|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
MPDSD Design Systems ARK 176 vt10Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2010-03-10 - 2010-05-15 Antal svar: 29 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 90% Kontaktperson: Jaan-Henrik Kain» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Arkitektur 300 hp Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Arkitektur 300 hp
Goals and fullfilment of goalsThe learning outcomes are given in the course programme. This is the knowledge, understanding, skills and perspectives you are expected to reach. Put down for each outcome how well they have been fulfilled.1. Learning outcome 1*After completion of this course, the student should be able to: Explain systems thinking and its relevance for design, architecture and planning.29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.75 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - more discussion and input within the area needed» (Insufficient) 2. Learning outcome 2*After completion of this course, the student should be able to: Select systems thinking approaches that are relevant for a specific design, architecture or planning task.29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.75 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - not dealt with» (Insufficient) 3. Learning outcome 3*After completion of this course, the student should be able to: Structure knowledge through systems thinking by using selected approaches in descriptions.29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.93 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 4. Learning outcome 4*After completion of this course, the student should be able to: To tentatively analyze and synthesize complex knowledge by employing systems thinking in design work, i.e., by combining and integrating different systems approaches.29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.81 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 5. Learning outcome 5*After completion of this course, the student should be able to: Translate such analysis and synthesis into a draft design proposals, using systems thinking as language of communication and justification (assignments 1 and 2).29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.79 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - I know how to understand systems, but not how to apply them to a new design proposal.» (Insufficient) 6. Learning outcome 6*After completion of this course, the student should be able to: Reformulate such analysis and synthesis into a more complex design program (assignment 3).29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.85 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - more guidence needed» (Insufficient) 7. Are these objectives reasonable in relation to your pre-knowledge?*29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.96 - The goals are too ambitious because Design Systems was a whole new topic/way of working and, especially having to apply systems thinking in design, an area which is approached more intuitively rather than analytically. » (No, the goals are too ambitious) 8. Are the goals reasonable in relation to the scope and amount of credits?*29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.1 - Although I believe course could last longer, explain more and be worth more points.» (Yes, the goals are reasonable) LecturesTo what extent did the lectures contribute to the learning outcomes and as support for solving the assignments?9. Systems thinking - Jaan-Henrik Kain*29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.57 - I really like most of the lectures. » (Excellently) 10. Exercise in System Dynamics - Patrik Wallman*29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.15 - The absolutley necesary lecture that gave the base for the whole course. » (Excellently) 11. Performance-oriented design - Michael Hensel*29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.88 - Very interesting» (Excellently) 12. Nature and environment - Ulrika Palme*29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.55 - It was useful to the extent of understanding how biological systems work, but may have lacked in architectural relevance. » (Quite well) 13. Buildings as systems - Liane Thuvander*29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.41 14. Collage - Lena Hopsch*29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.03 - That lecture was a joke and an insult to my intelligence.» (Not at all) 15. Risk Assessment - Krystyna Pietrzyk*29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.2 16. Economy - Anders Ekbom*29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.85 17. Politics - Sverker Jagers*29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.85 - He is interesting to listen to» (Quite well) 18. Systems of systems - Jaan-Henrik Kain*29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.79 - At that point the name of the lecture "systems of systems" was a bit too much. I think many of us was confused and didnt know what the course would lead to. » (Quite well) 19. Systems and Architecture - Marcus von Euler*29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.85 20. Conservation - Inger Lise Syversen*29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.53 21. Functions and flows - Birger Sevaldson*29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.11 - Should have been in the beginning of the course» (Excellently) 22. Programs for planning and building - Henrik Levin and Anders Ekberg*29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.48 Education and course administration23. What support did you get for your learning from course literature and other material?*29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.68 - But it rather my fault not to use it. But I found it usefull to have some of the presentations lecturers were leaving after lectures. Especilly from Programs for planning and building» (Rather little) 24. Literature seminar. To what extent did the literature seminar contribute to the learning outcomes and as support for solving the assignments?*29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.53 - Well, unwatched discussion turned to talks about sustainibility rather than systems, I believe we have no idea what should be the outcome so we have really free talk.» (Not at all) 25. How did the organisation, memoranda, direct information etc. function?*29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.1 - Exept for the last mail, thet specified what to hand in for the last assignment. It came when we didnt have any more time to work on, at the schedual. Not good.» (Rather well) 26. Assignments. To what extent did Assignment 1 contribute to the learning outcomes?*29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.89 27. Assignments. To what extent did Assignment 2 contribute to the learning outcomes?*29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 28. Assignments. To what extent did Assignment 3 contribute to the learning outcomes?*29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.1 Work environment29. How do you rate the possibilities to get assistance and ask questions?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.93 - Could have been more assistence time» (Rather bad) 30. How has the cooperation between the students in your group been?*29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.89 - We have spent alot of time on discussing meanings of words (we were multinational group). We have also problems with finding one strategy, everyone was rather pulling into his direction.» (Rather bad) Concluding questions31. What is your overall opinion of the course?*29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.89 - it was a confusing course that I could not find how can we use it especially in Architecture market.» (Good) 32. What should be preserved next year?- Challenging assignments»- Scope of lectures and number of assignments.» - ...» - the literature references» - Many of the lectures was interesting. » - the separated exercise » - Patrik Wallman, Ulrika Palme, Michael Hensel and especially Birger Sevaldsson should all be invited to participate next year. Birger should also be invited to redesign the course for next year, so that we can enhance the design systems concept to not only include CLD:s. Even though it was evident that the CLD way isn"t the only tool, we weren"t explicitly shown anything else until Birger"s lecture. Some experience from Birger"s course should enrich the students on what design systems could be about from the start.» - The groupwork. » - - guest lectures because it gives a fresh insight and interesting fields in the topics - selecting groups at random as it encourages students to mix and interact with others in the class - structuring of the assignments, building on the details and context as we were learning more » - Birger Sevaldsson» - Different approaches to systems.» - the lecture with birger sevaldson was very rewarding. could the cooperation be extended? workshop?» - Some lectures were realy boring. The lecture with Positive-Negative diagrams was excellent. Please more lectures from the same person !» 33. What should be changed next year?- Give all the requirments at the begining»- The last assignment shouldn"t be about the studio, it would be good to continue with the same project as in assignment 1 and 2» - ...» - the timing of the third assignment, so that it is completed before the studio project» - More basic info about systems and the history and contemporary use of it in the field of architecture. As it is today we didnt really know what to do and many times it was frustrating. At the end almost all groups did causal loop diagrams. But what more? I think it could have been a better learning outcome if we had more options. It is an enormous field, and we didnt really learn how to use the tools. If we should work with the causal loop diagrams it would be good to know even more about them. Now it was onley one lecture that really focused on it, I think it could be more. More info on how the diagrams work, the practical tools. What signs there is and so on... » - i guess the number of the people should be decreased to 3 or two for each assignment, and every assignment needs more frequent supervision during the course.» - Lena Hopsch should be removed, her lecture didn"t add anything of value to the course, and I must say: a waste of time. And PLEASE make the introduction lecture into something more inviting, as for now it"s a sleeping pill.» - You need to be more clear on what systems thinking is. And also about what you want in the assignments - I"m thinking about assignment 3, where we got the wanted number of "functions" and "criteria" when we had one morning left before hand-in. As I wrote above I was disappointed with the way the critique on the last day was conducted. A learning opportunity was missed there, mainly because of lack of time. If you take any of this serious you should really rethink the schedule for the critique - more time for discussion and opinions from external crits" (that obviously should look through the student"s work before hand)» - - post all lecture notes before hand so that we could skim through prior to lectures and have the possibility to print notes before the lectures - perhaps have two assignments rather than three, allowing for more time and therefore detailed work for each - the lectures should have more emphasis on architecture and design so it is more relevant to our studies and easier for us to apply - 100% attendance should be more flexible if one has a justifiable reason for being absent - more time during presentations, 7 minutes was definitely not enough time to demonstrate a good understanding of the subject because we cannot explain the work process and thinking that went into our projects» - Take away some of the lectures and focus more on the tools. » - Try to be more specific in how to apply those analysis to a new project.» - can more examples of systems in design be found, shown and discussed?» - Boring lectures should be replaced with something better.» 34. Other comments...- maybe there should be a clearer approach on how to relate systems thinking to design proses. Use some existing examples and compare different succesfull approaches»- ...» - although the course was confusing at times, i found the literature very useful and the assignments good practice in applying what we"ve learned.» - I think there has been a lack of communication in this group of students. If people do not understand they tend to be quiet an d it was the case here. The complicated subject restricted people from using there imagination and free thinking. I do not now how to deal with this but it has been a problem. » - Jaan Henrik Kain should take help from others who likes to teach to a larger extent.» - Overall a very interesting course, and I think it could be even better if it was spread out over a longer period of time just so that the subject can be explored in more detail. Thanks!» Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.57 * obligatoriska frågor
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3%