ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Waste management, KBT135

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-01-22 - 2010-06-07
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 20%
Kontaktperson: Stefan Allard»

1. Course material/textbook

We have not found any suitable textbook that covers all areas included in this course (at least not at a reasonable cost). Do you think it is a great disadvantage that there has not been any special textbook?

8 svarande

Yes»4 50%
No»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

- but this is a vast course so one text book can not cover the whole course material, the biggest advantage of having not one text book is that everyone looks different books related to concern topic so got an opportunity to read more.» (Yes)
- It would be nice to at least have a compendium where text from different sources are gathered so that there are at least something to read it one has missed a class or two.» (Yes)
- No special book is needed, but at least upload all material to the webpage.» (No)

2. Several different lecturers were involved in the course. Do you think it is an advantage or a disadvantage if many different specialists are involved in a course? Please motivate!

8 svarande

Advantage»7 87%
Disadvantage»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 1.12

- specialists have industrial experience and it is a good way to learn more about the trend of industrial waste treatment system.» (Advantage)
- Det är både en fördel och nackdel. Det kan bli svårare att få en helhetsbild av kursen men å andra sidan är alla föreläsare mycket kunniga inom just det området som de pratar om. Jag tycker därför att fördelarna överväger.» (Advantage)
- Waste management itself is a multidisciplinary topic and I think that it could not have been covered properly by one person. It was very nice to have introduction lectures of mainly all areas of waste management.» (Advantage)
- It can be an advantage, but then there must be a red line with the lectures. And if several lecturers cover similar facts please use the same terms and stress the same techniques to get a better result from the students.» (Advantage)
- We don"t know what to expect in the exam» (Disadvantage)

3. Should additional teaching/learning activities be included?

The course consisted of a series of lectures, a project work and study visits.
Do you think that any other teaching/learning activities should be included in the course such as tutorial lectures (“,,,räkneövningar”,,, in Swedish), laboratory sessions etc. If you think so please motivate your answer.

8 svarande

Yes»3 37%
No»5 62%

Genomsnitt: 1.62

- maybe practical sections would help students to learn more about a waste management method that they are interested in.» (Yes)

4. Lecture: Ashes (Britt-Marie Steenari)

Please grade the lecture from 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest mark!

7 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 28%
3»1 14%
4»3 42%
5»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

5. Lectures: Waste flows in society (Magdalena Svanström)

Please grade the lecture from 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest mark!

8 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 12%
3»0 0%
4»4 50%
5»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 4.12

6. Lectures: Hydrothermal waste treatment methods (Magdalena Svanström)

Please grade the lecture from 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest mark!

8 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»6 75%
5»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

7. Lecture: Thermal waste treatment methods (Tobias Richards)

Please grade the lecture from 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest mark!

8 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 12%
3»4 50%
4»1 12%
5»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

8. Lecture: Principles of bioremediation (Claes Niklasson)

Please grade the lecture from 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest mark!

7 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 28%
4»3 42%
5»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 4

- but need to elaborate more about lecture content example material balance and some equations where it came and give some practical example with numericals.» (5)

9. Lecture: Material balances for biological methods of handling waste (Claes Niklasson)

Please grade the lecture from 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest mark!

6 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 16%
3»3 50%
4»1 16%
5»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

10. Lecture: Modelling and simple optimization of biological treatment systems (Claes Niklasson)

Please grade the lecture from 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest mark!

6 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 16%
3»3 50%
4»1 16%
5»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- need proper industrial example, and give a reference from where did it take.» (?)

11. Lecture: Recycling of metals (Christian Ekberg)

Please grade the lecture from 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest mark!

8 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»4 50%
4»3 37%
5»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

12. Lecture: Handling of radioactive waste (Christian Ekberg)

Please grade the lecture from 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest mark!

8 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 12%
4»5 62%
5»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 4.12

13. Lecture: Sludge treatment (Harald Brelid)

Please grade the lecture from 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest mark!

7 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»3 42%
4»2 28%
5»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- Alltför mycket information.» (3)

14. Lecture: Recycling of plastics (Anna Jansson)

Please grade the lecture from 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest mark!

8 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 12%
3»0 0%
4»5 62%
5»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 4

15. Lecture: Biological treatment of industrial effluents (Åsa Malmqvist)

Please grade the lecture from 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest mark!

8 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 12%
4»4 50%
5»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

- Covered a lot, and since there is limited reading material to study on afterwards it is a bit hard to take in.» (3)

16. Study visit to Lillesjöverket

Please grade the study visit from 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest mark!

8 svarande

1»1 12%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»2 25%
5»5 62%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

- A good study visit. Good possibilities to be prepared in advance with help of their hompage. » (5)

17. The project

Do you feel the topics offered were relevant? Please grade from 1 to 5, with 1 being very irrelevant and 5 very relevant.

8 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 12%
4»2 25%
5»5 62%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- Good to have a subject that one have to investigate a bit closer.» (5)

18. Project group size

Please indicate the number of project group members you feel makes a good group.

8 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

2»3 37%
3»5 62%
4»5 62%
5»1 12%
6»0 0%
7»0 0%
8»0 0%
9»0 0%
10»0 0%

- Upp till fyra personer går bra, sedan blir det svårare att arbeta tillsammans på ett effektivt och bra sätt.» (2, 3, 4)
- Not more than 4!» (2, 3, 4)

19. Project bonus

Should the project affect the final grading? It can now give you a maximum of 6 points in addition to result of th written exam.

8 svarande

Yes»8 100%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

- Jag tycker helt klart att det ska påverka slutbetyget eftersom det är en så pass stor del av kursen. Om det inte skulle ha betydelse för slutbetyget skulle det inte vara lika motiverande att försöka göra ett så bra arbete som möjligt.» (Yes)
- the project required a significant amount of time and efford therefore i think it is reasonable to get extra points from that.» (Yes)
- One could weight the grade on the report. Etc. 25% of the grade on the report and 75 from the exam.» (Yes)
- 6 points are enough» (Yes)

20. Course administration

Please grade how the course administration and course information has worked, with 1 being terrible and 5 excellent.

8 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»4 50%
4»2 25%
5»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- Viss information kom ut sent, exempelvis för de studiebesök som ställdes in.» (3)
- The power points should be on the home page before the lecture, if the purpose is to learn as much as possible. Another alternative is to always hand out paper-versions in class.» (3)

21. Comments/suggestions in general

Please feel free to make any comments or suggestions relating to this course!

- it was a good course, the lectures were good, and good attempt to cover the basic and important information, but the method of presentation was very good, all teachers were highly co-operative.»
- Bra och rolig kurs som jag är glad att jag valde att läsa!»
- Keep the project. MAKE A COMPENDIUM!!! Try to keep a read line though the entire course and use the same expressions to make the course into one unity.»
- I missed the second study visit...»
- make a easy paper next time»

Kursutvärderingssystem från