Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Power system operation ENM 065, lp3, v10, ENM065
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2010-03-01 - 2010-03-21 Antal svar: 14 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 30% Kontaktperson: Valborg Ekman» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.14 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 2 | | 14% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 6 | | 42% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 4 | | 28% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 1 | | 7% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 2.5 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 13 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 1 | | 7% |
75%» | | 5 | | 38% |
100%» | | 7 | | 53% |
Genomsnitt: 4.46 - 85%» (?)
- overlapping schedule issues» (75%)
- the lectures was not organized very well.» (100%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?14 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 1 | | 7% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 8 | | 57% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 5 | | 35% |
Genomsnitt: 3.21 - Especially regarding the voltage stability project.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.13 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 13 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?13 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 5 | | 38% |
Yes, definitely» | | 5 | | 38% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 3 | | 23% |
Genomsnitt: 2.84
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?14 svarande
Small extent» | | 2 | | 14% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 14% |
Large extent» | | 7 | | 50% |
Great extent» | | 3 | | 21% |
Genomsnitt: 2.78 - Teaching should be made more practical,through Live demonstrations for example Lamp Model demo.» (Some extent)
7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?14 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Some extent» | | 5 | | 35% |
Large extent» | | 4 | | 28% |
Great extent» | | 4 | | 28% |
Genomsnitt: 2.78 - Some sort of compendium would have been great.» (Some extent)
- I would like to thank Tuan for giving printed lecture slides as they are very useful for Exam Preparation.» (Great extent)
8. To what extent have the guest lectures been of help for your learning?14 svarande
Small extent» | | 3 | | 21% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 21% |
Large extent» | | 7 | | 50% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 2.42 - Still great, and intressting especially the ABB guy and his protection lecture/presentation.» (Some extent)
- In my opinion only the guest lecturer from ABB was useful since the guest lecturer from e-on has no experience in giving lecture and was very anxious during lecture.» (Large extent)
9. To what extent has the worked-out examples been of help for your understanding of the lectures?14 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 4 | | 28% |
Large extent» | | 9 | | 64% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 2.78 - The tutorials were great, abit quick but that made u focus on what he said and did on the board.» (Large extent)
10. To what extent has the practical laboratory experiment been of help for your learning?14 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 21% |
Large extent» | | 9 | | 64% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 2.71 - Good for the understanding of the power-angle-curve.» (Large extent)
11. To what extent has the computer-based project (DigSILENT) been of help for your learning?14 svarande
Small extent» | | 3 | | 21% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 21% |
Large extent» | | 8 | | 57% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.35 - No clear goals, bad project discription and a lack of a clear definition of voltage collapse.» (Small extent)
12. To what extent has the ARISTO-demonstration been of help for your learning?13 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Some extent» | | 6 | | 46% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 38% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 2.46 - The demo was for a shorter duration and in a small room,i found hard to concentrate and took some time get going through the concept and then the time was over leaving many concepts uncovered and uncleared.» (Small extent)
- It was really good but too short.» (Some extent)
- It was a good session» (Great extent)
13. To what extent has the "lamp model"-demonstration been of help for your learning?14 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Some extent» | | 5 | | 35% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 35% |
Great extent» | | 3 | | 21% |
Genomsnitt: 2.71 - Don"t really know, as I missed it due to overlapping schedules.» (Small extent)
- always good with practical implementations.» (Large extent)
- It was very good one,Many these kind of demonstrations are to be done,there is no point in just delivering loads of concepts,if the concepts are lively demonstrated i think it will be a major asset for Students.» (Great extent)
14. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?14 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 12 | | 85% |
Very well» | | 2 | | 14% |
Genomsnitt: 3.14 - A bit slow with the leacture notes in the begining otherwise great.» (Rather well)
- they were good» (Rather well)
Study climate15. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?14 svarande
Very poor» | | 2 | | 14% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 4 | | 28% |
Very good» | | 7 | | 50% |
I did not seek help» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 3.35 - Examiner seems to be busy !» (Very poor)
- The speed of teaching was very high since the teacher was absent in the first weak and the content of this course has wide range.» (Very poor)
- From the tutorial teacher.» (Very good)
16. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?14 svarande
Very poorly» | | 1 | | 7% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 6 | | 42% |
Very well» | | 6 | | 42% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 3.42 17. How was the course workload?14 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 7% |
Adequate» | | 10 | | 71% |
High» | | 3 | | 21% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.14 18. How was the total workload this study period?14 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 6 | | 42% |
High» | | 7 | | 50% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 3.64 - good relation between the electric drives II course, since it"s workload was heavy in the begining.» (High)
- The work load is too much...!!!» (Too high)
Summarizing questions19. What is your general impression of the course?14 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 2 | | 14% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 14% |
Good» | | 9 | | 64% |
Excellent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 3.64 20. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The lab, and the course content. The ICA MAXI version.»
- I Think Tuan should handle all the tutorials as Mebtu was unable to deliver the concept through tutorials.We haven"t followed Mebtu Tutorials at all.»
- It should increase the practical labratory, I mean application should be more.»
- Aristo lab
»
- none»
- The project work and the demonstrations.»
- Everything»
21. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Separete elective course on protection!
Grab the ABB-guy and get him to teach it.»
- The subject contains a lot of concepts but lacks in-depth concept as it contains many topics.Mebtu Should be changed.ARISTO demonstration reveal in-depth concepts and its duration should be increased.»
- 1-The speed of teaching
2_Teacher should pay more attention to student question
»
- the subjects are spread and not with any details. its better to focus on one subject instead of talking about different subject.»
- none»
- In my opinion if the time period of Aristo demonstration could be extended, it would be really nice.»
- More lectures should be organised in the Power Protection section giving more detailed study. »
22. Additional comments- Examiner Tuan was very busy he cannot give us some time to explain our doubts.there should be some optional doubt clearing hours particularly from second half of study period of PSO as many students have doubts as the exam period approaches.»
- 1-Teacher should not explain easy subjects twice but go fast through hard subjects!
»
- none»
- If possible try to split this course into two courses. One as Power System Operations covering the operation and the other course as Power System Protection giving more detailed study on Power system protection and safety.»
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|