Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

2009/2010 Structural Bioinformatics, TDA506

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-03-03 - 2010-03-22
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Graham Kemp»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

6 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»6 100%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Reading the papers most of the time» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

6 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 50%
100%»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- Missed the class for my own reasons.. and I regret that. » (75%)
- Lectures are very interesting and the interaction with Prof. Graham Kemp » (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

6 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 33%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»6 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

5 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»2 40%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- The exam questions were clear and well considered» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»3 50%
Great extent»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Thank you so much Graham:) The classes are really interesting.» (Large extent)
- good and interesting lectures» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»5 83%
Great extent»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- would have liked some pages summarizing major consepts since there is no course book to go back to. This could also be useful for people missing lectures. Very good that it was marked which parts of the articles that were important. Articles were well connected to the lectures.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

6 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»2 33%
Very well»4 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»6 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

6 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 16%
Very well»4 66%
I did not seek cooperation»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 4

11. How was the course workload?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 16%
Adequate»3 50%
High»1 16%
Too high»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

12. How was the total workload this study period?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 33%
High»1 16%
Too high»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

6 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»2 33%
Excellent»4 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.66

- The course load is high and it should be reduced a bit.» (Good)
- I was not sure that I wanted to take this course since I was worried about if it was too hard, depending on my background. After only one or two lectures my interest was high and I had no problems completing the course.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The course structure»
- The lectures by prof. Kemp»
- membrane protein lectures and loop modelling»
- The structure of the lectures. »
- Course Teacher, Study Materials... every thing could remain the same»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- working with spdbv(well, i think it might help using windows instead linux for this particular s/w.Practical sessions could be extended.»
- Try to reduce the number of articles to study and give more detailed information of the algorithms in the handouts»
- slides for the Biognos part online»
- I doubt that any of us had the time to finish all the computer tasks. Maybe they could be marked after importance, so that there were only one very important exercise each week, and one more if you had time.»
- Other Course options, because this course itself is a very intensive course.»

16. Additional comments

- After these 2 terms, this is the first time am feeling satisfactory about a course. I really enjoyed it. I learnt so much from the practicals too.»
- The course was really good and lectures are the best part of the course.»
- I absolutely loved this course!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från