|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Active Microwave Circuits, EME101, MPMPE, VT2010, EME101Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2010-03-04 - 2010-03-20 Antal svar: 18 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 42% Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.27 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.33 - All lectures some exercises.» (75%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.61 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.17 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.05 - Too many and too long problems in too little time to be fair assessment. Make it an oral exam or make more questions on fundamental understanding on the written exam? The student with the most expensive and best programmed calculator wins at the moment.» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - I did not rely on course book (except on exam and final 2 days of studying).» (Large extent) 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.94 - Gonzalez not required, as the lectures cover what"s needed for the exam.» (Small extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - Course administration was sometimes a bit slow, for example dividing us into groups for the project work.» (Rather well) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.83 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.61 - Problems during assignment 2. Main problem is plagiarism and adding sources like wikipedia to the referencelist which is not okej.» (Rather well) 11. How was the course workload?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.22 - The first home task was good, too bad you don"t know how you did yet. The project work was just too much. Would be better with just an individual small paper or a smaller individual home task.
The fact that you are supposed to mark other groups reports is just ridiculous. How are you supposed to that good when you have 2 days to do it one week before the exam, very frustrating. » (High) (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand) 12. How was the total workload this study period?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.66 - The last week with the project was very hectic. If you don"t cancel the project for next year, have it earlier.» (High) Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.66 - It feels like I have done most of the things before, microwave engineering. » (Poor) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The lab was great! Good to try your designskills for real with fabrications.»- The lectures, the first home task and the lab.» - -» - Assignments and the labs are very good» - assignments» - The labs, it"s fun to actually build something.» - lab and assignment setting, tour of the clean room» - assignments» - The labs. It"s nice to do something practical.» - I think if there is small assignments for every topics than it will be better for student to understand topics quickly and all assignment should contain some marks.» - assignement, project and labs are very help full. and should be preserved.» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Before assignment 2 it should be clearly stated what is okej and what is not okej with references´,, plagiarism etc. The consequenses (suspension etc.) should also be clearly stated.»- the project.» - In this course we must need a programmable calculator,so authorities should allow the computer to access matlab not the internet during the examination because every one can"t purchase the programmable calculator necessary to score good result.» - -» - none» - ic, because you have Matlab, Cad and that kind of things. And then maybe you could have an more theoretical exam without the book, maybe just with a formula sheet. Because now its just "fucked" that you need to sit and make 10 programs too your calculate to be able to pass. And even if you have all the programs I didn"t have time to complete the exam. And then the semiconductur part I also think is bad. It would bin much better if we had say 20 theoretical things about semiconductors and then 5 of them was on the exam. I would really like to know what Jan has too say about the exam? Because I don"t think it"s the right way now. » - Project work felt very messy, much due to the groups not working well. Several members didn"t show up at meetings etc.» - the section of introduction to semiconductor » - Better connection between semiconductor device -> small signal model -> black box S-parameters.» - Tutorials should be given by more experience persons.» - i think a new method to save the calculation time in paper. and a final viva that include some exame points will make student to learn the concept deaply.it was helpfull always atleast for me in my graduation.» - The tutorial leader (K.E.) should be changed, he was just writing the question on board, and not explaining. more over he has copied solutions only. i feel he really lacks the knowledge of course. assignment 2 could be made better, if the topics r more specifc. like fabrication of some specific device, or limiting factor of a device. it is difficult to cover such a big topic in 15 mins. and difficult for student to grasp it» (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand) - Group-work, I didn"t learn "anything". It would have 100 times better that we did the report by ourself. And that wouldn"t been any problem since we where not suppose to do that much. Instead of trying to convince my group different things I would gladly do it on my own. The exam... Why not instead make 4 "larger" assignments and have higher demands on them. And then you can sum that score. I think that would be much better since then you could do something much better and more realistic, because you have Matlab, Cad and that kind of things. And then maybe you could have an more theoretical exam without the book, maybe just with a formula sheet. Because now its just too difficult that you need to sit and make 10 programs too your calculate to be able to pass. And even if you have all the programs I didn"t have time to complete the exam. And then the semiconductur part I also think is bad. It would bin much better if we had say 20 theoretical things about semiconductors and then 5 of them was on the exam. I would really like to know what Jan has too say about the exam? Because I don"t think it"s the right way now. » (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand) 16. Additional comments- -»- The course is good» - none» - most disappointed, thought I would learn much more. The best thing was the lab.» - tutorial is rather good» - yes at least the students should be hinted some how about how to solve the two tricky questions that always apear in every paper.»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22%