ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

New Venture Formation, CIP036

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-01-07 - 2010-02-01
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 33%
Kontaktperson: Annica Eijlinder»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

10 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»8 80%
Around 20 hours/week»2 20%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.2

- We have been having four courses and a project in parallell.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- Remember that this course took place over a whole semester» (At most 15 hours/week)
- Much less than 15 hours per week» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 10%
100%»9 90%

Genomsnitt: 4.9

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

10 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 10%
The goals are difficult to understand»3 30%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 40%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.7

- there was no e-format of the course PM» (The goals are difficult to understand)
- There are no goals in the syllabus, only purpose.» (The goals are difficult to understand)
- should be more clear for each part of the course» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 11%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»8 88%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.88

- not very familiar with the course"s goals» (No, the goals are set too low)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

10 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»8 80%
Yes, definitely»2 20%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»1 10%
Some extent»6 60%
Large extent»3 30%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

- good from a legal perspective» (Some extent)
- Teaching has been very limited, mostly case work. Good to learning by doing though.» (Some extent)
- I want more teaching from Lars. I understand the value of us searching knowledge, but every time Lars has an introduction I think he has a lot of interesting knowledge to share.» (Some extent)
- But a lot of the classes was not correlated to the expected learning» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»4 44%
Some extent»4 44%
Large extent»1 11%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.66

- There has been no course literature, unfortunately.» (Small extent)
- No course literature.» (Small extent)
- same legal perspective» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

10 svarande

Very badly»3 30%
Rather badly»7 70%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.7

- No course web site, no administrator, material sent out by different people, etc.» (Very badly)
- No course web page. » (Very badly)
- hard to understand assignments, needed too much consulting.» (Rather badly)
- Bangkok - Sweden is a long distance which resulted in problems.» (Rather badly)
- miscommunications and too late administration of information» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»3 30%
Rather good»5 50%
Very good»2 20%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- every question mainly had to be done through email and it was not that effective because the questions needed better explanation. » (Rather poor)
- The lecturer answered email in a good way, but harder to get access to him.» (Rather good)
- Lars is knowledgeable when you can get hold of him» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

10 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 10%
Very well»9 90%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

11. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 10%
Adequate»9 90%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- The course with the lowest work amount during the fall. This is good in a way since it gives you more time for the project.» (Low)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
High»4 40%
Too high»6 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

- The CSE-management must think about what signals this education sends to the students. It is easy to get the feeling that to be a successful entrepreneur you need to work 200%. I do not believe this to be true so I don"t like it. You are burning some students from the entrepreneurial way of living because of this. I understand that the balance btw courses and the project is a difficult one and under the present structure the only solution I see is to integrate the courses more into the projects. Make the courses more flexible with deadlines etc so students can choose when to do them so it suits the project.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»3 30%
Adequate»3 30%
Good»3 30%
Excellent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- Improve explanation of the course"s objectives. Do not have lectures that are overlapping with last year"s courses (e.g. incorporating legal firms).» (Fair)
- Not much learníng going on here. At the same time, there is no room to increase the work-load during this semester.» (Fair)
- Good content and focus of the course on producing useful documents.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Experiential learning approach and the knowledge which is practical. The way course has been structured is pretty good, it just needs some more attention from Lars.»
- the legal approach.»
- The subjects and the overall structure should be kept,»
- Learning by doing, i.e. producing useful documents and checklists.»
- The small individual sessions with the course leader, he taught us more in 10 minutes about things relevant to out projects than the lecturer in 2 hours»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Lecture on AB, the limited company, six times in this education is not fun! Please change it if possible!»
- the way the assignments are handed out and explained, to a way that they can bring more reward to the projects.»
- The information flow and the communication regarding teaching methology»
- Add some course literature. It is nice to have some reference material to use after the course has ended. Improve the teaching part so we learn (new) things.»
- Lars. Motivation beats qualifications. Lars is very competent but should not be allowed to do this course half-heartedly from a distance. Maybe keep him as senior advisor or take him in for some lectures or whatever, but not as responsible for course.»
- The course leader needs to be present at the lectures in order to guide the lecturer. the communication about what to talk about was not good.»

16. Additional comments

- Great course in general, needs more effort from faculty to execute it though!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från