Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Electronic system design project, Lp4 VT-10, DAT095
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2010-05-17 - 2010-06-03 Antal svar: 8 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 40% Kontaktperson: Victoria Ewers»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.8 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 1 | | 12% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 2 | | 25% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 3 | | 37% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 2 | | 25% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.75 - I was busy with this course almost all the week» (Around 30 hours/week)
2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 8 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 1 | | 12% |
75%» | | 0 | | 0% |
100%» | | 7 | | 87% |
Genomsnitt: 4.75
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?8 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 2 | | 25% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 4 | | 50% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 2 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.8 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 8 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?8 svarande
No, not at all» | | 2 | | 25% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 12% |
Yes, definitely» | | 3 | | 37% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 2 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 2.62 - Since there is no exam nor grading system, it is difficult to assess individually. » (No, not at all)
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?8 svarande
Small extent» | | 2 | | 25% |
Some extent» | | 4 | | 50% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 25% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 - Föreläsningarna var försena, skulle haft relevanta delar tidigare. Saknar även föreläsningar för de digitala delarna.» (Small extent)
- LP3 was good, but almost non-existing in LP4. » (Small extent)
- MOre lectures could be given. And specially the analog lectures that talked about circuit implementations should have been provided a little early.» (Large extent)
7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?8 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 12% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 37% |
Large extent» | | 1 | | 12% |
Great extent» | | 3 | | 37% |
Genomsnitt: 2.75 - The papers/tips were often given serveral weeks after most groups began their work in the areas, gining help earlier would have saved a lot of time.» (Small extent)
- the papers we found on ieee via the chalmers network were very helpful.» (Great extent)
8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?8 svarande
Very badly» | | 1 | | 12% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 5 | | 62% |
Very well» | | 2 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3 - Tex att vi aldrig fick reda på hur mitt termins rapporten skulle se ut eller mallen för slutrapporten kom först en vecka innan slutdatumet är väldigt dåligt. Att lärarna ger oss ett antal program att arbeta med som de tydligen inte har arbetat med själva och inte vet ifall de kan användas för detta projekt är mycket störande. Det finna ännu fler exempel på detta, även om detta är små detaljer så är det VÄLDIGT viktiga för intrycket av kursen/lärarna. Studenterna får ett väldigt slarvigt och lojt intryck av lärarna när de inte hanterar dessa saker tillfredsställande vilket resulterar i att de tappar intresset för kursen då lärarna inte verkar intresserade heller.» (Very badly)
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?8 svarande
Very poor» | | 1 | | 12% |
Rather poor» | | 2 | | 25% |
Rather good» | | 2 | | 25% |
Very good» | | 3 | | 37% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.87 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?8 svarande
Very poorly» | | 2 | | 25% |
Rather poorly» | | 2 | | 25% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 25% |
Very well» | | 2 | | 25% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.5 - there was no cooperation at all, some student didn"t do anything and unfortunetly pass the course easily » (Very poorly)
- Då vissa studenter inte arbetar alls eller inte kan något så blir grupparbetet dåligt.» (Rather poorly)
- The groups are terrible, people are forced to work outside their area and a LOT of people throughout the groups contribute close to nothing...
Students must be able to choose which area they work with. split the groups into "pure" groups of analog/digital. and LET THEM CHOOSE THEMSELVES!» (Rather poorly)
- groups need to be selected better than this year because some lazy group members effecting the group badly» (Rather well)
11. How was the course workload?8 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 25% |
High» | | 3 | | 37% |
Too high» | | 3 | | 37% |
Genomsnitt: 4.12 - The project could be completed if 1-2 tasks are given to smaller specialized groups. that way noone has to do work they don"t know how to. Maybe also having a coordinating group that set up interface between blocks and testing.» (Too high)
12. How was the total workload this study period?8 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 12% |
High» | | 5 | | 62% |
Too high» | | 2 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 4.12
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?8 svarande
Poor» | | 2 | | 25% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 25% |
Good» | | 3 | | 37% |
Excellent» | | 1 | | 12% |
Genomsnitt: 3.12 - for myself this course was interesting, because I learned a lot, but I have bad impression about group working,because some student took this course without any try and the just put their responsibility to others. » (Poor)
- Grades above G are needed, I don"t know how many timed I have heard the argument "It"s just a G course anyway"» (Adequate)
- it is a very good course, i learned a lot. however, i think the project was quite ambicious this year.» (Excellent)
14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- project subject is good»
- assessing individually with grading system,
right now there are some student that know without any work they can pass just by making fake report »
- System level design approach that this course teaches is a good learning outcome of this course. However, the task is too cumbersome for 2 quarters. Either the courses like Data conversions should be taught atleast a quarter before this course so that we are prepared before starting the project or some information should be clearly provided that would help us in the initial phase»
- mixed teams.»
- Integrity»
- BBQ»
- The tasks in general are good, but how groups are formed to complete them should change.»
15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- more lectures need to be added and there has to be lectures for analog or digital guys about the project. More information needed before the project start»
- I don"t know with lots of students, any useful change will be possible or not, but as I mentioned individual task should be considered»
- There should be more members per group since the design task is large. Also, some more guidance should be provided regarding the flow of the project, initially.»
- Less workload»
- Man borde få välja gruppmedlemmar själv eller åtminstone få välja vilken de av projektet man vill arbeta med. Som det var nu så blev det väldig ojämnt mellan de analoga och den digitala delen. Även ifall en person har gått en analog kurs behöver inte detta alls innebära att den vill arbeta med det.
Ha med möjligheten för betyg över 3, blir mer motiverande att anstränga sig lite extra ifall det går att få överbetyg.»
- The groups! Maybe possible to split inte analog or digital groups, let all student choose some weeks before the course starts.»
16. Additional comments- good course»
- Great barbeue! I know the most of us really appreciated it!
One thought could be to let everyone decide on a task/direction they want to work with a month or so before the course starts to avoid misunderstandings? »
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|