ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Ship Resistance and Propulsion, MMA155

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-12-18 - 2010-01-31
Antal svar: 16
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 47%
Kontaktperson: Lotta Olsson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

16 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 6%
Around 20 hours/week»6 37%
Around 25 hours/week»7 43%
Around 30 hours/week»2 12%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.62

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

16 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»2 12%
50%»1 6%
75%»9 56%
100%»4 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.93

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

16 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 18%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 18%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 62%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

13 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»11 84%
No, the goals are set too high»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.15

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»5 35%
Yes, definitely»5 35%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

- some questions were beyond the point and didn"t test the goals properly» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the Resistance lectures been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»1 6%
Some extent»2 12%
Large extent»4 25%
Great extent»9 56%

Genomsnitt: 3.31

7. To what extent has the Propulsion lectures been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»2 12%
Some extent»1 6%
Large extent»11 68%
Great extent»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

8. To what extent has the Tutorials been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»3 18%
Some extent»3 18%
Large extent»10 62%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.43

9. To what extent has the SSPA assignment been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»3 18%
Some extent»6 37%
Large extent»5 31%
Great extent»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

- The assignment was only time consuming and I did not learn anything new, if anything it confused me. The part with filling in the excel-sheet should be removed completely.» (Small extent)
- The assigment seems to be a kind of time wasting because for me there was no learning effect but it took a lot of time to do all exel formulars. I"ts interesting to see how this is calculated, but it shouldn"t be a exel learning assignment.» (Small extent)
- I dont consider filling out an excel form very awarding. The study visit itself was very good, but the following assignment wasnt.» (Some extent)

10. To what extent has the SHIPFLOW assignment been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»4 25%
Some extent»9 56%
Large extent»1 6%
Great extent»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.06

- It was interesting but I did not feel I learned anything new.» (Some extent)
- Too short and without depth. Better to focus on other stuff than to give an assignment like this» (Some extent)

11. To what extent has the Rolls Royce visit been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»4 25%
Some extent»6 37%
Large extent»4 25%
Great extent»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- To see a cavitation tunnel in action was very helpful in understanding the cavitation phenom.» (Large extent)

12. To what extent has the Berg Propulsion visit been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»7 46%
Some extent»4 26%
Large extent»2 13%
Great extent»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 1.93

- It would have been sufficient to see just RR.» (Small extent)
- Did not participate» (Small extent)
- the field trips were very interesting but they didn"t help the learning goals» (Small extent)

13. To what extent has the course literature on Resistance been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 6%
Large extent»7 43%
Great extent»8 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.43

- The material is good but can be clearer and more subdivided, an idex would be very helpful I think.» (Large extent)
- Would be nicer with an actual book. Compendium very good but too short in some areas» (Large extent)

14. To what extent has the course literature on Propulsion been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 25%
Large extent»8 50%
Great extent»4 25%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The material is good but can be clearer and more subdivided, an idex would be very helpful I think.» (Large extent)

15. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

16 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»12 75%
Very well»4 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

Study climate

16. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help - Resistance part?

16 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 12%
Very good»12 75%
I did not seek help»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 4

17. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help - Propulsion part?

16 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 25%
Very good»10 62%
I did not seek help»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.87

18. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

16 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»6 37%
Very well»10 62%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

19. How was the course workload?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 31%
High»9 56%
Too high»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

- Too much to do on resistance part, but not very much to do on propulsion part. Very unbalanced since we were supposed to spend the same amount of time on both parts in class.» (High)
- Mostly because of the SSPA/Shipflow lab so late in the course. It would have been better to hand out the assignments in the beginning of the course to spread the workload better over the course length. » (Too high)

20. How was the total workload this study period?

15 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 20%
High»11 73%
Too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.86

Summarizing questions

21. What is your general impression of the course?

16 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 6%
Adequate»1 6%
Good»11 68%
Excellent»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 4

- It feels like you just got a general idea of what the resistance part was about. The resistance literature was poor with not very good explanations in the text and the amount of information in it was too much, if we were to do the propulsion part too. It´,s too much to have 87 theory questions on the resistance part, that you don´,t even know the answers to. Also very strange that there is only 16 questions for the propulsion part but still, you get the same amount of points on the exam on both parts. This means that it´,s better to study hard on the propulsion part since there are less questions to know.» (Fair)
- Interesting and very good for understanding the geometry of a ship. The lectures of resistance especially.» (Good)

22. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- I liked the major structure of the course. It was good to save the visits to the last week and not present any new material during that week. »
- The study visits, exept Berg. »
- The trip to Berg Propulsion was excellent. The propulsion lecture notes were excellent.»
- The visits»
- Royce-Rolls trip & SSPA assignment»
- The use of theory questions.»

23. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Hand out assignments early in the course to make it possible to start on the assignments before the visits.»
- I think that the whole idéa of having pre-defined exam questions is unbenefitial for the students from an learning point of view. These questions makes us only focus on learning the answers to the questions taking the focus from the whole picture.»
- Possibly have the tours earlier and have more lectures or tutorials closer to the exam.»
- The literature, theory questions, and disposal of time on each part.»
- Split the course in two, one for resistance and one for propulsion. It felt like the proportion between the two were a little off, propulsion should get maybe 2-3 more lectures and tutorials»
- Solutions to all of the tutorials. »
- There should be added solutions for the home exercises»

24. Additional comments

- Both resistance and propulsion are pretty extensive areas. Perhaps split the course into two courses?»
- I would have liked more information on hull design and less emphasis on CFD. It seemed that there was a lot of CFD examples, but not a lot of theory on the design side as to why those situations were happening or how it could be improved.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från