (or even removed) from the programme?

Yes (1 to 2)»		589		42%
Yes (3 to 4)»		86		6%
Yes more than 5»		22		1%
No»		474		33%
No opinion»		228		16%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- Global chemical sustainabillity remove it from mandatory and put in advanced chemical reaction engineering or other courses as mandatory.» (?)
- image analysis» (?)
- Better suggestions for elective courses or to make it easy to find courses» (?)
- Source Coding (Removed and may be added to a new mastern degree program like information theory) Multimedia and Video (same comments) Wireless Networks ( must be revised) » (?)
- All the Compulsory courses should be in first 2 terms or first semester. in this program on Compulsory courses in each study term... it is very hard...» (?)
- Organisational project management» (?)
- Astrophysics and Earth Science to revised (to be given independently)» (?)
- Some courses should be cancelled such as manufacturing strategy. It is useless for students who choose the track of manufacturing technology.» (?)
- The choice you made to keep tution fees, I totaly against it. Well, you charged no fees to EU students who are from rich countries, but students from my country are poor, can"t even dream to study in Sweden any more. I am very unhappy for your dicission and sorry to say that we cannot come to Sweden for study any more. You might have few students who are really rich, but even they will not consider to come in Sweden. Because, I know, those rich students in my country they prefer to study in USA, UK, Canada or AUS. Rest of the poor students like me, preffered choice was Sweden. Now our hope and dream to receive some well higher education is stopped. This tution fee is just like a SLAP from Sweden to us who are poor. Wish you good luck you rich people.» (?)
- building in society, construction processes » (?)
- Managing Development Projects. Make the course more applied and less theoretical.» (?)
- applied mechatronics - really bad course, I didn"t learn anything but I still got grade 5 project management - have before product development course advanced cad - better eamination needed, could be a good course but more demands are needed » (?)
- Modern manufacturing processes. Too easy» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Material mechanics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced production systems» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Material Mechanics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Biopolymers» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Risk Assessment should be revised. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Uptill now its just 1, eHealth. In it the teacher is great, the guest speakers are great. The problem that i see is that apparently the course has no structure .... people come in talk about themselves about what they do and then leave, which might be ok, but i want more out of this course if i am made to study this as a mandatory course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Skippa management of Physical distribution - vet fortfarande inte riktigt vad jag lärde mig i den kursen. Distribution networks är inte helt rolig heller, kanske man borde göra något mer intressant av den kursen.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Software architecture - the course was more about programming than architecture» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course "Managing operations processes" has the potential of being a great course. The literature (book and articles) were very good and interesting but it needs to be taught by someone with enough knowledge in the field.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Utpräglade miljökurserna. Det behövs självklart utvecklas ett tänkande för hållbar utveckling, men det är lämpligare att detta görs som delar i befintliga kurser, snarare än i enskilda. Ska det vara enskilda miljökurser bör de vara tekniska inriktade och inte så färgade av föreläsarens egna uppfattning om hur alla små söta djur ska räddas.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I would like to remove Mats course Operations Processes which I was very disappointed of. Mats is not a skilled lecturer and does not inspire the class to learn. It seems that he does not know his slides and that he has copied them from the previous teacher. The course is much to broad and too similar to the first introduction course. On a master level I as a student expect more specialization and to dig deep into an area instead of covering all type of operations in 7 weeks. After a very interesting and challenging autumn, this course very much lowered my satisfaction with the programme. Moreover, the projects in the Six Sigma course must be distributed earlier in order for the student to have a fair chans of improving the process. Moreover, information should be improved between the courses so that Stefano is not repeating too much content from the autumn, which has happened. Finally, the course should take place on dates that doesn"t clash with exam dates. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Yes the course ehealth and Bioelectromagnetics should not be mandatory cause they arenot useful for all the tracks!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Production Logistics, den är alldeles för lik kursen Logistik som är valbar i 3:an för M-studenter.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Skip VEF and introduce a real finance course. NVF should be revised so that a motivated teacher is responsible.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Economics of Innovation are very similar to ekonomisk analys 3: innovationsekonomi which we studied in the third year at the I-programme at Chalmers. This course is much repetition for most students. Also, Research Design and methods, much of it were covered when doing the bachelor thesis.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- R&D Strategy and Organisation takes way too much time to be a course valid for 7,5 points, too many literature seminar, cases and literature. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Energy systems modelling and planning is a really good course idea-wise but it is run really poorly.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I like the AFP course but the examination should be revised.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Sustainable energy future and sustainable developement is to similar. Half of SEF is repitition. Don"t think that energy systems modelling an planning can be held as it is. It"s only frustrating without any good planning. I think the content is ok but the performance is unacceptable.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I don"t thick HVAC should be compulsary, it"s not relevant.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Statistical physics 2, but it already has.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The courses that were split up could be managed better for example the earth science/space science course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- In general the examiners shouldn"t hand out assignments so heavy they can"t grade them in time.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Change teacher in Microwave projects course, either start cooperation again with someone working in industry who can lecture on project leading or pay someone from say industrial economy to come and teach project management.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- ICM Theory in year 2 lp 2 could be removed. Didn"t added anything to the program where it is situated. Would be better as a start-up of the programme. The business creation lab feels more directed towards CSE and GIBBS and not ICM which makes this course freestanding from the rest of the program» (Yes (1 to 2))
- For many courses the two first weeks are used bringing students from external master programs up to speed. Maybe give those students handouts?» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Managing operations processes - interesting subject but the course needs to be revised in order to make students more engaged» (Yes (1 to 2))
- CATIA V5 more focus on the advanced modules Business markting and purchasing change to project management» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think the course Applied Nuclear Chemistry should be elective, not compulsory to make room for other courses if one does not wish to pursue a Chemistry oriented version of the programme.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The MTS-courses should not be mandatory to get a "civilingenjörsexamen"» (Yes (1 to 2))
- PLM - due to that the software used havent been functioning any of the years the course has been up an running. Why force the students to take a non-functioning completely useless course?» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Building Acoustics and Environmental Noise should be presented as two separate courses.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Materials Selection and Design is a joke. It does not fill the 7,5 credits with enough content and the lecturer is really lazy. It felt like a waste of time.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Distributed Systems was a catastrophy. Nearly half the course dealt with communication protocols and security, which is covered (by good margin) by the compulsatory communication course and the computer security course. This time could be spent on design of modern middleware instead. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmental management should be removed and replaced with a course in sustainable management taught by another department.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- More ultrasonics, if possible, and less loudspeakers...» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Applied signal processing, Multimedia anf video communications (too similar to source coding)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The information systems course should be heavily changed (the book, the TA, and the topics covered).» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Nuclear Chemistry course in the first study period has very high workload compared to the other course and most of the students find it difficult to cope with it. at least i found it very difficult.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Freight Transport system, it could be a bit better to add some more pratical examples.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Energy systems modelling and planning since much of the course has been covered in previous courses.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Freight course was too easy.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modeling and problem solving The cumpolsory "environmental"-crap assignment that does not result in any credits for the students.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- just remove digital control subject from this degree program.... » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Global Chemical Sustainability Advanced Chemical Engineering and PAT » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced sketching has very good and relevant content but it REALLY needs a course PM. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Freight transport systems Distribution networks Management of physical distribution These three courses could be added together since it is a lot of redundancy in them from previous courses.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The courses "Freight Transport Systems" and " Management of Physical Distribution" could be merged to one course. There was a lot of redundancy and repetition in the two courses. We even had the same guest lecturer come and give the exact same presentatation twice. Freight systems was a decent course albeit a little bit too easy but physical distribution was a total disgrace! We only had classes for four weeks. No read thread between the lectures. If you merge the two courses to one and put in a large case-project I think it would have been much better. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Agile Development in Teams» (Yes (1 to 2))
- e-Health.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Logic» (Yes (1 to 2))
- projekt and regler» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The mandatory courses are no good to people that have their B.Sc. from Chalmers Biotechnology program.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Engineering geology, which I hope, after the last time they gave the course and the disscusions.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The students" presentations in Complex Systems Seminar could be replaced with professional presentations of applications in Industry and Research.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I thought the project course was of no use for me. Chalmers student have done likely courses 3-4 times before. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Some of the courses could benefit from an approach that was more directed towards learning concepts, ideas and design issues instead of trying to teach students specific implementations. The courses I"m thinking about are mainly Internet Technologies and Distributed Systems (the first course, not the advanced one). These courses should definitely be in the programme, but they could be revised.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Fuel cells Surface and nanophysics They are both far too easy to pass, you barely have to learn anything. In surface and nanophysics it is also clear that the prerequisite of knowledge of solid state physics is not enforced what so ever.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think "Nanobioscience for information processing" must not be compulsory» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think that in general the programme should be made more flexible and studens should be allowed to design their own curriculum much more than now. My suggestion is that no courses are made mandatory for everyone and instead put some of the currently mandatory courses as mandatory within different "minors" or subprogrammes. This then relies on the students being given good information about the topics that different courses will deal with so that they can make informed decisions. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The PLM course is a bit heavy...» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The preparation course for the Master Thesis do not give a good preparation for the Thesis. a course like that is necessary, but the way it is done today do not help the students at all. The course Research by Design should also be changed. The course do not give any knowledge at all.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- MCC090 is too elementary for the program.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- VEF» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Physical Computing and Ubiquitous computing should be review as both can be join in one course with a better project that can be done in six months. Instead of 2 mediocre projects...» (Yes (1 to 2))
- YES!!!!! Environmental Management . One of the worst courses I have taken and it is so fuzzy, unstructured and low level of the lectures. That course might be good if you have not taken any course on sustainability before but for a master program such as Industrial ecology - where the most of the courses has some kind of sustainability aspect in it - this course is VERY LOW LEVEL! It also might have something to do with the teachers! Also Applied Industrial Ecology was very boring and could really have been structured and tought in a much more interesting way. It is though a quite relevant course for the program...» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The biggest problem is that some courses contains too much repetition from other courses already studied during the bachelor, which demotivates me since it seems like I do not learn anything new and I do not become more specialiased. So far this is specifically true for the course Protein Engineering I, which I am sure is possible to improve in a lot of ways. A course that need to be revised if not removed is the Biopolymer which give nothing for other students than thoose reading the tissue-track.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- introduction to communication engineering, antenna engineering» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Many are extremely similar, especially "management of physical distribution" and "Distrbution networks"» (Yes (1 to 2))
- 2nd Year courses need improvement ! such that they are relevant to Comm Engg.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Either there should not be restriction to study semi-elective courses (currently 2 out of 4) or there should be more semi-elective courses for selection of courses.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Conservation and transformation about cultural heritage is an interesting course, but not as useful as for exemple a course about laws and regulations.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- -Wireless networks(Just too easy and need to be revised for sure.Make it more practical rather than just giving guest lectures) » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Quality management and risk management» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Architectural conservation and transformation. This course is in need of a serious revising.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Materials selection should be revised to if that course really adds to the programme.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Design systems » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Think about internet technology. Too much stuffs to read. It is in the first quarter and the new students might have serious difficulties with them. No one got 5 this year, even in the re-exam so there must be a problem. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Remove Introduction to discrete events system and possible real-time control systems.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- in my opinion the course "managing operation processes" needs serious revision. the issue with the course is not the syllabus, but the teacher and his lectures.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Remove "Industrial design engineering - methodology ..." and "Risk Management and Safety"» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Energy systems modelling and planning» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Applied Mechatronics might be improved by adding some more depth to the topics.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- it does not have a clear statement of course selection in the second year, not quite clear specification» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Sustainable Development. I think this is the worst of two similar courses. The pepole behaind te course are much more nice i SEF than in SD. Even the staff in ESMP makes that course bad.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- PLM-course, too narrow and specific to be a part of the mandatory block. Should be elective. Or a part of the course could be included in another course, CAD for instance.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I guess the courses should be thoroughly revised as we come from different backgrounds from Bachelors.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Computer Introduction - removed Applied Signal Processing - revised » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Project in applied mechanics (removed) Computations in mechanics (revised) » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Ships Motions and Wave induced load bör pedagogiskt göras om. Pedagogiken i övegripande förståelse för strukturkurserna kan också göras bättre.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Good subjects but poor teaching in the Agile and Software Architecture courses.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Individual preparation course should be made into a more real course. I think that there is always a similar need for each new group of masters students to go into the "necessary evils" of acoustics and thus, a better structure should be easy to impose on the course curriculum.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modeling and simulation was a very poor course, and not a very good introduction for the master program (since it was in lp1)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Sustainable power production and transportation. This course is way to easy compared to the other master courses.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- again my suggestion is to make two programs instead of one» (Yes (1 to 2))
- You have to know which control subject have been handled befor in the master program. It has felt like we have been going trough the same material over and over again in the control subjects.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Ship resistance and propulsion should be split in two courses FEM in design was a bit too easy» (Yes (1 to 2))
- statistical inference can be made as an elective» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The Production Logistics course should change the book as it is really boring and hard to read, it is repetitive the information so is difficult to keep motivation when reading.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- information system for scm, make it more practical » (Yes (1 to 2))
- the QFT course needs another teacher» (Yes (1 to 2))
- As it is shaped today, I would not advise anyone to take the Room Acoustics-course since it is badly organized and requires work well worth at least 15 points. My suggestion is that the course is divided in to RAC-I and RAC-II and then have i.e. the BAC or HRSV moved to one of the periods after summer.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- BIS» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Biopolymers should not be compulsary. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Statistical inference» (Yes (1 to 2))
- MOP» (Yes (1 to 2))
- the room acoustics course should be revised. more consultation is needed. the scope is too comprehensive the learning outcome from the human response to sound course are quite vague» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Two. Advanced Classical physics and Quantum Field theory. I"m sorry but I have to be frank. The courses are good, except for the lecturer. There is general consensus among students are as far as I am concerned that we Really need a new lecturer.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- software architecture needs a new teacher.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Remove or substantially revise Environmental Management» (Yes (1 to 2))
- wireless networks. it doesn"t seem to be very well organized to me. the course memo / project memo should be clear enough for the student to understand what is that he has to do, but in this case, it seems like the people in charge are making it up along the road. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- KOK076 Natural product chemistry - the name should be adjusted to fit the content better. A large part of the course overlaps with KEM830 Medicinal Chemistry (GU). It would be more beneficial for the students if the name contained "Medicinal" or something along that line. Alot of course content is about medicine.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Vibration control» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Bioreactors is far to much similar with Bioreaktionsteknik from the bachelor in biotechnology. The part that Carl-Johan Franzen has is exactly the same as in the course we took earlier.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Bioreactor» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Materials for light weight design needs revision (as is planned for 2010/2011 for what I"ve heard) Materials characterisation and failure analysis can be more focused on some core areas instead of having a little bit of everything. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- On my oppenion Sustainable Power Production should be removed and compensated by Wind power only. Introductory MATLAB should be provided in parallel with Drives two Course. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- TEK350 Intellectual property and innovation strategies. Half of the course literature was removed becasue of copyright problems (!). The quality was extremely low in all aspects!!! » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Applied computational electromagnetics shoud be removed.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- In the first two study periods the sustanability courses are very much the same, one could be removed.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I dont think Introduction to discrete event systems should be mandatory if you choose control. Perhaps have a course in Random processes instead.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Material performance, Heat and moisture» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course Engineering Geology should be revised both in the amount of it"s class time and it"s subject.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Project in applied mechanics was very badly planned. Revise! And Vibration control too, it was too unclear goals and course pm.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- From the 6 out of 8 mandatory courses the course birefinery should be available for the programme, but not as a mandatory course. Instead it should be optional together with the paper and cellulose technology courses. Instead the course design of industrial equipment might take it"s place. Saying this without having taking the DOE course. It corresponds better to the chemical engineering programe. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- i do not understand why we had Iindustrial Energy Systems before Heat and Power Systems Engineering... and before Energy Systems Modelling and Planning, we should study wider systems first, it will help us to better understand heat exchanger systems... » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Introduction to automotive engineering for example» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Software Architecture. I hear it is being revised though. I didn"t like Software leadership and quality management much either.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Project Psychology course was perfect» (Yes (1 to 2))
- strategic environmental assessment is not reasonable in terms of the exam.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The Foundations of Probatility Theory, not much new compared from the one at F, studied for 30h altogether, got a 5.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Revise the content of Managing organizations in the construction industry so that they are more specific to construction. As of now, too much focus is put on organizations in general.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- protein engineering 1» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Foundation for microwave engineering» (Yes (1 to 2))
- heat and moisture engineering» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Information Systems for SCM should be revised. The level was too low when I took it in the spring of 2009. One improvement would be if the course focused on one ERP system, for instance Movex, giving the students deep (and meaningful) knowledge instead of general (and useless) knowledge of several ERP systems. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Earth science part of RRY030.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think that Project in applied mechanics, TME130 should be fundamentally revised and taken over by an other examiner or removed from the programme. The problem considered in the course is way too large to be treated with the expected accuracy in a 7.5 ECTS course. The course also suffers from poor administration and inadequate computer resources. Furthermore, the course requires knowledge that we don"t have (e.g. advanced CAD modelling). The fact that this course had problems also last year, and that these problems have not been solved in a satisfactory way, suggests that a heavy revision is necessary. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Functional analysis should only be compulsory for the Mathematics specialization. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Distributed Systems. Internet Technology» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Distributed Systems 1 & 2 needs to be modified, it feels slightly old.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- biomedical instrumentation» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Nordic Architecture» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Maybe the course wireless network can be changed a bit but not removed.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think there are too many environemental courses, it should be more geo and water-courses instead.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Risk Management. Relevant course, but for my group it was a disaster in lectures and structure. But I know this have been dealt with internally at Chalmers already..So the next year students will probably have a much better experience.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Digital contorl should not be one of the semi complus.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Wireless networks» (Yes (1 to 2))
- To many mandatory courses. 4 or 5 would be enough » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The managing operations course and the research methodology course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- research by design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced production systems, manufacturing strategy» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Biorefinery. (Informationen om träden och vedstrukturer och lite kemisk information om lignin, cellulosa och användningsområden var användbart. Däremot rabblandet av olika processer som utgör huvuddelen av kursen är totalt oanvändbart. Jämför en historieundervisning där du rabblar kungar och årtal, det ger inte så mycket. Global sustainable chemical engineering (man lär sig inget som är kopplat till yrket (dessutom gymnasienivå)) » (Yes (1 to 2))
- -Introduction to Automotive Engineering course should be taught in a different way. Too many different areas are covered in a very short period. Therefore, the student overlaps everything too quickly to remember the knowledge.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Material performance and heat & moisture. Perhaps make them into one course » (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think the master thesis should not be compulsory. One should be able to take 4 courses instead. I think the master thesis represents too much work compared to regular courses time. And it is very hard to find a supervisor with a good subject. It is also bad not to be able to find a partner and to work alone for a so long time. According to Sven Knutsson who is responsible of master theses, a student should work 40 hours/week, in full time work. I think this is too much work, because one has to work on writting a report, prepare slides for meetings, realize many tasks, travel at the company (in my case), read a lot of documentation, etc. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- eHealth» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Research by deisign as well as design development and management needs to either be revised or removed. Also the information abour what to ekspect from the courses should be made more clear.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Introduction to AE.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Building in society (poorly planed and executet course, aim unclear..) should be removed» (Yes (1 to 2))
- the first one we took (not science of env. change which was really good)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Material selection and design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- VEF, NVF» (Yes (1 to 2))
- software architecture software leadership and quality management» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Reform the Modelng and plannign subject, it is a good subject but very bad planned» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The project in applied mechanics. The structure of the course are not very good and it"s too short with one quarter for such a project. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Enviromental system analysis » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Managing Operation Processes» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I took the course in Distributed Systems, but I couldn"t find that it gave me much I will have use for. Maybe move focus away from the details of a few distributed algorithms and instead discuss the problems and solutions in a more general way. Tho course in Agile Development Processes could include a little more on SCRUM and a little less on XP.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- industrial engineering could maybe be a part of another course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Internal combustion engines and Hybrid and vehicles controls... the lecturer should be replaced..sven andersson is bad for the programme.. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Applied mechatronics need a revision.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- MCC090 could be made elective, not mandatory, because many people have had similar courses in their bachelor programs» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Sustainable Development course should be revised. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The systemic design course is problematic. It is valuable in that it helps us as architects to take a step back and realize that we are dealing with systems, all the time. However it is highly questionable to try to make students design a building in such a course without ever having the students even practice doing a more scientific systemic analysis prior to this. Perhaps it would be better as a theoretical course with some practice on more proven and traditional systemic analysis techniques, rather than throwing students out into a design assignment. It could probably be shortened. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- I was a student at Matter Space Structure during the fall, but changed to Spaces for Housing Healthcare and Work for the spring term. I am happy with my current study atmospehere, but still upset on how some issues were handled by Morten Lund. I think Morten Lund is a great architect, and good at giving relevant criticism and feedback, but not suitable for planning and managing courses. I completely lacked reasonable schedules and "framförhållning", and also clearity of the goals to achieve in one description. The part "system design" was not clear at all. "Design a system for Gothenburg, if the city is flooded". There was no respect for parallel courses, regarding the work load. The tasks were divided into "2 weeks assignment" when we had 4 scheduled days to perform, and night time work was encouraged. During the concrete workshop autumn -09, there were not safety masks enough for everyone, (or at least they run out) why I got sick and went to the hospital for lung-problems which lasted for 2 months. At the Housing program, I think things are better handled, even if I totally miss the construction aspect of buildings. Therefore, my following answers refer to mixed good and bad experiences. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced Software Architecture, » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Research methods and design should be in the fall first semester for exchange students that leave Chalmers in calender year should get the opportunity to write their master thesis abroad.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The applied mechatronics course should be better screened of for people with sufficient background knowledge. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- the introductionary courses can be alot better. The pace is to slow and a feeling for photonics is not obtained. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course Energy Systems Modelling and Planning was very bad.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The courses are good, but they overlap eachother to much!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- MVE135» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Material performance. Parts of it was good but definately not all. however this may be a good course due to large variations in students background.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The courses DTIM and IFS could be improved academically. Many lectures did not feel relevant to the course, while other important parts seemed to be missing.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Statistics and Data Analysis(Want to be removed) Mathematical Modelling(Could be revised)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- technological change and industrial transformation course can be revised not removed» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Managing operations processes must be revised. The subject is still important and interesting, but there is too much to cover in 7,5 credits. Better to go deeper into some areas of the subject.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- human center design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Especially the course Multimedia and video communications needs to be totally revised and the lecturer sacked.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Microwave Engineering should be removed.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- "Idea evaluation and fisibility studeies" course should be strongly removed from the elective courses. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- passive safety and active safety» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Automation - too much repetition from Z bachelor Introduction to discrete event systems - seems very similar to Automation.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced Active Safety - I feel more of electronics is needed in this course. Vehicle Dynamics - The entire framework should be modified !! » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Some courses seem very similar and repetetive. Could be more useful with some more electives in LP3 year 1. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Global chemical sustainability - No new information, just the same as other enivironmental courses. To heavy load for the swedish student to learn foreign students about project work and that you are not allowed to just copy your work from internet.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Information systems for SCM» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Project course should be more demanding» (Yes (1 to 2))
- financial management and strategic management, it feels like the level is too low.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Global chemical sustainability should be heavily revised, or not mandatory for students with batchelors degree from Chalmers» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Passive safety» (Yes (1 to 2))
- "Research by Design" was a mess but had a good idea behind it, even though it was poorly communicated. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Physical and ubiquitous computing» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advance Production Systems was terrible, did not learn anything. Lazy and uninterested professor with a very unclear purpose. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Medicine for Engineers is too much, in the future we may need to work on the specific part of the body, and then we can focus on that part, not memorizing all the Kndel textbook! Bio instrumentation and eHealth courses are less than a 7.5 credit courses. Bio instrumentation does not need to focus on details of sensors and so on. In my opinion courses are satisying that teach us useful methods, such as signal processing or analysing methods, that could be used in other fields as well.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- (Project in) Artificial Intelligence The project in Compiler Construction could be used as CSALL project instead.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The first part of microwave projects should be revised. Did not give too much.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Stochastic Optimization algorithms should be revised» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Multimedia should be changed totally because the professor of this course do not have enough knowledge and she does not give us proper teaching and she does not respond our questions» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The courses seem good, but they are really not. For example, Sven-Arne is not suitable for teaching Distributed Systems. I have not learned enough about that subject and I think he is a big part of the reason why.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Active microwave circuit should be revised.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Industrial energy systems should be optional and the sustainable development is really bad! It"s just repetition from the course Energiteknik in Civ.ing maskin årskurs 3. If you have studied that course you shouldnt ned to take the sustainable development.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Image analysis courses are not really relevant for people who"s not going to work in this specific field - don not force us to study them» (Yes (1 to 2))
- AI: It is not even a course, no actual education occurs in the course, few unrelated lecture, incoherent theme.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course Discrete event control and optimization should be revised, a lot more theory could be fitted in if less focus were put on the extended reporting... this felt more like a course in report writing than a technical course. Also, at least last year (academic year 08/09), the first 3 weeks (i.e. almost half the lecture time!) of the course realtime control was repetition from digital control! (And both are mandatory!)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Nuclear Chemistry, Natural Product Chemistry» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Heat and moisture engineering, material performance» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Industrial Automation (Martin Fabian). To some extent a copy paste from previous courses for students with background in Z.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Applied Mechatronics is not suited for most people with mechanical engineering background.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The "Data aquisition and systems biology" course did not add anything to my former knowledge and it was a messy course. Should be replaced with a course that gives some practical skills in molecular biology.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- form design advanced CAID for human factors major» (Yes (1 to 2))
- More choices of your own opinion, fewer compulsary courses. The Environmental system analysis was not satisfying, I would rather have had other courses.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Höj nivån på yach manufacturing och advances structures» (Yes (1 to 2))
- optimization, first course is hard to pass ,too hard» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Revise the MOCI course, the CCR course, and the introduction course for DCPM.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Industrial Engineering and Modern Manufacturing Strategies.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The project course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Power Elctrocin Design and Application shall foucse more in the application side » (Yes (1 to 2))
- the work load is very high in some courses» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Multimedia and video communication should be revised.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- ´,The course risk management and safety is a course more applied to operational engineering. Some people didn´,t have more options than choosing this course. Probably the problem is lack of other good appropiate courses in specific periods... for low coordination.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Instruction for vehicle dynamics courses have to be improved.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- all courses related to safety including active and passive should be more associated with mechanical field, it seems that it is more designated for biomedical and electrical engineering.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Ship Motions and Wave Induced Loads Computational Hydrodynamics and Optimization» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmental Management. Important course, but absolutely horrible. Feels like being back on high-school.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- PLM» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Electromagnetics part in "Electromagnetic waves and Spectroscopy" is almost same as "Radio and Microwave Engineering"» (Yes (1 to 2))
- PLM should be a elective course instead of mandatory» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Heat and moisture engineering should not be a master course. The teaching was often really bad. Very unclear goals. Should be revised.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Reliability and thermal management» (Yes (1 to 2))
- statistics and data analysis» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The curriculum is out of touch. However, I have noticed that this has been adressed already for next year, and those changes seem well thought and are in line with my own opinion.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Graphical Interfaces» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think it would be good to only have the design studio course eg. Matter Space Structure or Sustainble Studio etc. through out the hole master as that would make the studio work stronger and more focused. The elective courses eg. Design Systems, are never really on a deeper level and you can retreve that extra knowlegde .» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Dataaquisition in systems biology. When I took it included a lot of repetition for the biotechnology students and felt unnecessary. It should be heavily revised. I don"t find the biopolymer course to have that high standard as one would have wanted. Should include more synthesis information when it comes to polymers, more chemistry.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Structural Bioinformatics could be extended to be comprised of 2 courses... Structural bioinformatics I and II respectively, there is a lot of room in that area.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Programming in teams, Software architechture» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Improvement processes» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modeling and simulation needs a new lecturer and teaching assistents that actually care! A more arrogant person than the lecturer is hard to find. The lecturer in applied mechatronics do not know how to lecture or how to speak english, he must be replaced. It is embarrassing for a master program on Chalmers to have such low quality! Actually, the quality on the courses is very low due to lack of interest from the lecturers and teaching assitens. There is however exceptions from the rule but they are few, 4-5 people in total.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Yes, we hade a compulsory part that didn"t give us any credits, but took a lot of time. Some enviroment-poster-session. I am very intrested in water, but I don"t see why the water courses (eg. DWE) are compulsory - most of the students on this master program are not intrested in water, they are intrested in geo or traffic. I don"t see the point of why they should read this (if it is so important, why don"t the other civil engineering master programs read that course?)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Improving processes» (Yes (1 to 2))
- improvement processes» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Management of Physical distribution, This course were bad in almost al aspects. The level was to low, very little new information was given and the cases were irrelevant.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Molecula erlectronics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modeling and problem solving Environment assignment that Geo had to perform without being given credits.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The nuclear chemistry courses is not that valuable if you dont have any chemistry background» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Passive Safety, Vehicle Dynamics Advanced i suppose» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Logistikkursen (TEK240) som vi läste i masterprogrammet är väldigt lik logistikkursen som är valbar i grundutbilningen på M (TEK125) Till största delen gick det ut på att lära sig de engelska termerna för saker vi redan kunde sen innan och det kändes som slöseri med tid. Det borde gå att samordna så att TEK240 antingen är en fortsättning (och TEK125 krävs som förkunskaper till mastern) eller att vi som läst TEK125 inte behöver läsa TEK240 utan kan välja någon annan kurs den perioden.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Introduction to nuclear reactors.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- MPP105 and PPU090. Especially PPU090 is horrendus» (Yes (1 to 2))
- maybe biolpolymers and biocomposites only is suited for tissue engineering and not the food and medicine tracks» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Antenna Engineering (Should be revised) » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Statistical Inference» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Internet technology,the course is interesting and very basic but the way it is presented(content) is very broad so the student only tries to memorize the concepts than to understand all because there are so much concepts may be it will be good if it is given for a semester than for a quarter.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- CNB revised in terms of work load. More connections between the courses would have been preferable!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmental Impact Assessment» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Wirless networks. source coding.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- material mechanics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Building material should be heavily revised. It gives no further understanding in building materials. something really needs to be done.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- global chemical sustainability- Very simular to KMV (K/Kf).» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Data acquisition and handling in system biology, the materials of this course are too heavy to teach properly in only one quarter.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Manufacturing Strategy = Operation Starteg. Which I like..» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Building in Society, International Projects» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Bioreactors» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Methods ... (dat110)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- FEM should not be mandatory for student who will focus on Building performance design.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- in some courses there is more important who you work with to pass than your own skill, i hate that....» (Yes (1 to 2))
- sketch course: give some sketch tips of Specific products» (Yes (1 to 2))
- More focus on branding in the brand management course, not so much IPRs. Also, some more focus on IP strategies and not only legal issues.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- not much strong background in "SSY160 digital and multivariable control" of all chemical engineers. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Building in society» (Yes (1 to 2))
- microwave engineering numerical methods » (Yes (1 to 2))
- I find the final projects of the studios technicaly with extremely low constructional solutions. "A master student draw the project with imaginary columns (sometimes without) and this is considered as ok??"» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Removed:Wireless Networks, Revised:Antenna Engineering» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Organizational Project Management could be revised and the emphasis should not be on performing a benchmark on a company. I think that when we did that benchmarking assignment we did not have enough knowledge about how organizations actually work.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Finance!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Wave Load Course- Totally Revised. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmental management is horrible, no substance. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Many courses contains the same information as previous courses at the Industrial engineering and management Bachelor. And many courses are way too easy, for example business information systems for SCM, logistic and transportation management (do not remember the title).» (Yes (1 to 2))
- There is no need to have both "sustainable development" and "sustainable energy futures"» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Biopolymers felt really redundant to me (I take the biomedicine track). It"s perfect for people studying tissue engineering, but I felt that I gained nothing from it. It was mostly basic level mechanics. Had it not been obligatory I would absolutely not have taken it.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think the eHealth course shouldn"t be mandatory for student who do not choose that track. We should get more familiar with different techniques of doing research, as mentioned above.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Industrial design engineering - theory and methodology» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Distribution networks. There should be more applicable exercises. Meaning that the improvements that can be achieved with the theory applied should be put» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Vehicle dynamics needs to be revised» (Yes (1 to 2))
- yes one mm and Sub Tera hertz reciever Tech need some improment from learning piont of view.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Wirless Networks should be replaced with Routing Technology as a semi core course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Programming languages technology should require the course functional programming, or the lab-assignment for writing an interpreter for a functional language should be removed.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- power electronic devices and application course is too tough» (Yes (1 to 2))
- At least change Heat and moisture engineering and material performance totally...» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Social Entrepreneurship course should be reevaluated » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course in statistical inference needs to be more adapted to the people in the program to teach at their level. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The complex systems seminar course needs some revising» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Surface & nanophysics borde förändras rejält om den ska fortsätta var semiobligatorisk. Fyra timmars föreläsningar i veckan där föreläsarna inte förstår vad rast är och kunskaperna därifrån kollas aldrig. En väldigt frånvarande examinator och ingen feedback på inlämnade projekt.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmental management have certainly some good views that we have not read about before but today the course is also very much a beginners course in environmental studies overall. That is generally a problem I think that we do not have any courses where we go deeper in the subject after having read an introduction course. All courses seem to be fit for a student who have not taken any environmental studies before. Could be nice with some more advanced courses. The environmental management course also have some problems with to big groups in the project, not showing old exams (at least not yet), and some of the lecturer (including some guest lecturers) are not the best. All this says me that this course is enough to have as an optional one. And we have many to choose from this period. Try to move some of them to the autum» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Remove sustainable development and have combustion there as a compulsory course instead. Sustainable development and sustainable energy futures are very much alike and one would be enough. So, make combustion compulsory instead of sustainable development and focus more on that area in the master programme.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I suggest to change some general description courses into some deeper and more technique courses.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- wireless network course in not useful at all» (Yes (1 to 2))
- TCIT - Not so much new things but an ok cource» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Hybrid Vehicles and Controls is a very good course, but I think that should be an elective. A mandatory course should be Powertrain Mechanics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- less compulsary environmental courses» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The modelling and simulation course should be improved. and the applied mechatronics course should be applied and not include the part about reading scientific papers» (Yes (1 to 2))
- managing operations processes» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Heat and Moisture Engineering(BOM080) and Indoor Climate and HVAC system design(VIN032)require revision. Especially BOM080, as there were too many teachers involved and no clear perspective on the goal of the course. As for VIN032, there is a major lack of organization and it is difficult to learn from this course. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Every course with Sven-arne Andreasson should be removed or have a different teacher.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Remove: FEM - very unbalanced course involving illogical software. Remove: Applied mechantronics - bad literature, bad lectures and mostly repetition of mechatronics in M2.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- distributed systems I & II, they are mandatory but the courses had no real content. Remove them, or change them heavily (change teachers, overview the subjects in the lectures etc.)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced production systems (Johan Stahre) was a laugh. Embarrassing that Chalmers can provide such a pointless course. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Ubiquitous takes waaay too much time. And the teacher is not holding the courses, the students are most of the time. Also please revise the course Design Methodology. At least the first lecture. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- TIF120- Surface and nanophysics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Surface- and nanophysics skulle behöva tittas till då den som den är idag inte riktigt verkar genomtänkt (åtminstone inte för den klasstorleken som var i år då det mesta bara blev pannkaka). Ett annat upplägg vore trevligt med mindre presentationer (annan redovisningsform än rapport + presentation -- kanske en poster motsv.) och obligatoriska föreläsningar. Inga 4timmars pass utan rast tack.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The finance cource should be made much more practical» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Applied industrial ecology and Environmental management should be combined into one single course. They are relevant fields, but not relevant enough to have their own courses! This would also make room for a more societal course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- 1. Interaction Design Project - there is no good structure and the teacher is incompetent (he does not know even the simplest computer related things) and does not take the course seriously. 2. Interaction Methodology - why did we not get any grading guidelines, and why the hell were we graded by someone outside the course and not the main techer!?» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The advanced polymer course has not been very good so far, not that much new information compared to the first polymer course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Physical Computing and Ubiquitous Computing need better defined criteria for grading.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Interaction design methodology, The goals and keystones are really vague, the evaluation standard is not consist with the lecturer"s content Game engine, The teacher didn"t show that he have made efforts in this course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Materials Selection and Design: The course should not only deal with selecting a suitable material for a given task, but also the other way round. One material is available, what can be done with it, judging from its properties?» (Yes (1 to 2))
- geotechnics is a very interesting course. However the way of teaching it and explained its contents is not the most adequated» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Matter, Space & Structure Master programmet var nog det sämst organiserade jag någonsin gått på Chalmers. Det ställdes extremt höga krav på oss studenter, men Morten Lund tog inget som helst ansvar och kom ständigt sent till föreläsningar handledningstillfällen med mera. Morten är en bra lärare när han väl är på plats, men han är så extremt upptagen hela tiden att han sällan är det. Allt organiserande av kursen fick göras av oss studenter eller bestämdes allt eftersom med mycket kort varsel. Projekten var mycket korta och många kände sig extremt stressade då vi på två veckor förväntades prestera vad man normalt sett gör på en månad. Det är då extra frustrerande att kursadministrationen inte alls tar något ansvar eller alls fungerar. Jag har nu bytt till Housing invention ARK 136 och är nöjd med den. ARK146 Architectural Conservation and transformation var också en extremt dålig kurs. Inger Lise Syversen har ingen som helst kompetens att leda den kursen och det var allmänt förvirrat. Det kändes inte som att någon i klassen förstod några av de uppgifter i fick under kursen då de var mycket vagt formulerade och skrivna på dålig engelska. Alla föreläsningar behandlade i princip samma sak, nämligen Unescos World Heritage List. Detta framgick dock inte när man valde kursen. Vad de flesta trodde att de valde var en kurs om byggnadsvård, hur man varsamt tar hand om befintlig bebyggelse, men om det fick vi knappt veta något alls. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- knowledge and Learning in Organizations» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The VEF course should be revised a lot.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- UNIX,I think it need a better teacher and i think the UNIX is much important in DS.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- PLM !!!! Worst course in my life!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced sketching needs a remake. The combination of typography and sketching in the same course prevents student from attending both. Also the "class room" should be changed to something that can at the very least accommodate the students in the course. Most of the practical input was lost because the students were unable to remain in the vicinity of the teacher while sketching. The photoshop part on the other hand was very well done and should remain as it is today. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- advance topic in network and distributed systems, wireless network» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Game design course, really silly and not important at all.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Molecular electronics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modeling and Simulation (Professor has to improve teaching skills) Hybrid vehicles and Control (Course too basic)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Safety track is really weak and diverse and not managed by a sophisticated person or maybe a professor, mats svensson is in the margin. Sweden is famous in safety of vehicles, but safety track in automotive engineering of chalmers, is aweful.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- BOM050 - Organisational project management BOM090 - Knowledge and learning in project organisations should be heavily revised, key word would be heavily. As a resource investment from the student perspective, there is minimal value in the return. Study the courses suggested above and try to incorporate that in the modules. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Wireless Networks and Source Coding.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Surface and Nanophysics: a very interesting subject but the structure of the course is not good at all. That course should really be remade from the beginning. It isnt reasonable to have 4 h of presentations after a 4 h lecture. A different structure is very much recommended, for example: one large project about some topic and then some sort of quizes each week. Also more feedback on the presentations and reports are needed.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Courses in the "Building Performance" part of the program» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The Simulation of Complex System course could be improved» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modelling and problem solving» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmental system analysis» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Tailored Materials was too many teachers and 14 different topics and there was no red wire through the hole course. Hard to reach the goal here.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Erik Ahlgrens course, Energy Systems modelling and planning. Not the weekly excercises, they were fine. But the LECTURES... they were non-existant or just plain worthless.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modelling and problem solving» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Managing developing projects. More hands-on, teach about being a project manager. Have multiple small cases (be a project manager during this and that stage of a project), so you can learn by doing.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The Electric Drives (I) course, had covered many different subjects, which we had already studied some of them in our Bachelor. So I think it would be much better if for example the parts about DC machines or Synchronous machines (which we had already studied before) would be removed, and instead there would be more focus on new subjects such as core design or ... . The course Power Electronic Application is a very tough courseand covers a lot of subjects. Therefore I was not able to study it in the short period of one quarter. Therefore I decided to not study it and instead focus more on my other course in that quarter. I think it would be better if this course was not this much tough, so that I was able to study and pass it.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- traffic and urban planning, engineering geology» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Interaction Design Methadology - it was unclear what exactly we were supposed to be learning. Most students coming from non-design backgrounds, including myself, found this course difficult to grasp. Interaction Design Project - the theme should not be mandatory. It should be possible (and made clear that it is possible) to pursue any project students are interested in as long as it relates to interaction design.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Tailored materials should be removed and Engineering composites needs very very heavy revision.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The introduction course should be mandatory for foreign students and voluntary for Swedes that want to brush up their VHDL.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Applied Nuclear chemistry» (Yes (1 to 2))
- hybrid vehicle coarse could be revised» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The PLM course was not well organized.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Technical Acoustics 2. Has not been supervised good and shouldn"t be so freely (and easy for teacher) that is now.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course Material Performance was almost completly repetition of the bachelor course "Byggnadsmaterial".» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think Environmental Systems Analysis should be revised, especially in the manner of examination, which seems to be based on memorisation of lists. This is a turn-off for engineers and results in a lack of understanding and disrespect for the subject. The project associated with Engineering Geology was very time consuming and should perhaps include some kind of point basis. In addition, the project was introduced as an important, real-world activity, but then became a writing activity that ended in a poorly attended presentation (no professors).» (Yes (1 to 2))
- physical distribution, bara repetition av en tidigare » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Den med arkitekterna, helt värdelös» (Yes (1 to 2))
- environmental management. Applied industriable ecology. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The sustainability course (1:st quarter). There is no substance in the content. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Management of physical distribution should be heavily revised or exchanged for another course. Also Freight Transport Systems could be revised, especially the cases. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- source coding,» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Bio-electromagnetism e-Health» (Yes (1 to 2))
- data acquisition» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Wireless network» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modern manufacturing processes - way too easy and general. make tougher and increase the project size. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The purpose of the course Research by Design was quite unclear, and perhaps it could be useful but felt to me out of context and less than concrete. The course architectural competitions as well provided few useful lectures and absolutely no feedback to perhaps 75% of the students, making it almost a complete waste of time for many. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Internet technology needs to be better.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Definatley the MOP course. Maybe to some extent the Six Sigma Balck Belt also. The subject and aim is good but the education in class are lacking.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Freight transports systems and Management of physical distribution should be heavily(!) revised.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The teacher in Power System Analysis should be replaced, I´,m sorry but nether of the swedish students could understand his english, it is very poor. Thats why I left that course, which I regret now, cause I like power systems and might work with it in the future.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmentally adapted product development Did not contribute to any skills that couldn"t have been done without taking the course Course goals vague Grading system unsatisfactory for Swedish students (U/G) compared to exchange students (3,4,5) I wish I hadn"t taken the course - waste of time» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The medicine for the engineer, can be shortened to one quarter. And the eHealth, I hope that there can add some lab instead of rare lectures.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced Classical Physics and Quantum Field Theory. In my opinion Per Salomonsson shouldn"t give lectures. It is especially detrimental since these courses are very important for the programme.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced Form Design 1» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Internet Technology» (Yes (1 to 2))
- radio and microwave engineering, radar systems and applications» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Vehicle dynamics needs to be more applied. Like using Lotus Raven or Adams etc.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The Interaction Design Methodology course was a joke, horribly administrated. The examinating teacher (who wasn"t present at all in the course except for the last week) totally failed at communicating the goals of the course, what she would be judging and the requirements for passing.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Remove the course: Management of Physical Distribution. The course had a lot of repetitive topics from other previous courses of the Supply Chain Management Program and the teachers were not engaged in the subject.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course `Heat and Moisture Engineering` needs to be revised. It had too many lectures and needs a clearer focus and plan. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Research by design - time could be spent on a more relevant coure/ course could be made more relevant? Building design laboratory - .» (Yes (1 to 2))
- To much image courses, we specify on the track that concerns image!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think it is a lot that is repitition in advanced polymer technology that is given i this period if you have taken the material course in K3 and the polymer technology course last fall.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Those students who are not choosing to continue with the "building performance design" specialisation should not have to take a repitition course in building physics! Remove "Heat and maoisture engineering" from the list of mandatory courses.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Distribution networks» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Probability and random process.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- digital control.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Source Coding Wireless Networks» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The introduction course felt too basic.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Human Centered Design has much too work in it for a 7,5 point course, and the learning outcome isn"t that high.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- building in society, » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Electric Drives I needs to be treated in more depth, is a very light course. Of course is usually one of the first ones people take and maybe you try to make it easier in order to get adjusted in a better way to the Master program but still it needs to treat more about induction machines and synchronous machines. The labs on Power Electronics Devices and Applications needs to be better supervised and guided.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think that many of the courses repeat a lot from previous courses, so the time could probably be spent more effective» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced Topics in NDS was a good idea that was carried out badly. The exam did not manage to represent the whole course and focused mostly on the part of the course that the creator of the exam was responsible for, while skipping other subjects.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- computations in mechanics Foundations to prabablility theory» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Data acquisition and handling in systems biology should be removed or changed!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Intro to Communication to Engineering has a very demanding course. Also, wireless comunication demands are NOT compatible with other courses. I think the courses should require fairly an equal level of studies.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmental System Analysis-Revise GIS-Improve » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmental Management and Applied industrial Echology should be revised. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- advanced theory and methodology» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmental Systems Analysis. (Not removed, but revised)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Safety and Hybride» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The compulsory courses in the MBIO programme should be removed. It should be more like the chemistry and bioscience master programme, you should be able to choose your own courses among the offered ones.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- ESMP, Sustainable development» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Some compulsory courses, Bio-nano science for information processing, Semiconductor Device and circulates (needs real teacher) » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The way the "wireless networks" course is organized makes it one of the most pointless courses I have taken.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Applied industrial ecology» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Technical acoustics 2: Including practical project work with simulations. HRSV: More related to practical usage.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course "Energy Systems Modelling and Planning" arrives too late in the year to be really useful. Indeed, most of the concepts have already been treated in previous courses (Sustainable Development, Sustainable Energy Futures, Industrial Energy Equipment). The goals should be updated to not focus only on how to make simulations with "what if" questions, but rather on enunciating what kind of decisions should be taken to improve systems.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- SEA » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Wireless networks course should have the curriculum stated in the Student portal course description - with quizzes and everything. It is now changed to something completely else-basically a soft-skills course which anyone can take.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Technical Acoustics II, Human Response to Sound & Vibration (very interesting but not deeply studied), BAC more practical and in general more general feedback » (Yes (1 to 2))
- BOM050 Organisational project management have some serious problems. This was not on master level... It felt like we just did work for the teacher. Provided info. to her research! » (Yes (1 to 2))
- VEF» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The Studio should be heavily revised» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Passiv Safety var ingen höjdare, fokuserade på helt fel saker, Borde vara tekniken i centrum istället för att lära sig alla latinska namn på benen i kroppen.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- When i read Software Architecture it was quite bad. Not really relevant and out dated material. I know they have changed the course now so I hope it"s better. A lot of courses need new teachers that are up to date with modern technologies. Some courses gets the impression they use materials from the "stone age". » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Tyngdpunkten borde flyttas från miljö och vattenkurser till geoteknik/geologi. Flera perioder har inte erbjudit kurser som varit relevanta för en blivade geotekniker, och många har läst kurser de egentligen inte alls vill i brist på annat. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- CAD-course should be remade, PLM better back up from staff, adcanced design materials (i don"t know if i learned anything during this course).» (Yes (3 to 4))
- More emphasis creating solutions in the ergonomic courses. As it is today the course ends more or less when the problems are found. A relevant technical course, today they are mostly chosen with the aim to fulfill the formal goals for the degree and to fit smoothly into the schedule.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- - Energy Systems Modelling and Planning - Sustainable Development - Computational Fluid Dynamics for Chemical Engineers» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Higher standard needed in modeling and simulation and applied mechatronics. Would be good with some more courses with mechatronic/control topics in study period 4 year 1» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Biological Physics» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Leadership and Communication, Building in society, International projects, Strategic Management, Managing organizations in the construction industry» (Yes (3 to 4))
- The course in intercultural communication did not qualify to be held at this level. (No course literature, just a bunch of group discussions about the participants" previous experiences. The thesis we wrote ended up in nothing as we weren"t provided with much of a theoretical framework to build it on.) The introduction course was based on the same thesis so that was 6 credits granted to us "for free". I also believe that many students dropped out due to the fact that the program started out with softer topics while the subjects they were interested in (economy, law, logistics) did not appear until later. (Don"t get me wrong, I"m a keen believer in softer topics and I realize the importance of such notions in the world of maritime management. I do, however, believe that such courses should be elective and held at an appropriate academic level.) The human factors course was far better but otherwise the same arguments apply. Risk management was a disaster but I"ve heard rumors that this has been rectified. I sincerely hope so since risk management is more or less the heart and soul of modern shipping. Otherwise the courses have been just great! » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Software architecture, SPLE, Programming paradigms and Algorithms» (Yes (3 to 4))
- The compulsory courses needs to be inproved.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- software architecture(just bad), programming paradigms, algorithms (should be electable instead)» (Yes (3 to 4))
- programming paradigm Software leadership and quality management developing computer based system in teams» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Software Architecture, Programming Paradigms, Algorithms» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Architecture classes so far have suffered severely from, hazy aims and goals, lack of focus, lack of proper support from teachers, lack of experience/knowledge of the subject matter from teachers, very little or wrong written information, colliding schedules, final critiques without proper competence present etc. etc.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- The only course titled "applied mechatronics" is too basic for the master"s level and is basically a repetition of even lower-bachelor level material. the course "real-time control systems" needs some revision to fulfill the stated goals of the course. the course "modelling and simulation" in the first quarter is a good course in nature but the presentation of the course should be heavily revised. The course "robotics and robotic systems" doesn"t offer enough information for a master-level course. The work load for the course "applied signal processing" is too much.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- 1. Introduction to electronic system design 2. Methods for electronic system design and verification 3. Electronic system design project» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Courses by Phil» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Mandatory courses must be relevant for all students. Biopolymers and biocomposits is only relevant for people focusing on biomaterials. Of even higher importance, remove courses that are only or mainly repetion of the first three years, such as data aquisition and handling in systems biology. Let these courses be optional, so that students with a different background can take them. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Material performance, Structural systems - design and assessment, Heat and moisture engineering.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Interaction Methodologies and HCD» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Structual Systems: Only good part was the introduction on snow and wind load etc. The group work doesn"t give anything and "conceptual design" might be a good idea but is shit without experience (Basically everyone is just guessing stuff) Material Performance: Remove it, everything has already been taught in "Byggnadsmaterial". Heat and Moisture: THE WORST COURSE IN MY FIVE YEARS AT CHALMERS! Remove it or completely rearrange it..» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Biomedical Instrumentation» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Source coding: the projects should carry weight Multimedia and video communication: Lectures should be improved. Antenna Engineering: Not suitable for MPCOM, the lectures are not good at all.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- "Building in society" really really really needs to be revised content wise, find some relevance and brush up the lectures. If there is a common thread in the course it is really well hidden. The "Design, processes and management" have not had any lecture worth participating in, I went to the first four or five without learning anything, true story. Totally waste of my time, this is not what I want to spend my CSN-loan on. Waste waste waste, really need to be revised. Keep the group assignment. But really, revise the lectures, piece of crap. "Knowledge and learning in organization" are a bit too soft, the seminars would do good if there was a moderator to guide the discussions and foster a good seminar routine. Also the seminars are a bit too close to each other regarding deadlines for seminar hand-ins.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Architecture Advanced Theory and Methodology, Architectural Competitions, Research By Design, Sustainable Development in the Design Professions. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- The mandatory courses within the program i.e. data acquisition, biopolymers and bioreactors need revision. Maybe there should be more room for "track courses" instead.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Design and construction Project Management should be strongly revised. International Project Management could really be extended, the things we learnt could have been seen in 1 week. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Env and water courses» (Yes (3 to 4))
- There should be more to choose between in the small elective courses like Design Project Magagement etc. The theory/method/master preparation cource had good intentions but wasn"t that helpful and interesting.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- 1-Method for Electronic design 2- Project Electronic system design» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Applied mechatronics - Lacks structure today. Finite element simulation in design - make it even more applied. Advanced Computer aided design - Update the lecture content.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Heat & Moisture Engineering.(it is absolutely useless in all aspects) Structural Systems.(I had such a course in the first year of my bachelor degree. I believe it was too basic) Geotechnics Engineering.( I had two such courses in my bachelor degree. In a country such as Sweden with such an advanced technology and knowledge in soil mechanics, I expected more than this from Geotechnics engineering course. It was all repetition not only for me but also for some of my Swedish friends )» (Yes (3 to 4))
- I don"t get what the HVAC course has to do with this programme, it should at least be elective. Make combustion engineering or a SES-based CFD-course compulsory instead. All of the courses given by "Heat and power" should be revised not to contain any chemistry or chemical industry based knowledge.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- The level of difficulty is differing a lot between the courses in the MP. I would say that e.g. the Digital Control course is too difficult and the Global Chemical Sustainability is too easy. I don"t think these should be included in the semi-mandatory courses...» (Yes (3 to 4))
- yes the course I took in Machine learning was overlap with many other fields student!!then there was no application for Bioinformatics in that course!!this course should be more specific and it should be obligatory! The Matematical Modeling course that we have as a obligatory is a kind of heart of this program!it was not that coherent! the course Data aquisiton and Data handeling in systems biology should be obligatory for our program!and that course also was very mp3 I mean they wanted to just cover most part of the systems biology rather than dealing with course goal!on the other hand there is many topics in that course like clustering,modeling,flux balance analysis and so on that we have them in our other cources like Large scale data analysis and Metabolic Engineering course!then if these overlaps do recognize each course can be more practical and useful than this» (Yes (3 to 4))
- 1.Economics of innovation 2.Technological change & industrial transformation 3.R&D strategy and organization » (Yes (3 to 4))
- 1) Heat and Moisture should be heavily revised for the future. It contains too many subjects from previous years. 2) FEM basics, should be more practical! No learning outcome- just plain mathematics! 3) Advanced building physics: The goals were not at all well described and the course was not administrated well- messy. Very little learning outcome! 4) Applied Structural Dynamics: Should be held at the Structural Engineering in order to keep the relevance: No learning outcome, just plain mathematics! Steel Structures: Proper course material is needed! Messy course. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- I think the courses from the Building Performace Design branch should be revised. Both "Heat and moisture engineering" and "Advanced Building Physics" lacked organization and qualitative teaching. The course goals were difficult to understand in both the courses. I think Steel structures should revise the course material, it was only relevant for students attending all of the lectures. Since it is not compulsory to attend the lectures it would be useful with a proper course book.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Building in Society, Strategic Management, Environmental management» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Financial management Leadership and communication International projects» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Modelleringskursen under MP.åk 1 är katastrofalt dålig då den saknar syfte och har inget nyskapande i sig. Allt har man sett i tidigare kurser. Remove! ESA, dvs miljökursen under samma läsperiod MP. åk 1. Bra struktur men utan verklighetsförankring, mer fokus på MKB. Denna borde inte vara obligatorisk, byt ut mot mer pedagogisk miljökurs med fokus på miljö i projekt och förbättring i branschen, t.ex hur tänker man miljö som civilingenjör? » (Yes (3 to 4))
- my opinions: research by design - remove, did not understand the purpose of the course, vague directions, a waste of time. advanced theory and methodology - should be more connected to the following master thesis. design, management and processes - should be more theoretical instead of another student project.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Multimedia Communication Applied Signal Processing Source Coding» (Yes (3 to 4))
- The 3 mandatory courses. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Sustainable Development and Sustainable Energy Futures should be comprised to one course. It feels likte taking the same course twice even though it"s the same institution that owns the course. Energy Systems Modeling and Planning is not good. Simulation programs are interesting but the admninistration has been very bad. Erik tries to do things right but does not suceed very well... I appreciate to learn about LEAP and MARTES but the assignments them selves need to be improved.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Computer Graphics, Simulation Engines, Artificial Intelligence» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Nearly all the project courses should be revised into something that more effictively teaches something. In the projects there were basically no valuable feedback.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- HRSV, BAC, ATA.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- IEFS, DTIM» (Yes (3 to 4))
- compulsory courses, there should be some degree of freedom» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Environmental systems analysis should understand that not everyone want to learn how to do an environmental investigation but want to learn how to interpret an environmental rapport. Other courses that are mandatory should be optional. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- there are enough options in the program to choose and some of them are like each other that are repeat in different name» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Internet Technology: the teaching is not that much Real time Systems: they are using Ada which is obsolete, use C programming language instead, and if the teacher does not know it, let him learn. Distributed Systems II: The course is dry with no real life applications such as distributed services, cloud computing, etc.... Multimedia and video communication: The instructor does not know how to teach at all and her English is bad and not clear. Advanced Distributed System: Is this really a course or a waste of time!!! the course should cover advanced topics in distributed system but it does none of these. It is a complete waste of time.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- The CFD course should be divided into two separate parts, as it is now it"s too heavy, alternatively give 15 credits because now it"s very hard to have a course parallel with this one. The Design of Energy Systems (DIEE)course could be more prioritated. Everyone thought that the IES (Industrail Energy Systems) course was great and got a little bit disappointed in the DIEE course. But it was still good, but i felt that it wasn"t the "pride" of VOM as the IES course is. The MTS courses to chose from are not good. The MTS coarse was a waist of time.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- TEK320, TEK215, TEK 350 were completely useless.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- ALL courses that are obligatory to the program are too basic! The first three weeks of each course is a waste of time for all student comming from Industrial Engineering at Chalmers (at least 50% of the students). The workload is still heavy but we do not learn anything! If the external students cannot follow on the same level a preperation course for them should be added. It is not acceptable that Chalmers choose to waste to much of the own students" time. Thus Change all courses and put them on a proper masters" level!» (Yes more than 5)
- Do not force masters students to take courses together with second or first year undergraduates.» (Yes more than 5)
- There are a couple of courses which overlap, models of computation, types for programs and proofs, programming language technology for example all go thru lambda calculus, but none of them deals with the subject thoroughly. I also think that many of these courses intersect with each other, but the way they are presented you don"t get the feel for this unity. For example models of computation explains turing machines, the automata course covers push down automats, the types course covers lamda calculus -- these are all, according to the church-turing thesis, equivalent... The models course stresses this fact, but it isn"t mentioned in the automata nor types course i believe. An other example, turing machines, complexity classes from the algorithms course and recursion theory... again no link between these course is presented. Abstract algebra, automata, i"m sure the regex algebra forms some kind of algebraic structure. Functional programming and types and the connection to logic via the curry-howard iso again, no link presented until the types course (which is very likely the last of those three that you will take)... I"m sure there are more intersections between the courses (and fields) which i"m not aware of. I"d really like to see some effort trying to give this unified picture of the computer science field, perhaps as a separate course, but even better as part of all courses.» (Yes more than 5)
- The whole programme needs to be revised.» (Yes more than 5)
- All courses are proper for bachelor students. Master students need to be more specialized!» (Yes more than 5)
- Ta bort alla miljökurser!!! Man läser miljömastern om man är intresserad av miljö.» (Yes more than 5)
- Everything but CFD and Advanced Chemical Reaction Engineering» (Yes more than 5)
- Overall they should be more difficult.» (Yes more than 5)
- Electric drives I was terrible. Not deep enough. And ALL courses that utilizes Power Point should be rethought. It"s really worthless to watch. Power System Analysis probably were a really good course once, then it used the lecture notes on OVERHEAD! Handwritten and unreadable. It"s better to write of the black board, then you are able to gain the information. In my opinion.» (Yes more than 5)
- The Artificial Intelligence course that was offered as part of the program was of no use to game design. Learning about natural language processing was not useful. The simulation engines course is trying to cover too much in too little time. It overlaps the domains of the computer graphics and what should be the artificial intelligence courses awkwardly. The course needs to be seriously rethought and its ambitions lowered. As it is, the course teaches students how to produce a lousy amalgamation of existing software. The 30 credit Interaction Design Project course should be eliminated. The program has not yet provided nearly enough foundation (at least for the game design track) to place this program where it is. Perhaps if it was a full time, 30 credit course in period 4 it would make more sense. » (Yes more than 5)
- Most courses could made heavier, more information, more study, we are getting the 7.5 credits too easy.» (Yes more than 5)
- All of the four courses in the first semester. The first course in the second semester Building design... Financial management. » (Yes more than 5)
- The ESA-course must be more intresting» (No)
- Not of the ones I choose.» (No)
- The only thing which one can mind is that there should exist more courses to have the choose and that one can specialze still more ... as already mentioned above.» (No)
- I took English for Engineers (as extra course) and I really do not liked that course at all. I think the weakest course in Chalmers. I have taken numerous courses at different departments, but only English has really disappointed me.» (No)
- seems well structured.keep on!!» (No)
- The courses themselves and the connection between the courses are both very good. Well done.» (No)
- » (No)
- There are som work to be done with a few of them but in a few years time i think that they will worke very well.» (No)
- I am not at all interested in the robotics courses, but since they are electable I suppose they can remain. » (No)
- "heavily" you killed this question.» (No)
- The order of the courses looks a bit strange : we start with the most specific (IES) and finish with the most general (ESMP), with something inbetween in the middle (H&P). I"ve understood lots of things from IES with the H&P course. The opposite order would seem more logical.» (No)
- All courses within this program were reasonable and I didn"t feel any lack of the courses.» (No)
- I chose additional electable courses from other departments that would suit my studying goal, and I didn"t choose those that seemed to be of no use for me, so I don"t think any course should be removed, but there might be such courses.» (No)
- i want that the radio and microwave course be better than this.the teachers are not,really are not good...» (No)
- in general the courses are ok, but some teachers are not great in eng, which makes it sometimes difficult to follow. first years autum was though, especially the 2.nd study period.» (No)
- I have been on exchange the first year of the programme and haven"t taken any courses at Chalmers yet.» (No opinion)
- no suggestions» (No opinion)

Programme administration

23. How satisfied are you with the programme administration?

1413 svarande

Not at all»		36		2%
Not so satisfied»		117		8%
Neither/Nor»		178		12%
Satisfied»		691		48%
Very satisfied»		338		23%
No opinion»		60		4%

Genomsnitt: 3.97

24. How satisfied are you with the support from the Student centre?

Not at all»		33		2%
Not so satisfied»		68		4%
Neither/Nor»		163		11%
Satisfied»		621		43%
Very satisfied»		387		27%
No opinion»		145		10%

Genomsnitt: 4.21

Study climate

25. Did you feel welcomed by Chalmers and the staff at the Masters programme during your first days?

No, not at all»		22		1%
To some extent»		82		5%
Quite OK»		306		21%
Yes definitely»		666		47%
Excellent welcoming»		282		19%
No opinion»		57		4%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

26. How satisfied are you with the cooperation between you and your fellow students?

Not at all»		28		1%
Not so satisfied»		121		8%
Neither/Nor»		161		11%
Satisfied»		635		45%
Very satisfied»		438		31%
No opinion»		23		1%

Genomsnitt: 4

27. How satisfied are you with the opportunities to come in contact with teachers?

1412 svarande

Not at all»		15		1%
Not so satisfied»		82		5%
Neither/Nor»		113		7%
Satisfied»		712		50%
Very satisfied»		473		33%
No opinion»		22		1%

Genomsnitt: 4.15

28. Do you think that the student opinions and results from course evaluations have significant impact (taken seriously by the Programme coordinator)?

Not at all»		79		5%
To some extent»		242		17%
Could be improved»		394		27%
Yes, definetly»		474		33%
No opinion»		223		15%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

29. How large percentage (%) of the teachers in the core subjects within the Master programme have a good pedagogical ability?

0-20 %»		39		2%
20-40 %»		122		8%
40-60 %»		385		27%
60-80 %»		600		42%
80-100 %»		254		18%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

30. How large percentage (%) of the teachers in the core subjects within the Masters programme have a good ability to teach in English?

0-20 %»		14		0%
20-40 %»		79		5%
40-60 %»		243		17%
60-80 %»		480		34%
80-100 %»		593		42%

Genomsnitt: 4.12

31. To what extent is your knowledge/competence from your Bachelor degree sufficient to attend this programme?

Very poor»		10		0%
Poor»		40		2%
OK»		200		14%
Good»		419		29%
Very good»		724		51%
No opinion»		14		0%

Genomsnitt: 4.32

32. To what extent do the courses in the programme make use of, develop and deepen your knowledge/competence from your Bachelor degree?

1412 svarande

0-20 %»		62		4%
20-40 %»		173		12%
40-60 %»		404		28%
60-80 %»		558		39%
80-100 %»		221		15%

Genomsnitt: 3.51

33. How often do you use Chalmers Library resources

Never»		210		14%
Once or twice a month»		648		45%
Once or tvice a week»		425		30%
Almost every day»		133		9%

Genomsnitt: 2.34

34. In what way do (or could ) Chalmers library support you in your Masters Programme studies

Summarizing questions

35. Considering your experience from this programme, would you choose this programme if you could turn back time?

No»		65		4%
Probably not»		91		6%
I would consider it»		203		14%
Yes - probably»		415		29%
Yes»		620		43%
No opinion»		24		1%

Genomsnitt: 4.07

- The choice you made to keep tution fees, I totaly against it. Well, you charged no fees to EU students who are from rich countries, but students from my country are poor, can"t even dream to study in Sweden any more. I am very unhappy for your dicission and sorry to say that we cannot come to Sweden for study any more. You might have few students who are really rich, but even they will not consider to come in Sweden. Because, I know, those rich students in my country they prefer to study in USA, UK, Canada or AUS. Rest of the poor students like me, preffered choice was Sweden. Now our hope and dream to receive some well higher education is stopped. This tution fee is just like a SLAP from Sweden to us who are poor. Wish you good luck you rich people.» (?)
- It doesn"t feel like I"m a swede in sweden anymore, I could as well be an exchange student visiting India or China. It doesn"t feel like it"s one class, there isn"t any "we" in secure and dependable computing.» (No)
- Because I can not be a professional in Biomedical field and I just gained some feedbacks about its six tracks, nothing specialized in the first year!!» (No)
- The programme is to wide. I would like to study geotechnics/geology/traffic etc, not environment, chemistry, water etc. If I could have turned back time I would have studied at University of Lund.» (No)
- They lied on several things, such as what courses we could take. They should have recommend that it we are intressted in road engineering and infrastructure we should study at another school.» (No)
- I would do something completely different.» (No)
- This program was supposed to be a construction management program, or as the title claims "Design and construction Project management" which is even far more difficult to be handled because even best construction schools in the world don"t intend to cover design management, as it was claimed by this program"s title, in their curriculum. Nonetheless, the educations we got, if it can be called education as it looked like an immature not profoundly planned program, did not have half of the credibility of even a Generic Project management program and was not by no means able to give any particular competence to its students in terms of being recently graduated "Construction Managers". » (No)
- Because I would like to study another program of which I did not knew, when I applied.» (No)
- I would have chosen the master-programme "IT Management" on Lindholmen» (No)
- Since it"s lack of management (something that was not mentioned before applying). Also there seem to be far more interesting and better Master-programmes at the IT-university or GU but there was no information, or even a note, about those.» (No)
- It does not deepen my previous knowledge, to make me prepared for PhD position which is my ultimate goal. Moreover I do not have the possibility to dedicate most of my time (i.e. from the start of my Master education) to research activities. » (No)
- Det är alldeles för brett! I princip finns tre huvudspår, väg, vatten och geo. Som valbara kurser finns endast miljökurser. Är man djupare intresserade av något av de tre ovanstående gebiten finns inga fördjupningskurser att välja. Jag som är intresserad av vatten har fått läsa exakt samma kurser som mina vänner som är intresserade av geo eller vägar.» (No)
- See answer to question 22. Especially the lack of proper support from teachers with a clear focus of what the course aims towards, colliding schedules and lack of clear written information on the tasks and projects have limited the time, effort and joy I can put into the actual work. It has been a very frustrating year. I love the subject matter but the total confusion and lack of focus have been largely detrimental both to my learning and my general well being.» (No)
- Things are going well» (No)
- Unstructional lectures and fuzzy goals. In some subjects the lectures just confusing and was not in any way helping during the labs sinsce they did talk about the same thing. The coperation with other students was horrible» (No)
- i like nanotech» (No)
- i think it is not so related to the biomedical engineering,because there are courses in this field which are not so useful in the future such as finding or doing a job» (No)
- bad structure, bad course coordinator, not enough interesting subjects and too small of a class» (No)
- The competence that i have learned is not one that companies search for...» (No)
- Some of the courses has been very boring..» (No)
- Not satisfying at all» (No)
- Now i find other programs more interesting» (No)
- there is no working future in comparison with communication or control or computer engineering as well as rare PhD vacancies at Chalmers :(» (No)
- I should have taken a program which is more programming oriented» (No)
- I had already taken the good courses of the programme, so I didn"t really have a reason to take this programme from the start... » (No)
- There are not any good prospects for getting a job after this education and i do not think it has given me enough practical experience. » (No)
- the quality of the program was poor, the teachers were always super busy with things not related to the courses and would not answer emails of students, they were mostly treating swedish students differently and as the result there was no way to use my established background in chalmers to go for higher education (phd) in our department because of all the 8 phd students in TD department, non of them is non-swedish!! that doesn"t mean that I don"t have the necessary qualifications, it just means that I have been discriminated!» (No)
- Mostly my fault, the topics did not match what I want to focus on. Networks & distributed systems or Integrated electronic system design would have been a much better match.» (No)
- automotive engineering has a little scope in field. less work being done and less jobs in this period of global recession.» (No)
- The programme cover a too wide spectrum of subjects. It would be better if there were one programme for geotechnics/geology etc and water/envirnoment etc. I would have chosen another university if I could have turned back time.» (No)
- Parts of the program is mindless repetition of knowledge already achieved, the mandatory courses are not in my field of interest and the program promotes formalism rather than actual knowlege, since I feel that the actual knowledge of a student seldom is considered.» (No)
- Because my expectation of the program was completely different,I thought I will get a knowledge specifically about networking(based on the programme website)but I still didn"t get any.» (No)
- more clear about my future career plan» (No)
- It is to much work and I think of school every waken hour. » (No)
- Most of the compulsory courses are a waste of time. So many management courses in it.» (No)
- This master programme was not giving me any new technical skills on a computer science level. I learned some electrical technical skills however.» (No)
- Föreläsningarna och kunskapsnivån har varit för låg. Alltför många av kurserna blev repetition för att uppdatera utbytesstudenterna. Tyvärr saknar föreläsarna kompetensen att föreläsa på engelska, mycket kunskap förloras. Jag hade valt ett masterprogram utanför Chalmers.» (No)
- The programme is too broad, it should be divided into several master programmes. » (No)
- The programme is too broad» (No)
- Matter Space skulle jag av ovan nämnda anledningar aldrig välja igen. Mådde väldigt dåligt hela hösten och kände mig hela tiden stressad och med en känsla av att man aldrig fick vara ledig (och det fick man inte heller då även vissa helger var schemalagda)och att aldrig räcka till. Housing Inventions trivs jag däremot bra på.» (No)
- I didn"t get what I was expecting from it. I was looking for a Master where I could learn more about fabrication processes, which I did learn in the first semester. But the second semester is unrelated with the first one. I was expecting to work for professors in order to have the possibility to apply the knowledge I acquired during classes and also earn some money, it turns out that is not a common practice.» (No)
- I have not learnt that much from the program. There has basically not been anything taught. I dont know if that is by philosophy or because of the lectureres not having experience/knowledge enough to teach. The program have focused mainly on projects. I like projects but the problem is that you learn a lot that you can never use again. With valuable feedback, actual citisism, and smart projects where the work which you do not learn from is minimized this could be improved. (And in projects you do a ton of work that you dont learn from so I think the program should be more careful when deciding to add a project to a course)» (No)
- This program dosen´,t meet the needsof the business world.» (No)
- I have a bachelor in engineering physics. I felt like I learn a lot during these years. But when I came to engineering mathematics I don"t feel like I learn as much any more. I don"t want to work with math as my main thing, but I would like to know about math when I work. This program don"t really let me be prepaired for working in real life. You could think that math and economics would be a fine mix, but we are not allowed to study economics in any way and get it in the program. I know we have 30 hp free to choose, but when it comes to master thesis I can"t choose a subject that includes alot of economics. I don"t want to be best in math, I want to apply the math in real life.» (No)
- I would not have come to sweden.» (No)
- It"s been one of the biggest mistakes in my life to choose this master programme » (No)
- I am not satisfied with elective courses. It is like spending two years for nothing. On the other hand, I have gained some skills about system design. » (No)
- To easy, not really any new courses. Quality/requirements are way to low.» (No)
- People studying for grades and not knowledge=no chance to have a life outside Chalmers when you study every hour awake. Also hard to keep a friendly climate.» (No)
- This programme was not at all what I thought it would be and the administration has been out of order with the programme coordinator. The work load has been extreme, non humane, and the studio has learned me no more than producing presentations of projects without ground in as short time as possible. No new knowledge. » (No)
- Because it didnt turn out exactly as i had imagined. I came into a master"s program just sharpen my skills relevant to the research i had wanted to do and so far that hasn"t happened.» (Probably not)
- becuase there is not so much chance to continue my studey here, since the subject is almost related to digital design (not analog)» (Probably not)
- Because I have leant too little! I would have chosen a completely different school for my maste"s program in order to develop more.» (Probably not)
- För mycket flum!» (Probably not)
- Too much work compared to the other Master programmes that I could have chosen. Free time has not been available. The climat in the class is very competitive for grades and with students at the programme with severe problems in communicating in English (or low/no knowledge about Management and Economics of Innovation) makes the study environment very bad. Please: Put in tests for the programme, both in English and knowledge about the subjects before letting people in, it would have made it so much easier. » (Probably not)
- Jag hade läst lösa kurser från flera olika program, då geo and water bara erbjuder ett begränsat antal relevanta kurser. » (Probably not)
- Because the best courses were optional. In many of the courses I did not learn to much.» (Probably not)
- Perhaps bad choice, perhaps it could be more interesting.. » (Probably not)
- The courses are not taught in the depth I would have liked. There are other courses in Chalmers which are rather good. I would have chosen another Masters within Chalmers as core courses were done rather poorly.» (Probably not)
- I"m very disappointed with the teacher/relation student. May be is just a cultural problem, or may be is just me, but it has made my studies so far much less productive than I expected, and my life as a student very unpleasant.» (Probably not)
- The programme did not help me go further.. Despite getting a degree i dont feel that i am more ready now for the industry than after finishing my bachelors!» (Probably not)
- It is to fuzzy and you learn very few hands on skills. I now would have choosen a more hands on master such as Sustainable Energy Systems.» (Probably not)
- would shoose aplied mechanics» (Probably not)
- Too slow, not enough new learning... Feels sometimes more like a repitition than a deepening of my Bachelor degree» (Probably not)
- Too low level on the courses. This program is not for people that have studied physics on bachelor"s level but for people who are new to physics.» (Probably not)
- other program, like comunication will be more suitable for me» (Probably not)
- Poor coordintation between the modules» (Probably not)
- My first priority was Communication Engineering. I couldn"nt get admission in that program. I was given admission in this program (it was 5th on my priority list).» (Probably not)
- this course should be able to deal with more biology stuffs» (Probably not)
- Not stimulating. You always get a 4 no matter how little you study. No interesting discussions in class, everybody is just concerned about the grade. A non-mixed class: either you only work with Swedish people and get a good grade or work with exchange students and get to sit and correct spelling most of your time ( I think that is bad considering that you learn a lot from exchange students). The same theories come back in every course, you learn about Porter"s five forces in almost all courses and you wonder if management is only about that.» (Probably not)
- As more stress of studies is towards concurrent and functional programming, not on making a good managers or architects » (Probably not)
- The courses are, with very few exceptions, at a lower level than the undergraduate courses. Most could be taken before starting the undergraduate level.» (Probably not)
- Poor administration and project evaluation. Very little time for feedback and revision.» (Probably not)
- Think there are better programmes.» (Probably not)
- The courses and the direction of the programme wasn"t quite what I had first expected.» (Probably not)
- My interests have changed since I started.» (Probably not)
- Because I feel that some of the courses is poorly structured and that there seems to be bad communication between the courses regarding what they teach (it is better, trough my opinion, to read one subject more intesive and deep than scratch the surface several times in different courses), I had hoped for more practical practise in Leadership/management and communicational skills.» (Probably not)
- Everything here is perfect, except that i don"t have a lot of time digesting the course material. maybe i do my best to pass the course, but definetely i don"t enjoy my studying here. before i want to start enjoying it, the quarter is over! i didn"t like the quarter-based system here at Chalmers what-so-ever.» (Probably not)
- The university does not enforce high enough standards and the administration of the program is poorly structured. I don"t feel that the university is ambitious enough, which is probably a reflection on poor (or absent) leadership. » (Probably not)
- Few core subjects could be considered which are missing and few statistical courses could be made electives instead being obligatory » (Probably not)
- because in the second year me and same people as me that had chosen the production management didn"t have a support from mechanical department and should always go to VASA building and mix themselves with the courses offered in other departments. after passing those courses we are not familiar with the professors, we wont have referees, we wont have master theses and mostly we dont have identity that to which field are we experts.» (Probably not)
- I belive that what I have learned through this program I could have learned through other programs as well while getting a more general degree.» (Probably not)
- Personally willing to studying software programming.» (Probably not)
- It didnt open new opportunities to continue (my education/career)» (Probably not)
- Would like to have a more distinct alignment and more computational courses.» (Probably not)
- It is better and more useful for those who have biological background. » (Probably not)
- I simply think it has not been good enough. » (Probably not)
- The administration has been fuzzy. Lecturers are not engaged/do not try do lectures interesting. Demands are low, expectations are low (pygmalion effect).» (Probably not)
- 1-it should decided between bioinformatics and systems biology!each of these field are heavy enough for a Master program 2-if they want to cover both side and give more flexibility for student to choose a track after a semester which is really good they have to have a systematize program for tracking students for choosing a core track!thers is no good support for this! 3-many of the lectures are incoherent!they should detect good teachers and focuse on them rather than coming too many people in each course! 4-the lab parts are almost like coocking!except the KEMP labs in first quarter and Dimitri labs for MATLAB and also GUATHAM! 4-the most important thing is that you dont feel any entity for this program!there is no active website for pogram!I mean if you walk through the Matematic building you can not find any sign for Bioinformatics and Systems biology!I think this is the same for many programs,but this is very important to have entity at web and also at school 5-this is interdeciplanry program and it should be more gust lecture and also comminucation with important institute in europe and the world! » (Probably not)
- I think the practical work in this programme is less.......it should be increased.......otherwise its ok» (Probably not)
- The program was not designed well, and also the avalabilty of thesis project was very limited. I should say it opens less door to your future opportunities.» (Probably not)
- the program is not well organized » (Probably not)
- It is what i am intrested» (Probably not)
- Because it is not well adjusted to the swedish market and few companies know of it.» (Probably not)
- The structure was not what the name says. Are all the electronic systems Digital? Are all the electronic systems less than GHz Frequency? It would be better to change the name in CAD or change the syllabus please!!!» (Probably not)
- It is so far to my expectation, the number of related courses to my program is too few and students have to register for courses in other programs, like software etc. The related courses are not that much satisfactory, We have to study two courses in security.» (Probably not)
- Considering Employment and Learning opportunities» (Probably not)
- I"d probably not choose it if I had realized how few courses there were in geology and geotechnics» (Probably not)
- Very little new content coming from a bachelor at chalmers, much repetition. Uninteresting mandatory courses like Distr systems I & II.» (Probably not)
- Electronic System Design courses are more market oriented now.» (Probably not)
- The knowledge provided is not so applied.» (Probably not)
- It was not my first choice but was unaware of my possibilty of choosing the program i wanted.» (Probably not)
- Because this program is structured based on the available teachers in department, not based on the usability of the courses that has to be designed for such a program. regarding this fact just very brief description of many branches will be given to students and as a result students can not develop their knowledge in a concentrated area. » (Probably not)
- From the program description I gathered the program was going to be more about design than architecture, which is not the case. I would like something more focused on industrial design.» (Probably not)
- While it"s a great program to build foundation in Acoustics, the research done and opportunities in the department are not that exciting and interesting. Also, the emphasis of the program on Vibration and Mechanical Engineering is definitely not intune with my personal interests.» (Probably not)
- It is actually an excellent master program its just that I realized something closes to biology and medicine is more my thing. » (Probably not)
- the future of this program for international students is dark.no chance to continue their study in PHD.» (Probably not)
- There were not a lot of courses in my interest area(railway, road and logistics) even thou it sounded like it was possible when I applied. Also some of the mandatory courses are irrelevant for what I want to work with in the future.» (Probably not)
- because it has a few shortfalls in not covering enough management type situations.» (Probably not)
- I did not gain much practical knowledge from it and all the networking topics covered I have already studied before at my BS and in my Cisco CCNA. The networking section of the program is good especially with the routing technology course, but you need to work harder on the internet technology course. The distributed system section of the program is totally a miss.» (Probably not)
- I have problem to see what I really learn. » (Probably not)
- I would choose the same program but different studio.» (Probably not)
- - lack of flexibility within course and program » (Probably not)
- program is not well organized » (Probably not)
- Not as applicable courses as I thought.» (Probably not)
- since there are no jobs within the field, at least not in a couple of years. There are teachers in this master programme that are ignorant and do not want to help their students, but some are great » (Probably not)
- It is really expensive to life in Sweden. People are so close minded that if you dont speak Swedish it muight be a problem. After two years of international student you get tired and is relly hard to get a job. For instance, in UK you study a master in 1 year you pay titution fee, however you can establish long-term relationships and you might also be part of the comunity. » (Probably not)
- Too low work load, general for most courses.» (I would consider it)
- I have learnt a lot and some of my knowledge is great but I want to have the basics in the program and then studied something else more focused towards my basic training at Chalmers» (I would consider it)
- It feels like very good subjects and a nice combination of solid and fluid mechanics. However it feels like our courses has lower goals than the ones in the "Applied Mechanics" master so I might have chosen that one instead to get a deeper competence. » (I would consider it)
- I don"t feel that the master deepened my knowledge as much as I wanted, it was quite similar to the bachelor even if not totally. I can feel that I could have spent my time on a different track instead, in order to get a broader degree. Probably something within management, or entrepreneurship. » (I would consider it)
- Well, to start with the performance level of my fellow student is significantly lower at the SCM-program than it was at Industriell Ekonomi. Especially so with the exchange students. Their English level is on average to bad which make them ill suited to study Management since your most important tool is your ability to express yourself. Writing reports and so on with people who are bad at English is a pain in the ass. When it comes to the different courses some have been good, some so so, and some really bad. If I would have chose a master program now I might have chosen Business Design instead because they have better students and more resources. » (I would consider it)
- It is a very nice study environment, but i think the guidance in the studies is way too poor.» (I would consider it)
- The alternatives have the same problem as this master programme» (I would consider it)
- People always want to try something different if they have the chance, isn"t it?» (I would consider it)
- I love the world of IT, however I would probably pick something more like CSE or ICM. I thought that SET would be more allround but I still felt like we"re basicly educating code-implementors. » (I would consider it)
- Another interresting program exists as well.» (I would consider it)
- I want a mix of the QOM and Production Engineering courses» (I would consider it)
- I would consider other programmes, since some of the courses did not really suit me (like some of the control courses). I would consider other programmes as well, for example Complex Adaptive Systems.» (I would consider it)
- It"s not very theoretical, and being used to much more theoretical courses in the Bsc. education, the courses sometimes feel like they are based on rules of thumb rather than actual theory. Sometimes it even feels as if we are not expected to grasp the theory behind things, so it is not presented. Also, the lack of course literature also troubles me, I do not like the compendium style literature base that many courses have. There must be loads of excellent literature out there and I have even acquired some on my own, but the course material can be greatly revised!» (I would consider it)
- It"s a very good programme, although the focus is almost only on control.» (I would consider it)
- The courses are scattered and especially in year two they the elective courses are not really connected to the program. » (I would consider it)
- Not confident about finding a job in the field after graduation» (I would consider it)
- I would look for something more related tomy bachelor studies. » (I would consider it)
- The lectures in Advanced classical physics and Quantum field theory killed a lot of my energy to study. » (I would consider it)
- i wanted to take sometoher courses» (I would consider it)
- I do not feel very interested in management, and only somewhat interested in maintenance of programs and the computer system life cycle. Luckily there is several slots for choosing courses of own liking, but if I could turn back time I would more strongly consider the Computer Science programme.» (I would consider it)
- My interests might correspond better to another master program.» (I would consider it)
- it should be more special,more focus on a special region» (I would consider it)
- Focusing both design and engineering is a bit far from the needs of industry. The program is perfect but the reality is different.» (I would consider it)
- The name "wireless and photonics Engineering" is mischievous. it should be "microwave and photonics". This led to a misunderstanding between wireless which means wireless communication planning with microwave engineering is making troubles for me.» (I would consider it)
- Since my background is entirely electrical, I would like to have more electronics related courses which at the moment there is almost none.» (I would consider it)
- there are around 50 master programmes offered, and as a student I have to say no to 49 of them....I have to admit that I have been curious about all those courses I have chosen not to study.» (I would consider it)
- would seriously think to apply for the Business design» (I would consider it)
- because it was the first year for this program, some courses ran with pool quality, and when we asked why, the answer was that because it is the first year, so I do not know if the quality improved for new students or not.» (I would consider it)
- Its not really give much in terms of game development» (I would consider it)
- I would find a degree in core design like transportation design or automotive design.» (I would consider it)
- it is not my favorite field to study and work. » (I would consider it)
- The 2nd year courses were not organized at all. Lack of planning for thesis. Number of student is higher than available thesis.» (I would consider it)
- Sweden has a good reputation on sustainability and there are not that many schools that offer a masters that specializes in this. However, the masters lacks in technical expertise and there is the over-riding since that no matter what the quality of your work is you will pass. I agree that students should be their own motivators, however most human beings work well when the feel challenged and when their peers expect better results from them. There is very little consideration for the fact that many foreign and swedish students will work outside of sweden and need to know how to build sustainably in other climates other than cold ones.» (I would consider it)
- To much overlapping of the courses» (I would consider it)
- Interesting about Mechanical engineering as well» (I would consider it)
- The quality is to low overall in this masters programme. » (I would consider it)
- It was not as i expected. I thought it would be more antennas and transmission in air. I had not understood that it was this much electrical theory involved. Although Im not dissepointed. » (I would consider it)
- Due to that there are almost impossible to take avay compulsary corses and choose other courses that are of interest for me, I have decided not to take my masters degree from hte program but instead just take my civ.ing degree. I think that when you are of the age of taking a masters program there whould be less compulsary courses and more elective courses so that you can form the education from your own interest. Espesially when the first courses in the program are just repetition from the bachelors level to take all students to an even level of eductaion. This is wrong and a complete waiste of time!» (I would consider it)
- maybe I would also consider quality and operations mgmt or supply chain mgmt» (I would consider it)
- most courses are not so good as my expectation» (I would consider it)
- The program course core was not advanced. It was comparable with my bachelor degree. What I had seen in other universities was much more advanced. The main problem is that the program does not intend to prepare a percentage of students to be future researchers. This can be done by offering very advanced elective courses which could be selected by some of the students.» (I would consider it)
- The quality on the courses is very low due to lack of interest from the lecturers and teaching assitens. There is however exceptions from the rule but they are few, 4-5 people in total.» (I would consider it)
- ICM seems to provide a better, more hands-on education.» (I would consider it)
- find some better or more interesting programs» (I would consider it)
- I have learned a lot from this programme. However, I find in the 3rd semester I have no good courses to choose if I do not take a 60 credits thesis. To some extend, I can say I waste months and can not learn much.» (I would consider it)
- perhaps geo and water» (I would consider it)
- Interesting field» (I would consider it)
- i would consider it if course about Building information modeling are introduced.» (I would consider it)
- Personal preferences.» (I would consider it)
- The area i wanted to specialized had few courses» (I would consider it)
- lack of real dustry projects» (I would consider it)
- thought it would be more about traffic planning» (I would consider it)
- I would consider to choose a programme related more into my bachelor"s degree. » (I would consider it)
- We need more courses focus on communication technologies. Some courses in my program are not that useful and not well orgnized, when compared to KTH and Lund university.» (I would consider it)
- It has fulfilled my expectations. I think other programmes may have done that, too. » (I would consider it)
- I will not get a lot of opportunities to work non-academically» (I would consider it)
- Because the courses are not very good and I don"t feel I"ve gain much knowledge as I expected.» (I would consider it)
- The Master programme might be to similar to the bachelor I previously attended (DEI) but the raised expectations do make up for it to a large extent.» (I would consider it)
- In the last two years, my interests have changed a bit. So the choice is not linked to the quality of the master, which is very good, but to my own tastes.» (I would consider it)
- I maybe should have chosen one master programme in Lund instead since I want to learn more about roads. It feels like it"s much more construction here at Chalmers.» (I would consider it)
- Because some of the courses fail to rise to my expectations, as well as some of the students that are attending them with me. » (I would consider it)
- mostly due to personal interest.» (I would consider it)
- If courses in different track can be added and specified, I will take the programme again.» (I would consider it)
- To much focus on image!» (I would consider it)
- The only other option, as I see it, would be to atttend a similar mastersprogram at another university» (I would consider it)
- The fact of being free was a key factor in my decision. Of course also the well know level of Sweden"s education but still Chalmers is far away from US or Canada"s education. Or at least something in the system is not working well, because you have decided to start asking for tuition fees and also many of the really good professors that used to work at the department have left in the past 3-4 years, at least 5!!! Now that we are forced to pay, I would consider other options as well.» (I would consider it)
- Because we dont obtain any professional or practical experience. There are no correspondent labs with networking equipment. The level of given programming tends to 0. I am afraid to be unemployed after the graduation, because the master program doesnt give ANY employers" requirements. » (I would consider it)
- I think other masters programmes are more worked through and well organzed.» (I would consider it)
- The job oppurtunities seems uncertain.» (I would consider it)
- I would need more hard knowledge to find work withnin the field. Some courses were diffuse about learning outcomes and application. » (I would consider it)
- not easy to find a job in my country» (I would consider it)
- This is a very philosophical program with many "deep" discussions which focus on learning and knowledge, How, Way When etc. Sometimes it feels like there is to much of that part and you want some more real cases: We do like this in our company and so on...» (I would consider it)
- Maybe I choose Geo and Water since they have more friendly and helpful staff » (Yes - probably)
- The only thing that I do not like about MEI is that it is hard to put a finger on what knowledge you really got, for that reason I might consider SCM since it is easier to tell other what you actually know.» (Yes - probably)
- The only program at IndEk that accepts one year exchange studies instead of a year at Chalmers. This is great and reasonable if you manage to find the same courses abroad. MEI has a very bad attitude stating that they have a special quality and wont accept any courses from abroad as substitute. This is not acceptable. Most exchange universities, including UNSW as I go to, have way better quality than Chalmers and a range of courses that Chalmers can"t offer. Most students, including myself, that go on exchange are very ambitious. I definitely don"t want to waste a year abroad and retake all courses at chalmers when I get back. So QOM, good on you! MEI and all the others - you loose the best students :)» (Yes - probably)
- moar programming plzlol» (Yes - probably)
- I did not feel welcomed by the people outside the university and there has been a look down on me in society, the weather was awful, but the university was very good.» (Yes - probably)
- I have realized that I am more into developing, but I still want to keep the elements of interaction design in my knowledge» (Yes - probably)
- It´,s what I find interesting regarding civil engineering.» (Yes - probably)
- I might have been a bit more focused. However, it is one of the programs that gives knowledge directly usable on the market. I would have focused a bit more on programming though. And Tomas Olovsson rocks! :)» (Yes - probably)
- It covers my interests» (Yes - probably)
- That is my field of interest.» (Yes - probably)
- Its a good Masterprogram» (Yes - probably)
- I"m still not entirely sure that this is what I want to work with. Perhaps it would be good with some more in depth information of the programmes, with concrete examples of what kind of work you will be doing during the master.» (Yes - probably)
- There are limited electives in the stream. I mean there are no courses on Estimation theory, Tracking theory which i feel are very important. » (Yes - probably)
- Interesting program but not so many jobs after the education.» (Yes - probably)
- If I went back I would probably study a biological subject» (Yes - probably)
- I still think that there are improvements that can be done, especially while keeping in mind how to DEEPEN the knowledge and make it more ADVANCED for the students in their special field, and to keep better in mind what is probable that the students will WORK with (not only doctoral studies) in the future. » (Yes - probably)
- Yes I probably would have, although I found I really did not like the 7 week terms.» (Yes - probably)
- TKK, Helsinki seems like the grass is greener on the other side.» (Yes - probably)
- Teachers are highly qualified and teach good in class but they do not encourage students to go and ask questions to them after class timings.» (Yes - probably)
- I think the network and security courses have been excellent. (computer security, network security and internet technology)» (Yes - probably)
- I made a choice between production engineering and SCM, but I feel that despite the host company in each course the connection with real world and companies is poor. I have very little understanding of what I could actually work with.» (Yes - probably)
- it has gave me what i want» (Yes - probably)
- » (Yes - probably)
- It"s possible to gain a great deal of knowledge if you put some effort into it.» (Yes - probably)
- It is a good program with at least a couple of exellent courses. Reffering especially to Cryptograhpy and Algorithms.» (Yes - probably)
- Because of the level of the master program (see question 37.)» (Yes - probably)
- I find it good overall» (Yes - probably)
- like this programme» (Yes - probably)
- Because there are no other program that would suit me.» (Yes - probably)
- I should have taken more courses from other programmes, maybe changed university for one semester, since I don"t think there are enough "subject-specific" courses. I have taken some courses I didn"t want to beacuase there were no good options in the Programme. » (Yes - probably)
- It"s still the area I want to work with in the future.» (Yes - probably)
- the area is interesting, but the programmes could be revised» (Yes - probably)
- It"s interesting and no other subject interested me more.» (Yes - probably)
- I felt at the beginning of the program that the courses were not challenging enough. I took courses outside of the program in addition to the recommended courses and some of them were interesting and challenging. I expected that the master"s program would have been more fulfilling. So for, one of the most fulfilling parts of the master studies is the thesis, but it does not necessarily depends on the content of the program.» (Yes - probably)
- Many courses are very interesting.» (Yes - probably)
- becouse i like most course that i am taking» (Yes - probably)
- It is basically the only option if you want to work as a structural engineer in Sweden..» (Yes - probably)
- I like management and I like construction industry so in cooperation with CMB this is a perfect match! Perhaps I would have searched for a similar programme at Industrial Economy if this was not offered.» (Yes - probably)
- it`s hard to find a job» (Yes - probably)
- i like cars» (Yes - probably)
- but i would choose to take more courses from the "I-department" instead of the elective courses.» (Yes - probably)
- I find it is very interesting in current program. The reason make me reconsider maybe due to background of this area is not so solid. I am still glad to my choice.» (Yes - probably)
- new area, and few people participate, making it specific» (Yes - probably)
- Suitable for my interests. » (Yes - probably)
- It"s good enough for me to extend my knowledge in this area.» (Yes - probably)
- As i have said, I would like to opt a program that will offer more courses related to wireless communication engineering, rather studying un related courses just to complete 120 credits» (Yes - probably)
- jag skulle nog se över andra skolor så som KTH lite bättre om jag fick göra om mitt val.» (Yes - probably)
- it provided good and profound background in the field» (Yes - probably)
- I might also have chosen another masters programme and chose the relevant courses (I"m interested in earth observations, but not space science).» (Yes - probably)
- depends on if I can get a good job.» (Yes - probably)
- i can get a lot.» (Yes - probably)
- Also Management and economics of innovations.» (Yes - probably)
- love the subject, » (Yes - probably)
- this programme needs much strong background knowlege, otherwise it could be hard to follow from the first course, which is Introduction including knowledge from almost every fields of automotive.» (Yes - probably)
- I appretiate the layout of every project. Most projects are rooted in real problems and that adds complexity and at the same time triggers your mind to try to coop with issues that aren´,t even formulated in the brief.» (Yes - probably)
- I would chose it because I like the issues that are considered in sustaiable frame. And I like that the tutors are very open to talk or discuss with. However even the majority is internationals most of the courses are so Sweden based (we always go for climate or flooding problems, I think that is mostly a local problem to study in an international English program)» (Yes - probably)
- I would make sure to select as many courses as possible from other programs to get an even more interdisciplinary view on this field of science.» (Yes - probably)
- The ICM-program might have been more useful as it is more practical and it seems to me that the MEI program is a bit too much focused on reading articles/publications» (Yes - probably)
- But I would have studied a few other courses then» (Yes - probably)
- I would have liked more mathematics/physics/mechanics to maintain my knowledge from M1-M3.» (Yes - probably)
- The autumn courses were excellent, but the courses during the spring, especially Applied industrial ecology and Environmental management have not deepened my knowledge significantly about the subject.» (Yes - probably)
- It was fun and I actually feel that I learnt things from new areas for once.» (Yes - probably)
- It"s an interesting field» (Yes - probably)
- Most of the time, courses are overload by information, readings, lectures, project groups, individual groups, exams... There is a huge difference between the load in this programme and other programmes.» (Yes - probably)
- It met my expectations (few though they were) for the most part.» (Yes - probably)
- because my main interest in taking this program instead of a regular MBA, was the focus on the "human" part of management, and i cannot see it reflected on my courses so far...» (Yes - probably)
- No better alternative» (Yes - probably)
- Because it"s a good programme. I"m doubting because I also want to attend an other masters programme. » (Yes - probably)
- I may have had a second thought if I knew that all spring would be nearly useless. But still, I like the content of the courses, but only with the administration, pedagogical, and execution of the courses would be soo much better.» (Yes - probably)
- I would probably choose it because it is a very rare specialization that has few counterparts, but I am overall disappointed with the depth of the knowledge that I have gained. If compared to other Master programmes SCM has a quite low standard and expects little from their students. » (Yes - probably)
- I have learned what I wanted» (Yes - probably)
- Because it is the easy way.. just continuing from the bachelor. Also I had no insights in the other programmes, IDE was a safe choice.» (Yes - probably)
- Because the location in Göteborg and the possibility to have real life assignments» (Yes - probably)
- The option was solid and fluid mechanics but automotive felt more hands on.» (Yes - probably)
- Even though I think it was very interesting, I would perhaps choose a program with more focus on actual development, as that is probably what I will end up working with.» (Yes - probably)
- For a master programme I expected more research rather than just courses. However, the level of the courses were very well.» (Yes - probably)
- Maybe I would have chosen Sustainable Energy Systems, since this seems like a more precise field where you learn more specific things. IE is more vague.» (Yes - probably)
- good teachers interesting projects good conditions for working at school» (Yes - probably)
- Because it finally feels like one is learning something useful and interesting.» (Yes)
- No other MP is close to what I want to do.» (Yes)
- It"s super smashing great.» (Yes)
- I learnt a great deal, knowledgeable and energizing teachers, courses are well thought through, both how they fit together and how they are designed each and one by itself» (Yes)
- Since there are a lot of elective courses I could get the interesting parts from other Master programmes I thought of choosing.» (Yes)
- I think it"s one of the best organised master programs and it has a very good reputation.» (Yes)
- I learnt a lot of things. I come from a less technical background and I increased my technical skills thanks to my master programme» (Yes)
- I learned a lot! I had a great experience here! And I have a great deal of commitment and ownership feeling towards Chalmers now.» (Yes)
- strong academic atmosphere» (Yes)
- Loking back I would say that the Masters programme is the most interesting part of my entire education, by far.» (Yes)
- Nothing else is better is the main reason...» (Yes)
- Because it is the programme at Chalmers that provides the best education within human-machine interaction and industrial design. I would though, study at least 6 months, probably one year abroad to get training in the creative phases that are missing at this masters programme.» (Yes)
- It is still an excellent programme, I just think that there are things that could still be improved to further solidify this as a great programme in mathematics not only in Sweden but in Europe as well.» (Yes)
- learn by doing» (Yes)
- I found the courses I took interesting and useful and the experience enjoyable. » (Yes)
- Good teachers, nice courses and nice class-mates! Also a lot of laboratory work, which I really enjoy!» (Yes)
- It has been a great programme where I learned so much and enjoyed.» (Yes)
- interest matters» (Yes)
- Excellent Program, I am very satisfied.» (Yes)
- I think it was right for me» (Yes)
- The programme met my expectations in terms of course contents. I also appreciate the fact that most courses were difficult enough, which (listening to other students) was not the case in all programmes. » (Yes)
- Very fun an intresting program. Would take it again, without any doubt!» (Yes)
- For me it is the perfect mix of structural and fluid mechanics, and most importantly, allthough to some extent highly theoretical, the clear connection to the applications are there.» (Yes)
- Is a very good programme» (Yes)
- I really feel challenged, and even though there is a lot of work and sometimes quite frustrating. I still feel that it is worth the effort.» (Yes)
- Matches precisely my interests.» (Yes)
- It"s one of very few that I could choose, and I did not find the others more appeling.» (Yes)
- Because I studid Power Engineering from my bachelor .» (Yes)
- Many interesting coulses and project works.» (Yes)
- It is the right choice for me, I like this area of study and I really like the atmosphere and teachers at our programme.» (Yes)
- i learned a lot by coming and studying in Sweden, since my french school is not a specialist in energy (few programs about it)» (Yes)
- There is no other math masters program» (Yes)
- i think there are still lots of thing i can learn from this progamme» (Yes)
- A good program which has a strong status within the industry all ready.» (Yes)
- Its a good programme» (Yes)
- The master program provides the opportunity to choose courses quite freely. I could combine my chemistry and bio interests and I think the courses I selected was very interesting and I learned a lot.» (Yes)
- Because I like Software Engineering» (Yes)
- Its an awesome porgramme» (Yes)
- The programme is overall good, but you learn much less in 50% of the courses compared to the bachelor level. » (Yes)
- almost all of course materials are very interesting and practical for me.» (Yes)
- It is a good way to deepen the knowledge in sustainable architecture» (Yes)
- I think it is a good programme for software engineers, and especially developers. » (Yes)
- As the curriculum is not fixed, I can choose any electives I want (not just ones that are advertised in the program), and I"m mostly satisfied with choice of mandatory subjects» (Yes)
- This is a well-structure program and students have good communication with adminitrators in this program, so we could reflect on how we think and see the improvement.» (Yes)
- It is a really good education even though it"s quite tough» (Yes)
- No degree in Specialisation in control theory» (Yes)
- I feel that I really learned something which I doubt that I would at another programme.» (Yes)
- Because I am still very interested in the subjects.» (Yes)
- Because it"s what i"m interested of.» (Yes)
- Still my favorite subject» (Yes)
- It"s exactly what I want to do.» (Yes)
- -» (Yes)
- Because it is difficult and constantly tests my ability and intellect.» (Yes)
- Interesting and Broad spectra of topics which is positive!» (Yes)
- I emjoy too much the program. Something that I was looking for.» (Yes)
- -» (Yes)
- It was the perfect subject for me, even though I did not know it before. Very inspirational. » (Yes)
- the university is full of study resource, excellent and free study environment, unique courses » (Yes)
- I is really important for designing usable systems» (Yes)
- It suits me.» (Yes)
- I would highly recomend people from my bachelor (mechanical engineering)to take this master!» (Yes)
- This program provides exactly what I expected.» (Yes)
- I would choose the program but not attend any further courses from Building Performance design after the compulsory part.» (Yes)
- It was an excellent education with engaged and responsive teachers and interesting courses, which suited me perfectly fine» (Yes)
- Very interesting ! and very different from what I had in France...» (Yes)
- I started to know what is going on in the rest of the worlds and know more people get real knowledge.» (Yes)
- Very nice mix of heavy theory and subjects regarding chaos etc together with useful simulation and optimization procedures. Overall a very nice feel of doing something important comes from both the teachers and students.» (Yes)
- i believe the master education that i received at chalmers is at par with most other competent master programs in the world. this combined with an international experience , second time? yes please!» (Yes)
- I love what I learned from this department. I feel so lucky that I chose the right major and met so many wisdom teachers who are willing to help all the time.» (Yes)
- I am quite satisfied with the Programme I am in.» (Yes)
- This programme has helped me progress in the field that I wish to pursue my career in. It has been profitable for me to attend this programme.» (Yes)
- Good learning support and training in a relatively innovative field.» (Yes)
- It is what i want to learn. To learn the physics and to put things in application. This programme and the course it contains are excellent» (Yes)
- I have learned so very much and I have had a really great time, even though I have had to work my ass of and cried many times because of the enourmous preassure» (Yes)
- Over all has everything been very good» (Yes)
- The high quality of teaching, rather good English level, broad range of different but related subjects, company and site visits, and very good student mix - I would definitely choose this program again.» (Yes)
- It was nice class, teachers and I felt welcome here. It was funny and cosily here. A lot of nice people I have met here.» (Yes)
- It offers students enough freedom to pursue their interests and learn new topics within the emerging field of interaction design.» (Yes)
- I am very much interested in artificial intelligence, so it was this or complex adaptive systems. CSALL felt like the better choice back then and I still think so.» (Yes)
- I like it, it attracks my intertests.» (Yes)
- High quality courses (with a few exceptions)» (Yes)
- very good experience» (Yes)
- Because it matches with my knowledge and my interest» (Yes)
- this is what I am interested in and what I want to carry on doing in my working future» (Yes)
- Chalmers is one of the only places with a good, well organized, English language program with some specialty in building performance and building physics. It is a good program here.» (Yes)
- Its very flexible» (Yes)
- i will trun to fundalmental physics programme.» (Yes)
- The only master programme that could be interesting is the Sustainable Energy Systems. But this (Innovative and Sustainable Chem. Eng.)would still be my first choice.» (Yes)
- It covered what I expected and what I am interested in.» (Yes)
- Dependent, if I get job or not.» (No opinion)
- It"s difficult to say at the moment. I would perhaps consider it. » (No opinion)
- financial reasons, no ensured accomodation as a master student» (No opinion)

36. What should definitely be preserved in your Masters programme?