Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Course Evaluation Materials Selection and Design 2009/2010, MMK221

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-12-23 - 2010-01-15
Antal svar: 18
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 21%
Kontaktperson: Lars Nyborg»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

18 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 22%
Around 20 hours/week»6 33%
Around 25 hours/week»5 27%
Around 30 hours/week»2 11%
At least 35 hours/week»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.44

- in my idea this course was too time consuming» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

18 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»5 27%
75%»6 33%
100%»7 38%

Genomsnitt: 4.11

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

18 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 5%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 5%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 33%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 55%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

17 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 5%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»15 88%
No, the goals are set too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

17 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»11 64%
Yes, definitely»5 29%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.41

- Some of the questions on the exam was very ambiguous formulated, very bad!» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»8 44%
Large extent»9 50%
Great extent»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.61

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 22%
Large extent»6 33%
Great extent»8 44%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

- the recommended exercises» (Great extent)
- The slides made by some external source were very clear and pedagogical.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

18 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 11%
Rather well»6 33%
Very well»10 55%

Genomsnitt: 3.44

- I did not like the way how you could register for the group work. E.g: we already formed a group of 6 people, but when the last two wanted to register, unknown people had already registered in our group and we had to write mails to create the group we wanted!!! Would have been easier if for example one could create the group for all 6 people at the same time...» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

18 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 5%
Rather good»4 22%
Very good»11 61%
I did not seek help»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

18 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 11%
Very well»16 88%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

11. How was the course workload?

18 svarande

Too low»1 5%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»12 66%
High»4 22%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

12. How was the total workload this study period?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 11%
Adequate»11 61%
High»3 16%
Too high»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

18 svarande

Poor»2 11%
Fair»2 11%
Adequate»3 16%
Good»10 55%
Excellent»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- recommended exercises»
- group work and knowing about material properties»
- harder and harder»
- All of it.»
- No»
- all the stuff»
- The case study is very important»
- working in projects»
- The external slides»
- project assignment»
- intensive lectures»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- some of the lectures are not really needed, specially in the begining of the course»
- I think different majors should be seprated as they have different background and expectation,»
- study method»
- No»
- nothing»
- repeting over and over again, teh same things.»
- All other written material. It is poorly and wrongly written, both conent- and language wise. They contain numerous errors. The content of the course is poor. »
- see question no. 8»

16. Additional comments

- More time should be given to the topic of multiple constraints/conflicting objectives.»
- No»

17. What is opinion about CES as a tool in education?

- it was helpful in the projects»
- It was a helpful program »
- very good»
- CES software was so helpful for improving learning of course content.»
- Good experience.Can be very useful in professional environment.»
- No»
- it really helped in understanding the different concepts.very useful tool»
- This softwere is very good tool for the education»
- good, versatile tool»
- It is a good software that probibaly is useful to a larger extent than was shown in the course.»
- I did not really use it, but it seems to be a nice tool for business. don"t think that it is that reasonable for education...»

18. What is your opinion about the project assignment?

- everything was good about it»
- It was good to work with others and learn more about the course. Also, learning lessons more practically»
- good»
- project assignment was based on team working and was very helpful for learning the details of course.»
- Great experience to work with project mates.Learn a lot about how to work in group with people of different qualities.It was helpful in learning CES.»
- No»
- project assignments are really good. helped a lot in improving communication between the students and also how to apply the concepts in practical field»
- to some extent reasonable, but could have been better»
- A more complex project that better shows the benefits of the software and thrills your creativity would improve the course. Perhaps using the students different skills and background.»
- very good »
- Good way of learning by our own and reviewing the course.»
- nice!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från