ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Road Engineering, VMT060

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-03-01 - 2010-03-15
Antal svar: 17
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 34%
Kontaktperson: Gunnar Lanner»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Övriga studenter

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

17 svarande

<15 hours/week»3 17%
Around 20 hours/week»9 52%
Around 30 hours/week»3 17%
Around 40 hours/week»2 11%
>50 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.23

- I intended most of the lectures.» (Around 20 hours/week)
- More than 75% on the exercises» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. Attendance on lectures

How many per cent of the lectures did you attend?

17 svarande

<25%»1 5%
25-50%»2 11%
50-75%»2 11%
>75%»12 70%

Genomsnitt: 3.47

- If I could choose once more, I would had saved the time and would not participate at the guest lectures.» (>75%)

Teaching and course administration

3. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»1 5%
Some extent»3 17%
Large extent»11 64%
Great extent»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.82

- Good for learning, because of the book was not able to buy» (Large extent)

4. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»3 17%
Some extent»5 29%
Large extent»8 47%
Great extent»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.41

- Only by handouts. » (Small extent)
- The book arrived late to Cremona, so we got the chapters of importance as handouts. And I just read a few sides.» (Small extent)
- but not the course literature» (Large extent)

5. Was the course literature worth its price?

Do you consider that the course literature was worth its price? As a guideline the student union at Chalmers has set is at 70 sKr/hp.

17 svarande

1 (not worth it)»0 0%
2»1 25%
3»1 25%
4»2 50%
5 (well worth it)»0 0%
Did not buy the litterature»13

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- boken kom för sent och när den väl kom tyckte jag att det var för mycket pengar att spendera » (Did not buy the litterature)
- what does 70sKr/hp mean? swedish Kr per?» (Did not buy the litterature)
- Boken kom för sent för att köpa till det priset och man kunde plugga på annat material man hade tillgång till.» (Did not buy the litterature)
- We couldn"t buy it because it was nowhere to buy it from.» (Did not buy the litterature)

6. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

17 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 5%
Rather well»8 47%
Very well»8 47%

Genomsnitt: 3.41

- except the organization of the assignments - sometimes not very well thought through.» (Very well)

Study climate

7. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

17 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 11%
Rather good»4 23%
Very good»11 64%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.52

- too less time to get supervied at computer exercises» (Rather poor)
- outstanding» (Very good)
- There were some confussion the PMS-assignment.» (Very good)

8. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

17 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 11%
Rather well»3 17%
Very well»11 64%
I did not seek cooperation»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.64

9. How was the course workload?

17 svarande

1 (Too low)»1 5%
2»2 11%
3»12 70%
4»2 11%
5 (Too high)»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

- A larger design task, e.g design a road stretch, PMS object didnt help much for understanding the mechanichal mecanisms» (1 (Too low))
- reasonable» (3)
- Belv lite skev fördelning över läsperioden i och med att kursboken kom så sent så det var lite att göra i början och mycket i slutet.» (4)

Summarizing questions

10. How well did the course fullfill your expectations?

17 svarande

1 (not at all)»2 11%
2»1 5%
3»4 23%
4»8 47%
5 (very well)»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.41 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- i thought it would be way more technically, than economically based» (1 (not at all))
- A large design task i requested from my side» (2)
- i think the ccourse must be treated with other road engineering topics» (3)
- I expected that course, so it was nice. I missed road planning - that is the way you learn a lot more in my point of view.» (5 (very well))

11. What is your general impression of the course?

17 svarande

Poor»2 11%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»4 23%
Good»11 64%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.41

- good knowledge of a cross section of a road, but too less about designing a whole road stretch» (Adequate)

12. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Assignments»
- föreläsningarna och gruppuppgifter fast med mer fokus på förståelse snarare än att testa sig fram i ett dataprogram»
- The study visits.»
- pavement design, lecture examples regarding exam, PMS object (improve English), excel assignment (finance analysis),deterioration of roads - study trip, rehersal questions and revisions of them, extract from book»
- Lektionen när man gick runt skolan och tittade på skador på vägen.»
- the lectures about material properties and so on»
- everything»
- Studiebesöket på NCC roads. Studiebesöket i Jönköping var också intressant, men man hade kanske inte behövt åka så långt?»
- the exam»

13. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Swedish Language in assignments»
- några dataövningar kändes som att de inte gav något och dessutom tyckte jag att det kändes trisst för utbytesstudenterna att mycket av dataövningarna var på svenska. dessutom tyckte jag att man kunde gå igenom dataövningarna bättre i datasalarna eftersom det kändes ganska dåligt förklarat»
- There are a lot of slides that are not used.»
- swedish texts in software, in guest lecturer"s excel sheet, make more clear the structure of the course»
- as written earlier, a lager design task, not in PMS object.»
- nothing»
- Trasslet med boken som inte fanns.»
- the organisation must be better. there were some tasks that was supposed to give bonus points at the exam but that never happened, because of several reasons. The study trip to Jönköping was a total waste of time. There must be a crushing plant near gothenburg that we could have visit instead, and why travel for one extra hour just to visit a working place and don"t look at anything, just get a lecture of some new type of pavement. And the chalmers teacher just made fun of the one representing the company, who told us about the new pavement, and implied that their new idea won"t work because it has never been done before. Bakåtsträvare! That lecture should have been held at chalmers and not waste a whole day by traveling! Very bad!»
- The PMS-assignment»

14. Additional comments

- kändes lite väl långt att åka till jönköping och tillbaka på studiebesök. verkar som att det borde finnas liknande projekt i gbg-området som man kan besöka, som är minst lika världefullt att kolla på. »
- i had quite high expectations on ths course, but i thinl that yhe work load chould be higher. A large design task should be added. Less about the economy and test methods, more practical learning, i.e how to design a longer road stretch depending on the trafic load and so on.how to design roads in differeint climates, geological conditions etc»
- much explanation in deformation+softwares in english»
- Kursutvärderingen borde skickas ut tidigare! Svårt att komma ihåg..»
- Don"t want to waste more time at this course. I can just mention that a had a easy grade 4 on the exam and I spent 5 % of my study time on this road engineering course and 95 % of the time on the other course.......»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.41
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.41
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.6

Kursutvärderingssystem från