Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Valuation and Entrepreneurial Financing, CIP041

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-01-07 - 2010-02-01
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 36%
Kontaktperson: Annica Eijlinder»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»7 63%
Around 20 hours/week»2 18%
Around 25 hours/week»2 18%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.54

- We have been having foour courses and a project in parallell these two study periods.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- Remember, the course spans the whole semester.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- Very uneven effort. Initially, mostly classes and reading articles. Later, VEF assignment and exam increased the load a lot.» (Around 20 hours/week)
- The work load was very varying, some weeks we worked 70-80hours, others only a few» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 18%
100%»9 81%

Genomsnitt: 4.81

- Didn"t really benefit from a single lecture! Worst teacher ever! » (100%)
- I attended all scheduled sessions. In retrospect, however, I"d learned more by reading since the student lectures didn"t teach me anything.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 9%
The goals are difficult to understand»3 27%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 54%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.63

- seemed like a very numeric course but it involved a lot of theory on strategy and management.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

11 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»2 18%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 81%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.81

- The course did not help meeting the goals. The goals are on OK level, but the classes were far to basic. » (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
- The problem is that the class has very various background and levels of knowledge. No one had grip of this course and it became rather messy» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all»2 18%
To some extent»7 63%
Yes, definitely»1 9%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.09

- The VEF assignment was OK and I guess the exam tested the use of economic terminology. I miss, though, practical things such as product calculations, investments analysis, ratio analysis.» (To some extent)
- The exam was not about finacing I would say. It became more of a "cramp info into your head" of learning. The terminolgy I got but corportae finacing is still vague.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»9 81%
Some extent»2 18%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.18

- To small extent. (1) Content too basic. (2) Content focused on B2C, not B2B. (3) Not adapted to startup settings. (4) Have professional lecturers. Students shall not lead lectures. Especially students with no background in the topics. » (Small extent)
- The idea with leeting us teach eachother did not work that well. Tou learnt your own part but what you got from others lectures was really varying.» (Small extent)
- Students having the lectures is not good. How shall I, with a bachelor in Business Administration and 3 years in the I-department have any confidence in GIBBS-student holding lectures??? » (Small extent)
- the students was responsible for most clases. this did not work well becuase we did not know what to teach our class mates. better to bring in external lecturere.» (Small extent)
- We had to do the teaching, which was very... weird.» (Small extent)
- good frameworks.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»4 36%
Some extent»5 45%
Large extent»2 18%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.81

- Having students with low level of knowledge teaching is a bad idea» (Small extent)
- too many articles that overlap each other and in some cases, even contradict each other.» (Some extent)
- Too basic books. They are on Företagsekonomi A level, not master"s level. Regarding the articles, a few on business models and pricing were OK, many, especially, business processes gave nothing at all. » (Some extent)
- But it was hard to understand what to learn and how they all were connected» (Some extent)
- The reading of all material before the exam was where the big learnig chunk was.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»7 63%
Rather badly»1 9%
Rather well»3 27%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.63

- No course web site. Different students e-mailed out the material to the class mates. No electronic course syllabus.» (Very badly)
- No course web page.» (Very badly)
- We didn´,t have a web page, no handouts neither since the students held all the lectures.» (Very badly)
- from the start it was good, but it failed in the end of the courese» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»1 9%
Rather poor»1 9%
Rather good»7 63%
Very good»2 18%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- Help was given but ingen vilja att ändra upplägg efter kritik från i princip hela klassen» (Rather good)
- Kaj was always very willing to provide consultancy on any matter. I appreciate this very much!» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»4 36%
Very well»7 63%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

11. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 9%
High»5 45%
Too high»5 45%

Genomsnitt: 4.36

- very very cyclical, not well balanced» (High)
- I read all the literature, so the work load was high compared to the other courses. However, the work effort was spent on non-rewarding things.» (High)
- Thyis was the most heavy course with both lecturs, exam and assgnmnets. We are under a heavy workload this semester due to project running in parallell.» (High)
- A lot to do and study. Not in par with the other courses during this semester.» (High)
- the assignment was too long. It took more time than the Business Plan. In contrast with the other courses it contained too much workload, having a long assignment and an exam, while developing the projects.» (Too high)
- Assignment and exam is too much.» (Too high)
- Too much with a big assignment, have a lecture and an exam» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
High»5 45%
Too high»6 54%

Genomsnitt: 4.54

- A lot of time was spent on the project as well.» (High)
- See answer on NVF evaluation.» (Too high)
- Too high if we should have any chance to work with our projects.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»7 63%
Fair»2 18%
Adequate»2 18%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.54

- Everything was repetition. It was frustrating. Only the VEF assignment was good.» (Poor)
- It was messy and felt far from our project with exception for the assignment that was directly applicable in our team.» (Poor)
- I don´,t see that students with no background knowledge have enough knowledge in order to hold seminars for the other students at a master level. That heavily decreased the learning outcome from the course.» (Poor)
- Content OK. Lectures no help. Strange assignment. Strange exam. » (Fair)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- None that I know of except for the course contents which also need refinement! »
- the frameworks presented. The good guests.»
- Teacher but let him teach»
- VEF assignment.»
- The business game that we played was very good and gave a lot.»
- Nothing actually.»
- the topics presented in the course»
- No idea.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The course leader Mr. Kaj needs to be replaced! Course contents »
- The workload.»
- The students should not be responsible for the lectures»
- Structure, learning experience and balance the workload»
- (1) Course content: more entrepreneurial finance (2) Education level: GIBBS/CSE are master"s level business educations, so the classes need to meet this. Everything was repetition from BSc studies and the first fall (Business Creation Lab) of GIBBS/CSE. (3) Lecturer: Have a lecturer that knows entreprenurial finance, can speak good English. (4) Literature: Have a real text book, not a "Finance for dummies". Skip all the articles or choose good applicable ones, e.g. Harvard Business Review articles (Osterwalder was good). (5) More applicable, less academic. This should be a quantitative course were we do calculations etc, not write references to millions of articles. Benchmark with the other parallel courses.»
- students having the leactures! A seminar or two maybe but not to this extent.»
- Student holding lectures, the assignment (clarify!), the exam (or the whole examination). »
- The way of having the lectures. This year the students were responsible for having the lectures but for us who do not know much in the subject, the lectures did not give as much as if the teacher would have had them.»
- Kaj Sunesson, the extent of the assignment and students holding seminars.»
- the students should not be responsible for the classes»
- The lecuturing and examination.»

16. Additional comments

- The course leader Mr. Kaj needs to be replaced! I have no doubt that everyone at CSE & GIBBS already knows this! »
- Thank you.»
- Not a very good organized course.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från