ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Course evaluation for Sound and Vibration Measurement (SVM), 2007, VTA073

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-01-12 - 2012-01-10
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 55%
Kontaktperson: Jens Forssén»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

10 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 40%
Around 20 hours/week»1 10%
Around 25 hours/week»3 30%
Around 30 hours/week»2 20%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

- It has been running for so long, it is very difficult to estimate» (?)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»1 9%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 18%
100%»8 72%

Genomsnitt: 4.45

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 9%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 36%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»6 54%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

11 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»2 18%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 81%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.81

- but the programme could be more dense i.e. the amount of work could be higher» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all»1 11%
To some extent»4 44%
Yes, definitely»4 44%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»1 9%
Some extent»1 9%
Large extent»9 81%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»2 18%
Some extent»2 18%
Large extent»5 45%
Great extent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.63

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»1 9%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»6 54%
Very well»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»1 9%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 9%
Very good»9 81%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- the lab assistants were always very helpful. thank you very much for that» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»1 9%
Rather poorly»1 9%
Rather well»2 18%
Very well»7 63%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

11. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»1 9%
Low»2 18%
Adequate»3 27%
High»5 45%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

12. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low»1 9%
Low»1 9%
Adequate»3 27%
High»5 45%
Too high»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

Specific questions on the different parts of the course -- Introductory lectures

For the following questions (13-51), I would like you to comment where you have specific points of view -- that is, you do not necessarily need to write in all fields.

13. Any comment on the introductory lectures -- lecture 1?

Lecture 1 (Wolfgang Kropp)
Introduction, Principles of acoustic measurements, Guidelines for writing measurement reports.

14. Any comment on the introductory lectures -- lecture 2?

Lecture 2 (Mendel Kleiner)
Introduction to sound measurements and transducers 1

15. Any comment on the introductory lectures -- lecture 3?

Lecture 3 (Mendel Kleiner)
Introduction to sound measurements and transducers 2

-- Lab lectures

(For instance: Content covering? More detailed? More practical? More theory? Missing parts? Overall quality? Good ability to answer questions? Etc.)

16. Lab 1: Measurement of sound outdoors (MS)

- Good preparation for the upcoming lab»
- Interesting and nice lab (outdoor...), but quite difficult theoretical part/preparatory work, especially for a first lab.»
- Need more theory and basic knowadge before taking the expeirment and the report.»

17. Lab 2: Measurement of sound power (MS)

- Good course»
- Also interesting lab and quite fun to do, especially the measurement of the vacuum cleaner.»
- Nice»

18. Lab 3: Measurement of airborne and impact sound insulation (PD)

- Useful lab, since we will probably do similar tasks in our future professional life in acoustics. Very clear questions and goals.»
- Nice»

19. Lab 4: Signal analysis (SK)

- Quite difficult lab, especially for those who like me have not so much used Matlab in their previous studies. A bit confuse sometimes, some questions and explanations were not clear.»
- Nice»

20. Lab 5: Basic vibration measurements (PA)

- Good preparation for the upcoming lab»
- Interesting and useful lab, which made me better understand some of the TA1 lectures. Sometimes a bit tricky, eg. we weren"t warned in the PM that we had to divide by jw the FRFs to get the mobilities.»
- Nice»

21. Lab 6: Vibration measurement using a laser doppler vibrometer (AP)

- A little too long time spent on theory everybody know (laser light...)»
- Maybe less useful than the previous lab, but still interesting and well documented. Clear goals and questions, leading to a good understand of the modal analysis, as well as comparison between laser/accelerometers techniques.»
- Nice»

-- Preparatory homework

(For instance: Was it good preparation for the lab work? Did you get useful knowledge? Etc.)

22. Lab 1: Measurement of sound outdoors (MS)

- Good prepaaration for the lab & the data processing»
- ok»
- Nice»

23. Lab 2: Measurement of sound power (MS)

- Good preparation for the lab»
- ok»
- Nice»

24. Lab 3: Measurement of airborne and impact sound insulation (PD)

- ok»
- Nice»

25. Lab 4: Signal analysis (SK)

- N/A»
- need more theory explaination»

26. Lab 5: Basic vibration measurements (PA)

- Good preparation on the theoretical side»
- ok»
- Nice»

27. Lab 6: Vibration measurement using a laser doppler vibrometer (AP)

- Questions could have been more specific»
- ok»
- Nice»

-- Written instructions for the laboratory work

(For instance: Good description of practical lab work? Information missing? Etc.)

28. Lab 1: Measurement of sound outdoors (MS)

- Good guidance»
- Nice»

29. Lab 2: Measurement of sound power (MS)

- Good step by step instructions»
- Nice»

30. Lab 3: Measurement of airborne and impact sound insulation (PD)

- little confusing»
- Nice»

31. Lab 4: Signal analysis (SK)

- Complete instructions»
- Nice»

32. Lab 5: Basic vibration measurements (PA)

- Good guidance»
- Nice»

33. Lab 6: Vibration measurement using a laser doppler vibrometer (AP)

- Nice»

-- Practical part of laboratory work

(For instance: Tasks interesting? Did you gain sufficient experience? Too much/few measurements? Too many details to learn at one time? Etc.)

34. Lab 1: Measurement of sound outdoors (MS)

- Good»
- good»
- Nice»

35. Lab 2: Measurement of sound power (MS)

- Interesting task, good to have the two methods at once»
- good»
- Nice»

36. Lab 3: Measurement of airborne and impact sound insulation (PD)

- good»
- Nice»

37. Lab 4: Signal analysis (SK)

- Interesting to implement our own analyzer»
- good»
- Nice»

38. Lab 5: Basic vibration measurements (PA)

- Good workload, interesting»
- good»
- Nice»

39. Lab 6: Vibration measurement using a laser doppler vibrometer (AP)

- Few measurement, just let the machine do the job...»
- good»
- Nice»

-- Supervision

(For instance: Was the guidance satisfying? Good ability to answer questions? Etc.)

40. Lab 1: Measurement of sound outdoors (MS)

- Good guidance, able to answer questions»
- good»
- Nice»

41. Lab 2: Measurement of sound power (MS)

- Good guidance, able to answer questions»
- good»
- Nice»

42. Lab 3: Measurement of airborne and impact sound insulation (PD)

- No guidance at all»
- ok»
- Nice»

43. Lab 4: Signal analysis (SK)

- N/A»
- good»
- Nice»

44. Lab 5: Basic vibration measurements (PA)

- Good guidance, able to answer questions»
- good»
- very good»

45. Lab 6: Vibration measurement using a laser doppler vibrometer (AP)

- Good guidance»
- good»
- very good »

-- Other comments or suggestions of improvements for each lab?

46. Lab 1: Measurement of sound outdoors (MS)

47. Lab 2: Measurement of sound power (MS)

48. Lab 3: Measurement of airborne and impact sound insulation (PD)

49. Lab 4: Signal analysis (SK)

50. Lab 5: Basic vibration measurements (PA)

- Lab 5 and 6 could be done together and an extra lab on maybe SEA could be added»

51. Lab 6: Vibration measurement using a laser doppler vibrometer (AP)

Summarizing questions

52. What is your general impression of the course?

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»7 77%
Excellent»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 4.22

- all labs teached me good basic knowledge about measurement techniques. there could have been more but i"m satisfied with what i have learned.» (Good)
- I feel the course is rather good, I liked it. The course workload is rather high but manageable. The topics are very interesting and give enough information to fullfil the objectives» (Good)
- This was my favorite course. Everything was perfect. I feel I gained very good experience on experimental work, it worths my time. » (Excellent)

53. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the system of 4 persons per lab/ 2 persons per report. the possibility of a second version for the report»
- Intensity lab»
- The way we hand in the reports and the opportunity to improve them one week later»
- everything»
- I think almost everything is settled very good, no need to change anything. »

54. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- 1 or 2 more labs»
- pre-task should be done individually »
- non»

55. Additional comments

- In general all is really good. The lab lectures, the preparatory homework, the written instructions, the practical work, the supervision, everything was nice.»
- My only criticism will be about grading system. I thought it was graded out of 5 and I spend time to make my reports 5 but it turns to be only pass or fail course. Although I don"t regret spending time on reports, I think at least we should have been informed about the situation. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från