Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Material mechanics

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-12-17 - 2010-01-15
Antal svar: 17
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 68%
Kontaktperson: ragnar Larsson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

17 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 17%
Around 20 hours/week»5 29%
Around 25 hours/week»4 23%
Around 30 hours/week»3 17%
At least 35 hours/week»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.76

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

17 svarande

0%»1 5%
25%»2 11%
50%»0 0%
75%»7 41%
100%»7 41%

Genomsnitt: 4

3. Which masterprogram do you follow?

Mention MPSTR, MPAME or MPAEM or specify if it does not apply.

- phd student»
- Solid and fluid mechanics»
- It does not apply (Mechanical Engineering, Erasmus Exchange Student at the University of Porto)»
- MPAME: Solid and fluid mechanics»

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

4. How understandable are the course goals?

17 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 5%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 5%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 29%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 58%

Genomsnitt: 3.41

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

17 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»15 88%
No, the goals are set too high»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.11

6. Did the total examination of the course assess whether you have reached the goals?

17 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»7 41%
Yes, definitely»10 58%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.58

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»3 17%
Some extent»4 23%
Large extent»8 47%
Great extent»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.52

8. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»2 11%
Some extent»4 23%
Large extent»5 29%
Great extent»6 35%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

17 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 5%
Rather well»4 23%
Very well»12 70%

Genomsnitt: 3.64

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

17 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 5%
Rather good»3 17%
Very good»13 76%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

17 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 5%
Rather well»3 17%
Very well»11 64%
I did not seek cooperation»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.82

12. How was the course workload?

17 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»11 64%
High»6 35%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

13. How was the total workload this study period?

17 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 41%
High»5 29%
Too high»5 29%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

17 svarande

Poor»2 11%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 17%
Good»8 47%
Excellent»4 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

15. Additional comments

- I felt that the course material was more of a summary than teaching material. »
- Thank you for everything Ragnar ,)»
- I think that some parts of the course litterature were quite confusing. If the variables that are introduced could be explained a little more, I think that the lecture notes/course litterature would be much easier to follow. A small example to illustrate what I mean: in lecture note 3, the plastic multiplier lambda is introduced. A small description of lambda here and why it has to be greater than zero would be very interesting. (Of course I know what lambda is now, but with a good description in the right place, it would have been easier to learn.)»
- The teaching is way too messy, we barely know where we go, and things are often mixed up. It"s disturbing at the beginning»

Kursutvärderingssystem från