ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

TEK285 2009, TEK285

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-01-12 - 2010-01-31
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 21%
Kontaktperson: Andreas Hagen»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Klass: Övriga

1. How many percent of the lectures did you attend?*

13 svarande

<25%»0 0%
25-50%»1 7%
50-75%»5 38%
>75%»7 53%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

2. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?*

13 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»6 46%
Very well»7 53%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

3. How demanding was the course?*

13 svarande

Not at all demanding»0 0%
Slightly demanding»3 23%
Quite demanding»5 38%
Demanding»5 38%
Very demanding»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

- Demanding but not to much. I like som workload» (Quite demanding)
- It was a rather good work load throughout the course. One good thing is that we, as students, got to choose our own subjects in the written report. It made more interesting.» (Demanding)

4. Did you buy the course book?*

13 svarande

Yes»9 69%
No, too expensive»3 23%
No, other reason»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 1.38

- One of the best coursebooks i have bought, easy to read and alot of good/usable information!» (Yes)
- Very good course book, I can recommend you to keep it. However, I only bought the "main" book.» (Yes)
- Used different e-books» (No, other reason)

5. How much of the recommended chapters in the book have you read?*

13 svarande

0-25%»1 7%
25-50%»1 7%
50-75%»3 23%
75-100%»8 61%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

- You dident need it but it gave a deeper understanding» (75-100%)

6. How would you rate the book?*

13 svarande

Poorly written»0 0%
OK»5 38%
Well written»8 61%

Genomsnitt: 2.61

- Boken är direktöversatt från svenska och det finns gott om svenska böcker på andrahandsmarknaden. Den svenska boken används i andra logistikkurser på chalmers. Det finns även ett par räknefel i den engelska boken som är rättade i den svenska. Hade jag känt till att det fanns en svenskversion tidigare (tex på kurshemsidan) hade det blivit ett par sparade kronor. » (OK)

7. How useful were the lecture notes? (slide handouts)*

13 svarande

Did not use them»0 0%
Useless»1 7%
Somewhat useful»1 7%
Good to have them»5 38%
Very useful»6 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.23

- Good but should be more descriptive text.» (Good to have them)
- The most importet to pass the exam» (Very useful)

8. On average, how would you rate the amount of material covered in one lecture?*

13 svarande

Boringly little»0 0%
OK but more could be added»1 7%
Just about right on average»8 61%
OK but some could be removed»4 30%
Way too much to absorb per lecture»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

9. How would you rate the lectures?*

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Good»4 30%
Very good»6 46%
Excellent»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

10. How would you rate the Beer Game Workshop exercise?*

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Good»3 23%
Very good»6 46%
Excellent»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 4.07

11. How would you rate the group project assignment?*

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 15%
Good»3 23%
Very good»8 61%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

- There could be more suggested subjects on the project description paper for the students to give more insight about what can be studied as a project.» (Very good)
- It was good that we could select our own topic» (Very good)

12. How would you rate the consultation/supervision for your group project assignment?*

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 15%
Good»5 38%
Very good»6 46%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- Maybe you next year culd book times throug the homepage to make even better» (Good)

13. In general, how do feel about the availability of teachers?*

Do you feel that you could ask questions et cetera

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Good»4 30%
Very good»8 61%
Excellent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

14. Did the exam reflect the course in a fair way?*

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Good»1 7%
Very good»8 61%
Excellent»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 4.23

- I feel like there could have been a few more challenging questions.» (Very good)

15. What is your general impression of the course?*

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Good»2 15%
Very good»9 69%
Excellent»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 4

16. How would you rate Gunnar Stefanssons efforts in the course?*

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Good»2 15%
Very good»7 53%
Excellent»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 4.15

17. How would you rate Kenth Lumsdens efforts in the course?*

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 7%
Good»4 30%
Very good»6 46%
Excellent»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.69

18. How would you rate Andreas Hagens efforts in the course?*

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Good»3 23%
Very good»7 53%
Excellent»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 4

19. How would you rate Roger Lindaus efforts in the course?*

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Good»5 38%
Very good»7 53%
Excellent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.69

- unfortunately I cannot recall who hi is» (Good)
- He talked mostly about his experiences, which was interesting to listen to but not good in order to absorb information to the exam!» (Very good)

20. Other comments/suggestions for how the course can be improved?*

- Overall, the course met my expectations.»
- Guide the choice of project assignements so that it reflects the current market in logistics in some way!»
- no»
- It was not a bad course and is useful for people who want to have some knowledge about logistics and supply chain management»
- Improving the slides.»
- Good comprehensive course in logistics. Maybe visiting a company in the region would be nice.»
- I think a few more lectures concerning with computations and mathematical analysis about logistics would improve the course»
- You could in the last week have a FAQ lecture»
- Nothing further to add since I enjoyed the course it was interesting and well structured. Good grading system (exam + report = final grade).»
- In general the course was very good, and thee information learned seem to be appropriate. However, I think the information presented during lectures could have been structured in a way that made easier to follow. »
- Great course, I loved it and put a lot of effort. However, I got 4. I"ve never put as much effort in any other course as I have here because I loved it and I was hoping to get 5 because we did way too much work as needed in the project and I took all possible notes in the class, studied them before the exam, felt great after the exam, but I got 4... Very dissapointed... That is my "other comment"... Donatas Siaudinis»
- More content can be added, as I think student taking this course as a minor subject want know more about the field at least to understand the way SCM peoples solve a problem.»
- .»

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från