ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Real-time systems, Lp3 Vt10, EDA222/DIT161

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-03-01 - 2010-03-16
Antal svar: 24
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 7%
Kontaktperson: Åsa Samdell»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

24 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 5 20%

Around 20 hours/week» 15 62%

Around 25 hours/week» 2 8%

Around 30 hours/week» 1 4%

At least 35 hours/week» 1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.08

- including the laboratory hours» (Around 20 hours/week)
- due to sickness one and a half week the average is lower than the time i would have liked to put into the course» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

24 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 3 12%

50%» 3 12%

75%» 8 33%

100%» 10 41%

Genomsnitt: 4.04

- I wanted to attend all lectures because both the teachers are really good. I regret not being able to find the time. » (75%)
- I did not attend any of the exercise sessions.» (75%)
- perfect» (100%)
- missed one lecture due to sickness though..» (100%)
- Good interesting lectures given at a good tempo.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

24 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 1 4%

The goals are difficult to understand» 0 0%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 6 25%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 17 70%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

- The course is more towards the operationg system course, so it requires some quick view of Operating system concepts. » (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- special attention was paid by the responsibles to clarify the course goals» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)
- The goals were presented during the first lecture which was very nice.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

23 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 23 100%

No, the goals are set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

23 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 3 13%

Yes, definitely» 11 47%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 9 39%

Genomsnitt: 3.26

- The questions require interpretation and so hard to understand. In order to get the meaning of the question we had to read it a lot. Because of this, I really need at least an extra half an hour. The questions were so hectic but they could have been solved if there were more time. I really think that the exam timing was a problem. » (To some extent)
- the questions were highly relevant for the course» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

23 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 2 8%

Large extent» 12 52%

Great extent» 9 39%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- the lab assistant was really good and help full he gives a meaning to the whole teaching group» (Large extent)
- great lectures and perhaps even better exercise sessions. Risat challenges the students to think whether they have really understood the subject at hand in a fun way. great job both of Jan and Risat!» (Great extent)
- I did not read anything beyond lecture notes. So yea.. teaching has been "the" source of information in this course. » (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

23 svarande

Small extent» 4 17%

Some extent» 5 21%

Large extent» 9 39%

Great extent» 5 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.65

- Did not touch the text book. Slides were good. Teachers were good. Who needs more?» (Small extent)
- Didn"t read the book once. Good slides instead!» (Small extent)
- surprisingly i have not read much in the course book (i usually read a lot), the Tindall PDF was very good i think. » (Some extent)
- The course book was very easy to understand and fun to read, but I focused my studying on the slides.» (Some extent)
- Mostly the lecture notes given on the course web page. Haven"t read muck in the book, although it is sometimes good to look up certain subjects in it.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

23 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 1 4%

Rather well» 4 17%

Very well» 18 78%

Genomsnitt: 3.73

- Great job from beginning to end!! Many other course responsible could learn a lot from this!» (Very well)
- The best course web page ever. Great structure, very easy to find what you are looking for and all the information you need for the course is there.» (Very well)
- Excellent course homepage! All courses should adopt similar style. It would have been nice if we did not have to run between the student portal and course homepage for the lab registeration etc ... but its only a cosmetic issue. From the functionality point of view ... no complaints.» (Very well)

Laboratory Work

9. To what extent has the lectures been of help for your laboratory work?

23 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 7 30%

Large extent» 12 52%

Great extent» 4 17%

Genomsnitt: 2.86

10. To what extent has the exercises been of help for your laboratory work?

23 svarande

Small extent» 1 4%

Some extent» 2 8%

Large extent» 10 43%

Great extent» 10 43%

Genomsnitt: 3.26

- I did not attend the exercise sessions.» (Small extent)
- exercise sessions were really helpful» (Large extent)
- Dont know what we would have done in the labs without the exercises!» (Great extent)
- Really good with risats excercises that. could be in the beginning of the week instead.» (Great extent)

11. How interested would you be in doing a scheduling-theory take-home exam in study week 7? The take-home exam would be in addition to the lab assignment, but may give bonus points on the written exam.

23 svarande

Not interested» 3 13%

Mildly interested» 6 26%

Quite interested» 6 26%

Very interested» 8 34%

Genomsnitt: 2.82

- Lab + written exam + take home exam ... too many things. It would have been a good option if the lab was not so demanding. An alternative could be to have more extensive coverage of scheduling theory in the lectures and then include more/difficult problems in exam. » (Not interested)
- There is enough work to learn the scheduling theory for the exam, if the take-home exam was in the form of several shorter questions to test if you have theoretical knowledge of all areas of the course (and would help you prepare for the exam in that way) it would be very interesting but if it is an in depth exam then it would not be interesting» (Mildly interested)
- The idea is definitely interesting. The problem as I can see it though, is the increased work load. During the last week you really just want to study for the exams.» (Quite interested)
- Nice idea, but perhaps if it were optional. » (Very interested)

Study climate

12. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

23 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 4 17%

Very good» 14 60%

I did not seek help» 5 21%

Genomsnitt: 4.04

- Risaat was always ready to help. Pity that he did not always have the time to help. It felt like he was doing the job of 2 TAs all by himself. Nevertheless, he is a good teacher. » (Rather good)
- Sometimes it was difficult to get help during the laborations, but the help was excellent.» (Rather good)
- Risat was excellent during the labs. And we had lectures often enough so that you could ask there if you wondered about something.» (Very good)

13. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

23 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 0 0%

Rather well» 5 21%

Very well» 14 60%

I did not seek cooperation» 4 17%

Genomsnitt: 3.95

- the lab assignment cooperation worked very well and helped me a lot!» (Very well)
- the cooperation with the lab partner was quite good, but apart from this I didn"t have any contact with other students.» (I did not seek cooperation)

14. How was the course workload?

23 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 18 78%

High» 5 21%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

- The first couple of weeks it was pretty low. But the two-three weeks before deadline of the assignment and the exam were, I think the work load was adequate/high» (Adequate)
- The course covered a lot of content but I felt that there was a good motivation behind why we had to learn the things in the course.» (High)

15. How was the total workload this study period?

23 svarande

Too low» 1 4%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 6 26%

High» 13 56%

Too high» 3 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.73

Summarizing questions

16. What is your general impression of the course?

23 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 3 13%

Good» 11 47%

Excellent» 9 39%

Genomsnitt: 4.26

- i dont say good or excelent because it really depends on how will they mark my exam but i would rather say it was a good course» (Adequate)
- Interesting course!» (Good)
- the lecturer is excellent and the course assistant also, and quite helpful.» (Excellent)
- Very good course. Excellent structure, great lecturer.» (Excellent)
- One of the most interesting labs I ever did. » (Excellent)

17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- laboratory and exercises»
- The lectures, lab»
- The lab assistant ,Risat,is so kind and responsible and full of knowledge.»
- everything»
- the "solved on the blackboard" exercises, a similar lab assignment. the lecture slides were rather good.»
- The excellent administration of the course (web page, handouts, information). »
- The overall structure of the course. Hopefully both Jan and Risat will be involved next year as well, since they both did a great job. And keep the course web page! »
- Lab. »
- The number of lectures och excercises. The assignment was good.»
- Everything was good. Not having programming questions was the best idea but having more mathematical questions requires more time. »
- Homepage layout, risats excersise hours! Trainlab was also good.»
- Risat Pathan!»

18. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- -»
- -»
- just wrote the exam today and my hand/arm still hurts. maybe not so intensive problems on the exam?»
- -»
- The train lab was somewhat confusing at times, and even the TAs had a hard time helping us with some of the problems. There is probably a great deal of work involved in designing a new lab though. One other thing that I really don"t like is exam questions with minus points. I just keep second guessing myself and often end up not willing to take the risk of loosing points even though I am confident I do know the answer. A suggestion would be to remove the true/false part and base the points entirely on the motivation instead since there is nothing wrong with the questions themselves.»
- Maybe more indepth scheduling theory and related concepts. »
- Add some time constraints to the lab. This is just a copy of the parallel programming lab.»
- Perhaps the scheduling-theory take-home exam in study week 7 mentioned above. »
- Timing of the exam. We need more time to solve problems.»
- One big lab assignment should be removed.The lab part should be divided into 2-3 small assignments implementing different concepts. »

19. Additional comments

- During excercise sessions, use more time to solvve problems, and less lecturing»
- Thanks a lot for well-organized course. everything was clear and helpful.»
- a very interesting area of study.»
- for the GU students it did not say the limits for G and VG on front of the exam. »
- All things considered this was a very good course that I will definitely recommend to anyone interested.»
- It is a good thing that there were no questions on Ada programming in the exam because it is not interesting to write down code on paper for an exam. Both teachers are good. Risaat"s availability was sometimes a problem because he had too many students to look after. But he taught well. »
- the TA is really good and helpful person »
- Excellent Teacher and Lab Assistance»
- The scheduling part is the crux of the cpurse so it should be in the middle of the course not at the end of course.As the end of the course, things move vary fastly so it creates some problems. Also early inrtoducing of this concept will give more time to practise these calculations. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från