ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPPEN SSY 170

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-03-16 - 2010-03-31
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Martin Fabian»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Klass: Övriga
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Övriga studenter

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 28%
Around 20 hours/week»1 14%
Around 25 hours/week»2 28%
Around 30 hours/week»2 28%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»5 71%
100%»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 4.28

- Due to colliding lectures, otherwise I would attend 100%.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

7 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 14%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 42%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 14%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 71%
No, the goals are set too high»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2

- I would prefer a course with more narrow focus. As it is today, a little bit of everything almost becomes nothing together...» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

7 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 57%
Yes, definitely»3 42%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»2 28%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»5 71%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- The teacher taught based on the assumption that we had learned those knowledge before. So he taught quite fast in the class.» (Small extent)
- Interesting lecture technique! :)» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»3 42%
Some extent»2 28%
Large extent»2 28%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

- The course material is really the achilles heel in this course. Some irrelevant material and some hard to read lecture notes make my overall impression low. Why not use the material of Bengt Lennartsson?» (Small extent)
- The slides are not sufficient for us to understand the content taught in the lecture. We need something in more details.» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

7 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 14%
Rather well»3 42%
Very well»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 28%
Very good»4 57%
I did not seek help»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 28%
Very well»5 71%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

11. Was the time for the hands-in sufficient?

- Yes.»
- Yes but not the last one. It should be moved earlier and not the friday before the examweek»
- Yes»
- Yes.»
- Yes»
- Yes»

12. Was the time for the rework sufficient?

- Yes. »
- yes»
- Yes»
- Yes.»
- Yes»
- Yes»

13. What was your impression of the Student Lectures?

- Very good actually. »
- Good but this could also have been moved to a earlier time and not in week 7.»
- A little bit misplaced and therefore not really taken serious. Suggestion to next year: distribute more specific topics to make the lectures more interconnected.»
- That is good.»
- Very Good! Congrats!»
- Really bad concept. Would rather do a third interesting hand-in. Like the optimazation, but with more explanation so you would understand more how it works.»

14. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 14%
Adequate»3 42%
High»3 42%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

15. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 57%
High»2 28%
Too high»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- I took 4 (7,5hp each) courses paralell this period.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

16. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»1 14%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 28%
Good»3 42%
Excellent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- As mentioned earlier I think the course content is to wide and therefore to general. My suggestion is that you pic some of the 4 main blocks and develop the course on depth.» (Adequate)
- It is a good course that covers the most important aspects in the field of automation.» (Good)

17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The student lectures and the course content overall.»
- All.»
- Laboratory»
- Everything»

18. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Some better form of lecture material. Did not feel that all was relevant, and hard to know what was relevant or not. »
- Some exercise about communication should be added.»
- More optimazation and explanation to this. It was REALLY bad explained which is bad because it is such an interesting area.»

19. Additional comments

- The removal of the solution to the optimization assigment on the exam from last year less than 24h hours before the exam and than having a very similar assigment on the exam now was very upsetting. Especially as because the impresson I got on the importance of such problems during the lecture and exercises was quite low. Yes, I know that it said on the txt-file you posted to sum up the course that MILP-problems were included, but you still know what I mean. »
- I don"t know if it is because the lectures are in english and fabian doesn"t feel confident with speaking it, but every lecture seemed unstructured and when you were expecting a explanation to the problem you just got some quick ending that nobody understod. Many of the answers to the exercises were wrong which made you spend a lot of unnecessary hours trying to learn something that actually was wrong.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från