Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
MPRSS: RRY055 Remote Sensing Sp3, 09/10
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2010-03-15 - 2010-03-26 Antal svar: 6 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?% Kontaktperson: Arto Heikkilä»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.6 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 4 | | 66% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 2 | | 33% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.33 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 6 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 4 | | 66% |
100%» | | 2 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 4.33
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?6 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 1 | | 16% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 2 | | 33% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 3 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 3.16 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.5 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 5 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?5 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 20% |
Yes, definitely» | | 4 | | 80% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.8
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?6 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 33% |
Large extent» | | 4 | | 66% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.66 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?6 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 16% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 50% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 33% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.16 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?6 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 1 | | 16% |
Rather well» | | 3 | | 50% |
Very well» | | 2 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 3.16 - Handouts are not much clarifying, rather is a simple slide» (Rather badly)
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?6 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 2 | | 33% |
Very good» | | 4 | | 66% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?6 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 3 | | 50% |
Very well» | | 3 | | 50% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 11. How was the course workload?6 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 4 | | 66% |
High» | | 2 | | 33% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.33 12. How was the total workload this study period?6 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 5 | | 83% |
High» | | 1 | | 16% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.16
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?6 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 1 | | 16% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 4 | | 66% |
Excellent» | | 1 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 3.83 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The presentations in the beginning of the course, from different groups at the department. They were really good.»
- The Matlab project. »
- Handouts, compendiums and practice exercises»
- There should be more labs added in the course for more better understanding»
- labs»
15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The labs shouldn"t coincide with the lectures.»
- Base the lectures less on Power point presentations.»
- More Matlab simulations »
- There should be some points for the Assignments»
- better PM for FTIR lab, at the moment it is VERY bad»
- the slide would be more elaboration type, and the mix of the teacher also be balanced »
16. Additional comments- Good»
- over all it"s a very good course to me specially thats why i am planning to take applied remote sensing in the 4th quarter»
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|