Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Source coding, SSY140, VT10
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2010-03-02 - 2010-03-14 Antal svar: 25 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 55% Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.25 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 6 | | 24% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 12 | | 48% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 3 | | 12% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 2 | | 8% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 2 | | 8% |
Genomsnitt: 2.28 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 25 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 1 | | 4% |
50%» | | 2 | | 8% |
75%» | | 10 | | 40% |
100%» | | 12 | | 48% |
Genomsnitt: 4.32 - One session absent» (100%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?24 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 2 | | 8% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 4 | | 16% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 8 | | 33% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 10 | | 41% |
Genomsnitt: 3.08 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.21 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 1 | | 4% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 20 | | 95% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.95 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?22 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 7 | | 31% |
Yes, definitely» | | 12 | | 54% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 3 | | 13% |
Genomsnitt: 2.81
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning - the lecturer?24 svarande
Small extent» | | 3 | | 12% |
Some extent» | | 11 | | 45% |
Large extent» | | 9 | | 37% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 4% |
Genomsnitt: 2.33 - It is better to use teachers with stronger background» (Some extent)
- Using more examples would be great» (Some extent)
- He should be more confident and clear in his concepts. He should work a bit more before taking the lecture. my personal observation is, teacher was able to clarify doubts very clearly when we ask doubts independently but he was not able to deliver the lecture in the same way.» (Some extent)
- Ali has a lot of knowledge, but sometimes has problems conveying it.He should try to approach students more efficiently, so they could understand better» (Large extent)
7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning - the TA?24 svarande
Small extent» | | 3 | | 12% |
Some extent» | | 8 | | 33% |
Large extent» | | 10 | | 41% |
Great extent» | | 3 | | 12% |
Genomsnitt: 2.54 - he is not sort of willing to help» (Small extent)
- The TA doesn"t speak enough during the tutorials. he was most of the time just writing the solution and not giving a lot of explanations.» (Some extent)
- Behrooz should just try to organize writing on the blackboard better, and write down more of the things he says and speak more loud.Otherwise, every time I approached him for help he was very eager to help» (Great extent)
8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?24 svarande
Small extent» | | 3 | | 12% |
Some extent» | | 4 | | 16% |
Large extent» | | 13 | | 54% |
Great extent» | | 4 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 2.75 - Lecture slides does not contain much information. Further, the notations and few parts of explanation are completely different from course text book and lecture slides.» (Some extent)
- the lecture notes» (Large extent)
- The handouts for tutorials should contain all the solutions with more tips hints and explanations» (Large extent)
- Especially the lecture slides» (Great extent)
9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?24 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 6 | | 25% |
Rather well» | | 14 | | 58% |
Very well» | | 4 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 2.91 - Projects memo were uploaded really late for second project. The Tutorials solutions provided were not detailed enough !» (Rather badly)
- the projects were put up on the web page way to late and important information were handed out late.» (Rather badly)
- Webpage was updated seldom,although there were news to be published there.» (Rather badly)
- The Handout section is poorly organized. They might have divided that in to sub sections like Exercise, Lectures, Projects, etc.. rather uploading all doc"s in the same folder. » (Rather badly)
Study climate10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?24 svarande
Very poor» | | 1 | | 4% |
Rather poor» | | 1 | | 4% |
Rather good» | | 9 | | 37% |
Very good» | | 11 | | 45% |
I did not seek help» | | 2 | | 8% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?24 svarande
Very poorly» | | 1 | | 4% |
Rather poorly» | | 3 | | 12% |
Rather well» | | 10 | | 41% |
Very well» | | 10 | | 41% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.2 - Since very less time have been awarded the interaction between the students was very poor. Every feel to complete the projects some how, rather understanding it. I observed this situation much in the Project 2.» (Very poorly)
- most of the time it was two of us who did the most parts of the project and the other did not pay attention» (Rather poorly)
12. How was the course workload?24 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 4% |
Adequate» | | 19 | | 79% |
High» | | 4 | | 16% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.12 - Projects could be started earlier» (Low)
- Not enough time for project 2» (High)
- I had to study on my own ...there was little help from the lectures» (High)
13. How was the total workload this study period?24 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 13 | | 54% |
High» | | 8 | | 33% |
Too high» | | 3 | | 12% |
Genomsnitt: 3.58 - It was really difficult to manage the two courses at the same time» (Too high)
- If only the lectures could be made better, the workload could be little reduced, because in parallel there is tough course.» (Too high)
Summarizing questions14. What is your general impression of the course?24 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 2 | | 8% |
Adequate» | | 7 | | 29% |
Good» | | 14 | | 58% |
Excellent» | | 1 | | 4% |
Genomsnitt: 3.58 - The course is good.» (Good)
15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The lecturer, definitely one of the best teachers in our department»
- The task of the two projects. These tasks are very typical.»
- The content may be preserved.»
- The projects. The content of the projects was very good and helped in gaining understanding.»
- The teaching atmosphere at the both the lectures and tutorials is very open, Ali and Behrooz really carry a helpful attitude.»
- The good will from Ali and Behrooz to help»
- need some more exercise hours for practice.
»
- The course content»
16. What should definitely be changed to next year?- the tutorial teacher must be changed. there must be grades for the projects. the professor must improve his knowledge to large extent»
- The lecture topics, could be introduced with more basic concepts for better understanding»
- The pace of the tutorial lectures could be faster.»
- it should contain more theory of the book»
- Make the projects more reasonable dependeing on the time. It would be good to have grades for the projects since without there is so little motivation on group members to do the projects.»
- The depth and breadth of coverage of the content needs to be revised. The content was just touching many fields and that too not in a way that can help us gain understanding to do some research.»
- The instructions for project one could have been clearer. E.g. in the Huffman coding, what the Matlab program was supposed to do and what we could input manually, (the probabilities for example). Project two should have been released earlier so that we could have planned the time better.»
- Course should be less wide and more deep.People should have more time for project 2»
- Though Exercise sessions are good, the TA should be more active and interactive during the session. »
- Lecturer. I think the lecture has not his specialization in this area, he knowz little about the subject. He just reads out slides during lecture and that aint much helpful, you have study the whole concept on your own which makes workload quite high.»
17. Additional comments- svarskod är: 9415038015»
- Din svarskod är: 0415039260»
- Thanks for Ali and Behrouz for providing such an interesting lecture and excercise sessions.»
- The lecturer should be more prepared, and should lecture with confidence.
The TA should also be able to answer the questions when asked from the textbook.»
- It was very helpful to get the lecture slides handed out before every lecture. »
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|