ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPSTR-Heat and moisture engineering, BOM080

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-12-19 - 2010-01-31
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 21%
Kontaktperson: Björn Engström»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Väg- och vattenbyggnad 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time per week over the entire study period.

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 35%
Around 20 hours/week»6 42%
Around 25 hours/week»3 21%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

- En extremt oinspirerande kurs, med katastrofalt dåligt upplägg, som till större delen var rak upprepning av tidigare kurser. Man har blivit deprimerad och mörkrädd av att gå kurserna den här terminen. Hade man vetat om att det skulle vara så värdelös kunde man planerat för det och anmält sig till andra kurser att gå samtidigt, men nu var det en förlorad läsperiod. Så här långt in på mastersutbildningen skäms man över att gå den.» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

14 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 7%
50%»3 21%
75%»6 42%
100%»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

- Mådde dåligt av att gå på föreläsningarna men man måste ju hålla lite koll på vad som tas upp.» (25%)
- The lectures were not very organized. Different teachers said the same things on their lectures, possibly a communication issue between the teachers?» (50%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. To what extent did you reach the following goal?

After the course the student should be able to evaluate heat and moisture conditions in air and materials with varying boundary conditions.

- Ok»
- I feel that I have adequately reached this goal. I can comfortably execute the heat and moisture evaluation methods presented in the course. »
- Goal reached (but mostly thanks to the fem course).»
- i generally understand the topic and i feel able to solve the problems concerned the mentioned phenomena.»
- To some extent»
- Good»
- About 25%»

4. To what extent did you reach the follwoing goal?

After the course the student should be able to determine and evaluate heat and moisture distributions in building materials exposed to different environments.

14 svarande

0-20%»0 0%
20-40%»1 7%
40-60%»1 7%
60-80%»8 57%
80-100%»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 4.07

5. To what extent did you reach the follwoing goal?

After the course the student should be able to critically evaluate different building materials and combinations of materials for their functional properties with regard to exposure of heat and moisture, including influence from degradation mechanisms.

14 svarande

0-20%»0 0%
20-40%»2 14%
40-60%»2 14%
60-80%»5 35%
80-100%»5 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

- Hade ju nått målen lika bra utan kursen....» (80-100%)

6. To what extent did you reach the following goal?

After the course the student should be able to design structures with respect to exposure for heat and moisture.

14 svarande

0-20%»0 0%
20-40%»3 21%
40-60%»1 7%
60-80%»7 50%
80-100%»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

7. To what extent have you reached the following goal?

After the course the student should be able to evaluate information about building materials to be exposed to heat and moisture, and communicate and discuss it both with experts and the public.

- I learned more about that in the course "Material performance" than in this course.»
- Good»
- Yes, I believe I have reached this goal. »
- Reached»
- 50%»
- Small»
- biggener»
- About 25%»

8. How understandable are the course goals?

14 svarande

The goals are difficult to understand»2 14%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»8 57%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

- Describetion of the course could be more clear with details to acheive a higher score.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

9. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

14 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»2 14%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»12 85%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

10. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

No, not at all»1 7%
To some extent»10 71%
Yes, definitely»3 21%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

Teaching and course administration

11. To what extent have the lectures been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»3 21%
Some extent»7 50%
Large extent»4 28%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.07

- no extent» (Small extent)
- There was unfortunately a lack of flow in the lectures. More specifically, it was sometimes difficult to follow the main concepts of the course, as various professors were teaching in different styles and focusing on different aspects. » (Some extent)
- Very varying depending on which lecture» (Large extent)

12. To what extent have the guest lectures been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»7 50%
Some extent»7 50%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

13. To what extent have the exercises been of help for your learing?

13 svarande

Small extent»3 23%
Some extent»3 23%
Large extent»6 46%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.38

- There should be a clearer correction to the exercices, otherwise it is difficult to get a right way to solve them.» (Small extent)

14. To what extent have the laborations (pratical and computer work) been ov help for your learing?

14 svarande

Small extent»3 21%
Some extent»9 64%
Large extent»2 14%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.92

- exakt samma labbar som tidigare kurser. Härligt!» (Small extent)

15. To what extent has the project been of help for your learing?

14 svarande

Small extent»3 21%
Some extent»7 50%
Large extent»4 28%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.07

- The project greatly helped us understand how to utilize software tools, which is practical for the workplace. It was also very interesting to observe the effects of heat and moisture on different materials (i.e a facade) and to come up with an optimal solution. » (Large extent)

16. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»2 14%
Some extent»2 14%
Large extent»8 57%
Great extent»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

- The lectures and the book were not much related to each other» (Small extent)

17. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

14 svarande

Very badly»2 14%
Rather badly»3 21%
Rather well»2 14%
Very well»7 50%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Det vore bra om det syntes om något lagts upp istället för att man ska behöva scanna av alla femton mapparna» (Very badly)
- The home page of the course is a mess! It has one million different folders and it is almost impossible to find what you are looking for. Skip most of the folders for next year!» (Very badly)
- There was a lack of organization on the web page. It was difficult to find a given file, as there were too many folders.» (Rather badly)
- too many files, i couldnt easy find what i needed» (Rather badly)

Study climate

18. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

14 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»4 28%
Rather good»3 21%
Very good»6 42%
I did not seek help»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

19. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

14 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 14%
Rather well»5 35%
Very well»7 50%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

20. How was the course workload?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 14%
Adequate»8 57%
High»4 28%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

- We did not have many exercices to practise on before the very end of the quarter.» (Adequate)

21. How was the total workload this study period?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»4 30%
High»4 30%
Too high»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

- Not applicable» (?)
- Mostly because we had so much to do in the FEM-basics course» (Too high)

22. To what extent were there connections between the two courses ("Heat and moisture engineering" and "Finite element method - basics") in this study period?

12 svarande

Very small extent»1 8%
Rather small extent»6 50%
Rather high extent»4 33%
Very high extent»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.41

- i didnt participate in FEM» (?)
- Not applicable» (?)

Summarizing questions

23. What is your general impression of the course?

14 svarande

Poor»3 21%
Fair»3 21%
Adequate»6 42%
Good»2 14%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- The course is very much alike "Byggnadsfysik" from V2 but without the good teaching structure.» (Poor)
- I am not interested in that sphere of engineering » (Fair)

24. What is the remaing value of the course in the future?

14 svarande

Very small»2 14%
Rather small»6 42%
Rahter high»6 42%
Very high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.28

25. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- project between this course and the FEM-cours»
- The project, as well as the assignment (linked to FEM) should be preserved for next year. »
- projects, labs»
- Project»
- Exercise Lectures»

26. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Om man kunde spola tillbaka tiden hade jag sagt att ni bör ta bort den här kursen från programmet.»
- I think the course is rather poor. I think you have to change alot of the material in the course. Today i fells like something between the material performance- course and the bulding physics- course with no rely mening. Yoy have to look through the cotent in this three courses in order to reach a meningful group of courses who are conected to each other. »
- There should be chance for students to earn bonus points during the course. Giving points for the project, for example, would encourage students to put in more of an effort. »
- seperate the detail goals and tell student which lecture will solve which part os goals.»
- The handout section of the course home page!! Coordination between the teachers to prevent lectures about the exactly same things more than once.»
- better organisation of lectures, one sourace of info, pinpointing what is important.»
- Lab work is unneccessary»
- Heat and moisture engineering is a mandatory course for master in structural engineering and building performance design. However, it is not a helpful course for structural design engineers. it should be replaced for structural design engineers.»
- Evaluation of the laborations and project work should count as part of the final grade (10%, 20%,...)»

27. Additional comments

- Tip: Learn from the teachers of "Byggnadsfysik" about teaching practise.»
- Doc. Tang Luping"s bad accent in English prevents him from presenting the material properly. Ingemar was a lot of times not up-to-date with the material of the course.»
- I feel like we learnt a lot about what should not be done in heat & moisture. But we didn"t work much on what was the correct way to protect the buildings. It feels like we have a lot of examples of how to know that is was not built correctly, but never have the answers for how to do it properly.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från