|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Architecture - advanced theory and methodology, ARK316Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2010-02-02 - 2010-03-01 Antal svar: 13 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 25% Kontaktperson: Sten Gromark» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Arkitektur 300 hp
Goals and fullfilment of goalsThe learning outcomes are given in the course programme, that is the knowledge, understanding, skills and perspectives you are expectd to reach. Notify for each outcome how well they have been fulfilled.1. Learning outcome in generalThe Course is designed as an initiation to the preparation and formulation of an advanced or strategic programme brief for a given architectural assignment in general and a Master’,s Thesis project in particular. This is done within respective Master Programme studios in relation to chosen active teachers, examiners and respective studio leaders and supervisors. On the basis of indicated literature students were requested to produce a Paper Outline on the general theme of Exploring Architecture, identifying and analysing specific components such as: A Theoretical Perspective, B Specific Methodology, C Professional Transgressive Practice Analysis and finally D Specific Project Analysis. The course comprised lectures, seminars and a final presentation and crit session where papers were critised by two teachers and two students after an oral and visual final paper presentation procedure. As a main result the exercise consisted in writing a Paper Outline in English about 10-12 pages intended for an architectural scientific conference. This was the first occasion to test this kind of course in the MPARC and MPDSD Master Programme curriculums.The Course intended to provide a scientific context to the Master’,s Thesis preparation process, to introduce an overview of relevant literature, innovative projects and experimental approaches in contemporary urban architecture and to assist in advanced conceptual orientation while preparing a Master’,s Thesis. How well would you say these ambitions were met? 13 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - Sufficient of introducing a way to write about and expolre architecture and to analyse and be theoretic about architecture but insufficient to formulate a strategic programme brief for a master thesis. The course did not lead to that.» (Sufficient) 2. Learning outcome 2 : Support for the Master’,s Thesis Project Plan?How well did the course, the brief for a paper outline and the seminar discussions help you in your final formulation of the Master’,s Thesis Project Plan?13 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.76 - There was no discussion about what a project plan should contain and how it should be carried out. However the course made it possible to go deeper into subjects that helped formulating theories for the theses.» (Insufficient) 3. Learning outcome 3: Support from literature and other texts for the Paper Outline exercise?How well did the suggested concepts, the literature and other texts help you to develop your Paper Outline?13 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.91 - There was really not much that I used from the course literature. » (No opinion) 4. Learning outcome 4: Support from lectures and dedicated guest lectures for the Project Plan?How well did the lectures and guest lectures help you in your formulation of the Master’,s Thesis Project Plan?13 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.54 - most of the lectures never happened. » (Insufficient) 5. Are the aims and goals reasonable in relation to your pre-knowledge ?13 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.08 6. Are the goals reasonable in relation to the scope and amount of credits?13 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.08 - But, because the paper wasn"t connected to the project plan I had to use time outide the course and write the project plan parallell with the paper writing.» (Reasonable scope in relation to credits) Education and course administration7. What support have you got for your learning process from indicated course literature and other written material?13 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.61 - the course could have started with som compulsary litterature and a litterature seminar. That would have given a good startup and help to choose subjects to study. » (Rather little) 8. How did the organisation, memoranda, direct information etc. function?13 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.07 - We got late information obout if the course should exist or not. During the course the information about dates for delivering the project plan and the planning for the master thesis term was really confusing and we did not get any clear directions. This makes it hard to plan and make a project plan.» (Rather bad) Work environment9. How do you rate the possibilities to get assistance and ask questions?13 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.61 10. How has the cooperation between you and students in your group been?13 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.84 - There was no group work, but the group seminars were good.» (Very good) Concluding questions11. What is your overall opinion of the relevance of the course as an optional preparation course for the Master’,s Thesis spring term?13 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.69 - the thought of a preparation course before the Master"s Thesis is very good, but how the course was done didn"t help me with my Master"s Thesis at all.» (Very bad) 12. What should be preserved next year?- the objectives»- The freedom to drown in a subject. » - An external teacher in the end seminar as Beate H. Very good to get fresh eyes from a person outside. The inspiring attitude from Sten that made us explore new fields of architecture.» - Semminars, inspiration materials » - all the seminars and especially final seminar - presenting our papers» 13. What should be changed the next year?- More clear information about how & when to write the project plan»- perhaps I started with a preconception of the course as very dedicated to the task of being preparatory for the master thesis, but it could perhaps be made more clear beforehand that the course won"t automatically end in a synopsis document.» - we could have more help about academic writing» - see q 7 make subgroups that"s writing about related subjects. (see q10)» - A bit more organised and a closer connection to the practical parts of the promgramme plan for the thesis. Maybe a seminar discussing and brainstorming different topics for the thesis. Don"t call it preparing for the thesis when it doesn"t do that. If you keep the course as now you should refer to the course as a way of opening your mind and find new perspectives on your thesis.» - maybe more lectures...like guest lectures and such..but related to master thesis.» 14. Other comments- no»- This course gave me much value and I am positive about it. But it did not prepare me for my thesis in a practical way. If the information about the coming up thesis period was clearer it would have been better.» 15. To what degree –, if not native English language mother tongue –, did it present a problem for you writing in English as a foreign language?11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.09 - After two years (combined with the help of microsoft) it"s not a problem. some things would have been harder to formulate in swedish.» (not at all)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7%