|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Sustaianble Building A, ARK186Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2010-03-08 - 2010-03-17 Antal svar: 29 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 69% Kontaktperson: Michael Edén» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Arkitektur 300 hp Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Arkitektur 300 hp
Goals and fullfilment of goalsThe learning outcomes are given in the course programme, that is the knowledge, understanding, skills and perspectives you are expectd to reach. Notify for each outcome how well they have been fulfilled.1. Learning outcome 1-combine design with investigations29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.24 - Though the course very much focuses on one´,s own ability to be self-going, the amount of foregin students with little understanding for how swedish people think or of swedish climate, or students with NO experience in drawing buildings actually is a setback for the level on which the discussion and creative level of development is held. The bigger gain in experience is in group dynamics, rather.» (Insufficient) 2. Learning outcome 2-understand and use information about sustainable architecture in given project assignments29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.13 - see one.
But I am not sure. Some things are sufficient, some aren´,t.» (Insufficient) 3. Learning outcome 3-create design concepts about different aspects of sustainable architecture29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.03 - No other aspect than the ecological one. Different aspects should include social/economy features as well.» (Insufficient) 4. Learning outcome 4-communicate important issues in a design project through poster and in a report29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.17 - The examiner should pay attention and criticized about posters/layout and graphic communication on presentation more.» (Insufficient) 5. Are the aims and goals reasonable in relation to your pre-knowledge ?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.96 - The course offered a very good chance to me to apply interesting ideas got from a previous course. For example designing a straw bale house. It was fun!» (Yes, the goals are reasonable) 6. Are the goals reasonable in relation to the scope and amount of credits?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.07 - the idea of 2 short exercices is really attractive !» (Reasonable scope in relation to credits) Education and course administration7. What support have you got for your learning from course literature and other material?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.86 - We didnt use the recomended literature, there whas not enough time to do that. It would have been good with just a little bit more time and maby a litterature seminar. » (Rather little) 8. What support have you got from lectures29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - It’,s good to have wide information lectures but some of them should be more specific.» (Very little) 9. What support have you got from supervsion and meeting with engineer students?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.72 - and confused!» (Very little) 10. How did the organisation, memoranda, direct information etc. function?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.35 - Our groups had difficulty understanding exactly what the assignments were about and thought the hand-outs lacked clarity.» (Rather bad) Work environment11. How do you rate the possibilities to get assistance and ask questions?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.37 - Most of the scheduled meetings were put too close to hand-in. It would have been a lot more useful earlier.» (Rather bad) 12. How has the cooperation between you and students in your group been?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - in some of the groups there were some poeple who are not good in group working, when we do not have any pre-knowledge about them it makes conflict between somebody and makes everything bad.» (Very bad) Concluding questions13. What is your overall opinion of the course?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.31 - It is excellent the course is available at Chalmers architecture.» (Passed) 14. What should be preserved next year?- I think that the first assignment about materials was very good.»- Consultations are very good and useful.» - short and fun assignments.» - the short exercices» - The two different subjects in the assignments, both verry interesting. Material and stormwater. I think they will be a good base for the next course, the b part. Whith seems even more interesting to me! » - The course.» - I think with some re-phrasing and some more clarity about the course objectives and assistence earlier on in the courses, it will function fine.» - The time was very short for the assignments, and maybe it was about our elective courses as well which were as much as busy as ur studio.» - the goals» - cooperate in groups for the projects,but no more than 4 in one group is good.» - all the assignments» - I think seperating the delivery and the presentation is a good idea. So that we can go and have rest the night before the presentations. In addition to that commenting each others presentation was very beneficial. » - Meeting with engineer students» - Teacher"s humor.» - Lectures should be preserved.» 15. What shuold be changed the nest year?- I don´,t really like to have the studio in the V building. It feels like you are far away from teachers, the library etc. I also think that the work would have been more efficient and easier to organise if we just have one course instead of having two parallel courses . »- Ensure that all teams are filled, and do not allow smaller groups. Workload gets too high in relation to the level of ambition. » - More attention in design concept and in way to present posters (more care by the students and by the teacher), less investigation and more sketches.Maybe more lectures.maybe more than 1 supervision for project. » - why only designing projects for göteborg? could we do someting for other countries?» - I suggest to do the landscape first, when the weather is still good, when there isn"t snow everywhere» - I think a litterature seminar and more time for reading. The short time didnt allow for that this year. And more info about how to do u value calculations. I dont think I learnd how to do it. » - The possibility of choosing different aspects of sustainability.» - If one is to design something that is very much specialized It is a good idea to have done the basic stuff first. Therefore I think mosty students with architecture background should be able to do the course. That v-classroom is quite horrible, by the way. Cold. Not enough wallsockets for laptops. » - It was not a problem of my group but, the group could be more heterogenous, for example we were only international in our group so it was hard for us to go through local literature in Swedish. And some groups mostly of Erasmus people suffered from disorder and absence.» - maybe more consulation can be added, and the meeting with engeering students should be better organised, for example, they can be updated with the goals and contents of our project before the meeting so that we won`t spend a lot of time to explain what we supposed to do during the meeting.» - We could add a mid-term critic or present or kind of communication chance between different groups that might be helpful.» - the landscape assignment"s site» - The programme papers for both exercises had some missing information, so that the groups were a little bit confused and had to go back to the supervisor of the course and asked for detailed information. So I would better have a more explained programme in the beginning. » - slow down the tempo» - More information and small exercises.» - Nothing» 16. Other comments- Thanks !!»- Looking forward to next course, part B, with hope! Might very well be the best course in Chalmers!» - Good when the different steps of the course connect. It is good the groups are set from start, to get going quickly. » - more detailed information» - The studio can be changed. I think we should move to the studios in the second floor with kitchen, since we still kept working there (kenya studio) because we all want to use the studio full time and going to the other building didnt give us the feeling of "our studio"» - none» - The course was a little bit stressful for two projects ,especially for the second one.» - overall, i felt the course was very useful. the lectures were limited, but all very good. the assignments forced us to find references and due a ton of research. i feel i gained a lot of information in this course.» - If it is possible workshop included the course.»
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%