ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Advanced Analysis Methods, TIF110

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-03-08 - 2010-03-19
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 36%
Kontaktperson: Janusz Kanski»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

8 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 50%
Around 20 hours/week»1 12%
Around 25 hours/week»1 12%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

- Only lectures in the first week which were 4-6 hours/week but in the last two weeks more times was spent on the project, approximately 20 hours/week» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

8 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»6 75%
100%»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

- 80% mandatory» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

8 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 25%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 25%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 3

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 14%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»6 85%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

- The course aims at providing a common basis to Master students and PhD students in the Materials Science graduate school. This however misses that for many PhDs this is 95% repetition. Nevertheless the course is obligatory. It should be the decision of the supervisor if the PhD student has to hear this course. As it is, it is more or less a waste of time.» (No, the goals are set too low)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 66%
Yes, definitely»1 16%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»2 25%
Some extent»1 12%
Large extent»2 25%
Great extent»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- Every teacher was excellent, specially Michael and Fredrik» (Great extent)

7. What is your opinion about the individual lectures? Please grade on a scale 1-5 (with 5 being the best)

Matrisfråga

- Every teacher was excellent, specially Michael and Fredrik»

Introductory lecture
8 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 33%
4»1 16%
5»3 50%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 4.16

X-ray diffraction
8 svarande

1»0 0%
2»3 42%
3»0 0%
4»2 28%
5»2 28%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.42

Scanning electron microscopy...
8 svarande

1»1 14%
2»1 14%
3»0 0%
4»2 28%
5»3 42%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.71

Analytical electron microscopy
8 svarande

1»1 14%
2»0 0%
3»2 28%
4»1 14%
5»3 42%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.71

Scanning probe microscopy
8 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 14%
3»2 28%
4»1 14%
5»3 42%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.85

Auger electron spectroscopy
8 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 14%
3»1 14%
4»2 28%
5»3 42%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 4

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
8 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 28%
3»1 14%
4»1 14%
5»3 42%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.71

Secondary ion mass spectroscopy
8 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 16%
3»2 33%
4»2 33%
5»1 16%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 3.5

Ramnan and infrared spectroscopy
8 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 14%
3»2 28%
4»1 14%
5»3 42%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.85

MAX-lab
8 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 40%
4»1 20%
5»2 40%
No opinion»3

Genomsnitt: 4

Report writing
8 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 33%
4»1 16%
5»3 50%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 4.16

Atom probe tomography
8 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 28%
3»1 14%
4»3 42%
5»1 14%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.42

Nuclear magnetic resonance...
8 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 28%
3»1 14%
4»3 42%
5»1 14%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.42

Neutron diffraction
8 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 33%
4»2 33%
5»2 33%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 4

Analytical tools for biological systems
8 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»3 50%
4»1 16%
5»2 33%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 3.83

8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»2 25%
Some extent»3 37%
Large extent»2 25%
Great extent»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

8 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 25%
Rather well»2 25%
Very well»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- All presentation were not on the homepage until the same day as the presentation which was way to late» (Rather badly)

10. Were the lab tours sufficiently informative?

7 svarande

Yes, they served the purpose»5 71%
More time per lab would be preferred»2 28%
No, they could have been skipped»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.28

- Perhaps some more time to see the equipment at work. Since not all techniques were used for each project I would have liked to get the opportunity to see the others in action.» (More time per lab would be preferred)

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 12%
Very good»6 75%
I did not seek help»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 4

- I am sorry to say but Lena was not very helpful as compared to Janusz. Janusz was avaialable all the time when I went to him but Lena was outside Chalmers most of the time when I tried to reach her. » (Very good)

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

8 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 12%
Rather well»3 37%
Very well»4 50%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- There was a huge difference in skill between me and my labpartner which resultet in that I had to rewrite all of his contributions to the report so they were gramatically correct.» (Rather poorly)
- Our group was perfect. We had a very nice time together. » (Very well)

13. How was the course workload?

8 svarande

Too low»1 12%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 62%
High»2 25%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- too low but annoying...repetition» (Too low)
- I have 1 comment about this. In the begining it is not very high but in last two weeks it is very tough to manage the time. Specially if some group is unlucky then things can get worst ever. I would like to suggest that the deadline for handing in the project proposal should be earlier and the project should start immediately in the later week. » (High)

14. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 57%
High»2 28%
Too high»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- Again I would say the 2 weeks are like hell.» (Too high)

15. Did you get enough time on the instruments used in the short project?

7 svarande

Yes, it was enough for the purpose»3 42%
No, more time would be needed»4 57%

Genomsnitt: 1.57

- Our project was kind of more techninal and required more time but we were unfortunate to get results as expected.» (No, more time would be needed)
- Two hours with the SEM was a bit short» (No, more time would be needed)

16. Was the support in the lab sufficient?

7 svarande

Yes, it was enough for the purpose»6 85%
No, more help woul be needed»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 1.14

- All of the ones I met were very nice and helpful.» (Yes, it was enough for the purpose)
- Our sample was delicate and required more carefull handling for the use in SEM. We destroyed our sample because of lack of help.» (No, more help woul be needed)

Summarizing questions

17. What is your general impression of the course?

8 svarande

Poor»1 12%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 12%
Good»4 50%
Excellent»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- As stated above - pure repetition in my case. Something should be changed about that.» (Poor)
- It managed to convey a good understanding of which techniques are used for different purposes and it feels like a course that will benefit my following learning.» (Good)
- It is one of the most amazing courses I have ever taken.» (Excellent)

18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- everything »
- The presentations. I learned a lot from the presentations, probably more than from the lectures.»
- The course content»
- Hands on experience of selected techniques!»

19. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- As stated above...»
- the deadline of project plan should be more earlier so that students can put some extra time for the analysis of the outputs of experiments.»
- I think there should be more lectures in the first 3 or 4 weeks so most of the lectures are done when the project begins. Usually there isn"t so much in other courses that early in the period which will make this possible. I also think that the project should start at least one weeek earlier to even out the work load. Our lab supervisor was sick so the labsession was moved forward one week which resulted in a lab session 3 days before the presentation. Since I had a lot do do in other courses the schedule was very tight that week. If the the project would have started earlier this could have been prevented. »
- Groupwise report submission should be changed.Because members of a group may not be able to help his groupmate who is writing the report.»

20. Was tha balance between lectures and laboratory work adequate?

8 svarande

Very good»1 12%
Satisfactory»6 75%
Not satisfactory»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2

- A few more hours in the lab would have been nice.» (Not satisfactory)

21. Additional comments

- I have 1 suggestion. There must be some sort of quiz or home assignment. Students mostly focus on couple of techniques during the course. By introducing home quiz student will definitely give some more time to other techniques as well.»
- I think ,inorder to evaluate a student performance taking this course,short project must be assigned individually.If it is not possible to assigned short project individually then at least report should be submitted individually.And the presentation of every student should be graded seperately.By this way every student will be bound to perticipate in project. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från