ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Programming language technology, Lp 3 Vt10, DAT150/DIT230

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-03-15 - 2010-04-01
Antal svar: 19
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 6%
Kontaktperson: Åsa Samdell»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

19 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 5 26%

Around 20 hours/week» 8 42%

Around 25 hours/week» 3 15%

Around 30 hours/week» 3 15%

At least 35 hours/week» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.21

- I found Labs very tough» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

19 svarande

0%» 2 10%

25%» 5 26%

50%» 6 31%

75%» 4 21%

100%» 2 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.94

- Too small lecture rooms.» (25%)
- The teching was not useful at all.I didin"t learn enything from those few lectures that I attended.» (25%)
- Lectures are hard to understand.» (25%)
- overlaps» (50%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

19 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 5 26%

The goals are difficult to understand» 2 10%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 2 10%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 10 52%

Genomsnitt: 2.89

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

15 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 3 20%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 11 73%

No, the goals are set too high» 1 6%

Genomsnitt: 1.86

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

17 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 6 35%

Yes, definitely» 9 52%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.76

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent» 4 21%

Some extent» 7 36%

Large extent» 6 31%

Great extent» 2 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.31

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent» 6 31%

Some extent» 5 26%

Large extent» 6 31%

Great extent» 2 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.21

- I didn"t feel the need to open the book.» (Small extent)
- I did not read the book, but I read the slides» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

19 svarande

Very badly» 1 5%

Rather badly» 1 5%

Rather well» 11 57%

Very well» 6 31%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

- the mini thing is a bit hidden» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

19 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 2 10%

Rather good» 6 31%

Very good» 10 52%

I did not seek help» 1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.52

- The supervised lab sessions were very helpful. Easy to get good hints. Also, the mailing list helped a lot.» (Very good)
- nice thing the google group» (Very good)
- Ramona was awesome and answered all questions, even long after the exercise sessions were over.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

19 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 1 5%

Rather well» 8 42%

Very well» 7 36%

I did not seek cooperation» 3 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

11. How was the course workload?

19 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 1 5%

Adequate» 8 42%

High» 7 36%

Too high» 3 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- There was very little time left for the fourth lab at the end. I had no time left to prepare for the exam, due to the assignments in this course, and high workload in another course.» (High)
- The labs took faaaar too long for me. » (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

19 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 1 5%

Adequate» 5 26%

High» 11 57%

Too high» 2 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.73

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

19 svarande

Poor» 1 5%

Fair» 6 31%

Adequate» 2 10%

Good» 7 36%

Excellent» 3 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.26

- The course was very well structured and made it easy to learn new stuff» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Aarne is really good, I appreciate it !»
- Exercise sessions with bonus points. The labs»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Lab. 4, it is way to hard»
- too much work in lab assignments and the credits awarded is less. Would be better if the lab load is reduced or if the credits for the labs is increased and change the written exam into a home exam as the labs are really hectic and due weight-age is not given.»
- The lab 4. The 3 previous ones were great, we had guidelines, we knew what to do, and suddenly we were dropped into lab 4... I don"t think it was too hard, but it"s just that there should be more tracks to launch the lab on.»
- A more describing Lab PM for lab4. Very hard to understand what was needed to be done.»
- Maybe some more control on the bonus points. Some people had COMPLETELY wrong solutions on more than one occation.»
- The professor»
- Having two labs in the last week (for masters students) is too much. Improve the testsuites. Failing submissions when they are passing the testsuites should be enough.»

16. Additional comments

- great course, thanks. And don"t be so Haskell !»
- Great course, learned alot, thx.»
- The professor knows a lot but he doesn"t teach well.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från