Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Course Evaluation, ITR353

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-03-01 - 2010-04-06
Antal svar: 18
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 56%
Kontaktperson: Charlotte Zandier»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

18 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 5%
Around 20 hours/week»8 44%
Around 25 hours/week»6 33%
Around 30 hours/week»2 11%
At least 35 hours/week»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

18 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 5%
75%»7 38%
100%»10 55%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How well did the course fulfill your expectaitons?

18 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 16%
Satisfactory»3 16%
Well»11 61%
Very well»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.55 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

4. How understandable are the course goals?

18 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 5%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»7 38%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 55%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

18 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 5%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»15 83%
No, the goals are set too high»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.05

- Ok for Chalmers, in Germany I probably would get less than half credits.» (No, the goals are set too low)

6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

18 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»7 38%
Yes, definitely»9 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.55

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»6 33%
Large extent»7 38%
Great extent»5 27%

Genomsnitt: 2.94

8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»6 33%
Some extent»7 38%
Large extent»4 22%
Great extent»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2

- The course name is Information System for SCM, but there was nothing about SCM in the book. The book did not help much,if you just read the book, you can just get maximum 20 in the exam!!!» (Small extent)
- The powerpoint-slides were very good to study from! (The book just to have an overall look in)» (Some extent)
- I would prefer if the slides have more "test", means expanations for each point.» (Some extent)
- The book was not that much of help. But the lectures were definitely helpful. » (Large extent)

9. How well did the Navision Exercise contribute to your learning?

18 svarande

Not at all, I did not learn anything new from this exercise»0 0%
I have learned some from this exercise»4 22%
The learning has been satisfactory»4 22%
Well, I have learned from this exercise»4 22%
Very well, I have learned a lot from this excercise»6 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It is not a good way of learning by just sitting and clicking around without knowing what you are doing. This was a real bad way of learning! Instead it would hae been better to start off with an introduction to the programme and shown some basic funcionalities from the beginning. It"s not obvious that F3 means "new" if you have never used the programme before! And the help-guide doesn"t always cover the things you are looking for. And sometimes it doesn"t matter cause you don"t even know what the assignment asks for! There where to litte possibilities in comparison to the work that has been put in. Hoursand hoours have been spent just to look for things and understand what to do! Also it is hard to get any help if the supervisor neither can do the things that are required from us! » (I have learned some from this exercise)
- the problems and assignments on navision should be more practical and there should have been an introduction before starting.» (I have learned some from this exercise)
- Guidlances which were in the second task (about seraching adding new record etc) should be in the first task. One or all exercises should have instructions how to solve them because working out everythin by myself is waste of time. Students could gain the same knowledge when solving it with instructions. I could not imagine this kind of teaching while introducing this ERP in the company.» (The learning has been satisfactory)
- It was very helpful and interesting, but the last assignment was a bit confusing and unclear, and of course it took much time.» (Well, I have learned from this exercise)

10. How well did the ERP Case assignment contribute to your learning?

18 svarande

Not at all, I did not learn anything new from this exercise»0 0%
I have learned some from this exercise»5 27%
The learning has been satisfactory»6 33%
Well, I have learned from this exercise»6 33%
Very well, I have learned a lot from this excercise»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.16 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It was not very clear, especially when the group that I was in had a hard topic to describe. There were no good information at all about it! » (I have learned some from this exercise)

11. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

18 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»6 33%
Very well»12 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- Problems with printing and adding the last two chapter that I was supposed read in the last week before exam was tricky» (Rather well)
- I like that the functions in the portal really are beeing used. » (Very well)

12. Did you get a satisfactory service from the course examinator?

18 svarande

Very poor»1 5%
Rather poor»0 0%
Satisfactory»3 16%
Good»8 44%
Very good»6 33%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

13. Did you get a satisfactory service from the course administrator?

18 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 5%
Satisfactory»5 27%
Good»8 44%
Very good»4 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.83 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

14. How was the quality of the lectures given by Johan Bystedt?

17 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 5%
Satisfactory»9 52%
Good»6 35%
Very good»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.41 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Hard to know what was important! It was very much in to details, and sometimes it was not possible to keep up with what was saying.» (Good)

15. How was the quality of the lectures given by Gunnar Stefansson?

Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Gunnar Stefansson»

18 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Satisfactory»2 11%
Good»8 44%
Very good»8 44%

Genomsnitt: 4.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- He"s cool...» (Very good)

16. How was the quality of the lectures given by Henrik Sternberg?

Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Henrik Sternberg»

17 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Satisfactory»3 17%
Good»9 52%
Very good»5 29%

Genomsnitt: 4.11 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Very good that he uses a lot of examples from industry.» (Very good)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.79

Study climate

17. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

18 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 5%
Rather good»2 11%
Very good»15 83%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

18. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

18 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 11%
Rather well»6 33%
Very well»10 55%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.44

- http://www.student.chalmers.se/» (Rather poorly)

19. How was the course workload?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 11%
Adequate»10 55%
High»5 27%
Too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

- Except lab3!» (Adequate)
- The most of workload was associated with Navision laboratory. If the lab work can be linked better to other section of course forexample groupwork would be good. Now the labs were useful for understanding ERP but left still a little bit discrete feeling. » (Adequate)
- it was high only on the individual assignment» (High)
- too much Nav exercise.» (Too high)

20. How was the total workload this study period?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»11 61%
High»5 27%
Too high»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

21. How well did the planning, such as the scheduling of deadlines hand-ins etc work for you?

18 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 5%
OK»3 16%
Well»8 44%
Very well»6 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.05 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It was tough with the third individual assignment handin though!!» (OK)
- 3 oclock on Friday is quite strange deadline» (OK)
- Some dates given vere not clear eg. 00:00 22.02.2010 What date it should be handed in 23:59 21.02 or 23:59 22.02» (OK)

22. Did you get enough help with computer exercises from the exercise teacher?

18 svarande

No help at all»0 0%
Too little help»3 16%
OK help»9 50%
Good help»4 22%
Excellent help»2 11%
I did not ask for help with the computer exercises»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.27 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The group size was rather big for two teachers. Would it be possible to have kind of e-guide for labs. If somebody gets stucked with work the aid could be on hand via web or email. » (OK help)
- The Navision labs were though overloaded so you had to wait a lot to get help.» (Good help)

23. How well did the student representatives work?

18 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 5%
Rather well»2 11%
Well»4 22%
Very well»4 22%
No opinion»7 38%

Genomsnitt: 4.77 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Didn"t hear anyting from them» (No opinion)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.03

Summarizing questions

24. What is your general impression of the course?

18 svarande

Poor»1 5%
Fair»1 5%
Adequate»3 16%
Good»11 61%
Excellent»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- There is no idea, now just over one week to the exam, what level the cpuse is really on. The book is said to be bad, but there are a real big difference between the level on th book and the lectures. It feels like the book sometimes are too basic and the lectues are way too advanced! Overall there were not enough information about what should be done. Nothing was really concrete what should be done! No red line through the course!» (Poor)

25. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- guest lectures»
- MS Navision exercises»
- The laborations»
- Book, Gunnar as lecturer,»
- Nav labs but maybe a bit lighter.»
- Almost everything, course is well-structured.»
- navision class»
- Navison labs»
- The Nav exersice should be preserved, however the workload should be lower, I think two assignments are adequate.»
- Computer labs»

26. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- the work load of the individual assignment»
- --»
- The way of having labs. Chapters of the book that we are supposed to read should appear in the beginning.»
- The book.»
- Almost nothing else, course was quite good!»
- the guest lecture and the course book.»
- Amount of labs (fewer), book»
- the text book and the instruction of the lab exercise»
- Maybe add SAP lab»

27. Additional comments

- I think one of the most important things in ERP is the BPR. I suggest to work on BPRs in SCM, because our real work will be more related to BPRs rather than working with softwares. Another point is that there was not enough guest lectures for this course. Especially lecturers who work with SCM applications in reality.»
- --»
- Every comment in this work is personnal opinion of the author :D»
- It seems to be a bit vague on how the course literature or rather the book was prescribed. There was lot of things to know but getting only a view was a bit bad. Not much related to supply chian examples were documented.»
- Very good course overall.»

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.83
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.68

Kursutvärderingssystem från