|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
UNA016 - Environmental policy instruments, Vt 2010, MPECO, UNA016Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2010-03-23 - 2010-03-30 Antal svar: 23 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 38% Kontaktperson: Kathrine Jahnberg»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?Matrisfråga- Jessica was uninspiring.» Thomas Sterner
Genomsnitt: 4.52 Jessica Coria
Genomsnitt: 4.04 Magnus Hennlock
Genomsnitt: 4.34 Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.04 - The 60% part of "knowing everything" about examples in the world, in the exam was distrurbing.
Otherwise it was okay.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.4 - There where not really any calculation questions as in those two exams that were on the course home page before. In that sence they need to explain more how the exam is going to be» (To some extent) 6. The examination: Was it easy to understand the questions?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.08 - Why so many points and so few questions! That is very unfair if there is som e question you don´,t understand.
Very bad that there was no teacher visiting the exam and no number to call!!!! That is against all chalmers policy!» (No, not at all) Teaching and course administration7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?Matrisfråga- Thomas Sterner, very good and interesting lecturer, but tends to drift away and therefore the somewhat lower grade. » Thomas Sterner
Genomsnitt: 3.34 Jessica Coria
Genomsnitt: 2.6 Magnus Hennlock
Genomsnitt: 3.08 8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.82 - It is really nice when the course and the literature follows each other.» (Great extent) 9. How did you like the course book?- It was good to have a book that follows the course closely. Formulas in the book are written very strange and are hard to understand. »- Good in some ways but really boring to read because it was just alot of text with little pictures... Yes there where small boxes and diagrams but in the long run that becomes very uninspiring. » - it was ok, but the fact that the lectures and th reading plan didn"t match was irritating.» - Hard to read. Very much information and also a little difficult to understand some times.» - It could result interesting to read, but with more time and slowly.» - takes time reading, very intense, could have been shorter and skipped some parts» - Good, but With to much focus on Mathias and formulas.» - The book is way too big, we don"t have time to read it. For me, i bought it but as i knew i wouldn"t have time to read everything, i didn"t read anything. It"s a bit a pity. Moreover, for the few i"ve read (for the project mainly), the text is way too long, there are too many repetitions and so the text could be much more synthetic and shorter.» - Sometimes goes into details too much but overall the book is good and covers the most important parts of the learning objectives.» - Pretty interesting, 4/5» - ok» - A bit too thick, but overall good» - It is easy to read, but it is difficult to look things, words and concepts up in it because you have to read the whole text to get an explanation.» - It"s good as reference litterature.» - Very interresting.» - I really like it» 10. How large part of the book did you read?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.52 - I only read the chapters mentioned in the syllabus» (75%) 11. What was good/ bad with the course book?- Good - text where alot of information Bad - just text and no pictures and inspiring things»- Good: Described the different policy instruments so they were easy to understand. Bad: To much text with difficult words and concepts.» - The book goes around a subject too much. The slides result more objective.» - A lot to read.» - Cf Question 9» - Bad that some chapters go into too great detail, good that the book covers the entire course.» - the first 5 chapters was kind of non informative and took very long to read. chapters 6 and forward seemed more relevant for the course» - It was rather scientific, used difficult words and phrase constructions (bad), it included many examples (good)» - Not easy to look things up.» - yes,it is good» 12. What is your opinion of the policy instruments exercise?- it was good, good for understanding the difficulties but I didnt learn so much to do the calculations.»- Good but could have been more clearer defined instructions of how the evaluation and grading would be.» - exercise was good even thiough we wre too many in our group (7)» - Good and interesting. Gave a good experience on how it might work in real life buisness sectors.» - Excellent, the best part of the course, where I really started to understand the course goals.» - Good asignment, it was Open giving freedom in how to Solveig it.» - Very interesting. It allows us to really understand what are the different instruments, how they work and what are the effects. We were also able to see how it can influence companies, and how companies can try to influence them. I really enjoyed this exercise !» - Very good» - Very fun and educational. » - can"t remember» - very intreresting exercise, and one of the most interesting I havre done here at chalmers» - Outstanding! Especially the presentation and the freedom to decide how to do it, and also the "real life" way to do it, with making up the facts and manipulating the numbers» - Fun. But the group did not manage to work together at all, which made my learning experiece less than optimal.» - fun and beneficial» - Taught me a lot!» - Fun, but too big groups. Hard to organize the work.» 13. Was the case study useful for your understanding of policy instrument design?- yes»- Yes it was.» - yes!» - Yes it was.» - Absolutely.» - Yes definitly. However it was not reflected in the exam» - Yes, very! But give clear instructions from beginning (e.g about grades and credits)» - Yes, all calcyulations.» - Yes a lot.» - Yes» - To some extent, yes» - yes. some of the lectures was kind of messy so it made understanding more clear» - yes» - Yes, but in my group we split the instruments, so each member only new his own instrument, I was lucky, I made the presentation slides, so I had to understand all instruments» - Yes.» - Yes» - Yes!» - Yes» - yes, i think it is very useful, at first, i don"t understand anything,but after it ,I ,ｕ,ｎ,ｄ,ｅ,ｒ,ｓ,ｔ,ａ,ｎ,ｄ, ,ｍ,ｕ,ｃ,ｈ, ,ｍ,ｏ,ｒ,ｅ,» 14. Was the time you spend on the assignment proportional to the amount of points you could receive?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.69 - I spent a great deal of time on the assignment, more than was required but I found it interesting to explore it in greater depth.» (To some extent) 15. Did you get clear information regarding the project and the presentation?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.54 - More clearer defined instructions of how the evaluation and grading would be.» (To some extent) 16. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - some slides were missing from a couple of lectures..» (Rather badly) Study climate17. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.73 - But example Thomas always during the breaks went somewhere which made it hard to ask questions» (Rather good) 18. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.34 - The group assignment did not work that well. It was difficult to divide the task in a good way.» (Rather poorly) 19. How was the course workload?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.95 - Could have been higher demands on us. It feels like we just touched this subject. We could have learned so much more... This should be a master course on Chalmers » (Low) 20. How was the total workload this study period?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.26 - Together with the other course, the weeks in the middle were hellish. Too much at times, but I think the other course is to blame for that.» (High) Summarizing questions21. What is your general impression of the course?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.17 - Could have been hard» (Good) 22. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- case study, magnus as lecturer»- The subject!» - the exercise» - The case study.» - The assignment and the debate.» - Case» - The case study. The format of courses, the order the subjects are seen.» - The case excercise» - the project» - Case study! And Thomas" lectures» - The case study.» 23. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Alot more calculations excersies. We hadn´,t calculated anything untill the " summary lecture" if such a large part of the exam is calculations there should be possibilities to calculate all the way throgh the course. »- Clear instructions in how the examination of the case study will be and contact information on the exam AND A TEACHER THAT COMES TO ANSWER QUESTIONS!» - add some guidance on calculations...or at least make it clear that is will be a large part of the exam.» - Dont know.» - The availability of a professor on duty during the examination, that was actually very disapointing.» - Keep down the amount of slides... Plan the lectures better so there is enough time. Exam should reflect the general focus in the course! 3 hour lecture is not recommended.» - Less math, it makes basic concepts more complicated. More lectures held by Thomas.» - The book. If the book cannot be changed, maybe don"t ask to buy it and don"t expect students to have read it. Maybe a few texts could replace it.» - -» - More Thomas, less Magnus» - The exam!» - The bonus point system. It should be stated clearly how you get them.» - It is very vad that the rules for examination is secret before the presentation. The worst I have seen at Chalmers. This has to be changed!» 24. Additional comments- It would be nice to have feedback on the projects quite quickly after the end of the case study. This would also help for the examination preparation. It would also be nice to have the results of the examination quicker...»- -»
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
45%