Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Visions for future housing and care, AUT162

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-01-13 - 2010-01-22
Antal svar: 31
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 96%
Kontaktperson: Inga Malmqvist»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Goals and fullfilment of goals

The learning outcomes are given in the course programme, that is the knowledge, understanding, skills and perspectives you are expectd to reach. Notify for each outcome how well they have been fulfilled.

1. Learning outcome 1

Design, as a teamworker, a complex of elderly-housing

31 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»1 3%
Sufficient»25 80%
Excellent»5 16%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.12

- it´,s always very good for the architects to cooperate, but in my case it wasn´,t so good to work with my team» (Sufficient)
- I strongly agree that working in group helped us alot to reach most of our concepts and also made us challenge with different ideas and learn alot.» (Excellent)

2. Learning outcome 2

Use the concepts of elderly housing and space for care

31 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»1 3%
Sufficient»18 58%
Excellent»12 38%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- as we are going to need alot this kind of housing in near future I think that kind of study this kind of design will help us to finf sufficient way to reach this goal.» (Sufficient)
- we had contact with real users and people who are dealing with this issue so we could get a lot of useful information.» (Excellent)
- it is great to learn some concepts from literature,from teachers and from communicating with other students.» (Excellent)

3. Learning outcome 3

Take place in a work of programming for space for elderly, combining aspects of spaces for work, care and living

31 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»2 6%
Sufficient»22 70%
Excellent»7 22%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.16

4. Are the aims and goals reasonable in relation to your pre-knowledge ?

31 svarande

No, the goals are to elementar»1 3%
Yes, the goals are reasonable»28 93%
No, the goals are too ambitious»1 3%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2

- what goals?» (No opinion)

5. Are the goals reasonable in relation to the scope and amount of credits?

31 svarande

Too small scope in relation to credits»1 3%
Reasonable scope in relation to credits»29 96%
Too wide scope in relation to credits»0 0%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 1.96

- it is reasonable but more to the small scope. It could be a bit higher goals.» (Reasonable scope in relation to credits)
- mabe could be better to have more time» (Reasonable scope in relation to credits)

Education and course administration

6. What support have you got for your learning from course literature and other material?

31 svarande

Very little»1 3%
Rather little»11 35%
Rather big»17 54%
Very big»2 6%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.64

- I wish we had lectures more focused on the design instead of social aspects. But it was very interesting though to think about the social aspect. » (Rather little)
- It had been better if we would have the seminar earlier in the course, then we had been able to use the knowledge more, the same for lectures, study visits and meetings with people outside.» (Rather big)
- course literature, the study visits and meetings we had were so helpful.I think They should have been concidered as the main ideas for conceptions rather than the workshops. » (Very big)

7. How did the organisation, memoranda, direct information etc. function?

31 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»2 6%
Rather well»21 67%
Very well»8 25%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.19

Work environment

8. How do you rate the possibilities to get assistance and ask questions?

31 svarande

Very bad»1 3%
Rather bad»4 12%
Rather well»15 48%
Very well»11 35%
I have not asked for assistance»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- We had very little working space.» (Very bad)
- Mer är alltid bättre. Förslag för att göra fördelningen av handledning bättre: Sätt upp schema för hela kursens handledningstider redan från början. Det gör det enklare för grupperna att planera och ha med rätt material. Jag som jobbar mycket hemma har ju svårt att motivera resan till Göteborg bara för att skriva upp en tid.» (Rather well)
- The assistance has worked exellent!» (Very well)
- it could be better to have the possibility to meet the teacher some more times» (Very well)

9. How has the cooperation between you and students in your group been?

31 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»4 12%
Rather good»11 35%
Very good»15 48%
I have not tried to cooperate»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 3.41

- Jag upplevde det som att många utbytesstudenter inte hade de kunskaper man kan kräva på masters nivå.» (Rather bad)
- it was quite difficult to work with my group, many times we understud different things from your review and critics and some times they didn´,t want so change some detayls (and more) like you suggest us..» (Rather bad)
- The cooperation in this group certainly presented challenges. However, I felt that the cooperation was “,Rather Good”, because we were able to combine decisions and present a unified front at presentations. I attribute this to the willing cooperation from all members of my group. I was not able to rank the cooperation as being “,Very Good”, because I felt that not all group members contributed critical analysis or sufficient work in the design phase as was agreed between the group. This created an imbalance on the workload, which affected the quality of the overall work. Despite the challenges of the group dynamics that this created it afforded me the opportunity to learn how to work with peoples different working styles, and taught me the practice importance of encouraging each member to take ownership of the project. » (Rather good)

Concluding questions

10. What is your overall opinion of the course?

31 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Passed»3 9%
Good»19 61%
Very good»9 29%

Genomsnitt: 4.19

- To few lectures. Björn was a good to have for consultations. » (Passed)
- Good course on a very interesting subject. Started out in a pace that was too low, but picked up.» (Good)
- The course has a real client and provides the opportunity to deal with a sector that has a great need. There is therefore a great potential to be innovative. The workshops were a good way to introduce us into the design phase and really helped us to think outside the box. » (Good)
- A interesting course that gives the opportunity to really go deep in a subject. A good speed, sometimes to slow in the beginning, it didn"t felt that you as heads of the course thought that we should work in a high speed in the beginning so sometimes when we felt that we were finished with an task we did have 1-2 days more to work on it. soo with a higher speed in the beginning we would have come even more far in the end. » (Very good)
- for me it was a new kind of design,and I have learned alot from it.» (Very good)

11. What should be preserved next year?

- The overall aim, but a little higher tempo in the beginning. »
- the complementary assistance from people of different fields as well as the complementary work that we did work in groups complementary information complementary examples in the reality »
- work in groups complementary information as well as complementary visits for our knowledge»
- working with students of other countries»
- Study visits, mid-crits, jan paulsson ..»
- Workshops, but more intense. Instead of one week between just one day so that there will be more time for the project or lectures.»
- The over all layout with workshops in the beginning and more focus on the project in the second part of the course.»
- Bigger studio ! (really important), more computers for teams, more consultations.»
- Everything should be preserved. »
- The task, with a real "orderer" and to work with new things in the research area of elderly and care.»
- I think it would be better to start with the literature sooner,and spend less time on obstructions and start the design a little bit sooner so that students be able to reach more details in their designs.»
- The meetings with the people in charge with elderly housing and consulting with them which helps us with our future, professional life.»
- special design for elderly people, the workshop.»
- the method of workshops»
- study visits»
- The pace of the course. The slow pace made it possible for reflexion and to not haste the project.»
- studytrip visit of the place where to project meeting with expert»
- The study visits,trips and meetings»
- The amount of students was good: not as many as the matter space studio. It created a good atmosphere and team spirit.»

12. What shuold be changed the nest year?

- more lectures and a better planed study trip.»
- work in groups but with some individual visions of each student less workshop at the begining more than one mid-critic before the final critic»
- Gör klart redan från början att man får inhämta stor del av kunskapen själv, annars blir det för lite arbete första veckorna innan folk börjar förstå att det inte blir några föreläsningar. Inledande workshop: För mycket tid lades på att tex grupperna skulle bygga varsin landskapsmodell. Hade räckt med 1 eller 2 för hela studion. Kritikgenomförandet: -Elevkritik saknades! Den är viktig för att få en diskussion i gruppen. - Dela upp kritiken på två dagar, den måste få ta tid, det är jätteviktigt.»
- some indivudual work as a complement more than one critic before the final critic »
- nothing»
- Let the workshops be a starting point that craves a higher pace from start to finish.»
- Studytrip was very bad, it didn"t have anything to do with the subject and we didn"t enter more than one project. Fedrik didn"t know anything about the projects either. We could just as well look at pictures. »
- More lectures or study visits in the beginning. The study trip should include the possibility to enter the buildings that are visited. More divided consultation between all teachers.»
- the time for the workshops took too long, it would be better to have more time fore the process itself.»
- The workshops could include more in-depth analysis of the programs to be included in the group projects much earlier on, so that the volumetric proposals are more realistic and better considered in terms of the program needed. The “,Literature Review”, and “,Care-Taker’,s Visit”, could be arranged earlier in the term so that they are more influential throughout the design phase. The assessment could also include peer-assessments to give a better reflection of the group dynamics and overall participation. »
- have the seminar, all study visits, lectures in the beginning when we had the time and it"s much more better to have all the knowledge before you start to really go deep in the task.»
- maybe just a bigger place for work!»
- We didn"t get any comments from them in the external presentation. It would be nice for us to know their opinion about the final results of our project.»
- Maybe the studio room. there seemed to few computers there.»
- More lectures and study visits that show us more exampels of senior housing project.»
- Maby some more lectures. Maby a (geriatriker) or a rapport from Ingas trip to a the Japanese conference on housing for elderly or some one that knows something on lifestyles of the people born in the 40-ties.»
- more references, more mid-critics»
- more review for more suggestions from the teacher mabe dedicate less time for the first workshops»
- The program for the first 3 weeks »
- The place of studio shoud change: it´,s tto small and we don´,t get any fresh air.»

13. Other comments

- I lack some consistency in the opinions in the critics and the consultations, seemed to change from time to time.»
- It has been a great experience»
- - Jag tycker alldeles för mycket energi lades på sidoprogrammen, både från studenternas och kritikernas sida. Det är en helt felaktig prioritering tycker jag. Tyngdpunkten borde väl ändå vara kvaliteten på boendemiljön i sig, alltså lägenheterna, utemiljön och kommunikationen däremellan. Många lägenheter uppfyllde ju exempelvis inte ens baskravet på en tillgänglig toalett! »
- it has been a great experience»
- Mid-crits good timing.»
- about the study visit to copenhagen, it would be fun for all swedish student not to go to copenhagen, because we have been there for 3 times before. otherwise we want to go inside the buildings and see plans of apartmewnts etc.»
- I want to thank our teachers in this course who support and help us the most with their critics and I learned alot from consulting with them in different aspects of designing housing for elderly.»
- the study trips were great.»
- hopefully chalmers would have a bigger architectural book collection in the library»
- Perhaps it is better if the groups are selected by the teachers at the begining of the semester when the students do not know each other. Thanks a lot»

Kursutvärderingssystem från