ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Active Noise Control 2009

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-01-23 - 2010-02-15
Antal svar: 5
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Wolfgang Kropp»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

5 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 20%
Around 20 hours/week»1 20%
Around 25 hours/week»2 40%
Around 30 hours/week»1 20%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- I would have spent more had I not been busy with other courses.» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the lectures offered did you attend?

5 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 40%
100%»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

- 90%» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus (see http://www.student.chalmers.se/sp/course?course_id=11243 ) states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

5 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 40%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- Some material that was included was more like "own reading"» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

5 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

5 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 20%
Yes, definitely»4 80%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent have the lectures been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 20%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»4 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

7. How was the presentation speed in the lectures?

5 svarande

much too slow»0 0%
a bit too slow»0 0%
adequate»4 80%
a bit too fast»1 20%
too fast»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

8. To what extent have the lecture notes been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 40%
Large extent»2 40%
Great extent»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- They really need to be renewed.» (Some extent)
- Good guidance, I used the book quite much though.» (Some extent)

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

5 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 60%
Very well»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

Experimental work

10. How well was the experimental work supported by lectures

5 svarande

The lectures were essential for the lab work»5 100%
There is a need form more lectures before starting the lab w»0 0%
One could have managed the lab work wihout lectures»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

11. How well was lab work prepared

5 svarande

It was well prepared»2 40%
There is a need for improvement / please comment»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 1.6

- A classical well-structured lab-pm would be nice.» (There is a need for improvement / please comment)
- The settings on the lab were changed constantly by other groups, it would be nice to have a set up with clearer labels on the connections and a diagram in the lab station for reference» (There is a need for improvement / please comment)
- The lab was very well prepared. Everything was ok but upgrade of abit old and cumbersome software for programming DSP sounds necessary for future.» (There is a need for improvement / please comment)

12. Supervision of the lab work

Could you judge how helpful the supervision has been

5 svarande

very helpful»5 100%
moderate helpful»0 0%
not helpful att all»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

13. Relevance of the lab work

Judge the relevance of the lab work for the overall aims of the courses (see learning outcomes)

5 svarande

low»0 0%
medium»1 20%
high»4 80%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

14. What should be changed in the lab work ?

- would be nice to only use one pc instead of two.»
- My opinion is that the lab work should be less free, more supervised and a lot more effective. It would still convey the knowledge I think, and then more labs could be included covering other aspects of ANC.»
- It might be easier with a friendlier user interface and avoid changing files from one computer to another»
- 1) Upgraded software and equipments 2) More challenging tasks can also be added»

Study climate

15. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help of the professor?

5 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 20%
Very good»4 80%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

16. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help of the course assistent?

5 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 20%
Very good»4 80%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

17. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

5 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 40%
Very well»3 60%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

18. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 60%
High»2 40%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- If I had had 50% time available for the course I think it could have included more work, for example supervised excerices or hand-out assignments.» (Adequate)

19. How was the total workload this study period?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 80%
High»1 20%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

Summarizing questions

20. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 20%
Good»3 60%
Excellent»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Good practice of solving practical problems.» (Adequate)

21. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The lab and lectures»
- Combination of Lab works and lectures»

22. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- the lecture notes»
- Well, the latter part of the course book contains some interesting more advanced topics, some is touched upon in the lectures but not in depth. It would have been interesting to look further on those although maybe it would raise the mathematical level quite a lot...»
- everything is good»
- Upgraded softwares and lecture notes. Lecture notes contained some errors and can be strengthened from academic point of view as well. The last two or three lecture notes were not coherent enough.»

23. Additional comments

- This was among my very few enoying and highly educative courses I have ever had. Combination of lectures with lab works is very efficient and inherently essential idea for teaching ANC concepts.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från