|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
MPRSS: RRY035 Electromagnetic Waves and Spectroscopy Sp2, 09/10Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2009-12-17 - 2010-01-25 Antal svar: 5 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?% Kontaktperson: Arto Heikkilä»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.5 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.25 Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.25 - Goals for the EM Wave part don"t seem updated for the new course content.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.75 - The spectroscopyopart of the examination was good. However, the EM-part was very strange. The questions seemed to be more about remember physical formulas by heart than to know any physics at all. I find this very weird since I think this kind of education should be about understanding how to USE the formulas, not learning to draw signs in the right order. And if that"s how you choose to have the exam, please inform the students that they should cut back a bit on the physical understanding in their studying prior to the exam and concentrate harder on learning all kinds of formulas by heart since that has never been the way to go earlier in the education.» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.5 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - The pingpongsystem is a bit messy. » (Rather well) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - I did not feel comfortable asking Matthew questions since he often turned very defensive when students asked him things. Especially before the exam I felt he was downright hostile at points.» (Rather poor) 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.25 11. How was the course workload?4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.75 - Too much information for the given time. This promotes superficial revision of the most fundamental concepts» (Too high) 12. How was the total workload this study period?4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - Spectroscopy part was ok, and well understood, EM part exam was unexpected an vague. EM notes were difficult to understand. Formula sheet for EM was not provided, and lenghty equations were expected to be learn by heart» (?) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Both parts of the course are worth of two independent 7,5 credits courses.»15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- EM-part.»- EM Wave part feels totally out of place. Lots of fusion stuff and no connection whatsoever to the spectroscopy part.» 16. Additional comments- Both parts of the course are worth of two independent 7,5 credits courses. There is almost no interaction between the two parts of the course and the extension of each is very large. But the topics of the course and guidance of teachers were very good.»- The EM Wave part on the exam was something of a shock to me. We had close to no material at all to prepare (a handful of "example problems") and Matthew said we were supposed to know "everything" (including complicated formulas with lots of constants) in the lecture notes (~90 hand-written A4 pages) by heart. It felt like something that would perhaps have been appropriate for someone studying theoretical physics but as part of the Radio & Space master"s program it felt totally weird. I also felt that the EM Wave lectures were very rushed and I believe that the experience would have been a lot better with more time. It"s a pity that the scheduled hours weren"t put to use this time around.»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%