Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Engineering Metals 2009/2010, MMK231

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-12-23 - 2010-01-15
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 20%
Kontaktperson: Lars Nyborg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

10 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 20%
Around 20 hours/week»4 40%
Around 25 hours/week»1 10%
Around 30 hours/week»3 30%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 10%
50%»0 0%
75%»4 40%
100%»5 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.3

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

10 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 10%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 40%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 11%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 77%
No, the goals are set too high»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

10 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»6 60%
Yes, definitely»4 40%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- Most questions were identical to the collection of questions handed out and previous exams» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 10%
Large extent»8 80%
Great extent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I got a lot of help from the help teachers on heat treatment, but I did not attend their class hours as there was a lot of noise in the classroom. I had to go ask them at their office instead» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»1 10%
Some extent»1 10%
Large extent»7 70%
Great extent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- I needed to search for supplementary litterature to understand the course» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

9 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»6 66%
Very well»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 10%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»8 80%
I did not seek help»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- Helpful teachers» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

10 svarande

Very poorly»1 10%
Rather poorly»2 20%
Rather well»1 10%
Very well»6 60%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- I was not in the master programme "advanced engineering materials" and felt underpriortied at some points because of this» (Rather poorly)

11. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 10%
Adequate»4 40%
High»5 50%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

12. How was the total workload this study period?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 50%
High»4 40%
Too high»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 30%
Good»7 70%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- study harder and harder»
- Anything should remain in the course but it should be decided whether oxidation and corrosion remain in metals course or in failure analysis course.These topics should be dealt with in any one course in detail.»
- No»
- The exercices during the lectures were very efficient»
- the practical class, although the questions have to be formulated clearer (sometimes the expected answer didn"t fit that well to the question)»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- confidence»
- Same answer as for 14.»
- No»

16. Additional comments

- No»

17. What is your opinion about the practical class on heat treatment?

10 svarande

less good»3 30%
fair»1 10%
good»5 50%
very good»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- noisy» (less good)
- It could have proved much more fruitful if the Phd student were much sure and learned about there answers.» (good)

18. What is your opinion about the practical class on JMatPro simulation

10 svarande

less good»0 0%
fair»1 10%
good»5 50%
very good»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- time for discussion» (very good)

Kursutvärderingssystem från