Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Design of Technological Innovations and Markets, CIP010

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-01-07 - 2010-02-01
Antal svar: 20
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 40%
Kontaktperson: Annica Eijlinder»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

20 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»3 15%
Around 25 hours/week»6 30%
Around 30 hours/week»3 15%
At least 35 hours/week»8 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- Hard to split TBE DTIM due to BCL covering both, but the weeks themed by the different courses can still be seen as often more than double this amount. somewhere between 70-80 hours the later half of the fall.» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

20 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»5 25%
100%»15 75%

Genomsnitt: 4.75

- Sick a few lessons» (75%)
- Too much focus on Iphone case and other less important things instead of covering concepts and theories from the literature, why should we have it if the lecturer wont use it anyways?» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

20 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 10%
The goals are difficult to understand»5 25%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»7 35%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»6 30%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- The lectures supported the goals of the course but the main course litterature didn"t which caused some inconvenience when studying for the exam.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

17 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 5%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»15 88%
No, the goals are set too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2

- see above» (?)
- The number of credits was separated in to two different parts which was not made clear enough in the beginning of the semester. Since the lectures and in large extent the course litterature corresponded to the goals I would say the goals were fair.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

20 svarande

No, not at all»1 5%
To some extent»13 65%
Yes, definitely»3 15%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- I don"t think that the exam covered what I felt was most important in the course, some of the questions asked about things that Mats never mentioned on the lectures» (To some extent)
- The time of the exam felt very limited and did not give a sufficient amount of time to deliver. The TEVA analysis was perhaps a to big part of the final grade.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»4 20%
Some extent»6 30%
Large extent»6 30%
Great extent»4 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Since most of the things that were suppose to be on the exam, were not covered by the lectures...» (Small extent)
- Very very very basic. To my previous 3 years of ind ek almost nothing has been added.» (Small extent)
- Mats is a very inspiring lecturer who (most of the time) structure his lectures inline with the rest of the course material. I am very satisfied with this part.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»2 10%
Some extent»7 35%
Large extent»8 40%
Great extent»3 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- There is none, only vaguely relevant slides. And a crappy book with alot of text, but no substance. » (Small extent)
- The book was confusing as it didn"t correspond well to the course criteria. » (Small extent)
- The book is not very well written.....» (Large extent)

8. Where did you get the course book?

19 svarande

Cremona»10 52%
Library»1 5%
Other»7 36%
Didn"t get the course book»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 1.94

- Book was expensive. A compendium could have been provided as it was done for the IP course. That was really helpful and not expensive to purchase.» (Library)
- cheapest site online» (Other)
- .PDF» (Other)
- Online» (Other)
- Dowloaded on the net» (Other)
- Internet» (Other)

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

20 svarande

Very badly»3 15%
Rather badly»2 10%
Rather well»12 60%
Very well»3 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- information was sometime in the form of "oral information" during lectures, this information was sometimes not posted anywhere else. The Gul system is crap, information is split between too many places with too little information which means that to find something can take 20 downloads before the right document is found.» (Very badly)
- Gul is a terrible interface. Why can"t the normal student.chalmers.se interface be used?» (Very badly)
- There has been regular feed-back sessions which i have appriciated a lot since they give an opportunity to reflect in a good way. » (Rather well)

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

20 svarande

Very poor»1 5%
Rather poor»3 15%
Rather good»4 20%
Very good»11 55%
I did not seek help»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- The only reasonable way of getting information was to call or talk personally to teachers, then spread the information to the class. Otherwise some 10 min counseling with people who did not know what the hand-ins were about. » (Very poor)
- Group work, consultations etc. Very good follow up.» (Very good)

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

20 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»5 25%
Very well»15 75%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- Some students are extremely talented and work hard, some are not, and does not. Maybe some counseling to groups to see problems and counter them would help.» (Rather well)

12. How was the course workload?

20 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 25%
High»14 70%
Too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- It was very intense for the short period of time when the course elapsed.» (High)

13. How was the total workload this study period?

20 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 15%
High»15 75%
Too high»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.95

- The hours it took are really many, private life, you can forget it. Although its worth it.» (High)
- I think the workload should be high to learn more, however the stress factor does not lie in the time of the examination but rather 1-2 weeks before. Not week 48.» (High)

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

20 svarande

Poor»2 10%
Fair»2 10%
Adequate»1 5%
Good»13 65%
Excellent»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- I sometimes felt like im not working to learn alot but working to work alot» (Fair)
- It would have been excellent with a better (or no) course book. » (Good)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Iphone case (or similar)»
- the business model week, Mats funny lectures»
- Financial Evaluation part and Case study (spotify)»
- Many short hand-ins. Some uncertainty in the cases. »
- Hand-ins, cases»
- The way of choosing relevant and urgent topics as Spotify, Cellphones and so on.»
- The business model part. I learnt a lot at those lectures.»
- The case study approach can be preserved.»
- TEVA analysis in group.»
- Anders Sundelin"s lectures on business models and Tamir"s part on finance. »

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The amount of time spent on the iphone case»
- The focus of the lectures, focus more on the concepts if they are gonna use the book at all..»
- Literature, instructors! »
- The organization of the BCL is severely lacking. No-one sees the whole picture, and no one knows what the others do. From an institution that teaches management it is quite peculiar. Also early on decide from what perspective hand-ins should be written from. This was confusing from day one until final hand-in. »
- Administration and clarity of what is included in the course.»
- be clear about what case belongs to what course»
- The Spotify-case! Spending several weeks on Google trying to find out how spotify works did not teach us very much about business modelling and the actual assignment was done in last minute. Would have been better with a clear case where we had the possibility to find the information quickly and then to be able to focus on building the model. This way we also had very small chances to work on the business model for the business plan. Change the exam! This one did not feel like it was mirroring either the focus of the lectures or the book!!»
- I think that it is better if we work on doing business model for the cases in the TBE course, even if I liked the Spotify thing. Many people had very little time to create the business models and financing parts that were needed for the business plan presentations.»
- A compendium could be provided with some cases and explanation on each topic. The compendium can include content on the topics that were taught by Anders and which were not in the textbook, though it was in Anders blog.»
- Make sure that the TEVA works on the cases. I am not sure that TEVA works good on biotech (Genetic Engineering) cases.»
- The book should be changed or entirely removed. I missed a finance section on the exam. »
- Examination and lectures. Have lectures that add to the book. Also, make an assignment connected to te course.»

17. Additional comments

- The most interesting course so far! »
- Interesting course»
- A good and very interesting course!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från