|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Vehicle and Traffic Safety, TME200Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2010-01-25 - 2010-02-25 Antal svar: 18 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?% Kontaktperson: Johan Davidsson» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
1. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.88 - I don"t know clearly (or at least don"t remember) the course goals.» (?) 2. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.41 - Since I don"t know the goals, cannot say if the examination assess the achievment of the goals.» (?) 3. The course is inclusive: Please mention topics you would like to learn more about and topics you would like to leran less about.- I would like to learn more about injuries and biomechanics, but there is no topic I would like to learn less about.»- Less : Anatomic body (no medical engineers) More: Safetysystems passive and active» - To have more lecture about the way of designing a good car body should be interesting.» - Less diagrams of injury risk etc. over and over again. More on how a safe car should be designed.» - Remove the anatomy part.» - More: Human factors, Numerical simulations» - Lesser of Biology would be GREAT !! » - Crashwothiness» - I would like to learn more about passive safety (BIW). Psychology is crucial too, but should be represented in more attractive way.» - Structure design for passive Safety» - nothing more or less» 4. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.55 5. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.05 - no PM» (Very badly) 6. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.33 - From psychological point of view: if somebody says for students that questions is high school level, than student becomes shy automatically.» (Rather poor) 7. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 - Powerpoint maration lectures» (75%) 8. How was the course workload?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.94 9. How was the total workload this study period?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.82 - Took 3 courses ,-)» (Too high) 10. What is you general opinion about the laboration?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.41 - Unspecified requirements.» (Adequate) 11. Were the laborations relevant for the course?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.16 - It was interesting to see, but it was not helpful for the examination. I liked it anyway.» (Partly) 12. Is there any topic (in the AS and HF parts of this course) which, in your opinion, should be elaborated more next year? Which one/s?- I think boimechanics is very interesting, but it rests time to study properly the passive and active safety part.»- Both! This course is a powerpoint course today do it more interactive!» - HF part with kip was a waste of time» - Human factors in general, there were only a few lectures about it and the teacher was great.» - design of chassis for passive safety» - Redo the whole course» - there is some thing more abt seat belt like, slack allowance etc can br elaborated» 13. How did you like the demo with the XC60 city safety? Any suggestion for next year?- Be aware of the wheather.»- Nice with some practic!» - It should be better it its possible to drive the car» - useless» - not so interesting to see a car braking» - It was pretty good. I think its better to have a few more demos like this and this would give the students an insight on how active safety systems work. And if possible visits to companies would be good.» - Did not participate unfortunately» - daylight» - That was very good .» - OK» - As much practical stuff as better, because if there is theory only, then studies will become demotivated.» - It was good.» - its good may be new S60 with pedestrian detection for next year with XC60» 14. Is there any background knowledge/information which was taken for granted in the AS and HF part of this course even if you were not familiar with it? If so, can you show some examples?- Well, in active safety, the electronics part. Some people didn"t know to much about it (sensors and stuff).»- No» 15. Please list three “,,things”,, you would like to keep as they are in the AS and HF part of this course and three you would like for us to improve.- The compatibility lecture should not be that short and it is really interesting. The human aspects are important, but there were too much time for it. Shorten the injuries lectures and increase the duration of passive and active safety systems.»- to keep: laboration, the number of example in active safety to ameliorate: reduce the quantity of anatomy» - better communication between lecturers- we got alot of same information, i.e. the city safe system, from many different lecturers. ... over all a very good and well planned course.» - Redo the course from the begining and skipp the anatomy» - lab presentation from industrial people handouts» 16. Please comment the teachers involved in the course! Do you suggest any particular change? More or less of any of the teachers?- No, teachers were really good.»- It felt that Johan Davidsson repeated himselft very much» - Johan was a great teacher, he could teach more. Marco was also really good to follow. I liked his lectures. The best teacher in this course was Kip Smith, who was talking about human factors. Best teacher I ever had! The other teachers were also adequate, cant remember anybody particularly great/bad.» - more of the teachers » 17. What is your general impression of the course?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.11 - No course PM there MUST exist!, non intressting couse in engineering point of view! » (Poor) 18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- All»- Laboration» - laboration» - LabWork» - the laboratory» - lab» - LABB» - all the things» 19. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The duraction of some lectures that I think are relevant, but they rest time from the ones that give the name to this course.»- There should EXIST a course PM! Less anatomic lecture, more intressting lecture (not like this year were we hade powerpoint lectures 100% and 40 slides every lecture)» - Additional LabWork concerning AS?» - Course content» - More practical things (visits). For example, to watch the real crash test would motivate studients to interesting more.» - answer key for active safety could be provided» 20. Additional comments- This is the first year and it was good. There are some suggestions, but in general I liked it. Congratulations!»- the slides wasen"t that easy to use as the base for the study to the exam» - More labs! Bring to class a dummy or a deceased person instead of showing us powerpoint slides of dummies and human muscles.» - On the exam paper was written, that results will arrive after 19 days, but we got it very late. So, it is double standarts for students" projects deadlines and for teachers.»
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11%