|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
10lp3 TEK255 Managerial EconomicsStatus: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2010-03-09 - 2010-04-18 Antal svar: 58 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 43% Kontaktperson: Jamal Nasir» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
1. What is your general impression of the course?57 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.73 - Although I got 5 from this course, but I really didn"t learn any thing from this course.» (Very poor) 2. Are the aims and goals reasonable in relation to your pre-knowledge?57 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.64 - The part about all the investment appraisal should be more detail because there are lot of new knowledge and it is difficult to understand very well» (Very much) 3. How much did you learn from the course?57 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.66 - GOOD KNOWLEDGE OF MANAGEMENT» (Very much) 4. How did you find the lectures?56 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.58 - No agenda, not coherent at all which made them difficult to follow.» (Very poor) 5. Attendance on lectures57 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.07 - I HAD PROJECT AND IT WAS DIFFICULT FOR ME TO ATTEND THE CLASS.» (50 - 75%) 6. Did the course meet your expectations?57 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.56 - YES SURELY.» (Good) 7. Are the course contents relevant for your further studies and professional plans?57 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.54 8. Did the exam reflect the course in a fair way?57 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.1 - The exam was almost a copy of the older one"s. If you have solved one you have solved them all. The last question was basically a quadric equation and the problem was to derivate this. The last question should be a little tricky. » (Very poor) 9. How much did you learn from the project?57 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.66 - THIS MADE ME TO UNDERSTAND A LOT ABOUT THE MANAGEMENT.» (Very much) 10. Has the project met your expectations?57 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.61 - Group was generally a bunch of leechers who didn"t really contribute and just rode along 1-2 peoples hard work.» (Very little) 11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?57 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.77 - teacher should form groups by his own.» (Average) 12. Any other comments about the project, its contents and the work process?- it can be quite difficult to find a company»- Project was very good because it covers all the contents of course lectures and it really help me to understand how these theoretical concepts used in the industry» - Some warning or heads-up for a backup-plan should be issued for when a company doesn"t respond to your expectations. When they give hardly no info, then what do you write about?» - its very difficult to find the company"s person for the interview and most often the time given by the concerned person is not natch to our schedule. » - It was really good, but did not have enough time for the second part of the project.(to close to the final exams.)» - GOOD TO HAVE SUCH PROJECTS FOR BETTER UNDERSTANDING» - good» - As a whole the project was good but company provided very little relevant data. that was not also fair and transparent. » 13. Did you buy the course book?56 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.46 - You only needed the notes on the homepage.» (No) 14. Comments on the course literature?- A bit to simple. Feels like reading a book for high school students.»- Course literature covers very useful information that I really need to know» - The book is not usefull» - bad that there are miscalulations» - Very easy!!» - Excellent....» - ok» - fairly good. » - explain good» - varies a lot from the lectures» - Hand outs of the professor"s notes could have helped!» - The book is really good, easy to read and understand» - GOOD AND BRIEF.» - good» - Course literature was very relevant to the course goal and very easy to understand.Its also provided too much help in understanding the real world problems. » 15. Did you miss anything that you think should be included in the course?- I don"t think that I miss any thing»- Meeting with tutor for project to act as early feedback.» - Tuffer exam!!!» - no» - no.» - GUEST LECTURES AND COMMON INDUSTRIAL VISIT MIGHT HELP THE COURSE VERY MUCH ACCORDING TO ME.» - none» - I think not at all but it should include some material relevant to why industrialists deviate from real applications of the economics theories in some cases.» - The exam was a joke. I studied for 2h total and passed. That should not be possible... To low standards!» 16. Additional comments:- overall a very good course specially its contents»- its very difficlut to meet/appointment the project teacher as he is not the chalmers faculty members.» - It will be nice to have more examples (experience of real firms) during the lecture» - GOOD COURSE» - none» - This course provided me very good lesson of economic models and theories.»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3%