Visa resultat

Electric Drives II, ENM075, lp3, v10, ENM075

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

16 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»		0		0%
Around 20 hours/week»		2		12%
Around 25 hours/week»		6		37%
Around 30 hours/week»		2		12%
At least 35 hours/week»		6		37%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- Initially, I had to spend a lot of time due to the Matlab acitivities. However, as the course progressed the time taken up by Matlab reduced a lot.» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

15 svarande

0%»		0		0%
25%»		0		0%
50%»		3		20%
75%»		2		13%
100%»		10		66%

Genomsnitt: 4.46

- 95%» (?)
- Teaching was very helpful in this course, the lectures were very well structured and very easy to understand if you attend the classes.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

I have not seen/read the goals»		1		6%
The goals are difficult to understand»		1		6%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		6		37%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»		8		50%

Genomsnitt: 3.31

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

15 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»		0		0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»		14		93%
No, the goals are set too high»		1		6%

Genomsnitt: 2.06

- But there is too much work load in the project works.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

No, not at all»		0		0%
To some extent»		4		25%
Yes, definitely»		8		50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»		4		25%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The examination was very good. It was actually fun to write the exams. But for me I would definitely have fared better than what I will now, if I had more time. The paper was not lengthy, but the questions asked you to think, which took a lot of time.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		0		0%
Some extent»		0		0%
Large extent»		9		56%
Great extent»		7		43%

Genomsnitt: 3.43

- I learned everything during the lectures» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		1		6%
Some extent»		3		18%
Large extent»		9		56%
Great extent»		3		18%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

- The compendium is not so important» (Some extent)
- Most of the preparation was based on the lecture notes given by the teacher. However, the course compendium is also a very good source for learning. My suggestion is to recommend other books for further reading of related topics.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

Very badly»		0		0%
Rather badly»		0		0%
Rather well»		7		43%
Very well»		9		56%

Genomsnitt: 3.56

9. Was it a good approach to have a mix of lectures, tutorials, lab and projects?

Yes, but I want less lectures and tutorials and more project»		0		0%
Yes, the mix is good as it is»		15		100%
No, more lectures & tutorials and less projects»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2

10. Were the first week with lectures, tutorial, lab and project too though causing you to fall behind

Yes, it was too much to do»		5		31%
Yes, it was, but most time was spent on learning Matlab»		3		18%
No, it was tough but still OK»		7		43%
No»		1		6%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- actually it was not so bad, since falling behind was allowed, so actually it was not a problem» (Yes, it was too much to do)
- was abit more than the other weeks, but on the other hand the motivation was high right after the christmas holiday.» (No)

11. If the work load from the lab and project is reduced for the first week, I would have more time for the other project tasks

Yes, I could not spend so much time on the other projects»		0		0%
Yes, but I was in phase in the end»		8		50%
Yes, then the work load would be more even»		5		31%
No»		3		18%

Genomsnitt: 2.68

- I believe that in the first week if the work load is reduced then it would become difficult to recap with MATLAB for those who have already worked on it and difficult for those to learn MATLAB who never used it. So it should be left as it is.» (No)

12. Should more of the projects be prepared as project 7, please comment

Yes all, I didn´,t learn anything of Simul./Matl.implem»		0		0%
Yes, but only some of the last projects»		7		43%
No»		9		56%

Genomsnitt: 2.56

- It wuold be better. Also different controller like position controller sholud be implement and reason of different variation of parameter and also other variables should be clear.» (Yes, but only some of the last projects)
- I suggest from week 5 we have like project 7 and week 6 we do it our self and week 7 as it was.» (Yes, but only some of the last projects)
- for example project6 and 7» (Yes, but only some of the last projects)
- Since the workload increase closer to the exam its good that the last one is prepared assignment.» (No)
- I think if I do the simulation I can implement the simulation in real world by myself much more better» (No)
- It was comfortable in the end, mostly since you are more interested in starting with your exams studies, but I think as big a part as we had to be in the making of the other prjects was the least we can be to not just miss big parts of it.» (No)
- Project 7 was assigned in week 7 and our exams are very near at this stage of time. So, the students do not have much time to spend on the project. So it should be left as it is.» (No)
- I prefer preparing my own models.» (No)

13. Is it some project/s that you think is not relevant/so important for this course and should be removed/changed, please give comments?

Project 1, Induction machine»		0		0%
Project 2, Current controller»		0		0%
Project 3, Current model flux estimator and speed controller»		0		0%
Project 4, PMSM»		2		66%
Project 5, Voltage model flux estimator»		1		33%
Project 6, Field weakening»		0		0%
Project 7, Digital control»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

- All helpful for the course.» (?)
- No, it was a good mix. » (?)
- all are important and give clear understandings» (?)
- Alls ok. It should be increase on digital controller.» (?)
- none» (?)
- No all projects were good» (?)
- Everything is important.» (?)
- I dont think anything should be removed. If time permits new things should be added.» (?)
- no» (?)
- seems weird, the others are about induction machine. might be good if PMSM put in thelast.» (Project 4, PMSM)

14. Is it some project task that is missing?

Study climate

15. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

Very poor»		0		0%
Rather poor»		0		0%
Rather good»		1		6%
Very good»		15		93%
I did not seek help»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.93

- the assistance was so good» (Very good)

16. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

Very poorly»		0		0%
Rather poorly»		2		12%
Rather well»		4		25%
Very well»		10		62%
I did not seek cooperation»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- we have different Matlab background. » (Rather poorly)

17. How was the course workload?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		5		31%
High»		8		50%
Too high»		3		18%

Genomsnitt: 3.87

- higher in the beginning and lower in the end, perfect as the exam gets closer and closer.» (Adequate)
- Please reduce the work load. Thanks.» (Too high)

18. How was the total workload this study period?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		6		37%
High»		7		43%
Too high»		3		18%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

- Please reduce the work load. Thanks.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

19. What is your general impression of the course?

Poor»		0		0%
Fair»		0		0%
Adequate»		2		12%
Good»		7		43%
Excellent»		7		43%

Genomsnitt: 4.31

- A demonstration lab on PMSM-wheel edition would have been nice since it seems to be an inventive solution.» (Adequate)
- It was the best course during these 3 quarters.» (Excellent)

20. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

21. What should definitely be changed to next year?

22. Additional comments