|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Engineering Ceramics, KKE 012Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2007-12-05 - 2008-01-17 Antal svar: 6 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 28% Kontaktperson: Elis Carlström»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.83 - The lectures hours were not evenly distributed in the quarter and the volume intended to be taught was abnormal. You didn"t mention the ones from other major who dind"t have Ceramics basis thogh were to handle all the the information in just 7 weeks. All the ceramics in 7 weeks !!!» (At least 35 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.5 - According to the exam taken, it made no difference whether I took part all or part of lectures as some of my clasemates did.» (100%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.66 - Lecturers were kind of scientists on behalf of supreme leading research center in Sweden and they surveyed all the data to be taught at least hundreds of times in advance. Niether me nor any other one can expect you to put yourself as a teacher in our sight and teach in a way we can digest the matter.» (The goals are difficult to understand) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.5 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.8 - As it is stated above, lectures were about interesting points of ceramics but axam was about beans and carrots...!!!» (No, the goals are set too low) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.83 - There were very interesting points about ceramins. I wonder how come dear examiner didn"t evaluate us about the main point we should know and entered into non-important details rather than key issues.» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.16 - Thanks the lecturers who provided us with the book. else we really could understand nothing.» (Some extent) 7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.66 - But for grasping what is happening, it takes tens of hours to read the book around just one specific subject.» (Great extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - Some handouts neither had explanation nor had any sourse to refer to. But there were questions in examination from the depth of them.» (Rather well) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.33 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - In later days of the lecture there were vast segregation among students. The most amazing one was not sitting genders both with together !! It didn"t bother me at all but it can be a good mean of judgment!!» (Very poorly) 11. How was the course workload?6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.66 - The more we studied, the less we grasp the points!!» (Too high) 12. How was the total workload this study period?6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - Mainly the bad distribution of lectures exceeded the due weight.» (High) Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.16 - The course provided a very good overview of ceramics used for engineering purpose. The scope covered is quite broad and we had to consider how deep we should go into a specific topic. So, it becomes a little stressful sometimes, but generally the stress helps in the learning process :)» (Excellent) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Laborations vere very rewarding»- Appart from labs, lectures should totaly be revised.» - The labs, they are fantastic!» - The ratio laborations/lectures. Many teachers.» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Schedule, Handouts, Set of workload»- The part about surface chemistry and rheology is a bit difficult to understand without literature.» 16. Additional comments- Excellent course, I very much liked it»- In my opinion, surveying all these data in this short period of time were of a good experience, but the last irrelevant questions in exam were totally made the hard reader inconvenient.» - Nice coffee!» - A great course!»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%