ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPRSS: RRY100 Satellite Communication Sp2, 09/10

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-12-17 - 2010-01-25
Antal svar: 17
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Arto Heikkilä»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

16 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 31%
Around 20 hours/week»4 25%
Around 25 hours/week»5 31%
Around 30 hours/week»2 12%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- Spent just a few hours every week (during the lectures) until the last week when I wrote the report on which I spent at leats 20 hours.» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

16 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»2 12%
50%»0 0%
75%»11 68%
100%»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.93

- Sessions are goods but lectures should be more» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

16 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 12%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 37%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»8 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

15 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»14 93%
No, the goals are set too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.06

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

15 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 6%
Yes, definitely»14 93%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.93

- The report"s oral exam was very deep and conceptual.» (Yes, definitely)
- Project report over which we work and submitt as our examination was help full in achiving the goals of this course. » (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»6 37%
Large extent»8 50%
Great extent»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- Teacher is great knowledgefull» (Large extent)
- Rudigar was very helpfull.He really put his effort to guide us in this course and during lab sessions.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 31%
Large extent»8 50%
Great extent»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

- Course Book is suitable for this course.But the material and information regarding project was unsufficient.Open hand in Project Research creat confusions.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

16 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»5 31%
Very well»11 68%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

- Lab manuals are very well written.All handouts were deliverd on time.And course administration was very helpul.» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

15 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 13%
Very good»13 86%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.86

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

16 svarande

Very poorly»1 6%
Rather poorly»1 6%
Rather well»5 31%
Very well»9 56%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- The group members were not sharing there ideas clearly during projectBecause of individual report they were also not intrusted in project meetings.» (Rather poorly)

11. How was the course workload?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»11 68%
High»5 31%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.31

12. How was the total workload this study period?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 6%
Adequate»8 50%
High»6 37%
Too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.43

- I had 3 courses.» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

16 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 6%
Adequate»2 12%
Good»11 68%
Excellent»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.87

- This couse was very intrusting.Course Project.lectures,Activites and labs were of great learning.» (Good)
- Course stuff is on Genral techniques and knowledge. It should be in detail study of intenal structure os Satllite communication.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The tour to the onsala!»
- Almost every thing.»
- the project design»
- project, assignments»
- The final projects and its purpose»
- Genral pricipal, rules , techniques of communications »
- The body of lectures but some detail should be add»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Maybe we should add a written exam to test the learning.»
- project detail should be improved.»
- General project guidance. As a student you can think of a lot of things that can be presented in the final project. However, some of this things are less important or irrelevant. Therefore some general guidance can be done, not only really specific guidance as in the work groups.»
- Satellite internal communication (ISL) and its structure.»
- The way of work groups»

16. Additional comments

- No»
- All study stuff and also satff was good.»
- As there are many books which were followed by the examiner during lectures, therefore, lecture slides should be more comprehensive and self explanatory. Students can not afford to buy all the books.»

17. This course is offered to several master"s programmes at Chalmers, and it is also elective for other students at Chalmers. Which programme are you from?

- Communication Engineering»
- MPOCM»
- masters in microwaves and photonics»
- I"m an Erasmus student.»
- MPCOM»
- Communication Engineering»
- Communication Engineering (MPCOM)»
- mpmpe»
- wireless and photonic»
- Wireless and phtonic»
- MPCOM»
- MPCOM»

18. The goal of this course was to give you an overall understanding of satellite communcation systems. Was this goal reached?

16 svarande

yes»16 100%
no»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

- This course give us brief overview of satellite communication.» (yes)

19. What is your impression on the course level?

16 svarande

too easy»0 0%
right level»14 87%
too high»1 6%
do not know»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.18

20. BEFORE the course: Please specify your subjective impression on your personal knowledge BEFORE the course on the following topics that are ingredients of the course.

Matrisfråga

satellite orbits and orbital calculations
14 svarande

very bad»3 21%
bad»6 42%
fair»4 28%
good»1 7%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.21

link budget calculations
14 svarande

very bad»1 7%
bad»1 7%
fair»6 42%
good»4 28%
very good»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

noise in satellite communications
14 svarande

very bad»2 14%
bad»4 28%
fair»6 42%
good»2 14%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

electronic equipment in satellite communications
14 svarande

very bad»2 14%
bad»4 28%
fair»5 35%
good»3 21%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.64

antennas for satellite communications
14 svarande

very bad»2 14%
bad»1 7%
fair»5 35%
good»6 42%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

modulation, multiplex, multiple access
14 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»0 0%
fair»3 21%
good»7 50%
very good»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 4.07

polarization of electromagnetic waves
14 svarande

very bad»2 14%
bad»4 28%
fair»2 14%
good»3 21%
very good»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

atmospheric propagation and attenuation
14 svarande

very bad»4 28%
bad»4 28%
fair»4 28%
good»2 14%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.28

industrial aspects: products and economy
14 svarande

very bad»4 28%
bad»5 35%
fair»5 35%
good»0 0%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.07

21. AFTER the course: Please specify your subjective impression on your personal knowledge AFTER the course on the following topics that are ingredients of the course.

Matrisfråga

satellite orbits and orbital calculations
13 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»0 0%
fair»2 15%
good»5 38%
very good»6 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.3

link budget calculations
13 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»0 0%
fair»1 7%
good»6 46%
very good»6 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.38

noise in satellite communications
13 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»0 0%
fair»3 23%
good»5 38%
very good»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 4.15

electronic equipment in satellite communications
12 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»1 8%
fair»3 25%
good»5 41%
very good»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

antennas for satellite communications
13 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»0 0%
fair»2 15%
good»6 46%
very good»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 4.23

modulation, multiplex, multiple access
13 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»0 0%
fair»1 7%
good»8 61%
very good»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 4.23

polarization of electromagnetic waves
13 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»0 0%
fair»3 23%
good»5 38%
very good»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 4.15

atmospheric propagation and attenuation
13 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»0 0%
fair»1 7%
good»6 46%
very good»6 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.38

industrial aspects: products and economy
13 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»0 0%
fair»5 38%
good»6 46%
very good»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

22. Did you expect something that we did not cover in the course? If so, please specify.

14 svarande

yes»3 21%
no»11 78%

Genomsnitt: 1.78

- ISL inter satellite link, Satellite stucture its internal functionality and calculations with diffrent models, » (yes)
- the origin of calculation in noise formula» (yes)
- Inter Satellite Communication.» (yes)

23. Course elements: Which course element contributed how much to your learning process. Use a scale between (1) - "contributed least" to (6) - "contributed most"

Matrisfråga

The lectures
14 svarande

(1)»0 0%
(2)»2 14%
(3)»2 14%
(4)»3 21%
(5)»4 28%
(6)»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 4.28

The discussions during the working group meetings
14 svarande

(1)»1 7%
(2)»0 0%
(3)»3 21%
(4)»3 21%
(5)»5 35%
(6)»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 4.21

The homeworks
14 svarande

(1)»0 0%
(2)»0 0%
(3)»1 7%
(4)»3 21%
(5)»7 50%
(6)»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 4.85

The labs at the Onsala Space Observatory
14 svarande

(1)»1 7%
(2)»1 7%
(3)»4 28%
(4)»4 28%
(5)»3 21%
(6)»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

The excursion to RUAG Aeropace
13 svarande

(1)»2 15%
(2)»2 15%
(3)»3 23%
(4)»2 15%
(5)»4 30%
(6)»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

The RUAG Aerospace guest lectures.
14 svarande

(1)»2 14%
(2)»2 14%
(3)»2 14%
(4)»5 35%
(5)»2 14%
(6)»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

24. LABS: The lab exercises included three different tasks. What is your impression on the labs?

Matrisfråga

LAB01 (microwave radiometer)
14 svarande

very bad»1 7%
bad»0 0%
neutral»3 21%
good»6 42%
very good»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

LAB02 (TV-satellite)
14 svarande

very bad»1 7%
bad»0 0%
neutral»2 14%
good»6 42%
very good»5 35%

Genomsnitt: 4

LAB03 (2.3 m radio telescope)
14 svarande

very bad»1 7%
bad»0 0%
neutral»3 21%
good»8 57%
very good»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

25. HWs: What is your impression about the homeworks (HWs)?

15 svarande

too easy»0 0%
right level»15 100%
too advanced»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- but one was hard» (right level)

26. WGs: The course used the pedagogic concept of working groups (WGs). What is your impression about the WGs?

14 svarande

I like this approach to learning.»13 92%
I do not like this approach to learning.»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 1.07

- I think is the best part of the course. Being able to discuss the problems you have with your fellow students» (I like this approach to learning.)
- Individual report writting creat sefisness and gap between the group members.Report should be once for each group and for assment the oral exam could be individual.» (I do not like this approach to learning.)

27. WGs: We tried to create heterogenous WGs in order to stimulate intercultural communication and understading of cultural differences in particular with repect to learning situations. What is your opini

15 svarande

I like this approach to learning.»15 100%
I do not like this approach to learning.»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

- Its always appriciating approach» (I like this approach to learning.)
- One more thing i want to add ,i every WG meeting every group shud also present some part of their project as well as the assignment which they have to present at that day.» (I like this approach to learning.)
- The idea is good, however, there are some students you better not listen to. You just need to figure out who they are...» (I like this approach to learning.)

28. WGs: Did your understanding of cultural differences with respect to learning situations improve?

15 svarande

yes»10 66%
no»5 33%

Genomsnitt: 1.33

- I hink coordination among groups were not so effective and they did not share much :)» (no)
- We didn"t really talk about something else than the project.» (no)

29. WGs: What is your impression on how much the supervisor interfered with the WGs" work?

15 svarande

not enough»3 20%
right level»12 80%
too much»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.8

30. EXAM: The examination is based on the written examination report and an oral exam. What is your impression on this procedure?

15 svarande

I do not like it.»0 0%
I like it.»15 100%
I do not know.»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Research report is good for learning point of view.And oral exam was very nicly conducted.» (I like it.)
- It is better if you give more information/constraints which are different for different groups so that each group/groups will have to meet those specific constraints rather than giving same constraint to all groups.» (I like it.)
- It is an open examination, where you can show your knowledge with certain freedom.» (I like it.)

31. What did you like most in the course?

- The learning method of working in a group»
- Project,trip to onsala and Teaching staff.»
- the project and the excursions»
- Project»
- The project and the working groups»
- LABs , Lecturs , home assignaments»
- Onsala LABs»

32. What did you dislike most in the course?

- Nothing!»
- nothing»
- nothing»
- Sometimes some derivations are made in class, however for the purpose may seem irrelevant.»
- Course was covering Inter satellite link and satellite internal structure and its functionality.»

33. Do you have any ideas on how we could or should improve the course in general?

- Maybe add a written examination»
- Students could be given brief introduction of satellite simulation tools in ocmputer lab.Guest leactures could be more technical.»
- The time used for derivations (such as the kepler laws) can be used to maybe have some excercise problem»
- There should not be one project for all student ther sould be diffrent prjects for diffrent groups »
- Work group meetings should be supervised by the same level of supervisors.»
- The project was loosely defined. It was hard to figure out what was expected in the report. Maybe you can give some more details on what is expected from us (in the project). The labs need to be changed. In lab 2 we were 10 people in the small shed, looking at a small display. All I could see was the other guys backs. Lab 3 was quite interesting. In lab 4, it was too windy, we could not do anything. In lab 1, we just got a lot of numbers and then we needed matlab, and there were no computers provided. So, again, all we could do was to sit down and wait.»

34. Would you recommend this course to somebody at your "home university"? Why, or why not?

14 svarande

yes»14 100%
no»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

- This course let us know the satellite system well.» (yes)
- I gave the brief idea about the whole architecture of satellite communication.» (yes)
- It is a good opportunity to gain somw satellite communication knwoledge and all the basis behind it. It covers the critical parts.» (yes)
- Because of its learning procedure.» (yes)
- Its a great oppertitunity to learn about satellite. A lot of new things of communications technique with diffrent approaches models of Satellite. » (yes)
- As my major is microwave engineering that is one of barnches that we can find job» (yes)
- My home uni is Chalmers. The course is good, except for the labs.» (yes)

Kursutvärderingssystem från