ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Engineering polymers 2009/2010, MPM080

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-03-02 - 2010-03-24
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 25%
Kontaktperson: Rodney Rychwalski»
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time: spent in class and on your own work.

10 svarande

at most 15 h»0 0%
around 20 h»4 40%
around 25 h»3 30%
around 30 h»2 20%
at leat 35 h»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

9 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»5 55%
100%»4 44%

Genomsnitt: 4.44

- around 90%,missed a couple of classes» (?)

3. Were the course goals reasonable considering your background and number of credits?

9 svarande

the goals are set too low»0 0%
the goals are reasonable»9 100%
the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

4. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning at this advanced level?

10 svarande

high extent»6 60%
some extent»3 30%
small extent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 1.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

5. How well did the course administration, course homepage, handouts etc work?

10 svarande

Very well»6 60%
rather well»4 40%
very badly»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It would have been better if the compendium we bought was complete, if there was no need for extra notes and additional pictures/figures all the time!» (rather well)

6. How were the opprtunities for asking questions and getting help, were the lecturers caring?

10 svarande

Very good»4 40%
rather good»5 50%
very poor»1 10%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.7 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

7. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

10 svarande

very well»5 50%
rather well»5 50%
very poorly»0 0%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

8. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

too high»1 10%
adequate»9 90%
too low»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.9 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It was good that the TTS presentation was rather early in the course!» (adequate)
- high to adequate» (adequate)

9. How was the total work load this study period?

9 svarande

too high»3 33%
adequate»6 66%
too low»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.66

- adequate to high» (?)
- nej» (adequate)

10. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- course content»
- Everything»
- Rodney and Mikael are both excellent professors.»
- nej»

11. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The compendium as mentioned earlier. The text that actually was in it was good, but that there was so much missing was bad.»
- lecture notes should be improved,either completely in a compendium or on student portal.»
- Doing lab and report could be earlier.»
- nej»
- way of handling tutorial classes»

12. Level of information presented in lectures was...(put an X)

10 svarande

too high»1 10%
reasonable»9 90%
too low»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.9 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

13. Lectures gave substantial information

10 svarande

I agree»8 80%
hesitant»1 10%
I disagree»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 1.3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- nej» (hesitant)

14. Do you think the course should cover more or fewer topics?

9 svarande

more topics»3 33%
no change»6 66%
fewer topics»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- relevant industrial applications of the materials» (?)
- some more time must be spent on viscoelasticity and something on design of polymer products» (more topics)
- Defentitelly not more topics. The work load was not to low.» (no change)
- nej» (no change)

15. Tutorial problems helped to better understand the computational aspects

10 svarande

I agree»6 60%
hesitant»3 30%
I disagree»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 1.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- There could have been slightly more tutorials.» (I agree)
- nej» (hesitant)

16. Labs were helpful from the point of view of the thory and laboratory practice

10 svarande

I agree»5 50%
hesitant»4 40%
I disagree»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 1.6 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The rheology lab was really good.» (hesitant)

17. Topics to study brought me more into the world of polymeric materials

10 svarande

I agree»5 50%
hesitant»4 40%
I disagree»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 1.6 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

18. Handed out criteria for evaluating topics to study were of help?

9 svarande

I agree»7 77%
hesitant»1 11%
I disagree»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 1.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Always nice to know what should be more in focus and what should be more general knowledge.» (I agree)

19. The course book was a helpful source to study polymeric materials

10 svarande

I agree»6 60%
hesitant»4 40%
I disagree»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- But not by itself. It really needs additional material since the language in the book is rather scientific and sometimes a bit difficult to digest.» (I agree)

20. On the whole you would

10 svarande

recommend the course»8 80%
hesitant»2 20%
not recommend the course»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 1.56

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 1.56
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.27

Kursutvärderingssystem från