ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Course evaluation: Experimental Physics

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-02-06 - 2010-02-28
Antal svar: 12
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 80%
Kontaktperson: Janusz Kanski»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Övriga studenter

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

12 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»2 16%
Around 25 hours/week»7 58%
Around 30 hours/week»1 8%
At least 35 hours/week»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

Goals and goal fulfilment

2. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 9%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 27%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 63%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

3. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»10 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

Teaching and course administration

4. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

12 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»7 58%
Very well»5 41%

Genomsnitt: 3.41

Study climate

5. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

12 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 25%
Very good»9 75%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

6. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

12 svarande

Very poorly»1 8%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»5 41%
Very well»6 50%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

7. How was the course workload?

12 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 33%
High»7 58%
Too high»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- 4 experiments would have made it to high» (Adequate)
- Reasonably high, or adequate high.» (High)

8. How was the total workload this study period?

12 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 41%
High»5 41%
Too high»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

9. Introductory lectures

Apart from the general course introduction, how useful were the introductory lectures for the laboratory work ?

12 svarande

I got valuable guidelines»12 100%
I had previous laboratory experience, so the lectures were u»0 0%
The laboratory work could have been carried out just as well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

10. Feedback

Was the feedback on your laboratory reports adequate?

12 svarande

yes, we had good discussions with the supervisors»11 91%
no, the feedback was not constructive»1 8%
no, there was no feedback»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.08

- the best feedback was from Johan Bielecki, because he really took the time to talk about things, and not just wrote it on our report» (yes, we had good discussions with the supervisors)
- Bad thing with the feedback was the delayment. It"s not ok to get feedback in february, when the course ended in december. » (yes, we had good discussions with the supervisors)

Summarizing questions

11. What is your general impression of the course?

12 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 8%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»11 91%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

12. What should be preserved to next year?

- I think it was good with only 3 labs as there was time to do all the labs and report good. I think there would be less quality with one more lab.»
- Three experiments was enough. One week experiment and one week report writing was more or less perfect.»
- it was good to have (in average) two weeks for each lab, without having two labs interfering by having to write a report and doing some different lab-work»
- the introductory part and any experiment which gives good results.»

13. What should be changed to next year?

- IR spectroscopy experiment»

14. Additional comments

- Maybe the groups should be randomized between labs»
- the achieve more and more from this course»

Kursutvärderingssystem från