Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Risk Control in Engineering, BOM125
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2010-03-15 - 2010-04-15 Antal svar: 14 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 70% Kontaktperson: Andreas Lindhe» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers Klass: Övriga Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Väg- och vattenbyggnad 300 hp
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus contain course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student.1. Are the goals reasonable considering your own educational background and the number of credits of the course?Answer this question and the two subsequent only if you do know the course goals.13 svarande
No, the goals are too easy» | | 1 | | 7% |
Yes, the goals are reasonable» | | 12 | | 92% |
No, the goals are too advanced» | | 0 | | 0% |
I have no idea about this» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.92 - Det var dock en av de trevligaste och roligaste kurserna jag haft på länge. Men ett kompendium eller någon annan form av litteratur kunde vara bra» (No, the goals are too easy)
2. Did the examination reflect the course goals?13 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 5 | | 38% |
Yes, definitely» | | 8 | | 61% |
I have no idea about this» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.61 3. Are the course goals adquate for what can be expected from a course like this?13 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Yes, to an acceptable extent» | | 7 | | 53% |
Yes, to a large extent» | | 3 | | 23% |
Yes, to a very large extent» | | 2 | | 15% |
I have no idea about this» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.46
Teaching and course administration4. The teaching has been of help for my learning to...13 svarande
a small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
a large extent» | | 10 | | 76% |
a great extent» | | 3 | | 23% |
Genomsnitt: 3.23 - Ja pågrund av den sparsamma litteraturen, så fanns det inte så mycket annat sätt att tillgodogöra sig kunskaperna. » (a large extent)
5. What was your general impression of the administration of the course?- It was very good. »
- good structure,applicable knowledge, etc.»
- Good»
- good»
- Good!»
- Jag tycer att kursen var strukturerad och väl genomtänkt. »
- Very Good.»
- very good»
- good. It was were well planed»
Course Literature6. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?13 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 15% |
Large extent» | | 9 | | 69% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 2.76 - No course literature?» (Small extent)
Study climate7. The opportunities for asking questions and getting answers and help were...13 svarande
very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
neither good nor bad» | | 1 | | 7% |
rather good» | | 1 | | 7% |
very good» | | 11 | | 84% |
of no interest for me» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 4.76 8. The cooperation between me and my fellow students worked...13 svarande
very poorly» | | 1 | | 7% |
rather poorly» | | 2 | | 15% |
neither poorly nor well» | | 1 | | 7% |
rather well» | | 2 | | 15% |
very well» | | 7 | | 53% |
Genomsnitt: 3.92 - Some (one) of the groupmemberes did not contribute very much to the project work.» (rather poorly)
- The division of labour was not good. Some students had to do all the work in their groups while some students almost did nothing.» (rather poorly)
9. The workload of the course was...13 svarande
too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
low» | | 1 | | 7% |
OK» | | 8 | | 61% |
high» | | 3 | | 23% |
too high» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 3.3 - I guess this was an effect of that one of the members did not do anything, especially in the end.» (high)
- because I did almost whole report. I think you should at least check students presence in class. I kind of saw one of the people in my group last week of the course.» (too high)
10. The total workload this study period was...13 svarande
too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
low» | | 3 | | 23% |
OK» | | 8 | | 61% |
high» | | 2 | | 15% |
too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.92
Summarizing questions11. What is your general impression of the course?13 svarande
The course was quite bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
The course was quite fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
The course was acceptable» | | 1 | | 7% |
The course was good» | | 8 | | 61% |
The course was excellent» | | 4 | | 30% |
Genomsnitt: 4.23 - I just wonder how come each group gets the same grades(4) even though some of the groups worked very hard and some just worked near the deadline!!!! This was a big surprise to me :(
Very very discouraging to me & my groupmates.» (?)
- I have nothing to complain about. Interesting and good lectures.» (The course was excellent)
12. Do you have suggestions for improvements - what should be done differently next year- I had a course environmental analysis of water. they had also a group project. they had a strategy to check all people cooperation in the work and if some one was missing they were asking about the reasons. I think you should do the same.»
- it"s ok now»
- More connection in guest lectures and lecturers with the course topic and what it is ,involved.,»
- Perhaps even more lectures. Some consultancy talking about how they work with risks in their company, SWECO perhaps?»
- Maybe a bit smaller groups, 4 persons»
- Project work should carry full weight of grading and exam should be pass or fail. One must pass the exam which would be based on the project just what was this year.»
- i think the project must be real case issue»
- Every group shouldn"t have the same subjects, maybe some group could have more about roads and so on. It"s a general risk course, so it would have been fun to choose a subject you were really interested in.»
13. What do you think about the soil contamination/drinking water project?- project was so helpful to learn course materials.»
- it works well for us to apply what we learned from the lectures. »
- very good»
- A professional project report rather than general report would be better with ,emphasizing on the result part. ,
Report writing process is time consuming, and it is maybe better to spend more on the ,results part.,
»
- Very good. Included all relevant parts for the course.»
- Good.»
- was good example taken»
- If your are not interested in water and soil contamination it"s hard to get all the aspects of the course I think»
14. What is your general impression of the course?13 svarande
The course was quite bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
The course was fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
The course was acceptable» | | 0 | | 0% |
The course was good» | | 9 | | 69% |
The course was excellent» | | 4 | | 30% |
Genomsnitt: 4.3 - Special thanks for Andreas for always being there to answer questions. » (The course was good)
- Best course so far!» (The course was excellent)
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|