Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPRSS: RRY045 Numerical Methods in Radio and Space Science Sp3, 09/10

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-03-15 - 2010-03-26
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Arto Heikkilä»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

5 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»4 80%
Around 25 hours/week»1 20%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

5 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 40%
100%»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

5 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 20%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 60%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- I have freely elective courses and looked in the syllabus for guidance to see what I will learn during the course. Some mentioned moments in syllabus was left out. If those things are important and will be taught if time is enough I think this should be mentioned so students choosing courses so they can consider if one should choose the course or not, or just leave them out» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- They are clear now when the course is covered, but initially I expected more numerical methods algorithms. Like different numerical integration methods and discussing how to improve convergence of error etc.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

4 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»3 75%
No, the goals are set too high»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- I think one should include transforms as a prerequisite. I do not consider transforms as basic mathematics, but maybe all chalmers students have learned transforms.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

5 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 60%
Yes, definitely»2 40%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 20%
Large extent»3 60%
Great extent»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»2 40%
Some extent»2 40%
Large extent»1 20%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.8

- The numerical recepies book was not really needed in my opinion if one had good basics in transforms» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

5 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»2 40%
Very well»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

5 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 20%
Very good»4 80%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- Teachers were very willing to answer questions!» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

5 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 40%
Very well»2 40%
I did not seek cooperation»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

11. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 20%
Adequate»3 60%
High»0 0%
Too high»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- Average low, but high peaks!» (Low)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 60%
High»0 0%
Too high»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- So much report writing and matlab...» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 20%
Good»4 80%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- The wavelet introduction was of great value for one who didn"t know anything about them before. The Kalman filter was also interesting but much too short.» (Adequate)
- Except of leaving parts mentioned in the syllabus out, the course was good. The parts of ODE was taken to briefly in my opinion. I think that was interesting and more focus should have been on it. The same with kalman filtering.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Wavelets.»
- Teaching staff and Porjects»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Syllabus. I understand that master student which have this course as semicompulsory course, this is not a big issue, but for those choosing courses very freely the syllabus is a guideline for the other students assess the contents and see if one should choose this course.»
- More about method algorithms.»
- Nothing»
- It would better provided worked examples»

16. Additional comments

- I enjoyed the course»
- Alessandro part of the course was excellent, teaching method was superb, the course would be alot better if more time was spent on the Alessandro part. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från